Climatecon

John Madric

JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:

"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
"As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.
The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is "the cloud-sunlight- reflexivity thermostat mechanism.
Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system.
Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.

I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."

Tim adds:

He's right,but misses the bigger picture. This was and remains not a scientific debate at all but a political debate. The internationalists and leftists launched the whole thing as a mechanism to fundamentally transform human civilization and empower world government and international socialism. It serves that purpose.

Yes, many people are becoming rich off it - look at Elon Musk for a prime example (even though he's not one of the "Gang Green" he knew a good thing when he saw it.) And of course all the governments love it because it empowers them to impose regulations and taxes. But in the end the goal is to create international institutions and restrict free market capitalism in "The Great Reset". The socialists realized they were never going to win through persuasion and simple political activism; they needed a boogeyman, something to frighten the public into adopting measures that were radical.

The science has been purposefully, systematically distorted over the years to create a "crisis" from normal variations in temperature. And of course they then offer the "solution" which is to fundamentally alter our way of life and to adopt non-working solutions that are designed to fail (like EV's) so they eventually can impose what they really want. That is restrict population, restrict travel, restrict housing. The Left has always dreamed of these things.

AGW theory has failed on multiple levels. The models are huge failures, and in fact cannot even predict current climate conditions based on historical data. All of their predictions have failed. Core predictions - such as the tropical tropospheric hot spot - have never panned out. They couldn't predict the two pauses in warming. They can't find the so-called missing heat. They can't explain why Eastern Antarctica has growing ice mass. Etc.

Of course, they always "find" these things and announce it with much fanfare then quietly have to withdraw the claims.

So now they tell us last summer was the warmest in 2000 years, and once again they recycled Michael Mann's errors (simply eliminating the Roman and Medieval Warming Periods, for instance, to "discover" this searing heat.) If the facts were on their side they would just need to present them. That they are forever manipulating data sets to comport with their theory speaks volumes.

Climate change is the biggest con and swindle in human history. Even if there is something to it it most certainly is not the mother of all emergencies as they claim. And they know it. Why lie?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:55 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 599 words, total size 4 kb.