August 23, 2019
Barack Obama who says climate change will put the coasts underwater in 12 yrs just bought a multi-million $$ home in the Hamptons.
7500 sq. Ft. $14.8 million asking price.
A WORD FROM TIM:
Here is the Vineyard Conservation Society's take.
It states:
On the Vineyard a five-foot rise in the sea will swallow whole swaths of low-lying land–beaches, salt marshes, roads and homes. Five Corners in Vineyard Haven will disappear, as will portions of downtown Edgartown and Oak Bluffs.
The land surrounding our many majestic coastal ponds will be under water, including the shores of Chilmark and Edgartown Great Ponds, Sengekontacket and Trapp's Pond, Farm Pond, Sunset Lake and Squibnocket Pond. South Beach, Katama Point and vast portions of the Chappaquiddick shoreline will be lost to the sea. Much of Lobsterville will cease to exist, as will at least half of the Felix Neck Wildlife Sanctuary.
So why is Obama buying sea front property? I guess he believes his own claim to be able to stop the seas from rising...
I've got another question; how did a guy who worked as a Community Organizer make this kind of money? Where did he get it from?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:23 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
If you promise that you will give him money later and he does favors for you while he's in office and you give money to him after he leaves office, that's not bribery. Why? Because "nothing of material value" was given to him while he was in office. A promise of enrichment has no material value.
I'm glad I could clear that up for you.
Posted by: Bill H at August 23, 2019 08:35 AM (vMiSr)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at August 23, 2019 09:06 AM (PnO6z)
First off, Democrat politicians who rise above certain heights almost NEVER go to jail, no matter what kind of dirty financial transactions they are involved in.
Second off, we're talking about The Lightbringer here. He could (pardon the low class example I'm employing here, but I think it's a good one) have sex with Rachel Maddow, manifestly without her consent (and it would be -- euphemism used to keep this in reasonably decent taste), on MSNBC, and the collective Left would still cheer.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at August 23, 2019 09:47 AM (FamR2)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at August 24, 2019 06:08 AM (Sm0ZE)
37 queries taking 0.3107 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.