Courts O.K. Vote Fraud

Timothy Birdnow

The vote theft goes live in Pennsylvania.

Pa. Supreme Court tosses ballot signature-matching rule

Pennsylvania is a critical state and now their supreme court just greenlighted vote fraud.

From the article:

With Election Day just 10 days away, Pennsylvania is a key battleground state. President Trump won the state by fewer than 45,000 votes in 2016.

It has been reported that about 26,500 ballots were rejected during the June primaries due to apparent signature defects.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has also said that if voters do not place their ballot in a "secrecy” envelope their votes would not count.

Pennsylvania’s Democratic Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar had requested clarity on ballot rules in the Keystone State. Boockvar and the Trump campaign had sparred over the law’s interpretation, with the court eventually siding with the secretary.

"[We] hold that county boards of elections are prohibited from rejecting absentee or mail-in ballots based on signature comparison conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third-party challenges based on signature analysis and comparisons,” the court wrote.

And if we didn't need more proof of the importance of getting Amy Coney Barrett on the high court, there is this tidbit from the article:

The U.S. Supreme Court handed another win to Democrats in Pennsylvania after a deadlocked court, 4-4, shut down a GOP-led effort to block an extended period for counting ballots.

In the event of a 4-4 deadlock, the lower court ruling is affirmed and upheld.

We desperately need Trump to win and appoint more constitutionally minded Justices.

John Roberts (who else?) joined the liberals on the Court to cause the deadlock. A pox upon him and his house!

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:34 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.