November 15, 2024
Commie Editor of Scientific American Resigns
Timothy Birdnow
The editor-in-chief of Scientific American went on a tirade, insulting much of America, on social medoa on election night and has been forced to resign.
Laura Helmuth had such choice comments as:
and
Also
This not only shows her utter disdain for the average American it also shows she is a radical who was using Scientific American as yet another tool of propaganda.
After an explosive backlash on the Sci-Am boards, she deleted all the critical messages and then posted up a ridiculous article in the magazine about dealing with "the very real" stress of Trump Derangement Syndrome Election Grief (Good Grief!)
Sci-Am claims she chose to resign (right!) but she did so only after making a spectacle of herself.
She is par for the course in our modern times - a radical activist who somehow worms her way into a position of authority and then corrupts a once venerable institution.
Helmuth (To paraphrase Rick Moranis in Spacceballs "I'll bet she gives great helmuth")has a doctorate in cognitive neuroscience from UC Berkeley (is any of that a surprise - "cognitive neuroscience is pretty much a pseudoscience and what it has given us are ridiculous claims that conservatives are fearful and despotic based on junk science like the study I rebutted a few years ago) and anything from Berkeley is red and infected. She went on to U.C. Santa Cruz’s science communication program, then from there as an editor at leftist Smithsonian magazine, leftist Slate, Science magazine, and the leftist Washington Post. None of her previous employment suggests anything but a radical in a lab coat.
I'm glad she's gone but we need to be much more proactive. The Left would guarantee a right-winger would never work again and we should return the favor, seeing to it people like this are blackballed. What always happens when these radicals cross the line is they simply keep their heads low for a while then emerge with another important job, usually better than the last. Our people wither away. It's time we start holding grudges.
Now is the time to push Sci-Am to find a real editor, one who will have scientific objectivity, at a minimum. I favor Steven Milloy, for instance, or Mark Morano.
The editor-in-chief of Scientific American went on a tirade, insulting much of America, on social medoa on election night and has been forced to resign.
Laura Helmuth had such choice comments as:
"Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f–k them to the moon and back,”
and
"I apologize to younger voters that my Gen X is full of f–king fascists.”
Also
"Every four years I remember why I left Indiana (where I grew up) and remember why I respect the people who stayed and are trying to make it less racist and sexist. The moral arc of the universe isn’t going to bend itself,”
This not only shows her utter disdain for the average American it also shows she is a radical who was using Scientific American as yet another tool of propaganda.
After an explosive backlash on the Sci-Am boards, she deleted all the critical messages and then posted up a ridiculous article in the magazine about dealing with "the very real" stress of Trump Derangement Syndrome Election Grief (Good Grief!)
Sci-Am claims she chose to resign (right!) but she did so only after making a spectacle of herself.
She is par for the course in our modern times - a radical activist who somehow worms her way into a position of authority and then corrupts a once venerable institution.
Helmuth (To paraphrase Rick Moranis in Spacceballs "I'll bet she gives great helmuth")has a doctorate in cognitive neuroscience from UC Berkeley (is any of that a surprise - "cognitive neuroscience is pretty much a pseudoscience and what it has given us are ridiculous claims that conservatives are fearful and despotic based on junk science like the study I rebutted a few years ago) and anything from Berkeley is red and infected. She went on to U.C. Santa Cruz’s science communication program, then from there as an editor at leftist Smithsonian magazine, leftist Slate, Science magazine, and the leftist Washington Post. None of her previous employment suggests anything but a radical in a lab coat.
I'm glad she's gone but we need to be much more proactive. The Left would guarantee a right-winger would never work again and we should return the favor, seeing to it people like this are blackballed. What always happens when these radicals cross the line is they simply keep their heads low for a while then emerge with another important job, usually better than the last. Our people wither away. It's time we start holding grudges.
Now is the time to push Sci-Am to find a real editor, one who will have scientific objectivity, at a minimum. I favor Steven Milloy, for instance, or Mark Morano.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:56 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 458 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Another fantastic post! Your ability to explain things in such a clear, concise, and engaging manner is truly a gift. Looking forward to more amazing content from you.digital marketing company in gwalior
Posted by: Ninja at November 16, 2024 12:22 AM (uZWH3)
2
I read a post about this on Power Line, where they opined that she was fired, rather than resigned. Or you might say "resigned at the point of a gun."
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at November 17, 2024 01:19 AM (j5ngG)
3
Dana, I have little doubt tthat is how it went down. It was only her choice in that she could resign with a good recommendation or be sacked for cause. Now sh'ell just move on to the next publication she can politicize.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at November 19, 2024 09:07 AM (qTVdk)
25kb generated in CPU 0.1693, elapsed 0.2162 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2049 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
