Timothy Birdnow

It always starts in the universities.

From American Thinker:

When I was in college back in the eighties the big push was "multiculturalism". All the more political professors (and many were not back then, although few were actually conservative) were pushing this idea "diversity is our strength". I didn't bother to tell these dopes that diversity did so very much for the Balkans, or for India, Or Africa, but then I couldn't afford to get a bad grade. At any rate they were pushing "diversity" as if it were a command from the Almighty Himself.

So how do you get "diversity" in the Western World? Especially in lilly white Europe you will need to import it en masse.

And the U.S. required that too because multiculturalism was just that - multi culture. It was not supposed to be a melting pot as America had been. I realized that after a short time, that my professors were talking about not bringing Unum from e pluribus but rather of bringing radically different cultures together in the same space. The idea was that people should walk around wearing Burkhas and bikinis right next to each-other. Immigrants were to keep their cultures as opposed to adopt ours.

The real reason for multiculturalism was not the stated, of course; it was to tear down our traditional Western civilization and rebuild it with new "material" aka people. Breed out the "whiteness" by overrunning it with Third World types. Eventually a term was coined by our side for what they had in mind - the Great Replacement.

Eventually they knew that mass immigration would break the bonds of fealty between Americans (or British, or Australians, or whoever) as there would no longer be a specific American anymore. Just an amorphous, multicultural blob And this blob would see no reason to love America, which would just be a geographical location and not an idea, a family, a heritage. We would all become workers in a worker's paradise, just as the Communists wanted. And we would end up with a world government overseeing it all.

That was the plan and that is why they first started with multiculturalism. (Actually they first started with the special treatment of "historically discriminated against groups" with special privileges granted by law to black folks or other minorities.) But it was the multiculturalism movement that opened the door to opening the door. You can't have a multicultural society in a homogenous one. So you need to recruit the "balance" you are seeking.

This has been just one of a generations-long plot by the Marxists facilitated by academia and then government policy. Oh, and let's not forget the one world industrialists who see people primarily as consumers and laborers - as commodities to be traded.

At any rate the author of this essay is right although he fails to give specifics. He concludes that a vast web of funding through multiple groups and organizations and corporate interests has produced this but he doesn't tell us which. (Actually, all one need do is go to David Horowitz's Discover the Networks where the former Communist turned right wing Lion lays bare the funding of all sorts of nasty stuff. A lot of that funding comes from Western governments too, I might add, including the United States. USAID distributed much of it.

This is a dream of the modern Left going back to the nineteenth century and now coming to fruition. Whole nations are disappearing before our eyes in an effort to remake the world under one government and run by the elites - a new form of feudalism. Worker drones distinguishable by their marked brown pigmentation and the ruling class who is not. The Nazi dream did not come out of a vacuum and the destruction of America and other such places is but the revenge of the Nazis. Instead of focusing on wiping out the "mud races" as they see them they are co-opting them to wipe out the Judeo-Christtian worldview and the Peoples who defended it. Then they will put themselves at the head of a world governing system (and, as most are malthusians, probably slowly eliminate the worker drone class when time permits).

This project will fail one way or another in the end, but it will cause untold misery in the process. It is arguable that the nation-state is the best we flawed humans can do, that anything larger is too unwieldy to govern justly (look at the Roman Empire, which governed through sheer force then split apart.) Certainly the Bible warned against building empires - Nimrod tried that and his tower of Babel was intended to be his crowning achievement but God smote him for it and broke up his empire and scattered everyone. This is little more than a modern, electronic version of that same scheme.

It will fail one way or another, but in the process some very dear things will be lost.

Hide Comments | Add Comment