November 11, 2019
It is becoming increasingly obvious the "whistleblower' whose accusations are being used to fuel an impeachment inquiry is a CIA plant. This man works for the CIA, has deep ties to John Brennan, former CIA director and Trump hater, as well as ties to Joe Biden and is a loyal Democrat. He was a holdover, and served briefly on the National Security Council at the behest of Mr. Brennan.
In short, this and the earlier "Russian Collusion" meme are black ops, the kind the CIA has used overseas for decades.
In fact, we now speak of the "Deep State" all the time. We know it's there; a combination of the security agencies, the Democrats, the Media, and Academia as well as the tech companies and other giant corporations.
Paranoid, right?
No. President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned of this very danger. In his farewell address to Congress, the President darkly warned:
- A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we which to travel.
- But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
Here Ike calls it:
Isn't that exactly what has happened to America? The rise of the computer, with everyone online, has handed an empire to the tech companies and to the young people who know how to use the modern technology. In all of our intelligence services we use computers, and as a result the age of the people in responsible positions has dropped. We now have kids running programs in the CIA, the NSA, etc. It's why Ed Snowden was had access to so much classified information; he was a computer geek, and it fast-tracked him. He wasn't ready for such responsibility.
I suspect this is playing out across the board in every aspect of our government. And, of course, our government is composed of people who can vote more money to themselves.
This is exactly what Eisenhower warned against.
Donald Trujp posed an existential threat to the power of the Military Industrial complex. He wanted to cut back on our international adventurism - something that would cost a lot of the Deep State, the arms makers, the intelligence agencies, the cyber people, etc. He wanted to upset the carefully planned international order, bringing China to heel and promoting the return of manufacturing to the U.S. The foreign policy eggheads had carefully planned an itnerdependent world, a precurser to world government. Trump wanted to upend the careful plans. See, Chinaw would be the engine, the manufacturing base. The Arab world would provide the oil. The U.S. would be the tech sector. Agriculture would be done in places like Mexico, as well as some light manufacturing. it was a careful division of labor and eventually the world would be so interdependent that it would make no sense NOT to have world government.
This was the exact model used to create the European Union. The E.U. was born of a plan by France to tie Germany's economy to Frances in an anaconda embrace. They brought the rest of the European countries on board, then began systematically dismantling their sovereignty. Germany was to become the industrial heart of the E.U. Each country had a specific niche, and were largely not allowed to go outside of that because they would then be in competition with the other member countries. It worked (sort of) so now the elites in the U.S. and around the world are trying to impose this on a global scale.
But Trump represents the people who oppose this. I'm not saying Trump is some great champion of freedom, just that he saw this vast swath of Americans who didn't want the world the MI Complex was trying to create and Trump exploited it. Well, that is an unforgiveable sin because it shows there is NOT an inevitab\ility to this, that is is a policy, not a sweep of historyas the elites would have us believe.
That could not be tolerated. Trump has to be destroyed.
At any rate, Mr. Eisenhower forsaw the Global Warming scam and other such things as well:
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is clear Ike understood exactly where we were heading back then. He saw it more clearly then than we see it now.This coup against a duly elected President is being run by the military industrial complex that Ike warned about so many decades ago.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1302 words, total size 9 kb.
Para 12: "To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;"
Interestingly, Para 13: "To provide and maintain a Navy;" does not impost any time limit.
The degree to which our government violates Paragraph 12 is simply stunning, of course. The founders had a profound distrust of standing armies, and were intending to prevent this nation from maintaining one. Their belief was, and they had plenty of evidence for it, that despots tended to start wars merely because they had the armies with which to do so.
Was it Madeline Albright? "What's the point of having the world's biggest army if we are unwilling to use it?"
Posted by: Bill H at November 11, 2019 10:58 AM (vMiSr)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at November 11, 2019 11:03 AM (M+HnH)
37 queries taking 0.2635 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








