1 Maybe. Or maybe not. Over the last umpteen years our foreign policy, especially when Democrats are in control of the asylum, is generally nothing more than "feel good" stuff that we really believe the other side will respond favorably to. We continue to act as if we believe the "other side" will come around to our way of thinking if we're just nice enough -- that they "share our values." It hasn't happened yet, has it? Perhaps the success of the Marshall Plan after WWII gulled us.

2 Perhaps Dana, and that may be the thinking of the foot soldiers on the Left, but I am certain the inner cadre know what they are doing.

3 Hard to tell, my man. Surely the top guns have done what they could to install CRT and other such garbage. But when you look at what's just gone on, it's hard to believe that anybody in control had his underpants turned the right way.

4 Dana, I think you are assuming they didn't WANT a disaster here. I am of the opinion they did.

5 I can't figure what a disaster gets them. Blaming everything on Trump is getting very old and fewer people are buying it. If they're pushing to flood the country with Afghanis, where're they going to put them? We're already overflowing with people waltzing over our southern border.

6 Dana, this is "top down, bottom up, inside out". The whole point is to humiliate the U.S. on the world stage, break America's pride and sense of self, flood the country with perhaps a million more people, and unleash more wars and terrorism which will drive America and the Western World further to the grip of the internationalists. Humiliation of America is a big thing, and it is a way to teach the lesson that nationalism and individual national action are fruitless and only a world order fully engaged can solve world problems.

They will also use this to promote socialism as they will argue we wouldn't be having all this terrorism if it weren't for capitalism and capitalist greed.

At the same time the capitalists will feed their greed by selling munitions and small arms to the terrorists and to countries resisting the terrorists.

And the surveillance state will continue to metastasize as every person is a potential terrorist and must be watched.

The whole thing sounds convoluted but I have little doubt they discuss this kind of stuff at Davos or at the Renaissance Weekend, or other places. The World Economic Forum is a big one too.

The more things that happen on the World stage the less I believe in random events. We seem to be gambling with rigged dice and the house always comes up with a seven.