Timothy Birdnow

The Gang Green just can't stop from tripping over their own, uh, male members.

The paper, written by a man very aptly named Scambos, argued tha the loss of Antarctic ice was caused by an upwelling of waters around the continent plus an increase in war air circulation and that these were evidence of climate change. Only a funny thing happened - the Antarcic ice recovered and then some from a summer low.

Nothing to do with the phase change from La Nina to El Nino, was it>

At any rate the new media ballyhood the paper but failed to mention the recovery which embarrassed the heck out of Scam bro.

One commenter on the article argued the long term trend is negative but that is odd since it is known Antarctica has been GAINING ice mass since the beginning of this decade (Kolbe et al.)

Someone kindly explain to me how the models can be so wrong and we can have six years of ice growth when the planet's carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have increased? There is absolutely nothing in the models that can explain this and it was entirely unforeseen. How is Big Science dealing with it? By ignoring it and doubling down on their climate change stupidity.

And remember, we only have a few decades of observation of Antarctica to extrapolate from We don't know half of what Big Science claims we do.

Hide Comments | Add Comment