October 05, 2021

China's Carrier Problem

Timothy Birdnow

This from Cornelius Carroll

Why Did China Nix Its Dream of a Six Aircraft Carrier Fleet?

This might be problematic. China clearly is positioning itself to win a localized conflict within the first island chain but w/o carriers or a cluster of small island bases I doubt they could effectively projected power decisively into the second island chain or Indian Ocean.
Long range/

Hypersonic missiles and submarines can help fill that gap but it would be a lot more challenging to project power to decisively defeat an adversary.
China would build a network of bases in the Central and South Pacific to check the United States & the string of pearls in the Indian Ocean can sideline India along with strategic partnerships w/ Myanmar, Pakistan, and Iran.
But those are very visible strategies that both powers can work around.

End quote.

Hmm.

I have little doubt the Chinese are struggling to build a sizable fleet of carriers, but they can compensate with other technology.

Here is an interesting snippet:

China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy takes many of its cues from the U.S. Navy as it develops its carrier aviation branch. It is seeking similar flat-deck carriers to its U.S. counterpart, and has developedairborne early warning planesandelectronic attack jetscomparable to American E-2D Hawkeyes andEA-18 Growlers.

But that tendency may have backfired for once. That’s because the U.S. Navy has been beset by major cost overruns and delays in deploying its new generation Gerald Ford-class supercarriers due to persistent flaws in their catapults, arresting gear, radars and weapons elevators. You can read more about these many problems in an earlier article.

First, why would you take your cues from the U.S., which is becoming increasingly feeble and going broke from building stuff like this?

Second, "Gerald Ford Class Carriers"?! What do they do, bore the enemy to death?

Who would name a class of military vessel after Gerald Ford? And who would imitate it?

In fact the article admits these problems:

But that tendency may have backfired for once. That’s because the U.S. Navy has been beset by major cost overruns and delays in deploying its new generation Gerald Ford-class supercarriers due to persistent flaws in their catapults, arresting gear, radars and weapons elevators. You can read more about these many problems in anearlier article.

Similar problems apparently are affecting China’s carrier program. In November 2019, Minnie Chan of the South China Morning Postreportedthat Beijing was scrapping plans for a fifth and sixth nuclear-powered carrier, once it finished construction of two new steam-powered vessels.

The reason? "Technical challenges and high costs,” including issues particularly linked to development of the latter two vessel’s electromagnetic launch systems—the same system bedeviling the U.S. Navy.

The Chicoms aren't stupid; they see the trap we have ensnared ourselves in.

They figured out that we have been bankrupting ourselves with this kind of crap. It can be done leaner and more successfully with new tech - provided the tech actually works. As you say, this hampers their ability to project power now, but the Chinese take the long view.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:24 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 516 words, total size 5 kb.

1 There are times when we -- and apparently everyone else -- tries to create a technological marvel that turns out to be beyond our capabilities. If you make something impossibly complex, you get trouble. There's a reason that Russia's AK-47 is such a great gun -- simplicity pays off.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at October 05, 2021 10:33 AM (5O9A0)

2 Strategic goals, Team work and Communication is the key with our industry. Following tracks may also lead us to success. Its always been grateful for the opportunity you gave us all. Have a nice day. à¸ªà¸¥à¹‡à¸­à¸•คาสิโนออนไลน์

Posted by: Ieuan Ventura at October 06, 2021 12:44 AM (PlDqw)

3 Agreed Dana. The more complicated the more that can go wrong.

It's one of the great faults in computer design; the techies are always adding too much complexity and then are puzzled when people complain about the gadgets not working.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at October 06, 2021 07:02 AM (sEtRq)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




27kb generated in CPU 0.0864, elapsed 0.2501 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2405 seconds, 189 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
J.D. Rucker
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
>Selwyn Duke
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at timbirdnow@aol.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 181613
  • Files: 9630
  • Bytes: 4.6G
  • CPU Time: 479:30
  • Queries: 6361900

Content

  • Posts: 33341
  • Comments: 136041

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0