Discrimination is Discrimination

Timothy Birdnow

How is it either moral or practical to discriminate against a race of people?

Minnesota: "Whites Need Not Apply”

It's not; it violates the most basic legal protections, protections that have been in place at least since the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

To toot my own horn I will say I predicted this long ago; as the tide turns the whites will not be afforded the protections they voluntarily handed to minorities. Payback will be a bitch, and all the high-minded rhetoric will simply vanish as the increasingly powerful minority community seeks payback for the bad old days. I knew this was coming.

That is in no way a defense of how white people treated blacks, Hispanics, Asians, etc. But it is an indictment of the way the process of making a colorblind society was implemented.

First, everyone is racist to a degree. Every race thinks it's own is best. That is just human nature. We come from the paleolithic where tribes were isolated and we put our allegiance first with our tribe. No doubt this problem will continue until the end of Mankind as it is hard-wired into our DNA. But that doesn't mean everyone ACTS or even thinks in a racist manner; it just means some try harder than others to push the demon down, just as we have to push other demons down - like our sexual lust or our appetites. Yes, there are degenerates who have sex with underage girls or with young boys or who cheat on their spouses or whatnot. Yes, there are obese people who eat way too much, But most of us control it, and the controlling process is usually unpleasant but we do it because we know it's a bad holdover from the Paleolithic. Racism is no exception.

(I hate the term, by the way; oftentimes what is called "racism" is simple dislike of the CULTURE of another race, not the race itself. Back in the '70's we called the "prejudice" but that phrase is passe'. Racism used to be reserved for those who HATE people from other races. George Washington held slaves - as did many rich planters - and he wouldn't allow blacks to serve in his army. He bore black folks no ill-will, just thought they weren't acceptable folks for serious work. He was not racist. Nathan Bedford Forrest, on the other hand, WAS racist and would have no problem finding a "final solution" to the slavery issue.)

At any rate America has not been racist, not for a long time at least. It is still prejudiced to a degree, but often for minorities. The real racism in America is against the whites by the minorities. And by white liberals, who have been taught for decades to hate America and the evil white old patriarchs who founded her.

DEI is an attempt to institutionalize that hatred of the white majority, and despite it being clearly anti-constitutional it found a home in many places, notably the Democratic (sic) Party which has labored to implement structural racism against white folks.

(BTW "white racism" was inevitable given the way colonization happened; you had small settlements of whites amid a then-much-larger aboriginal population. Also, the Spaniards were pushing into North America and the British colonists faced the difficult decision of whether to remain British or be absorbed by the larger masses, as did the Spanish. (There are few white people in Latin America; mostly they are mestizo, a mix of Indian and Spanish.) The British colonists chose to remain British, even after independence, and they justified it because they looked at the Indians or the black slaves or the Mexicans and saw them as something they did not want to be. Had the original settlers not separated themselves they would have disappeared. They had read their Bible and knew the same held true for the Israelites. American racial attitudes may not have been kind but they had a rationality to them that made sense at the time.)

At any rate DEI is being implemented even now, when the Democrats got spanked and are getting spanked, because it comports with their view that "demographics is destiny" and the white people will wind up minorities. So they promote what they think will be the winning side, and they try to help that victory along.

And it MAY happen, unless white people start having children again. White people stopped because for decades now there has been a constant drumbeat of acrimony against them and they have been despairing. White men are the only demographic in America that has it's life expectancy declining, and that is because white men see themselves as being completely abused by the system (and they are right). Couple that with the massive immigration and the prospects are dim for white folks. The massive immigration was intended to accelerate this process, I might add. The "replacement theory" is entirely correct; the plan is to replace white people in America and re-found her as a socialist part of Latin America, or near enough. White people formed the kernal of the old United States. They have to go to create the new nation.

DEI is little different from the Black Codes or Jim Crow, it's just aimed in a different direction. It's a way of abusing and suppressing the white majority in favor of minorities. Sadly too many Americans allowed it to happen, voting for the party that promotes this.

They still do. The election of 2024 should have been a far bigger blowout than it was.

At any rate in a sane world Minnesota would be punished severely, with businesses leaving, with civil rights violation charges, etc. But we are so used to this stuff that the reaction is "oh, that again" and that's pretty much the end of it.

If it is illegal to discriminate against anyone, how can it be legal to discriminate for them? Two wrongs don't make a right. Discrimination is discrimination.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:12 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 1031 words, total size 6 kb.