July 20, 2020

CDC acknowledges mixing up coronavirus testing data

Dana Mathewson

From The Hill. Another reason to be skeptical of "the experts."

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledged Thursday that it is combining the results from viral and antibodyCOVID-19 tests when reporting the country's testing totals, despite marked differences between the tests.

First reported by NPR's WLRN station in Miaimi [sic], the practice has drawn ire from U.S.health experts who say combining the tests inhibits the agency's ability to discern the country's actual testing capacity.

"You’ve got to be kidding me,”Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told The Atlantic. "How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess.”

Do you suppose they want a mess? That they deliberately desire obfuscation?

Viral tests — commonly referred to as PCR tests as most of them use a process known as polymerase chain reaction — are used by health professionals to determine whether or not a person is currently infected with the disease. During the pandemic, viral tests have been the most effective way of being able to diagnose a positive case of COVID-19. They are what state governments have been counting to track the number of confirmed cases of the virus they have.

Antibody, or serology, tests serve a different purpose. Unlike viral tests that are taken by nose swab or saliva sample, antibody tests examine a person's blood to see if their immune system has created antibodies to combat COVID-19. These tests allow doctors to see if someone has previously been exposed to the virus. As the push for widespread testing in the U.S. has strengthened, antibody tests have been widely produced,many experts have balked at saying that antibodies equate to immunity from COVID-19. Serology tests are also less accurate than PCR tests, increasing the chances for a false negative.

Moreover, a negative test means different things for either test. A negative PCR test indicates to physicians that the patient isn't currently ill with the disease. But, a negative serology test means that the patient has most likely not been exposed to or infected with COVID-19.

"The viral testing is to understand how many people are getting infected, while antibody testing is like looking in the rearview mirror. The two tests are totally different signals,” Jha told The Atlantic.

In a statement, CDC spokeswoman Kristen Nordlund told The Hill that when the agency began to track coronavirus testing, viral tests were far more commonly used nationwide than serology testing.

"Now that serology testing is more widely available, CDC is working to differentiate those tests from the viral tests and will report this information, differentiated by test type, publicly on our COVID Data Tracker website in the coming weeks," she said.

Oh, I'll bet I know. The American people are stupid, can't handle the truth. Just throw a lot of numbers against the wall and hope some of them stick. This is what the Drive-By Media tell us, if not outright, then by implication, all the time. Small numbers good, big numbers bad.

And maybe the American people, or enough of them, are stupid. Look how many people are supposedly going to vote for Joe Biden.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:37 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 535 words, total size 5 kb.

1 Dana, your conclusion is exactly correct; this is intended to FRIGHTEN the American People with big, scary numbers. And it works, too; most people quote those numbers with awed silence, and so clearly believe them.

What IS scary is the gullibility of so many, and how so many "science" outlets now routinely accept and produce fake science.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at July 21, 2020 09:06 AM (rLsub)

2 Keep testing until you get the numbers you want...

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at July 21, 2020 09:31 AM (tUvF0)

3 Just like vote fraud. Remember the election of 2000 when they kept "counting the vote" until Gore would win? Had SCOTUS not put a stop to it we would have had President Gore. That's exactly what they are trying to do with this; produce a scary doomsday scenario and  then demand a change who would be...Joe Biden (some change).

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at July 23, 2020 07:10 AM (/2j6O)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




27kb generated in CPU 0.0349, elapsed 0.2862 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2761 seconds, 186 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Center for Immigration Studies
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
>Climatescepticsparty> Daily Caller News Foundation
Conservative Angle
Conservative Treehouse
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music Discern Report
From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Jo Nova
Lifezette
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
Not the Bee
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Science Tech Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 44143
  • Files: 2153
  • Bytes: 705.0M
  • CPU Time: 59:04
  • Queries: 1252145

Content

  • Posts: 32795
  • Comments: 133772

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0