October 28, 2026

Dems Demand Truce over Omar

Timothy Birdnow

But the investigation started under Joe Biden.


Did the Democrats show any such compassion to Republicans over the years? Ted Stevens up in Alaska? Long Island rep. George Santos? Paul Gosar of Arizona? Chuck Edwards of North Carolina? How about Ken Paxton, who they tried to remove from office? Todd Akin, who was not charged with any crime but was Borked by the Democrats anyway. How about Bork? Kavanaugh? How about the President himself, who they investigated endlessly and impeached twice. But now they think Trump should call off the DOJ because they fear losing an election if it continues now.

NOW they want a truce!

From the article:

Nearly 200 House Democrats are moving to shield Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., from further investigation after federal investigators raided her Washington, D.C., home earlier this month.


Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., led 175 members of the House Democratic Caucus in a letter to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Attorney General Todd Blanche, criticizing the probe into Omar's immigration history as a partisan attack and accusing them of trying to sway her bid for another term in Congress.

"Congresswoman Omar is seeking reelection in Minnesota’s 5th congressional district in just one week. News of the search warrant, whether properly predicated or not, could affect voters’ decisions, which is exactly why federal law enforcement should not engage in such conduct when voters are casting their ballots. This type of interference strips Minnesotans of their right to a free and fair election guaranteed to them under the Constitution," the letter said.

"We stand with Congresswoman Omar and condemn the weaponization of law enforcement against her. You have already disgraced the offices you hold, and we demand you refrain from taking any further actions that could affect the outcome of the upcoming election."

IF the GOP weaponized the law against Omar (and again, this probe started under Biden) then it means she is innocent, something that appears increasingly unlikely. Also, if this be weaponization of the law, turnabout is fair play since they have done that repeatedly over the years to our side. If you don't want something don't start something.

Of course this is not about weaponization; it's about political power and how they plan to use this to gin up support and money, now and in the future. They are telegraphing how they are going to spin this, as a corrupt would-be tyrant using the law to take out political enemies (as if Omar has EVER sponsored any real legislation). All she is is a reliable yea or nae vote for the Democrats.

The Democrats are hoping to split off the weakling RINO Republicans. This has worked in days gone by; the "principled" RINO's will want to protect "comity" in government and will surrender to the Dems as they always have. "Be the bigger man". They are like Ashley Wilkes in Gone with the Wind, pompous asses who pride themselves on being superior to the point where they refuse to get their hands dirty but sneer at those who do. These have long been the useful idiots of the Democrats, who disobey the rules they quote to these clowns at will but the RINO wing never stops listening to them. Like Charlie Brown and the football. They always believe "this time".

Here is how the Dems justify their claim:

Her fellow House Democrats recounted the allegations in their letter, saying, "Your probe into the congresswoman reportedly concerns her late father’s filing of immigration paperwork after she fled Somalia’s civil war at age eight, making her a U.S. citizen at age seventeen."

But they argued it does not justify "a pre-dawn raid on her home for paperwork her father filed when she was a minor."

But it has nothing to do with her father's paperwork error (he conveniently forgot to mention he was a warlord's hatchet man) but with her own actions. She was old enough at the time not to get citizenship through her father and she purposely had her staff alter documents to make her appear younger to hide this fact. That is a felony.

Jaypal knows it too; don't kid yourself.

It also ties in with the fact she married her own brother to bring him here illegally as well. Jaypal knows that too.

So she is lying through her teeth with all of this. The authorities did not make a pre-dawn raid (like they did to Roger Stone) nor did they bust down the door. This was nowhere near as bad as what they did to President Trump, tearing up his home and sniffing Melania's panties (well, you can't blame the agents for NOT sniffing Omar's). And if Ilhan wants to end this, if she is innocent, she would have provided her DNA willingly along with turning over her phone and computer. The DOJ had to seize it.

And we do not know what else the DOJ is investigating about her. She has deep ties to the Somali community, the one that was cashing in big time on stolen government money. Was she at the forefront of that?

This is not weaponization, it is not something started by Trump, and if it were weaponization Ilhan could have ended it by being forthcoming. It was SHE who dragged this into the political season (which, granted, is hard to avoid as it's always political season these days.)

As ye sow so shall ye reap. They started it. Now they don't like the results.





Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:06 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 937 words, total size 7 kb.

1  45 dems said thanks but no thanks including Pelosi. They recognize poison when they see it. My thinking is that Nancy would be only to happy to slap the cuffs on omar and escort her to the airport for the one way back to shithole I mean Somalia.

Posted by: Mike at October 28, 2026 07:19 PM (r7WVt)

2 I'm sure the old guard Democrats know that Omar is toxic and would like her to just go away. But so many of them can't bring themselves to go along with anything a Republican is doing, of course. But you are right Mike; I'm sure Pelosi won't shed any tears.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at October 28, 2026 11:11 PM (oflqW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




28kb generated in CPU 0.0455, elapsed 0.2186 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2068 seconds, 190 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
No Tricks Zone
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 369744
  • Files: 26232
  • Bytes: 9.8G
  • CPU Time: 501:50
  • Queries: 12929191

Content

  • Posts: 33865
  • Comments: 135163

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0