October 15, 2026
Shadow Figures of the Revolution
This from Vincent Thomas Ignatius
The Domestic enemies of America are many. They have been here for decades, going back to at least the 1920s when KGB handlers helped organize underground communist cells in America.
The goal was to infiltrate our institutions, such as education and the Media and, through continual subtle propaganda, try to convince as many Americans as possible to adopt Marxist and Socialist ideas.
Obviously, these ideas were packaged under different labels. Labels that at first sounded benign but grew 'progressively' worse as we became desensitized to them.
Tolerance
Acceptance
Civil Rights
Political Correctness
Colonialism
Multi culturalism
Economic Inequality
Critical Theory
Minority Rights
White Privilege
Toxic Masculinity
Islamophobia
Our domestic enemies had to work under the radar, or underground. They had to because at one time, the vast majority of Americans would absolutely reject these ideas if they truly understood who and what was behind them.
These shadow figures of the Revolution, freverently dedicated to their diabolical cause, continued to move FORWARD to produce HOPE AND CHANGE and called it PROGRESS.
Our Founding documents, written by the most brilliant political and philosophical minds in American and perhaps, world history, gave We The People the tools to keep tyranny in check. Among these tools was the belief that only a people of Judeo Christian faith could maintain the type of Free Constitutional Republic our Founders gave us.
It is, as they said, wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Our domestic enemies knew and know this. Following the ideas of Antonio Gramsci, they targeted two main institutions....
The Church, and the nuclear family.
Everything or almost everything these children of the devil believe in and follow fall under targeting these two critical institutions.
Abortion
Divorce
Same sex marriage
Transgender ideology
Wide acceptance of Homosexuality (read, After The Ball)
The attacks on Christian flideas and faith
Embrace of depravity and immorality.
Erosion of Education.
This decades long onslaught served and serves to bypass the Constitutional firewall our Founders set up to protect us from tyranny.
Jefferson wrote thay when government abandons its limited role as protector of our unalienable rights, it is the duty of the People to cast off such government.
What the Founders didn't understand or realize is that tyranny does not only originate with government.
It also emerges, and more often does, from among the people. After all, what is government but citizens elected by their fellow citizens to serve and protect?
The same type of people who once worked in the shadows to fundamentally transform America into a Socialist and eventually, a communist State, are now openly in office, running for office and boldly proclaiming their disdain for America.
They do this because a critical number of people in America have a tyrant living in their hearts. From among us, tyranny has arrived.
Through the process of Subversion and open borders, we now have a population of mini tyrants with no love of America and no faith in the God of the Bible.
Slowly, their fellow mini tyrants are being elected to office and given prominent positions of influence.
This is not a case of a free people who were somehow fooled into electing our enemies to office. This is a case of a people who hate the US and the Cross, who knowingly vote for Socialism, Islamism, atheism and anything anti American.
What constitutional remedy is there for a population that grows tyrannical? After all, government is but a mirror of its people. It reflects what the zeitgeist of that nation is.
I don't have a solution. Well actually I do. It is a simple but extremely difficult solution.
It is the solution those who once lived under the beast of Communism offered....
Yuri Bezmenov
Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Igor Shafravich
Even those of us who say we are patriotic people of faith. Are we?
As we hold subscriptions it all manner of depravity, from HBO to Netflix. We pay them to pump sewage into our homes and minds of our children.
As we can't be bothered to go to Church. Hey, it's football season!
Tyranny succeeds not only through direct action, but through apathy, laziness, and tolerance.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 702 words, total size 6 kb.
Star Wars; Return of the Dead Eye
Timothy Birdnow
In response to Zelensky's refusal to lay off of diesel refineries and his "up yours" to the President, America's Department of War has
cut off access to Star Shield, a military version of Starlink.
Ukraine was using Starshield to run it's attack drones. No Starshield and command and control becomes, uh, tricky.
Take THAT you arrogant snot Volodomor!
There is
more at Hot Air about this. It hurts not just drone attacks but interceptors too. It was a major blow to Ukraine's ability to fight the war.
But Zelensky had it coming; he was asked nicely, then warned. America is not obligated to help, and especially not if our help is unappreciated. There are strings to our technology; if you want our aid you have to give a little in return. All Trump asked was not to target diesel refineries and Zelensky refused to do even that.
What he is doing is burnishing his street cred with the Europeans in the hopes they will come into the war on his side. He knows Trump will never do that but he thinks he can get Europe to send in troops - something he desperately needs - as well as supply weapons. He figures he has wrung about all he can out of America as long as Trump is there and so he hopes to get a new Congress that will give him more and at the same time show how tough he is, how he "stood up to Trump just like he stood up to Putin". It's a fine strategy except Mr. Trump holds all the cards.
If Zelensky wants our help he needs to be polite to us. You don't demand and you don't tell us to butt out. If you don't want us involved then we will not be involved - at all. No more money, no more weapons, no more Starlink, nothing. You can fight on your own.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:35 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 329 words, total size 2 kb.
Gin-Soaked Judge Forcing Trump Admin. to take in Visa Lottery Winners
Timothy Birdnow
Gee, whoda seen this coming?
If judges want to make laws they should run for Congress. If they want to implement them they should run for President. But what they have no business doing is either when it is their job to pass judgement on the legality of things. That is exactly what they have NOT been doing in all of these injunctions.
The ruling was by U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta of the Southern District of California, a judge who undoubtedly has a vested interest in immigration. (I rather doubt a guy or gal named Gin-soaked, er, Jinsook, has a long family history in America) and it orders the diversity lottery be restored. The administration halted it when it was learned the Brown University shooter got into the country via this program.
Immigration is the province of the Executive branch of government and the courts have very limited authority on the matter. This judge is WAY out of line.
The judge (a woman, apparently) even admitted it:
"There is no statutory requirement that every available diversity visa be issued each year,”
So it is none of her business, it seems. If the Administration deems it unwise at this time no tinhorn judge has a right to second guess them.
The Red Eagle law firm was the spearhead for this and I wonder if they had legal standing. Who hired them and paid their bills? The article does not say but I suspect it wasn't a plaintiff who was trying to hire one of these folks; if it was an alien they had no standing nor does some immigrant advocacy group.
Again, this is a district judge issuing an injunction that impacts the whole country and not just her district. Trump should reduce the numbers down to just a few candidates and send them all to her district and nowhere else. She has no authority to foist all of these people on the nation as a whole.
My question is, why is a 1991 law still in place? Why hasn't Congress repealed it? They are busy reforming college sports and other useless stuff and let things like this remain.
The Left really knew what it was doing when they packed the courts with their own partisan hacks.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 399 words, total size 3 kb.
Half of America Worried About Socialist Candidates
Timothy Birdnow
This could mean a good night for us next month.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
The Ghost and Talarico
Timothy Birdnow
Gather round the campfire boys and girls; I'm going to tell a scary ghost story! It's about a Senate candidate who disappeared suddenly without a trace.
James Talarico is
fading while Paxton is rising and the God is nonbinary candidate seems to be hurting from his disappearing act as the public knows they aren't being told the truth.
You can lie to the public but you can't lie after ignoring them. Talimebananarico disappeared for weeks without telling the public he was out or why then comes back with a lame story about having the flu. He could have at least issued a public statement but nothing. If he was too sick to campaign the public would have understood, but not his just ghosting the good people of Texas. That is disrespectful and dishonest. If he's pulling this kind of thing now what will he do when he's in office? Right now he's asking the public to elect him.
I always thought Paxton would surge anyway. As the people of Texas learned just what a complete radical this guy is they would decide he was not for the Lone Star State. Texas takes their God and their guns seriously. Talabanrico does neither.
The article states:
The polls, for the first time in months, have Ken Paxton in the lead. The Quantus Insights poll is widely considered to be the most accurate, for what that’s worth. (It was the only poll to get 2024 right.) Quantus has Paxton at 47.2 to Talarico’s 46.7. A half a point does not seem earth-shattering, but you also have to throw in the GOP correction that nobody likes to talk about, which in previous elections has ranged from 3 to 5% (Current research now states that it has reached 6.2%.) YouTube poll Election Time gives an impressive total of Paxton at 55.1% against 44.9% for the Boy Wonder. Realistic? Maybe not. But the real importance of polls is to show you where the wind is blowing, and right now, it’s gale force against Little Jimmy.
end
And Paxton keeps talking about this. Talarico ghosted the public and showed disdain for the voters. If he can't be bothered to keep them informed why would he bother to listen to them after he's in office?
Elected officials are PUBLIC servants; it is their job to keep the public informed.
Even if 'RICO brings the receipts he can't change the fact that his campaign could have brought the receipts when he was out. Everyone would have understood. He didn't have to personally do it. But his campaign dropped the ball, and probably because they feared the real story getting out worse than what is happening now.
So, unless the RINO wing of the GOP steps in to cost Paxton, we will probably retain this seat. Hopefully a lot of others.
As an aside I would like to point out that there is vast sums of money being pumped into Missouri right now in opposition to an abortion ban and transgendering ban on our ballot; every commercial break on television has at least one commercial against it and often two. They are also running lots of commercials about redistricting, trying to get the public to save Emmanuel Cleaver from the cleaver. The only reason Cleaver has had a seat is because of the rule where minorities had to be given their own, special districts, the rule the Supreme Court recently overruled. SCOTUS refused to hear Missouri's appeal (despite the fact our state constitution forbids a referendum over redistricting) until after we had a vote on it. My question is, where is the money coming from? There are no commercials competing with these. And if we are being inundated is the rest of the country? Someone is spending a LOT of money, and in times past I would say they were tapping into taxpayer dollars. They still might be.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 654 words, total size 4 kb.
Zelensky Gives a Big ef U to Trump and America
Timothy Birdnow
An arrogant and ungrateful Volodomor Zelensky has just
flipped President Trump the bird in no uncertain terms, bombing Russian refineries and according to the article:
Zelenskyy was quoted as saying that "the block” on attacking refineries "is out.” He added, "We’re done.”
If Zelensky is done with the moratorium on bombing Russian diesel refineries then America will be done with giving him what he needs to continue fighting. This ungrateful little snot thinks he doesn't need our help, apparently.
Zelensky is hoping that his lack of cooperation will flip Congress next month and thus lead to a friendlier policy by the U.S.
Notice he's gotten quite cocky after Congress passed an aid bill to Ukraine. He now thinks he can't be denied that money.
No doubt he can't as that is the way our government works; the Executive Branch cannot withhold money earmarked by Congress. But he can slow it down and possibly put some strings on it. And with a little luck he could get Congress to rescind it.
The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 states the President must notify Congress if he intends to implement Impoundment - a practice where the President does NOT use authorized funds which goes back to Thomas Jefferson - and it must be approved by Congress. The President can either defer spending or do a recission (a perment cut) but he has to get tacit Congressional approval for a recission. In the current climate it seems unlikely Congress will allow President Trump to do it. But he can order a deferment. He should.
But then there is also the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, which authorizes the President to cut spending under certain circumstances and when it does not do harm to national interests or add to the federal budget deficit and it must have tax benefits. Under this provision it is possible the President could cut spending on Ukraine, but he'd have a big fight on his hands with Congress nonetheless. They can still override him in this instance.
Only one problem; SCOTUS declared this law unconstitutional. So Trump can't use that.
Zelensky knows all this and that's why he's getting cocky now; he has the
the $175 billion and he won't need to come back to the well for a while.
If Ukraine were defunded the war would quickly be over. But Zelensky sleeps well at night knowing the Western World will never tire of propping up his corrupt and despotic junta.
President Trump needs to find a tender spot to squeeze the Ukrainian government. He probably will; it's what he is best at. His speciality is finding leverage to force a deal.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 458 words, total size 3 kb.
Trump Wusses Out on Nidal Hasan Execution
Timothy Birdnow
Trump wussies out!
Executing a guy decades after the fact and then making it private sends no message to anyone and in fact there is little reason to do it if the public doesn't see it happen. It loses any deterrence it may have had. There is a reason why executions used to be public until the mid-20th century. Many of the atrocities we see today did not happen much in the old days because everyone knew the ropes (literally). Now it's a case of a sanitary, quick, largely painless death and so especially young people will risk it.
Yes, there is the risk of making a martyr out of someone, but that's why you need to take steps to counter that. Burying a Muslim's body with pig skin or embalming tthem with bacon grease would be a good start; many Muslims believe this will prevent the jihadist from going to Heaven.
Me, I'm all for tossing the body into a pig pen and letting nature take her course, but of course filming it while we're at it. I doubt many would-be terrorists would be willing to seek their seventy two virgins and a mule if they figured they'd be eaten by hogs and wind up with seventy two ugly old homosexual men instead.
Trump shouldn't have chickened out on this. It is important the public see these kinds of executions. We have become entirely too squimish and soft to face certain realities. What the man did was horrible and we need to know that justice was served. Nobody was forcing anyone to watch it, I might add. But it should be available to be seen by the public.
This isn't going to gain Trump or the Republicans any good will. The Democrats will still trash Trump just for his Administration suggesting it. Better to be damned for what you do than for what you refrained from doing but get blamed for anyway.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:59 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 350 words, total size 2 kb.
The Brain Still Learns Under Anesthesia
Timothy Birdnow
Atheists have long used anesthesia as proof that there is nothing beyond the grave; when anesthetized people often lose all sense of time; one minute they are here and the next they are here with no seeming awareness of any time passing. I know; I've experienced that myself (and didn't much like it). But it may well not be so.
From the article:
"Our findings show that the brain is far more active and capable during unconsciousness than previously thought," said Dr. Sameer Sheth, professor and Cullen Foundation Endowed chair of neurosurgery and a McNair Scholar at Baylor. "Even when patients are fully anesthetized, their brains continue to analyze the world around them."
[...]
The researchers used advanced recording devices called Neuropixels probes to monitor electrical signals from hundreds of individual neurons in the hippocampus. These tiny probes can detect activity from many nerve cells simultaneously, providing a detailed picture of how groups of neurons respond to information.
According to the researchers, this technology had not previously been used to investigate this particular brain region in this way. It allowed the team to examine how the hippocampus responds to sounds and language while patients are unconscious and unable to report what they experience.
The first experiment involved playing a series of repeating tones, occasionally interrupted by a sound that differed from the others.
Although the patients were under anesthesia, neurons in their hippocampus responded differently to the unexpected sounds. Even more surprisingly, the brain cells became better at distinguishing these unusual tones as the experiment continued.
This improvement suggested that the hippocampus was showing signs of neural plasticity, the brain's ability to change its responses through experience. In other words, some of the basic processes associated with learning appeared to remain active even without conscious awareness.
So while we may not be consciously aware, our brains are still processing information. Veddy eeenterestink!
I know this to be true from personal experience. I had the honor of enjoying a vitrectomy, an operation where they they cut into your eye, remove part of the vitreous Humor (which I did in no way find humorous) - the gelatinous material between the retina dn the lens of the eye that protects the retina. I had had a bleed in my eye and the blood stuck to the vitreous and so they had to cut out that part. They gave me general anesthesia for it. While I was under I dreamed, a very vague dream but a dream nonetheless. In it I was mad and kicking my eye doctor. When I awoke I learned he had had a terrible time removing the vitreous; he'd never seen anything like it. My vitreous appeared melted and coagulated and he couldn't get it out with his probe. Eventually he had to put a solvent in and essentially burn it away! The procedure took a long time; I was grateful I was under general anesthesia because often those procedures are done with locals. But I dreamed, which is important; you aren't supposed to be able to dream in that state. (I also dreamed I had metal straps around my chest and when they brought me out of it I was having trouble breathing, triggering a complete panic in the recovery room.) But I did.
The article continues:
The researchers then tested whether the unconscious brain could handle something more complicated than simple sounds.
They played short stories to the anesthetized patients while continuing to record activity from neurons in the hippocampus.
The results revealed a surprising level of language processing. Distinct patterns of neural activity contained information about different categories of words, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives. This suggested that the hippocampus was responding to meaningful features of language rather than simply detecting that sounds were occurring.
But the most intriguing discovery went a step further.
The researchers found that neural activity also carried information that could be used to predict upcoming words in a sentence. Even though the patients were unconscious, their brains appeared to anticipate how the language unfolding around them might continue.
So anesthesia is NOT mimicking death but rather just an altered state of consciousness.
It continues:
The findings raise important questions about what consciousness actually contributes to the brain's ability to process information.
Consciousness is generally associated with subjective awareness, including the experience of hearing, thinking, and understanding the world around us. Yet the study suggests that some neural processes involved in interpreting language and predicting future information can continue even when that awareness is absent.
This does not necessarily mean that the anesthetized patients consciously understood the stories being played to them. Instead, it indicates that the brain can carry out surprisingly complex aspects of language processing without a person being aware of doing so.
The distinction could help researchers better understand how consciousness emerges.
One possibility is that awareness depends not simply on whether individual brain regions remain active, but on how information is coordinated and shared across larger networks of brain regions.
Under this view, a structure such as the hippocampus might continue analyzing information even when the broader communication between brain regions needed for conscious experience is disrupted.
This has important implications for many different things - like euthanasia. It is often argued that a person in a vegetative state is simply dead and should be put down like a dog. But this suggests that as long as there is some neural activity the person is still alive in more ways than just bodily and thus you ARE murdering them even if they don't appear to be alive to you. And it explains the old saw about how you should talk to coma patients even if it appears they are totally unaware; they aren't.
This is a powerful pro-life development.
The article goes on to discuss how this works in a way surprisingly similar to how AI processes information, especially about language. Ai predicts what is coming from it's store of linguistic knowledge and apparently the hippocampus does likewise.
I would argue this is proof that the body and the mind are different things and the body continues to do it's job whether the mind aka the soul is aware or not. But of course this article won't mention that because neuroscience in particular is absolutely sure the brain and the mind are the same thing and let's not muddy that with discussions about souls. But we all have souls and that is a fact.
One last thing; people who have out of body experiences when clinically dead have reported everything said in the room as the medical staff worked to revive them. While I favor the idea this is because they were out of their bodies and still aware it DOES suggest that their brains were still processing even while clinically dead. take from that what you will.
In the end this is a fascinating development.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1165 words, total size 9 kb.
Rising Strokes and Cancer in Youths a Result of Covid Shot?
Timothy Birdnow
Not one but two articles in Science Daily this morning say young people are suffering from illnesses normally reserved for the older generation and they say scientists are puzzled.
And
I can think of a few reasons this may be the case; sedentary lifestyles, living with electronic gadgets stuck to their hands and heads, bad diet, etc.
But the one thing that screamed in my head as soon as I saw these two articles was COVID VACCINE.
We KNOW the mRNA vaccine causes stroke; that link has been well established. Cancer has been less so but it stands to reason given what we are doing inside the body with the mRNA shot. I worried about cancer when they first announced they were doing this; the mRNA shot uses messenger RNA to "teach" the body to produce antibodies for the spike protein in Covid without actually giving you Covid (weak or dead) as traditional vaccines do. The problem is this can trigger the body to produce mutated cancer cells in the process.
This study was done in England and it does not divide the populace by race, something necessary to understand the big picture. Are the recent immigrants more likely or less likely to get the cancer than the native British? It well may be the newly arrived are getting it at higher rates and that would make sense as they probably have different lifestyles and different diets.
They argue that obesity is part of the answer and that may be (or not) and they talk about how things have "improved" like eating less red meat (that may well be the problem; changes in the traditional diet) but in the end they conclude in both instances that scientists don't know, there is a missing X factor.
I think that X factor is the clot shot.
The study about strokes in young people was conducted in Cincinatti and northern Kentucky and I assume this would include Louisville as well as the Appalachians. Diets are pretty bad in these parts; lots of fried foods. It's also bourbon country, so take what you will from that. Also, at least in the mountains, inbreeding is an issue one cannot ignore. It may be there is a genetic predisposition to more strokes, one that just wasn't noticed in the old days.
But I suspect the Covid shot may be at work here as well. We KNOW it causes strokes; that's why we call it the clot shot.
At any rate scientists have thought and thought and never considered that it may be what medical science foisted off on us that caused the problem. They dare not admit that.
I fear we may have permanently damaged the genome of our population. Despite what has been claimed about this vaccine it does cause small but permanent changes in our DNA. See
here. (I had a devil of a time finding this as a Duck Duck Go search produced countless propaganda pieces dismissing claims the mRNA vaccine caused alteration in the genome - the claims all being made to protect the hoax that was the entire Covid panic.)
BTW the study linked in the article I linked above about how it makes changes to the genome says, among other things, it leads to a rise in Leukemia and other cancers - just as the first linked article about cancers in young people suggests - and I personally have heard about a number of older people who have developed leukemia recently.
See two papers about this here:
and
The clot shot causes the body to produce spike proteins so that the immune system can learn to recognize them and deal with the organisms producing them. But they were only taught to produce a very specific type of spike protein and so when Covid mutates the immunity doesn't work with the new strain. But what does happen is the body keeps producing the spike protein, triggering inflammatory responses and the subsequent problems stemming from high inflammation. Cancer is one such, especially blood cancers.
Yet neither of the papers which triggered this article mention the Covid shot as a possible cause of rising cancer and of increasing strokes among the youth. They cannot, even now, admit they really screwed the pooch on this.
The medical community is going to hide from this, as will our government, until memory fades. They are hoping to outlast the mistake rather than own up to it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:09 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 789 words, total size 6 kb.
October 14, 2026
Just Say No to Sanity Tests for our Leaders
Timothy Birdnow
No.
What test will be used? Who will administer it? Who will interpret the results? Where is the cutoff between fit and unfit?
The article does speak to the way the Left uses sanity as a claim Conservatives are insane and that hearkens back to the old Soviet Union where they used to put dissidents in mental institutions, drug them, use electric shock on them, and otherwise torture them to put fear in anyone else who dared question their leadership. It is a common trick of the Left.
And if we were to put this in place the Left would eventually take it over and abuse us with it.
They have already claimed Trump is unfit for office and should be removed via the 25th Amendment because he is insane. You know they will use that again, and if we had a sanity test it would always go against us, and not the Left.
In my opinion the author, using the nom-deplume of Raw Egg Nationalist, has laid an egg here. While acknowledging the problems he/she/xi has then suggested something that is ripe for abuse.
I agree there should be some standards and those should come before an election - such as age limits, or not allowing immigrants to run. But to say we are going to have sanity tests is putting our faith in the "expert class" which is invariable on the Left because it comes out of universities. Faith in experts is something the Left has always promoted to get people to not use their own gray matter but allow the "best and brightest" to run their lives.
Foolish.
Abraham Lincoln was clinically depressed and, given his ferocity in the war, was a mass murdering butcher to boot. If he had to pass a sanity test there would be reason to believe he'd fail. Woodrow Wilson was incapacitated and his wife ran the government late in his second term of office. FDR was in a wheel chair from polio. Nixon was paranoid. They called Reagan insane, if you remember. We cannot afford to let the "experts" decide who is fit and who is unfit.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 376 words, total size 3 kb.
We Have Lost Our Country
Timothy Birdnow
Fully 20% of all college kids believe America deserved the 911 attacks.
This isn't rational and it isn't normal. But it's what happens when a bunch of Bolsheviks get ahold of our youth.
If I had children I would sooner send them into the place where the lions are kept in the zoo rather than to a modern college. The worst a lion would do is eat them; college professors will steal their souls.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
How many of them know what happened on 9/11? How many are foreigners, esp from islamic states? How many had self hating brain dead libs for parents? I heard an interesting theory on Palestinian flag wavers. Its not so much support of Palestine but of the islamic ideology. The islamic ideology doesnt have a flag and is attached to whatever country is seen as being abused by freedom loving people. If the islamic ideology had a flag the palestinian flag would disappear
Posted by: Mike at October 14, 2026 05:08 PM (r7WVt)
2
All excellent points Mike. Of course the universities should at least be teaching these kids the truth, which would make them less receptive to this but they are now. Yeah; the Palestinian flag waving is solidarity with Islam and not Palestine, of which these kids probably know nothing at all.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at October 15, 2026 08:05 AM (oflqW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Trump Channels Reagan
Timothy Birdnow
This essay says what I believe as well. He argues that what Trump is doing is essentially what Reagan did in the eighties and I concur, although some of the policies predated Reagan. Containing the Russians, for instance, was a fifties policy devised by George Kennan. But by and large I have to say the essay is absolutely correct. Trump is taking Reaganism and running with it.
Read it all; it's short.
BTW People have forgotten how reviled and despised Ronald Reagan was back in the eighties. The Left had endless investigations of Reagan and tried to get him on the Iran/Contra business (and would have had not Oliver North manned the firewall). Trump is hated even worse because, unlike Reagan who wasn't rolling back the social programs and even gave America an illegal alien amnesty, Trump is going after the citadels of Leftist power in this country. Sun Tzu said to "seize that which the enemy holds dear" and that is exactly what Trump has been doing. Naturally that makes the enemy crazy when you do, which is the whole point.
And sadly many former Reaganites also hate Trump, just as the old guard Republicans hated Reagan. They tried to saddle Reagan with Gerald Ford as his Vice President, or "co-President" as they wanted to make him. Reagan wisely said no but then threw them a bone with George H.W. Bush, who overturned much of the Reagan Revolution along with his son W. Anyone who upsets the power structure is reviled by both parties. Reagan became the new norm, so when Trump came along National Review and even the American Spectator turned hard against him. Now both are irrelevant in American Conservative thought these days.
Trump is becoming the new norm. And we are watching the Nevertrumpers fade into the ashbin of history.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.
The Wormer Solution
Timothy Birdnow
"I Think That This Situation Absolutely Requires A Really Futile And Stupid Gesture Be Done On Somebody’s Part.”
Otter from Animal House
Blanket punishment for everyone is just abuse. Why should fraternities that don't host drug-fueled gangbangs be punished with those that do? Imagine if they said "all parties hosted by black students" or "all parties hosted by LGBTQ students" instead of fraternity parties; there would be riots.
The Left has always hated the Greek system because it is something outside of their power structure and is all male or all female. They despise that. They forced the Boy Scouts of America to accept girls and now they are going after fraternities.
For the record I was in a Catholic fraternity in college (Alpha Delta Gamma) and while we had some pretty drunken parties we never once came close to what this frat at Cornell did, but I am sure they were an outlier.
Of course the University lacks authority off campus and so the frat could host parties off campus, but even then, knowing the way Liberals think, they will probably kick students out of school for even doing something off-campus. It's how they roll.
And the girl was NOT a member of the frat so why are the boys punished when the girl was an eager and willing partner in a drug-fueled gangbang?
You punish the guilty, not anybody you think could maybe be guilty of something some day. America has innocent until proven guilty; the Left is always pounding on that. Well, the rule, which appears nowhere in the Constitution, doesn't really apply here but the Left would certainly make the claim if the roles were reversed. So why are all these kids being assumed guilty without charge?
Dean Wormer would get it. Even HE didn't kick the other fraternities off campus in Animal House.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 2 kb.
Feminist Crazy
Timothy Birdnow
It's female supremacy, not feminists seeking equality.
Feminism is not and never was about equal treatment but has always been about putting women in control. If that power must flow from a double standard so be it. Yes, feminists excuse women who murder their kids because to not excuse them would be to make them accept consequences, and if they do that they are then under the patriarchy, see. Men must understand always that they are second class, that women are entitled to rule.
It is history's oldest delusion. Eve pulled this trick in the Garden of Eden.
The Book of Genesis has a forgotten and misunderstood passage when God is doling out punishments to the first rebellious couple:
Gen.3:16
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Most people who do not understand this passage think her SEXUAL desire will be to her husband, but it means more than that. I heard a Bible scholar explain it once; her desire is not so much a desire as jealousy; she wants to usurp his role as head of the household. The mistranslation is unfortunate as people don't get what it is saying. The woman is going to want to be the boss, the big cheese, the top dog, and she will jealously regard the man's authority and seek to overrule him. But in the end he'll be the one in charge and will rule over her and she won't like it. Many, many marriages suffer such power struggles and most marriages of atheists do not last precisely because of this power struggle.
But we weren't made that way. Men, too, aren't crazy about the job they have been given as head and Adam let Eve usurp his role because it was easier and men have done that ever since. Feminism would not exist had men not let women do it in the first place. Men are often weak and women often disdain them for it.
Feminist women especially look for beta males, men who will play along with their fantasy of power, and then hate them for being so weak. Yet they hate strong men even more because the strong men won't play their game. So often they end up alone and that is why there are so many lesbians in the feminist movement; no man can ever measure up to the standard they set. Of course two women have a similar problem.
Feminism has ruined our civilization and I see no way to put the bitch back in the bottle. Naturally they don't believe it was feminism that ruined their lives in the first place and so feminist women rarely change; it's always men's faults.
That is why they seem so double-minded; they are not interested in a fair shake but in power, and power can be attained by women by always taking the side of women and making men answer the question "when did you stop beating your wife". The want a rigged game, loaded dice.
But any game is worthless to satisfy a person if it does not have clear and enforceable rules. Feminism cannot possibly meet a woman's emotional needs because she knows deep down the game is not fair and she is only winning because her side is cheating.
Every woman who is a CEO or News Anchor or Congresswoman and who is a feminist has a deep-seated fear in her gut that she only has that job because she's a woman and not because she merits it. Such knowledge is called imposter syndrome and it gnaws at the soul. And rightly so; if you got ahead because you had the backing of the Woke movement you do NOT deserve your position.
At any rate feminism has made chicks crazy, and it will make them worse and worse as time goes by if society keeps letting them have their way. The insane must sometimes be restrained. They certainly shouldn't have sane folks play along with their delusions.
There is crazy then there is Feminist Crazy. We need to start calling them that, and it should become an everyday idiom.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 720 words, total size 5 kb.
Short Eyes in Sharia Germany
Timothy Birdnow
Sharia reigns in Germany as the country is being overwhelmed by
child brides being forced into marriage with immigrant men at ridiculous ages (like 11 or 12).
This is Germany today.
Only a handful of the 358 "marriages" have been annulled by the government.
When you immigrate to another country you live under their laws, not your own. But Muslim immigrants (and others these days) refuse to do that.
(Chinese too; they opened police stations in the U.S. to police their own people and impose Chinese law on them even though they are living here.)
This proves they are not immigrants at all by invaders who plan to overthrow the host countries. It's well past time to evict them from the Western World.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
The Lies Told About Columbus
Timothy Birdnow
The author rightly attributes these lies to a Progressive movement that hates Christiaity. He's right.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
Nursing Home Vote Scam
Timothy Birdnow
We were told there was no vote fraud in America and that the '20 election was the cleanest in American history. Guess that wasn't true after all ...
Now America has universal education and not knowing how to sign your name is absolutely ridiculous; there is no reason why any ballot should be signed with an X in modern America. That is a huge red flag and every such ballot should be scrutinized.
When my father was a boy his grandmother owned a farm deep in the Ozarks. They had no running water, no central heat, no electricity. And she had a laborer who lived in a log cabin with a dirt floor back in the woods behind her home. Jim Lowe was the son of a Confederate soldier who settled back there and lived quietly to avoid any Union entanglements. (I suspect the senior Lowe was a Bushwhacker and so could not take the amnesty as irregulars were often not given one.) So old Jim grew up with no education and signed his checks with an X. But even he eventually learned to write his name. In modern America there is no excuse for not being literate enough to sign your own name at a minimum. And if you can't sign your own name how do you understand what is on the ballot?
BTW Jim Lowe himself kept a low profile after killing a man in a bar fight. He rarely went to town after that, and the local sheriff was none too eager to go and bring him in because he would not go easily, and it was an accident after all. This was in the late thirties and forties.
At any rate they told us there was no fraud in our elections and we keep finding more and more fraud. It is what has kept the Democrats close to the GOP all these years. We've had dozens of elections that ended with a GOP win but then the Democrats kept counting until they suddenly "found" enough ballots to win. It's odd how slow counting is always a problem in DEMOCRAT districts.
If democracy is so important then the first thing we must have is secure elections. Without that democracy means rule by the better organized, not the will of the People.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 410 words, total size 3 kb.
Drooling Elephants
Timothy Birdnow
The Republicans are the stupid party, no question, but THIS stupid?
Yes, this group of morons actually ran an ad for Susan Collins in Portland - Portland OREGON.
How can we hope to win elections with buffoons like this in our party?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
Did Omar Change Her Birthdate to Obtain Citizenship?
Timothy Birdnow
I've got a bottle of good champagne chilling for the happy day she is deported back to Somalia from when she wriggled.
From the Western Journal article:
And the New York Post lays out plainly why this is such a big deal: "If the congresswoman is actually one year older than she’s claimed to be, that would mean she couldn’t have legally become a U.S. citizen in 2000, critics contend.”
Omar’s birthdate has long been publicly listed as Oct. 4, 1981.
However, according to the emails obtained by the New York Post, it appears that in May 2019, the above date was shifted forward by one year, to 1982.
That time frame is significant, as Omar had had her age questioned by a political opponent, AJ Kern, who, the post reported, "came in a distant fourth against Omar in the 2022 House Democratic primary for Minnesota’s Fifth District.”
"She claims her citizenship narrative is that she derived citizenship through her father when she was a 17-year-old minor,” Kern told the Post.
However, he continued, "For derivative citizenship, two things have to be true — one, her father had to naturalize; and two, she still had to be a minor — and what I have found is that it’s highly likely that neither of those things are true.”
The Post reported Kern filed a FEC complaint to demand proof of Omar’s citizenship.
Couple this with corruption charges, which I hope will be forthcoming, and we may be able to oust this ungrateful, arrogant woman from America.
I find immigrants who then bad-mouth and abuse their host country to be particularly onerous; we gave them shelter and offered them the best of what we had and to be so astoundingly ungrateful as is Omar is something we should not have to suffer. This woman has never once expressed gratitude to the nation that saved her from a life of prostitution or scavenging for food. And she repays us by badmouthing her adoptive country and by stealing everything not nailed down.
She deserves to be sent back to the land of squalor and poverty and then she can remember how she had it all and tossed it away in her arrogance.
I doubt this particular issue alone will take her down but it's just one more piece of a mosaic being constructed right now and I hope in the end they build a strong case; it has to be very strong to deport a sitting member of Congress.
Mike Johnson should suspend her from all her committee assignments until this is straightened out. But of course he won't dare.
And, just so everyone knows, the judge who approved the raid is a big Democrat donor (he donated a lot of money to Hillary) - Judge Matthew Sharbaugh - who was appointed by Joe Biden in October of 2024 as part of his court packing prior to leaving office (or I should say the Autopen appointed him) and Sharbaugh was sworn in by James Boasberg, with whom he has much in common. The guy has a rock-solid Progressive record.
According to Wikipedia he's
homosexual and he has given the Trump Administration all kinds of trouble over the years, including throwing the book at J6 protesters and he freed a WWII memorial vandal for no good reason. This guy is as liberal as they come, yet it was he who authorized the raid.
So if a registered Democrat and partisan hack judge signed off on the warrant for the raid then there is very credible evidence against Mrs. Omar. (I forget; is she married to an American or still married to her brother?)
Immigrants should not be allowed to hold or run for federal office, in my opinion. Local and maybe even state but not for the federal. I may be a dreamer but I'm not the only one.
Anyway I hope they deport Ilhan soon so I can free up some space in my fridge...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 713 words, total size 5 kb.
October 13, 2026
Carbon Isotope Ratios Caused by Natural Phenomenon
Timothy Birdnow
Sorry I didn't have the time to clean this up. From a Facebook argument with a true believer who said he needed an explanation for why the c12/c13 isotope ration was not explained by human emissions:
Well then this should turn you into a skeptic. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383240024_Multivariate_Analysis_Rejects_the_Theory_of_Human-caused_Atmospheric_Carbon_Dioxide_Increase_The_Sea_Surface_Temperature_Rules
Sea Surface temps are driving the increase in c12.
I suppose you haven't seen this https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-10-04-new-research-finds-ancient-carbon-rocks-releases-much-carbon-dioxide-worlds which showed that rocks outgas as much carbon dioxide as volcanoes. This wasn't included in the climate models but is undoubtedly part of the reason atmospheric CO2 has been rising (we are no longer pumping as much sulfur into the atmosphere and thus the rocks are now in release mode rather than absorption mode when a lot of acid was coming down with rain - a rain that no longer falls in many places as clouds have declined and there has been no major increase in precipitation, especially over land. Most of these surface rocks contain lighter carbon - the kind being blamed for the isotope balance issue.
And then there is this. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1619240114
" Using updated records, we show that no plausible
combination of sources and sinks of CO2 from fossil fuel, land,
and oceans can explain the observed 13C-Suess effect unless an
increase has occurred in the 13C/12C isotopic discrimination of land
photosynthesis. "
end
In other words there is something equally wrong with the isotope argument. There are other forces at work.
Here's more:
"Fossil fuels are slightly de
pleted in 13C because they were initially formed from photo
synthesis, which involves isotopic discrimination, that is, selective
uptake of 12CO2 over 13CO2. The emission of fossil fuel CO2
therefore lowers the atmospheric 13C/12C ratio. A second im
portant influence on the 13C-Suess effect is the natural back-and
forth exchanges of CO2 with land and ocean carbon reservoirs.
These gross exchanges, also known as "disequilibrium fluxes,”
scramble carbon atoms between reservoirs, thereby spreading
the Suess effect into the land and oceans while reducing the
atmospheric signal. A third influence is net gain or loss of carbon
by the land biosphere, which is depleted in 13C because of
photosynthesis, similar to fossil fuels. A sink for excess CO2 on
land therefore offsets the influence of fossil fuel burning, not just
on CO2amount, but also on its isotopic composition. In contrast,
ocean uptake of excess CO2 has little influence on δ13C of at
mospheric CO2 (5)."
end
Just to make sure you understand the PLANTS are taking more c13 out of the atmosphere. Get it?
And just one percent of the atmospheric carbon dioxide is c13. So that is 0.0045% of the total volume of the atmosphere. It is so insignificant amount we cannot say with any certainty just how much is there at any given time.
BTW here is a list of 700 papers that dispute the orthodoxy on climate change, putting the lie to Oreskes and the 99% claim. https://www.cfact.org/2010/04/26/700-papers-supporting-climate-realism/
And it wouldn't do anything if we did reduce emissions. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-68586-y
So your strongest argument is in doubt, and all the other things predicted by the alarmists have been tarnished if not downright disproven. It's time to take a good, hard look at the science in opposition to the hypothesis.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:47 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 543 words, total size 4 kb.
99kb generated in CPU 0.0891, elapsed 0.4624 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.4486 seconds, 224 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.