May 07, 2026
Articles of Impeachment for Boasberg
Timothy Birdnow
High time!
Bosoberg has been pulling all sorts of monkeyshines in his quest to thwart President Trump, and he has willfully disobeyed Supreme Court orders in the process. He needs to go.
Of course the Democrats will probably save him, but at least all the information will come out about what he has been doing. And the process is the punishment too which means Boa Constrictberg will have to waste a bunch of time and money to defend himself.
Good; couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
FTA:
Texas GOP Representative Brandon Gill introduced articles of impeachment on Tuesday against Chief Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
This action follows Judge Boasberg’s approval of secretive subpoenas linked to the Biden Justice Department’s "Arctic Frost” probe — a sweeping inquiry that conservative leaders have exposed as a politically driven campaign targeting Trump allies and Republican lawmakers.
Congressman Gill posted this on X:
Post
See new postsConversationCongressman Brandon Gill
@RepBrandonGillI just filed Articles of Impeachment against radical activist Judge James Boasberg.
Judge Boasberg abused his power by weaponizing the judiciary against critics of the Biden Administration. As part of the Arctic Frost Investigation, Judge Boasberg signed off on frivolous nondisclosure orders to conceal the fact that sitting US Senators were being surveilled. Not only was this action egregiously improper; it was a gross violation of the separation of powers.
Judge Boasberg is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, is unfit for office, and should be impeached.
We need to make an example of this guy and any others who have abused their authority of office in this manner. Until people pay real prices for such bad behavior it will continue. We have to make it so painful even the Democrats dare never do this sort of thing again.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 325 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Indubitably! A case could be made that jurisprudence is not politics, and vice versa, and that this gink is doing is way out of his lane.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at May 07, 2026 10:53 PM (nxbxX)
2
Indubitably indeed! There are limits to how judges may operate and Boasberg has overstepped them and been spanked (repeatedly) by superior courts over it.
There needs to be some mechanism for removing bad judges short of impeachment; a recall vote, perhaps, when a judge is shown to have overstepped his bounds. But of course that would require a Constitutional Amendment.
Aleander Hamilton argued a bad judge's rulings could simply be ignored, which was how he answered complaints about lifetime tenure of judges. Sadly nobody is willing to do that and horrible decisions are never annulled.
There needs to be some mechanism for removing bad judges short of impeachment; a recall vote, perhaps, when a judge is shown to have overstepped his bounds. But of course that would require a Constitutional Amendment.
Aleander Hamilton argued a bad judge's rulings could simply be ignored, which was how he answered complaints about lifetime tenure of judges. Sadly nobody is willing to do that and horrible decisions are never annulled.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at May 08, 2026 05:47 AM (oflqW)
24kb generated in CPU 0.0187, elapsed 0.2266 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2129 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2129 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
