October 05, 2025
How Biden Abused the TSA
Timothy Birdnow
What DID Biden do that wasn't tyrannical?
TSA abuse of no-fly lists was more Biden-era ‘quiet tyranny’
He abused average Americans at every turn.
BTW I opposed the creation of the TSA at the time for just this reason; it was ripe for abuse. And government workers never do a better job than private employees who can actually lose their jobs.
FTA:
What DID Biden do that wasn't tyrannical?
TSA abuse of no-fly lists was more Biden-era ‘quiet tyranny’
He abused average Americans at every turn.
BTW I opposed the creation of the TSA at the time for just this reason; it was ripe for abuse. And government workers never do a better job than private employees who can actually lose their jobs.
FTA:
It wasn’t just Tulsi Gabbard: The "quiet tyranny” under President Joe Biden saw no-fly lists used to punish countless average Americans.
Simply resisting mask mandates was enough to get19 Americans stuck on watchlists, more than half on no-fly lists, the Department of Homeland Security revealed Tuesday.
This would be demented atany time, but the targeting of non-maskers under Biden’s Transportation Security Administration chief David Pekoske was part of "Operation Freedom to Breathe” (such a sick name), which launched in September 2021 — long after the worst of the pandemic was over, and nearly six months after the CDC relaxed its rules on indoor masking.
So the Biden crew was penalizing Americans not for posing any danger to others, but for having the audacity to buck the regime’s obsessive micromanaging during COVID.
The
TSA put another 280 people on watchlists, and five on no-fly lists, for
alleged involvement in the Jan. 6 protests — on the basis of half-baked
"intelligence,” such that one no-fly designation hit a National
Guardsman who was deployed to DC for Biden’s inauguration
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:09 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 245 words, total size 2 kb.
October 04, 2025
WSJ: Hegseth Needs "Gravitas"!
Timothy Birdnow
Hey Wall Street Journal, we voted against this sort of weak-kneed RINO crap!
The Embarrassing Pete Hegseth
You guys are the embarassment. Hegseth is making the military great again.
Too bad you clowns didn't get the memo.
From the article:
A lot of people in the Trump administration think this is their moment and America’s last chance. They know what time it is, you don’t, it’s later in the game than you think, the damage is great and right now is the final hope of constructive national change. A sense of urgency is their central driving force.
But when people get into a "last chance” mindset, they become insensitive to, less mindful of and careful about, what they come to think of as "constitutional niceties.” When it is constitutional niceties—respecting the other branches’ authority, knowing the limits on your own, knowing what’s your lane and what the traffic will bear—that have kept us going since 1789, when the new government began functioning.
You can lose a republic while trying to save a republic. No matter what your level of idiocy, you don’t want that, you can’t want it, so you have to be careful. And serious.
When you are driven by a sense of urgency you must still try to act like a normal person—normal in your comportment, which means sober, judicious. Not like some pumped-up drama queen who makes everything more jarring and fevered, and who comes across as the living answer to the question, "What would it look like if Captain Queeg took Adderall?”
end more...
Hey Wall Street Journal, we voted against this sort of weak-kneed RINO crap!
The Embarrassing Pete Hegseth
You guys are the embarassment. Hegseth is making the military great again.
Too bad you clowns didn't get the memo.
From the article:
A lot of people in the Trump administration think this is their moment and America’s last chance. They know what time it is, you don’t, it’s later in the game than you think, the damage is great and right now is the final hope of constructive national change. A sense of urgency is their central driving force.
But when people get into a "last chance” mindset, they become insensitive to, less mindful of and careful about, what they come to think of as "constitutional niceties.” When it is constitutional niceties—respecting the other branches’ authority, knowing the limits on your own, knowing what’s your lane and what the traffic will bear—that have kept us going since 1789, when the new government began functioning.
You can lose a republic while trying to save a republic. No matter what your level of idiocy, you don’t want that, you can’t want it, so you have to be careful. And serious.
When you are driven by a sense of urgency you must still try to act like a normal person—normal in your comportment, which means sober, judicious. Not like some pumped-up drama queen who makes everything more jarring and fevered, and who comes across as the living answer to the question, "What would it look like if Captain Queeg took Adderall?”
end more...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:27 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1409 words, total size 9 kb.
Democrat Threats of Violence
Timothy Birdnow
Oh, it's not Democrats who are inciting violence!
Democrat AG Candidate Reportedly Said He'd Put Two Bullets in Republican State Rep's Headd, Piss on His Grave
Donald Trump is the one saying mean things!
I would call that a credible threat of violence; this Democrat should be charged with a felony or two.
Oh, it's not Democrats who are inciting violence!
Democrat AG Candidate Reportedly Said He'd Put Two Bullets in Republican State Rep's Headd, Piss on His Grave
Donald Trump is the one saying mean things!
I would call that a credible threat of violence; this Democrat should be charged with a felony or two.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:53 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
Sophie's Choice
Timothy Birdnow
The woman who showed up at Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home to kill him has been given just 8 years in prison.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh's would-be assassin sentenced to 8 years
The judge in the case credits the convicted felon - Sophie Roske - with turning herself/himself in. {S}he is also sentenced to lifetime probation after.
The article describes Roske as a man but with a woman's name. What does that tell us class?
There is no mention of who appointed the judge, -District Judge Deborah Boardman - which suggests it was either Joe Biden or Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmmmmmmmm!)
Prosecutors sought at minimum thirty years for the would-be assassin.
In eight years he can get out of prison and finish the job, in all likelihood.
At any rate we have yet another soft-on-crime judge letting someone off easy. Someone who made a dry run on a Supreme Court Justice.
Dry run indeed; I suspect this was a warning to the members of SCOTUS to send a message. The Left didn't want a martyr; they wanted to strike fear into the conservatives on the bench. A dry run is much more effective for that. And this person could then use mental disorder as a defense and provide an exculpatory surrender to the authorities. He'll be out in probably four years or less, and no doubt have a pile of cash waiting on the outside.
Has anyone interviewed Roske about possible connections? I suspect the FBI hasn't bothered. I do not trust anything in our political landscape anymore.
That is why prosecutors were seeking a thirty year sentence; they had to make it plain to the world that America would not tolerate assassination attempts. But then this soft-on-crime slime judge had different plans, apparently.
I get cutting his sentence a bit for cooperating, but by 22 years?
This whole thing stinks of a setup by the Left.
The woman who showed up at Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home to kill him has been given just 8 years in prison.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh's would-be assassin sentenced to 8 years
The judge in the case credits the convicted felon - Sophie Roske - with turning herself/himself in. {S}he is also sentenced to lifetime probation after.
The article describes Roske as a man but with a woman's name. What does that tell us class?
There is no mention of who appointed the judge, -District Judge Deborah Boardman - which suggests it was either Joe Biden or Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmmmmmmmm!)
Prosecutors sought at minimum thirty years for the would-be assassin.
In eight years he can get out of prison and finish the job, in all likelihood.
At any rate we have yet another soft-on-crime judge letting someone off easy. Someone who made a dry run on a Supreme Court Justice.
Dry run indeed; I suspect this was a warning to the members of SCOTUS to send a message. The Left didn't want a martyr; they wanted to strike fear into the conservatives on the bench. A dry run is much more effective for that. And this person could then use mental disorder as a defense and provide an exculpatory surrender to the authorities. He'll be out in probably four years or less, and no doubt have a pile of cash waiting on the outside.
Has anyone interviewed Roske about possible connections? I suspect the FBI hasn't bothered. I do not trust anything in our political landscape anymore.
That is why prosecutors were seeking a thirty year sentence; they had to make it plain to the world that America would not tolerate assassination attempts. But then this soft-on-crime slime judge had different plans, apparently.
I get cutting his sentence a bit for cooperating, but by 22 years?
This whole thing stinks of a setup by the Left.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:47 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 2 kb.
Canada's Days are Numbered
Timothy Birdnow
Alberta, Canada's western, oil rich province, may hold a pleibescite for independence and Donald Trump has promised to recognize an independent Alberta if they choose to leave the Soviet Republic of Canada.
https://thepatriotjournal.com/trump-admin-secede-canada/
While polls show such a plan going down in flames, the fact is Alberta's governor has extended the time to collect signatures and lowered the threshhold for signatures to put the measure on a ballot (from 600,000 to 177,000). Support for independence jumped from 25% to 36%, which is a sizable gain, although a loss of sixty percent would still be a bloodbath. But Brexit looked to be a lost cause until the votes were counted and Britain is now no longer officially a member of the European Union (although it's leaders simply refuseed to obey the will of the People and act as if they are still members.)Alberexit is being promoted by The Alberta Prosperity Project, a collection of businessmen and community groups.
Alberta is quite unhappy with the governance of the Liberal Party and Mark Carn-evil Carney. They believe they have more in common with Montana, or North Dakota, or even Texas, than with the people in Ontario or Quebec.
And Trump has promised to recognize their independence and perhaps even annex them if they so wish.
Alberta has suffered from the radical environmentalism of the Trudeau and Carney governments, and their standard of living has dorpped preciptiously thanks to draconian regulations on oil and gas drilling.
Canada as a nation never made all that much sense; it was simply territory the United States couldn't conqquer, and many Torys in the U.S. moved there after the American Revolution. It's primary identity is wrapped up in the idea it isn't the U.S. (which is why they elected Carney after Trump foolishly trolled them about annexation.) Their independence day is July 1, so it coincided with the American July 4, no other reason. They celebrate Thanksgiving in october instead of Novemember (an Americcan holiday) because of the cold,but sttill they borrowed our holiday. Their flag and their national anthem were designed by committees.
And they are two peoples, two cultures, united only by the fact they weren't Americans and were protected by the British. No other reason. They have no military heroes to speak of,and in fact they were livid when American forces accidentally bombed some of their troopos in Afghanistan, not because they lost people so much as because they were proud of not having lost anyone since WWII - what does that say about them? A military loses people or it's not fighting wars.
Canada is a nice, pleasant place with kind, overly polite people - a good place to live if you have no ambition. If you want more, try to make a business or live a bigger life, it's not the place for you. And God help you if you get sick and need specialized treatment!
Canada is French and Anglo. Two cultures generally do not get along well in one country, and the fact is Canada has always had a split personality. It's not a healthy union; obsessive politeness is one of their national attributes because they dare not speak their minds lest the whole thing fall apart. It's a bad marriage where the husband and wife pretend everything is great when they are seething underneath. Now Alberta is tired of the charade,as often happens in bad marriages.
I am not thrilled with annexing any part of canada; even the most conservative parts will probably wind up being purple states, nor red. And given the size of Alberta it would probably have to be broke up into several states. That could be good for us; we could wind up getting new Republican senators. But who knows? They could wind up being Democrats too. Certainly other Canadian provinces would.
Also, I rather like the existence of Canada. It's American in culture and language but not American. I like variety in life.
But I like the protection of the American Republic more, and if it is necessary to annex Alberta I say Welcome Aboard!
Any way you slice it I doubt the Dominion of Canada will last another hundred years; it has too little in common and is horribly mismanaged by the left which dominates the federal government. In the end it's not a stable country. And it is now overrun by illegal aliens and in time the character of Canada will change dramatically. Her days are numbered.
Alberta, Canada's western, oil rich province, may hold a pleibescite for independence and Donald Trump has promised to recognize an independent Alberta if they choose to leave the Soviet Republic of Canada.
https://thepatriotjournal.com/trump-admin-secede-canada/
While polls show such a plan going down in flames, the fact is Alberta's governor has extended the time to collect signatures and lowered the threshhold for signatures to put the measure on a ballot (from 600,000 to 177,000). Support for independence jumped from 25% to 36%, which is a sizable gain, although a loss of sixty percent would still be a bloodbath. But Brexit looked to be a lost cause until the votes were counted and Britain is now no longer officially a member of the European Union (although it's leaders simply refuseed to obey the will of the People and act as if they are still members.)Alberexit is being promoted by The Alberta Prosperity Project, a collection of businessmen and community groups.
Alberta is quite unhappy with the governance of the Liberal Party and Mark Carn-evil Carney. They believe they have more in common with Montana, or North Dakota, or even Texas, than with the people in Ontario or Quebec.
And Trump has promised to recognize their independence and perhaps even annex them if they so wish.
Alberta has suffered from the radical environmentalism of the Trudeau and Carney governments, and their standard of living has dorpped preciptiously thanks to draconian regulations on oil and gas drilling.
Canada as a nation never made all that much sense; it was simply territory the United States couldn't conqquer, and many Torys in the U.S. moved there after the American Revolution. It's primary identity is wrapped up in the idea it isn't the U.S. (which is why they elected Carney after Trump foolishly trolled them about annexation.) Their independence day is July 1, so it coincided with the American July 4, no other reason. They celebrate Thanksgiving in october instead of Novemember (an Americcan holiday) because of the cold,but sttill they borrowed our holiday. Their flag and their national anthem were designed by committees.
And they are two peoples, two cultures, united only by the fact they weren't Americans and were protected by the British. No other reason. They have no military heroes to speak of,and in fact they were livid when American forces accidentally bombed some of their troopos in Afghanistan, not because they lost people so much as because they were proud of not having lost anyone since WWII - what does that say about them? A military loses people or it's not fighting wars.
Canada is a nice, pleasant place with kind, overly polite people - a good place to live if you have no ambition. If you want more, try to make a business or live a bigger life, it's not the place for you. And God help you if you get sick and need specialized treatment!
Canada is French and Anglo. Two cultures generally do not get along well in one country, and the fact is Canada has always had a split personality. It's not a healthy union; obsessive politeness is one of their national attributes because they dare not speak their minds lest the whole thing fall apart. It's a bad marriage where the husband and wife pretend everything is great when they are seething underneath. Now Alberta is tired of the charade,as often happens in bad marriages.
I am not thrilled with annexing any part of canada; even the most conservative parts will probably wind up being purple states, nor red. And given the size of Alberta it would probably have to be broke up into several states. That could be good for us; we could wind up getting new Republican senators. But who knows? They could wind up being Democrats too. Certainly other Canadian provinces would.
Also, I rather like the existence of Canada. It's American in culture and language but not American. I like variety in life.
But I like the protection of the American Republic more, and if it is necessary to annex Alberta I say Welcome Aboard!
Any way you slice it I doubt the Dominion of Canada will last another hundred years; it has too little in common and is horribly mismanaged by the left which dominates the federal government. In the end it's not a stable country. And it is now overrun by illegal aliens and in time the character of Canada will change dramatically. Her days are numbered.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:17 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 750 words, total size 5 kb.
Wikipedia Gets Soros Money
Timothy Birdnow
We all suspected it to be true but now we know.
Shocker: Soros-Backed Tides Foundation Funding Wikipedia
Wikipedia is horribly biased and when a conservative tries to edit any wrongful information his edits are removed - even from top people in their field. S. Fred Singer used to complain bitterly about how his climate edits were simply removed, even though he was one of the most respected climatologists in America but he disagreeed with tha alarmist view. He didn't remove the alarmism from the article, just added some solid science.
And Wikipedia always comes up in the first position when doing a Google search. It's CROWD SOURCED which means it's hardly an authoritative study of facts, yet it is always at the top and the average person just looks at Wikipedia and nothing else. (I know my oldest brother does that.)
After reading about this Elon Musk deccided to launch Grokpedia, a competitor to Wikipedia. I doubt Google will give it a high rating, meaning few will see it.
Zero Hedge points out:
Yeah; a real reliable source of imformation!
The AI sources that are now available pull information heavily from Wikipedia and other Left-wing operations. Musk is simply trying to balance them out.
Control of information is the way the Left has risen to holding America and the world in thrall to their insane beliefs. They have power over information that the most despotic tyrants could only dream of, and they can control the thinking of the masses without a huge espionage state, but rather just by pretending they are independent entitites while all ships sail in the same direction. Wikipedia and Google are two cornerstones of that power.
God bless Elon Musk!
We all suspected it to be true but now we know.
Shocker: Soros-Backed Tides Foundation Funding Wikipedia
Wikipedia is horribly biased and when a conservative tries to edit any wrongful information his edits are removed - even from top people in their field. S. Fred Singer used to complain bitterly about how his climate edits were simply removed, even though he was one of the most respected climatologists in America but he disagreeed with tha alarmist view. He didn't remove the alarmism from the article, just added some solid science.
And Wikipedia always comes up in the first position when doing a Google search. It's CROWD SOURCED which means it's hardly an authoritative study of facts, yet it is always at the top and the average person just looks at Wikipedia and nothing else. (I know my oldest brother does that.)
After reading about this Elon Musk deccided to launch Grokpedia, a competitor to Wikipedia. I doubt Google will give it a high rating, meaning few will see it.
Zero Hedge points out:
Here are all of Wikipedia's "reliable source". They include
MSNBC
NYT
Huffpost
Reddit
Snopes
Politifact
Rolling Stone
The Atlantic
Propublica
NPR
GLAADhttps://t.co/WvT6oEn7ag https://t.co/GsmWnpEA15
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 30, 2025
MSNBC
NYT
Huffpost
Snopes
Politifact
Rolling Stone
The Atlantic
Propublica
NPR
GLAADhttps://t.co/WvT6oEn7ag https://t.co/GsmWnpEA15
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 30, 2025
Yeah; a real reliable source of imformation!
The AI sources that are now available pull information heavily from Wikipedia and other Left-wing operations. Musk is simply trying to balance them out.
Control of information is the way the Left has risen to holding America and the world in thrall to their insane beliefs. They have power over information that the most despotic tyrants could only dream of, and they can control the thinking of the masses without a huge espionage state, but rather just by pretending they are independent entitites while all ships sail in the same direction. Wikipedia and Google are two cornerstones of that power.
God bless Elon Musk!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:51 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 319 words, total size 2 kb.
Bud-liting Netflix
Timothy Birdnow
(Pointing finger and with a tone of haughty derision) HAHA!
Value of Netflix Plummets $15 BILLION Amid Boycott Calls Over Shows Sexualizing Children
Very good; companies that promote this stuff need to suffer, and dearly. Netflix has been on the vanguard of DEI and sexual deviancy for a long time now and deserves to die a horrible death from the slow strangulation of economic patriots. Money is what they crave and money is what they need to lose.
The Left has used boycotts and gaslighting campaigns against corporations they do not like for decades (going back to the boycott of Coors Beer back in the seventies and maybe before) and Conservatives have been reluctant to use the power of the purse to punish (try saying that ten times fast!) It was always a kind of moral issue; we didn't want to hurt people's livelihoods because of their beliefs, or the beliefs of their bosses. But now we are starting to push back in this fashion and are just beginning to realize our enormous power. There are a LOT more of us than of them, and they rely on leveraging power from investors, many of whom are unaware the companies they bought stock in are pulling this. Now by hurting the corporate bottom line we are waking up investors, and they are moving elsewhere, leaving these wokeratti corporations in ruins.
Good; high time!
FTA:
(Pointing finger and with a tone of haughty derision) HAHA!
Value of Netflix Plummets $15 BILLION Amid Boycott Calls Over Shows Sexualizing Children
Very good; companies that promote this stuff need to suffer, and dearly. Netflix has been on the vanguard of DEI and sexual deviancy for a long time now and deserves to die a horrible death from the slow strangulation of economic patriots. Money is what they crave and money is what they need to lose.
The Left has used boycotts and gaslighting campaigns against corporations they do not like for decades (going back to the boycott of Coors Beer back in the seventies and maybe before) and Conservatives have been reluctant to use the power of the purse to punish (try saying that ten times fast!) It was always a kind of moral issue; we didn't want to hurt people's livelihoods because of their beliefs, or the beliefs of their bosses. But now we are starting to push back in this fashion and are just beginning to realize our enormous power. There are a LOT more of us than of them, and they rely on leveraging power from investors, many of whom are unaware the companies they bought stock in are pulling this. Now by hurting the corporate bottom line we are waking up investors, and they are moving elsewhere, leaving these wokeratti corporations in ruins.
Good; high time!
FTA:
"Netflix is in free fall,” the report said, "The streaming giant lost more than $15 billion in market value in just one week, according to Forbes, after Tesla CEO and X owner Elon Musk urged his 227 million followers to cancel their subscriptions ‘for the health of your kids.’”
Musk had been triggered by a Netflix cartoon called "Dead End: Paranormal Park,” which promotes transgenderism and bisexualism for children.
It was marketed to children as young as seven.
Finally, a Faith-Based, America-First Wealth Manager With No Allegiance to Wall Street, ESG, or DEI Agendas.
The X account Libs of TikTok had cited the offending materials: "Meet Hamish Steele, creator of a kid’s show on @netflix which teaches kids they can be transgender. After Charlie [Kirk] was ass*ssinated, he called Charlie a nazi and had a meltdown because people were mourning him. Netflix is SILENT. Their silence is deafening. CANCEL NETFLIX,”
The Netflix stock fell 2.4% over the week, even as Dow Jones Industrials were climbing.
Newsmax reported, "Musk’s boycott calls thus far have made a small dent in an otherwise strong year for Netflix’s stock and revenues. Shares are up 30% since January, when they traded around $886. In its July earnings report, the company posted a 16% year-over-year revenue increase to $11 billion, while net profit jumped 46% to $3.1 billion. Netflix also raised subscription prices by at least $1 across all plans at the start of the year.”
fin
Musk had been triggered by a Netflix cartoon called "Dead End: Paranormal Park,” which promotes transgenderism and bisexualism for children.
It was marketed to children as young as seven.
Finally, a Faith-Based, America-First Wealth Manager With No Allegiance to Wall Street, ESG, or DEI Agendas.
The X account Libs of TikTok had cited the offending materials: "Meet Hamish Steele, creator of a kid’s show on @netflix which teaches kids they can be transgender. After Charlie [Kirk] was ass*ssinated, he called Charlie a nazi and had a meltdown because people were mourning him. Netflix is SILENT. Their silence is deafening. CANCEL NETFLIX,”
The Netflix stock fell 2.4% over the week, even as Dow Jones Industrials were climbing.
Newsmax reported, "Musk’s boycott calls thus far have made a small dent in an otherwise strong year for Netflix’s stock and revenues. Shares are up 30% since January, when they traded around $886. In its July earnings report, the company posted a 16% year-over-year revenue increase to $11 billion, while net profit jumped 46% to $3.1 billion. Netflix also raised subscription prices by at least $1 across all plans at the start of the year.”
fin
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 477 words, total size 3 kb.
October 03, 2025
Chevron Refinery Burning
Timothy Birdnow
Color me skeptical. I am very suspicious about this fire.
Firefighters battle large blaze at Chevron refinery in Southern California
I strongly suspect it could be an act of environmental terrorism. We know there were arsonists involved in the Pallisades fire, for instance, and in fact with others in the Golden Shower State.
This was one of the last remaining oil refineries in California.
L.A. Mayor karen Bass did make a comment after they tracked her down to Camaroon or some such place. She blamed the fire on a lack of transgendered workers at the factory.
Color me skeptical. I am very suspicious about this fire.
Firefighters battle large blaze at Chevron refinery in Southern California
I strongly suspect it could be an act of environmental terrorism. We know there were arsonists involved in the Pallisades fire, for instance, and in fact with others in the Golden Shower State.
This was one of the last remaining oil refineries in California.
L.A. Mayor karen Bass did make a comment after they tracked her down to Camaroon or some such place. She blamed the fire on a lack of transgendered workers at the factory.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:40 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
Comeback Cori
Timothy Birdnow
This should be jolly fun!
Corey Bush Atttempts Comeback in Congress
She is one of the dumbest people you will ever meet and should she win (not impossible in her ghetto district) she will present a wonderfully idiotic face for the ever-shrinking Democrats.
BTW she won't be replacing a MAGA man,but another idiot Democrat (sorry for the redundancy). It will just be a lateral move.
The truly stupid are too dumb do realize how stupid they are. It's like being an alcoholic; everyone around you knows before you realize it. Bush is so brainless she probably thinks she's a genius.
It'd be fun to have her back in the saddle; we need comedy relief.
BTW she has no chance of unseating Wesley Bell in a primary. Bell is not as crazy as Bush and is a heckuva lot better looking. He's an idiot liberal (but I repeat myself) but not as crazy as Corey. Good luck with that.
This should be jolly fun!
Corey Bush Atttempts Comeback in Congress
She is one of the dumbest people you will ever meet and should she win (not impossible in her ghetto district) she will present a wonderfully idiotic face for the ever-shrinking Democrats.
BTW she won't be replacing a MAGA man,but another idiot Democrat (sorry for the redundancy). It will just be a lateral move.
The truly stupid are too dumb do realize how stupid they are. It's like being an alcoholic; everyone around you knows before you realize it. Bush is so brainless she probably thinks she's a genius.
It'd be fun to have her back in the saddle; we need comedy relief.
BTW she has no chance of unseating Wesley Bell in a primary. Bell is not as crazy as Bush and is a heckuva lot better looking. He's an idiot liberal (but I repeat myself) but not as crazy as Corey. Good luck with that.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:23 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
The Going Global Warming Grift
Timothy Birdnow
We are winning!
Joe Nova observes:
Deniers are everywhere. The race is on to be a skeptic now — Kemi Badenoch vows to repeal Climate Change Act
FTTA:
Science has started overtaking the false narrative and so many things have come to light the Gang Green cannot put those genii back in their bottles. Meanwhile the public has come to realize that, after forty five plus years, the media and science establishment has been lying to us all along. So many failed predictions. So many doomsday scenarios, and none have come to fruition. Furthermore, the ruling class has not lived at all as if this were a crisis, buying beachfront property and continuing to fly in their private jets and whatnot. It has become clear climate change is a scam, a con, a grift. Oh, maybe there has been some climate warming over the last few decades, but there is no evidence that was in any way a result of industrial emissions and that we need to end human civilization as we know it to fight this "problem". In fact, fewer people have starved as the planet has supposedly become too warm. The only reason for a very modest rise in hunger is because of the Covid lockdowns which disrupted the food chain (as I predicted it would.)
The fact is everything remains pretty much the same, exactly as the father of global warming theory, Roger Revelle, said it would. Ravelle thought a modest warming would happen a curiosity more than anything. He was right and the doomsdayers wrong.
The Europeans have long pushed for these climate change accords because it is a tool to restrict their primary competitor - the United States. They thought to seduce our leaders into tying our hands heind our backs. It almost worked too. But Trump has shown what the Bible means when it says "I will destroy them with the sword of my mouth and the brightness of my coming". It just took one important person to stand up and say "NO!"
We know the Russians were promoting this, and green energy, in the west so they could wind up with the only fuel the Europeans could purchase when it failed. Ditto the Chinese.
It was a kind of madness, like dancing sickness or the tulip bulb craze; everyone rushing to the cliff's edge because everyone else was so rushing.
I've long compared it to Orson Wells' War of the Worlds show/hoax. Only Wells' version lasted just a day or so while the climate grif has gone on for a full generation. But in the end there wre no Martians and there are no doomsdays caused by plant fertilizer.
People are FINALLY starting to wake up to that fact. I would say the Covid con was what finally led people to start questioning what "experts" were telling them and look into the matter. They started using that squishy gray think at the top of their necks and found the conventional wisdom was sorely lacking.
Of course the Left dare not give this up; it is too lucrative and gives them too much of what they have sought. There was immense power and profit for them in it and it will be hard to find another scheme with so much promise. So they will keep trying to resurrect it.
We have to be there to stop them.
This was never about science but power and control and money, and in the utopian vision of the anointed to create a new world order, one without private enterprise or borders or religion. That's what it has always been about.
We are winning!
Joe Nova observes:
Deniers are everywhere. The race is on to be a skeptic now — Kemi Badenoch vows to repeal Climate Change Act
FTTA:
Sir Kier Starmer was a star at the last COP meeting in Azerbaijan, but this year he doesn’t even want to go to the next COP meeting in Brazil. Apparently his aides "are worried about being criticized by the Reform UK party.” Only two years ago Starmer was criticizing Rishi Sunak for missing COP27, now he’s too scared to go himself lest he look crazy-green.
Everywhere countries are saying they care about climate change but are doing the opposite. The EU nations are fighting over their 2035 and 2040 emissions targets, Mexico is borrowing up to keep its oil company afloat, Canada scrapped their carbon tax, and is being "coy” about their 2030 target. Governor Gavin Newsom just boosted oil drilling in California "a year after he described the industry as the "polluted heart of this climate crisis.”
Everywhere countries are saying they care about climate change but are doing the opposite. The EU nations are fighting over their 2035 and 2040 emissions targets, Mexico is borrowing up to keep its oil company afloat, Canada scrapped their carbon tax, and is being "coy” about their 2030 target. Governor Gavin Newsom just boosted oil drilling in California "a year after he described the industry as the "polluted heart of this climate crisis.”
Science has started overtaking the false narrative and so many things have come to light the Gang Green cannot put those genii back in their bottles. Meanwhile the public has come to realize that, after forty five plus years, the media and science establishment has been lying to us all along. So many failed predictions. So many doomsday scenarios, and none have come to fruition. Furthermore, the ruling class has not lived at all as if this were a crisis, buying beachfront property and continuing to fly in their private jets and whatnot. It has become clear climate change is a scam, a con, a grift. Oh, maybe there has been some climate warming over the last few decades, but there is no evidence that was in any way a result of industrial emissions and that we need to end human civilization as we know it to fight this "problem". In fact, fewer people have starved as the planet has supposedly become too warm. The only reason for a very modest rise in hunger is because of the Covid lockdowns which disrupted the food chain (as I predicted it would.)
The fact is everything remains pretty much the same, exactly as the father of global warming theory, Roger Revelle, said it would. Ravelle thought a modest warming would happen a curiosity more than anything. He was right and the doomsdayers wrong.
The Europeans have long pushed for these climate change accords because it is a tool to restrict their primary competitor - the United States. They thought to seduce our leaders into tying our hands heind our backs. It almost worked too. But Trump has shown what the Bible means when it says "I will destroy them with the sword of my mouth and the brightness of my coming". It just took one important person to stand up and say "NO!"
We know the Russians were promoting this, and green energy, in the west so they could wind up with the only fuel the Europeans could purchase when it failed. Ditto the Chinese.
It was a kind of madness, like dancing sickness or the tulip bulb craze; everyone rushing to the cliff's edge because everyone else was so rushing.
I've long compared it to Orson Wells' War of the Worlds show/hoax. Only Wells' version lasted just a day or so while the climate grif has gone on for a full generation. But in the end there wre no Martians and there are no doomsdays caused by plant fertilizer.
People are FINALLY starting to wake up to that fact. I would say the Covid con was what finally led people to start questioning what "experts" were telling them and look into the matter. They started using that squishy gray think at the top of their necks and found the conventional wisdom was sorely lacking.
Of course the Left dare not give this up; it is too lucrative and gives them too much of what they have sought. There was immense power and profit for them in it and it will be hard to find another scheme with so much promise. So they will keep trying to resurrect it.
We have to be there to stop them.
This was never about science but power and control and money, and in the utopian vision of the anointed to create a new world order, one without private enterprise or borders or religion. That's what it has always been about.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 748 words, total size 5 kb.
Climate Crisis Crackup
Timothy Birdnow
We are winning!
Joe Nova observes:
Deniers are everywhere. The race is on to be a skeptic now — Kemi Badenoch vows to repeal Climate Change Act
FTTA:
Science has started overtaking the false narrative and so many things have come to light the Gang Green cannot put those genii back in their bottles. Meanwhile the public has come to realize that, after forty five plus years, the media and science establishment has been lying to us all along. So many failed predictions. So many doomsday scenarios, and none have come to fruition. Furthermore, the ruling class has not lived at all as if this were a crisis, buying beachfront property and continuing to fly in their private jets and whatnot. It has become clear climate change is a scam, a con, a grift. Oh, maybe there has been some climate warming over the last few decades, but there is no evidence that was in any way a result of industrial emissions and that we need to end human civilization as we know it to fight this "problem". In fact, fewer people have starved as the planet has supposedly become too warm. The only reason for a very modest rise in hunger is because of the Covid lockdowns which disrupted the food chain (as I predicted it would.)
The fact is everything remains pretty much the same, exactly as the father of global warming theory, Roger Revelle, said it would. Ravelle thought a modest warming would happen a curiosity more than anything. He was right and the doomsdayers wrong.
The Europeans have long pushed for these climate change accords because it is a tool to restrict their primary competitor - the United States. They thought to seduce our leaders into tying our hands heind our backs. It almost worked too. But Trump has shown what the Bible means when it says "I will destroy them with the sword of my mouth and the brightness of my coming". It just took one important person to stand up and say "NO!"
We know the Russians were promoting this, and green energy, in the West so they could wind up with the only fuel the Europeans could purchase when it failed. Ditto the Chinese.
It was a kind of madness, like dancing sickness or the tulip bulb craze; everyone rushing to the cliff's edge because everyone else was so rushing.
I've long compared it to Orson Wells' War of the Worlds show/hoax. Only Wells' version lasted just a day or so while the climate grif has gone on for a full generation. But in the end there wre no Martians and there are no doomsdays caused by plant fertilizer.
People are FINALLY starting to wake up to that fact. I would say the Covid con was what finally led people to start questioning what "experts" were telling them and look into the matter. They started using that squishy gray think at the top of their necks and found the conventional wisdom was sorely lacking.
Of course the Left dare not give this up; it is too lucrative and gives them too much of what they have sought. There was immense power and profit for them in it and it will be hard to find another scheme with so much promise. So they will keep trying to resurrect it.
We have to be there to stop them.
This was never about science but power and control and money, and in the utopian vision of the anointed to create a new world order, one without private enterprise or borders or religion. That's what it has always been about.
We are winning!
Joe Nova observes:
Deniers are everywhere. The race is on to be a skeptic now — Kemi Badenoch vows to repeal Climate Change Act
FTTA:
Sir Kier Starmer was a star at the last COP meeting in Azerbaijan, but this year he doesn’t even want to go to the next COP meeting in Brazil. Apparently his aides "are worried about being criticized by the Reform UK party.” Only two years ago Starmer was criticizing Rishi Sunak for missing COP27, now he’s too scared to go himself lest he look crazy-green.
Everywhere countries are saying they care about climate change but are doing the opposite. The EU nations are fighting over their 2035 and 2040 emissions targets, Mexico is borrowing up to keep its oil company afloat, Canada scrapped their carbon tax, and is being "coy” about their 2030 target. Governor Gavin Newsom just boosted oil drilling in California "a year after he described the industry as the "polluted heart of this climate crisis.”
Everywhere countries are saying they care about climate change but are doing the opposite. The EU nations are fighting over their 2035 and 2040 emissions targets, Mexico is borrowing up to keep its oil company afloat, Canada scrapped their carbon tax, and is being "coy” about their 2030 target. Governor Gavin Newsom just boosted oil drilling in California "a year after he described the industry as the "polluted heart of this climate crisis.”
Science has started overtaking the false narrative and so many things have come to light the Gang Green cannot put those genii back in their bottles. Meanwhile the public has come to realize that, after forty five plus years, the media and science establishment has been lying to us all along. So many failed predictions. So many doomsday scenarios, and none have come to fruition. Furthermore, the ruling class has not lived at all as if this were a crisis, buying beachfront property and continuing to fly in their private jets and whatnot. It has become clear climate change is a scam, a con, a grift. Oh, maybe there has been some climate warming over the last few decades, but there is no evidence that was in any way a result of industrial emissions and that we need to end human civilization as we know it to fight this "problem". In fact, fewer people have starved as the planet has supposedly become too warm. The only reason for a very modest rise in hunger is because of the Covid lockdowns which disrupted the food chain (as I predicted it would.)
The fact is everything remains pretty much the same, exactly as the father of global warming theory, Roger Revelle, said it would. Ravelle thought a modest warming would happen a curiosity more than anything. He was right and the doomsdayers wrong.
The Europeans have long pushed for these climate change accords because it is a tool to restrict their primary competitor - the United States. They thought to seduce our leaders into tying our hands heind our backs. It almost worked too. But Trump has shown what the Bible means when it says "I will destroy them with the sword of my mouth and the brightness of my coming". It just took one important person to stand up and say "NO!"
We know the Russians were promoting this, and green energy, in the West so they could wind up with the only fuel the Europeans could purchase when it failed. Ditto the Chinese.
It was a kind of madness, like dancing sickness or the tulip bulb craze; everyone rushing to the cliff's edge because everyone else was so rushing.
I've long compared it to Orson Wells' War of the Worlds show/hoax. Only Wells' version lasted just a day or so while the climate grif has gone on for a full generation. But in the end there wre no Martians and there are no doomsdays caused by plant fertilizer.
People are FINALLY starting to wake up to that fact. I would say the Covid con was what finally led people to start questioning what "experts" were telling them and look into the matter. They started using that squishy gray think at the top of their necks and found the conventional wisdom was sorely lacking.
Of course the Left dare not give this up; it is too lucrative and gives them too much of what they have sought. There was immense power and profit for them in it and it will be hard to find another scheme with so much promise. So they will keep trying to resurrect it.
We have to be there to stop them.
This was never about science but power and control and money, and in the utopian vision of the anointed to create a new world order, one without private enterprise or borders or religion. That's what it has always been about.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 746 words, total size 5 kb.
Leo Does the TDS Twostep
Timothy Birdnow
More stupidity from our Barack Obama Pontiff.
Pope Leo's comments on 'inhuman treatment of immigrants' in U.S. offend some conservatives
What, disapproving of abortion isn't pro-life? Opposing euthanasia isn't pro-life? Wanting people to labor for themselves and make their own lives in dignity isn't pro-life? (The Bible says, not Donald Trump, that he who will not work shall not eat.)
What is the "inhamane treatment" that makes Trump not pro-life?
FTA:
Sooo...the Catholic Church, which condemns abortion as an act of murder, wants to honor one of the principle backers of murder and Leo is o.k. with that.
This is rather like the Bishop of, say, Berlin wanting to honor Joseph Mengele. Oh, he was pro-life because his research was going to help sick people!
Leo's statement is an enormous non-sequiter; the topics he jumbled together here are completely different and the argument can and must be made that they are in no way similar. The death penalty is quite Biblical.
Take for example:
I could go on but you get the point.
Scripture says the King aka government has "the power of the sword" to "punish evildoers". There is no debate about it; God Himself commands we occasionally use the power of execution. It's His job to sort it all out at that point.
So how does support for the death penalty equate to being not pro-life? God Himself commanded the death penalty; the Israelites didn't just make it up themselves.
And of course Pope Francis, er, Leo knows full well that there has been no formal condemnation of capital punishment by the Church and the matter is still open for debate. Read this for the Catholic arguments for capital punishment. The Magisterium has not formally condemned it, nor has any of Leo's predecessors. Yes, some former Popes have rejected it, but that is their personal opinion and in no way binds Catholics.
Meanwhile all Popes have rejected abortion. Pope Benedict XIV gave it the Church's highest condemnation in In his encyclical Deus Caritas Est (2005)
And I ask you who is pro-life? Is it pro-life to let killers wander loose to kill again? Was it pro-life to let that guy loose who killed that Ukrainian girl on the subway? When evaluating life one must weigh ultimate harm against innocents verses the compromised "right to life" that the criminal enjoys. And there are some crimes that are for God to decide; we can only act pragmatically.
Would Leo have supported letting Hitler off? Stalin? Mao? Pol Pot? If not why not?
In fact both justice and human dignity require the death penalty on occasion. Otherwise we are spitting in God's face, saying we know better than does He.
As for his ridiculous comparison between controlling our borders and abortion, I give you this passage from the Bible:
Now Jesus was speaking about the Kingdom of Heaven and He Himself was the door, but Bible passages often have more than one meaning and I think this statement illustrates perfectly the moral problem with illegal immigration; it is a climbing in another way. Jesus was quite clear in calling such people "thief and robber". Illegal immigrants are thieves and robbers and that is a fact. The come to steal jobs, steal social services, steal taxpayer money in other ways, and especially in these latter days have done so with no intention of actually becoming Americans but rather in milking America for what they can get. Much of the Mexican economy, for instance, is predicated on remittances from their citizens from the U.S.
Why bother reforming your economy when you can just steal from your neighbor? You can play with socialism and the other stupidity and never pay the price.
The Bible has always made it plain that nations are supposed to exist, going back to God's breaking up the empire of Nimrod and his babbling tower. Israel was supposed to subsume the nations of Canaan, but only if they accepted Judaism. They were supposed to be tolerant of foreigners (because it was their job to spread worship of God) but they were never commanded to change their laws and ways for them. That is what the illegal immigration has done to America (and does to most nations if too many immigrants come.) Israel was condemned by God for allowing aliens to influence their culture to the point He twice uprooted the whole lott of them. Much of the apostacy suffered by Israel in those days was because they were taking in too many aliens as they conquered parts of the Holy Land.
And how is asking these people to just go home inhuman treatment? Did we do what other nations do to such peoples? Mexico's laws are far stricter than our own and these folks would have been evicted in short order if they hadn't been migrating to the U.S. (which Mexico wanted them to do as part of the "reconquista".) These people were fed, given new clothes, decent housing (shoot; in New York City and in California they were living in luxury hotels where native born Americans couldn't afford to visit), were treated with respect.
So ICE has started rounding up criminal illegals, people who have done bad things back home and here in the States, and Leo gets his cassock in a bunch.
Governments are supposed to protect the innocents from crime. It's one of their primary reasons for existing. Letting people suffer from the vile acts of evildoers is what is inhumane.
We have treated the illegals as humanely as any people in history ever did. I dare him to visit an ICE detention camp and prove me wrong! But like all liberals he just spouts easy words that support his worldview without any actual facts to back it up.
(BTW Leo is allegedly a devotee of St. Augustine and claims to be heavily influenced by him. I've read Augustine in no small measure and can attest to the fact Auggie is diametrically opposed to much of this Progressive stupidity espoused by Leo and his bestie Francis. Just one example is Augustine's theory of just war, which is applicable to U.S. immigration policy today.)
Leo said:
Well, these immigrants bsed THEIR decisions on economics in the first place so naturally it's an issue. They are here to clean up where they lacked the opportunity back home. But what happens when a large swath of a country leaves? How is anything fixed there? That is just passing the problem along to us, outsourcing it. In fact it is a gentle invasion of America, one designed to ease problems in the Third World but to overwhelm the American system. Read the work of Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven if you want to understand this left-wing policy and how it applies to immigration. They taught radicals to overwhelm the system to destroy it and usher in the era of socialism and Godlessness. Leo seems not to understand any of this.
"Human dignity" is a fungible term that can mean anything. It can be argued that a man wearing a little girl's dress and holding a lollipop must be treated the same way we would treat anyone else because of "human dignity" even though that person, through mental illness or whatever, has rejected human dignity themselves. But economics are hard facts and they cannot be ignored. I would argue we have treated illegal aliens with enormous amounts of human dignity. Other countries would have thrown them in horrible prisons until they could be kicked out.
The article continues:
There is nothing "complex" about the issue of illegal immigration; we have people openly breaking our laws and that for their own economic benefit. We take in more immigrants than any nation in history since perhaps the Barbarian Invasions of Rome (and they came in peacefully, not militarily in most cases.) We are being overrun; there are at least 20 million illegals in this country and probably more. We have sixty million aliens here - legal and illegal - and that is comfortably more than the population of Canada and over double that of Australia. We have a duty to our own citizens to stop the flood of aliens into this country - legal and illegal. Our nation cannot survive this deluge and even a dimwit should be able to see that. America has done great good in the world and deserves to survive; doing what you believe is a kind thing at the expense of your own life is not required of Christians. It especially isn't required for the wrong cause.
We have no divine order to commit national suicide.
So this Pope buys a few attaboys from the liberal press at great cost to his home country and to the world at large. Remember your Dante' your Eminence; Antenora is the place for traitors to kin and country.
Oh, and Leo isn't "preching the word" but rather his own opinion and the opinoin of his friends and benefactors. He would have kept his mouth shut on this subject if he were.
The article continues:
Bullshit. Pope Benedict issued the highest injunction against abortion, which is the conscious, willful murder of an innocent. In his papal bull he said it had the Church's highest condemnation, making it fall just barely short of a ruling ex-cathedra (infallible). Immigration is not a settled matter in the Church nor is it anywhere near as clear. Many aliens are criminals and we have been forced to round up such before they kill people (as so many have now done).
(The last ex-cathedra ruling by a Pope was in 1959 when the Church ruled Mary was bodily assumed into Heaven.)
Leo has simply made a fool of himself here. He shows he is more interested in friendship with the world then in actually fighting for justice. There is no justice in promoting an invasion of a country out of some misplaced idea of the poor. If we want to help the poor we first stop enabling their governments. Caring for the poor does not mean forcing people to wander the Earth for money, and sending their children with molesters to be sold in the skin trade or work as slaves.
Leo won't care about any of this; his is an easy, virtue signaling Christianity, just like Pope Francis. These are very serious times that call for a serious Pontiff. Instead we have Pauley Shore.
God is punishing Mankind by allowing these two lousy Popes to impose their errors. We need to ask God to forgive us and pray for Leo, that he may be granted wisdom by the Lord.
More stupidity from our Barack Obama Pontiff.
Pope Leo's comments on 'inhuman treatment of immigrants' in U.S. offend some conservatives
What, disapproving of abortion isn't pro-life? Opposing euthanasia isn't pro-life? Wanting people to labor for themselves and make their own lives in dignity isn't pro-life? (The Bible says, not Donald Trump, that he who will not work shall not eat.)
What is the "inhamane treatment" that makes Trump not pro-life?
FTA:
Leo, a Chicago native, was asked about plans by Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich to give a lifetime achievement award to Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin for his work helping immigrants. The plans drew objections from some conservative U.S. bishops opposed to abortion, given that Durbin is a pro-choice Democrat.
Leo said he wasn't familiar with the specific initiative, but that the "overall work" of the senator could be considered as it "related to the teachings of the Church."
"Someone who says I'm against abortion but is in favour of the death penalty is not really pro-life," Leo told reporters on Tuesday. "Someone who says I'm against abortion but I'm in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don't know if that's pro-life.
Leo said he wasn't familiar with the specific initiative, but that the "overall work" of the senator could be considered as it "related to the teachings of the Church."
"Someone who says I'm against abortion but is in favour of the death penalty is not really pro-life," Leo told reporters on Tuesday. "Someone who says I'm against abortion but I'm in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I don't know if that's pro-life.
Sooo...the Catholic Church, which condemns abortion as an act of murder, wants to honor one of the principle backers of murder and Leo is o.k. with that.
This is rather like the Bishop of, say, Berlin wanting to honor Joseph Mengele. Oh, he was pro-life because his research was going to help sick people!
Leo's statement is an enormous non-sequiter; the topics he jumbled together here are completely different and the argument can and must be made that they are in no way similar. The death penalty is quite Biblical.
Take for example:
Leviticus 20:8
10 " ‘If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death.
Leviticus 20:8
13 " ‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
Exodus 21:12
12 "Anyone who strikes a person with a fatal blow is to be put to death.
Exodus 21:16
16 "Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession.
Exodus 22:19
19 "Anyone who has sexual relations with an animal is to be put to death.
Exodus 21:17
17 "Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.
Genesis 9:6
6 "Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind.
Romans 13:1-7
4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
Matthew 5:17
17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Leviticus 21:9
9 " ‘If a priest’s daughter defiles herself by becoming a prostitute, she disgraces her father; she must be burned in the fire.
10 " ‘If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death.
Leviticus 20:8
13 " ‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
Exodus 21:12
12 "Anyone who strikes a person with a fatal blow is to be put to death.
Exodus 21:16
16 "Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession.
Exodus 22:19
19 "Anyone who has sexual relations with an animal is to be put to death.
Exodus 21:17
17 "Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.
Genesis 9:6
6 "Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind.
Romans 13:1-7
4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
Matthew 5:17
17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Leviticus 21:9
9 " ‘If a priest’s daughter defiles herself by becoming a prostitute, she disgraces her father; she must be burned in the fire.
I could go on but you get the point.
Scripture says the King aka government has "the power of the sword" to "punish evildoers". There is no debate about it; God Himself commands we occasionally use the power of execution. It's His job to sort it all out at that point.
So how does support for the death penalty equate to being not pro-life? God Himself commanded the death penalty; the Israelites didn't just make it up themselves.
And of course Pope Francis, er, Leo knows full well that there has been no formal condemnation of capital punishment by the Church and the matter is still open for debate. Read this for the Catholic arguments for capital punishment. The Magisterium has not formally condemned it, nor has any of Leo's predecessors. Yes, some former Popes have rejected it, but that is their personal opinion and in no way binds Catholics.
Meanwhile all Popes have rejected abortion. Pope Benedict XIV gave it the Church's highest condemnation in In his encyclical Deus Caritas Est (2005)
And I ask you who is pro-life? Is it pro-life to let killers wander loose to kill again? Was it pro-life to let that guy loose who killed that Ukrainian girl on the subway? When evaluating life one must weigh ultimate harm against innocents verses the compromised "right to life" that the criminal enjoys. And there are some crimes that are for God to decide; we can only act pragmatically.
Would Leo have supported letting Hitler off? Stalin? Mao? Pol Pot? If not why not?
In fact both justice and human dignity require the death penalty on occasion. Otherwise we are spitting in God's face, saying we know better than does He.
As for his ridiculous comparison between controlling our borders and abortion, I give you this passage from the Bible:
John 10:1
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber."
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber."
Now Jesus was speaking about the Kingdom of Heaven and He Himself was the door, but Bible passages often have more than one meaning and I think this statement illustrates perfectly the moral problem with illegal immigration; it is a climbing in another way. Jesus was quite clear in calling such people "thief and robber". Illegal immigrants are thieves and robbers and that is a fact. The come to steal jobs, steal social services, steal taxpayer money in other ways, and especially in these latter days have done so with no intention of actually becoming Americans but rather in milking America for what they can get. Much of the Mexican economy, for instance, is predicated on remittances from their citizens from the U.S.
Why bother reforming your economy when you can just steal from your neighbor? You can play with socialism and the other stupidity and never pay the price.
The Bible has always made it plain that nations are supposed to exist, going back to God's breaking up the empire of Nimrod and his babbling tower. Israel was supposed to subsume the nations of Canaan, but only if they accepted Judaism. They were supposed to be tolerant of foreigners (because it was their job to spread worship of God) but they were never commanded to change their laws and ways for them. That is what the illegal immigration has done to America (and does to most nations if too many immigrants come.) Israel was condemned by God for allowing aliens to influence their culture to the point He twice uprooted the whole lott of them. Much of the apostacy suffered by Israel in those days was because they were taking in too many aliens as they conquered parts of the Holy Land.
And how is asking these people to just go home inhuman treatment? Did we do what other nations do to such peoples? Mexico's laws are far stricter than our own and these folks would have been evicted in short order if they hadn't been migrating to the U.S. (which Mexico wanted them to do as part of the "reconquista".) These people were fed, given new clothes, decent housing (shoot; in New York City and in California they were living in luxury hotels where native born Americans couldn't afford to visit), were treated with respect.
So ICE has started rounding up criminal illegals, people who have done bad things back home and here in the States, and Leo gets his cassock in a bunch.
Governments are supposed to protect the innocents from crime. It's one of their primary reasons for existing. Letting people suffer from the vile acts of evildoers is what is inhumane.
We have treated the illegals as humanely as any people in history ever did. I dare him to visit an ICE detention camp and prove me wrong! But like all liberals he just spouts easy words that support his worldview without any actual facts to back it up.
(BTW Leo is allegedly a devotee of St. Augustine and claims to be heavily influenced by him. I've read Augustine in no small measure and can attest to the fact Auggie is diametrically opposed to much of this Progressive stupidity espoused by Leo and his bestie Francis. Just one example is Augustine's theory of just war, which is applicable to U.S. immigration policy today.)
Leo said:
"sometimes decisions are made more based on economics than on human dignity" in the U.S.
Well, these immigrants bsed THEIR decisions on economics in the first place so naturally it's an issue. They are here to clean up where they lacked the opportunity back home. But what happens when a large swath of a country leaves? How is anything fixed there? That is just passing the problem along to us, outsourcing it. In fact it is a gentle invasion of America, one designed to ease problems in the Third World but to overwhelm the American system. Read the work of Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven if you want to understand this left-wing policy and how it applies to immigration. They taught radicals to overwhelm the system to destroy it and usher in the era of socialism and Godlessness. Leo seems not to understand any of this.
"Human dignity" is a fungible term that can mean anything. It can be argued that a man wearing a little girl's dress and holding a lollipop must be treated the same way we would treat anyone else because of "human dignity" even though that person, through mental illness or whatever, has rejected human dignity themselves. But economics are hard facts and they cannot be ignored. I would argue we have treated illegal aliens with enormous amounts of human dignity. Other countries would have thrown them in horrible prisons until they could be kicked out.
The article continues:
Canadian Cardinal Michael Czerny, a senior adviser to both Francis and Leo, said the new pope was following an instruction given by St. Paul, a first-century leader of Christianity: "Preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season."
"[Leo] encourages and challenges each local Church and each Christian, faced with complex and urgent issues, to live the Gospel," Czerny told Reuters.
"[Leo] encourages and challenges each local Church and each Christian, faced with complex and urgent issues, to live the Gospel," Czerny told Reuters.
There is nothing "complex" about the issue of illegal immigration; we have people openly breaking our laws and that for their own economic benefit. We take in more immigrants than any nation in history since perhaps the Barbarian Invasions of Rome (and they came in peacefully, not militarily in most cases.) We are being overrun; there are at least 20 million illegals in this country and probably more. We have sixty million aliens here - legal and illegal - and that is comfortably more than the population of Canada and over double that of Australia. We have a duty to our own citizens to stop the flood of aliens into this country - legal and illegal. Our nation cannot survive this deluge and even a dimwit should be able to see that. America has done great good in the world and deserves to survive; doing what you believe is a kind thing at the expense of your own life is not required of Christians. It especially isn't required for the wrong cause.
We have no divine order to commit national suicide.
So this Pope buys a few attaboys from the liberal press at great cost to his home country and to the world at large. Remember your Dante' your Eminence; Antenora is the place for traitors to kin and country.
Oh, and Leo isn't "preching the word" but rather his own opinion and the opinoin of his friends and benefactors. He would have kept his mouth shut on this subject if he were.
The article continues:
Leo was a relative unknown on the global stage before his election in May. He spent most of his career as a missionary in Peru, where Allen said he developed a desire to care for immigrants and speak up for social causes.
"He understands the priority of the abortion issue, but he's not going to be somebody that says that's far more important than immigration," she said.
"He understands the priority of the abortion issue, but he's not going to be somebody that says that's far more important than immigration," she said.
Bullshit. Pope Benedict issued the highest injunction against abortion, which is the conscious, willful murder of an innocent. In his papal bull he said it had the Church's highest condemnation, making it fall just barely short of a ruling ex-cathedra (infallible). Immigration is not a settled matter in the Church nor is it anywhere near as clear. Many aliens are criminals and we have been forced to round up such before they kill people (as so many have now done).
(The last ex-cathedra ruling by a Pope was in 1959 when the Church ruled Mary was bodily assumed into Heaven.)
Leo has simply made a fool of himself here. He shows he is more interested in friendship with the world then in actually fighting for justice. There is no justice in promoting an invasion of a country out of some misplaced idea of the poor. If we want to help the poor we first stop enabling their governments. Caring for the poor does not mean forcing people to wander the Earth for money, and sending their children with molesters to be sold in the skin trade or work as slaves.
Leo won't care about any of this; his is an easy, virtue signaling Christianity, just like Pope Francis. These are very serious times that call for a serious Pontiff. Instead we have Pauley Shore.
God is punishing Mankind by allowing these two lousy Popes to impose their errors. We need to ask God to forgive us and pray for Leo, that he may be granted wisdom by the Lord.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2351 words, total size 15 kb.
The Lying Polls
Timothy Birdnow
Despite claims Trump is polling poorly, the fact remains he is doing better than Barrack Obama did in his first year in office.
Never believe polls or the media.
The fact is there is now way the public has turned on Trump. Inflation is actually down to a normal levels (what we had prior to Biden) and the economy is growing despite all the panic over tariffs. Trump has us at peace in the world. Trump is restoring pride in America. Trump has essentially ended all illegal immigration to the U.S. He is opening oil and gas production again. Regulations are being removed. He is spending less money. He's restored order in D.C. and in California and is going to do so elsewhwere. There are few downsides to his Presidency, certainly not enough to have the public turning on him.
So all these polls coming out claiming he's tanking are lies. Why not? The pollsters know they won't be checked by election just yet and it then becomes their word v. others. Polls have long been designed to lead public opinion, not reflect it.
My wife worked as a pollster for a while and she was astonished at the way they work; they just promote the Democrats and didn't care about accuracy. (These are the public polls; there are secret, internal polls for the political parties and the media, no doubt, which actually DO look for accuracy so they can plan, but the public never gets these.)
So polls are taken far out from elections and desinged to favor Democrats and liberal causes. As elections near they suddenly change,and become more accurate because the pollsters are afraid of losing their credibility. Granted, every poll was slanted where Trump has been concerned because they thought the stakes were so high they had to risk sticking their necks out. Now fewer people trust the polls - and well they should not.
We are still far enough out the pollsters want to start an anti-Trump bandwagon. They hope to turn opinion against the Orange Peril and thus win Congressional seats for their party.
Right now we are in the gaslighting season. Don't believe a word of it.
Despite claims Trump is polling poorly, the fact remains he is doing better than Barrack Obama did in his first year in office.
Never believe polls or the media.
The fact is there is now way the public has turned on Trump. Inflation is actually down to a normal levels (what we had prior to Biden) and the economy is growing despite all the panic over tariffs. Trump has us at peace in the world. Trump is restoring pride in America. Trump has essentially ended all illegal immigration to the U.S. He is opening oil and gas production again. Regulations are being removed. He is spending less money. He's restored order in D.C. and in California and is going to do so elsewhwere. There are few downsides to his Presidency, certainly not enough to have the public turning on him.
So all these polls coming out claiming he's tanking are lies. Why not? The pollsters know they won't be checked by election just yet and it then becomes their word v. others. Polls have long been designed to lead public opinion, not reflect it.
My wife worked as a pollster for a while and she was astonished at the way they work; they just promote the Democrats and didn't care about accuracy. (These are the public polls; there are secret, internal polls for the political parties and the media, no doubt, which actually DO look for accuracy so they can plan, but the public never gets these.)
So polls are taken far out from elections and desinged to favor Democrats and liberal causes. As elections near they suddenly change,and become more accurate because the pollsters are afraid of losing their credibility. Granted, every poll was slanted where Trump has been concerned because they thought the stakes were so high they had to risk sticking their necks out. Now fewer people trust the polls - and well they should not.
We are still far enough out the pollsters want to start an anti-Trump bandwagon. They hope to turn opinion against the Orange Peril and thus win Congressional seats for their party.
Right now we are in the gaslighting season. Don't believe a word of it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 369 words, total size 2 kb.
Biggs Running for Az Governor
Timothy Birdnow
Congressman Andy Biggs is running for Governor in Arizona.
Biggie has the name recognition to win in this critical swing state. And if he wins, and the GOP win the Secrettary of State seat, things are going to change in John McCain's purplish fiefdom.
We might flip Arizona completely red.
Biggs said it:
His competition is a limousine liberal Republican Karen named Karrin Taylor Robson, whose 95 year old monopoly man husband is underwriting her campaign. Robson got trounced in the last election by Kari Lake and she looks to get trounced by Biggs, who holds a whopping 24 point lead over her at 55% to 31%.
Of course Katey Hobbs stole the election from kari Lake last time and may be able to do so again if it is even remotely close.
Robson supports giving illegal aliens all manner of goodies like in-state tuition for illegal aliens in Arizona state universities and "reaching across the aisle" to Democrats so they can bite off the Republican hands.
Let us hope Biggs has a replacement capable of holding his seat; we need all hands in Congress now and I hate to lose him.
Congressman Andy Biggs is running for Governor in Arizona.
Biggie has the name recognition to win in this critical swing state. And if he wins, and the GOP win the Secrettary of State seat, things are going to change in John McCain's purplish fiefdom.
We might flip Arizona completely red.
Biggs said it:
"we're going to make Arizona the freest, most Republican state in the country.”
His competition is a limousine liberal Republican Karen named Karrin Taylor Robson, whose 95 year old monopoly man husband is underwriting her campaign. Robson got trounced in the last election by Kari Lake and she looks to get trounced by Biggs, who holds a whopping 24 point lead over her at 55% to 31%.
Of course Katey Hobbs stole the election from kari Lake last time and may be able to do so again if it is even remotely close.
Robson supports giving illegal aliens all manner of goodies like in-state tuition for illegal aliens in Arizona state universities and "reaching across the aisle" to Democrats so they can bite off the Republican hands.
Let us hope Biggs has a replacement capable of holding his seat; we need all hands in Congress now and I hate to lose him.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 2 kb.
What's Racism Got to Do with It?
Timothy Birdnow
This from the party that gave America Robert Byrd.
Hopeless Hypocrites: Same Dems Calling Jeffries Sombrero Meme Racist Fought to Put Blackface Kimmel Back on TV
Byrd was actually a grand cyclops, or grand cleagle, or whatever they call their ripest cheese, in the Ku Klux Klan and he was an honored Senator for decades - a DEMOCRAT.
And it was the Democrats who opposed the Civil Rights ACt, not Republicans.
Naturally Trump poking fun at Democrats with Hakeem Jeffries wearing a sombrero led to immediate charges of "racism!" I would like these people to actually give a definition of racism, a concrete definition. The word has stretched like Plastic Man until it no longer has any meaning at all except "you suck".
Racism is a specific thing, and it means to HATE other races and wish them ill. It is NOT having a little fun at the Democrat's expense. Back in the '70's they used to use a term "prjudice" which was a catch-all that the word racist now replaces, and it meant out of ignorance or perhaps even out of a poor-taste sense of humor feeding into stereotypes. It was itself created to tar anyone on the right, but it lacked the punch of racist so it was retired in favor of the more vile term. Racism equates with Naziism and the Klan and other truly evil things.
How, pray tell, does an AI image of Jeffries - a black man - in a sombrero (a Mexican and other Latin American article of clothing) insult anyone BUT Mr. Jeffries? What if they had put Jeffries in a big afro hairdo and had him holding fried chicken, would that be better? That at least would be a "racist" representation that comports with Mr. Jeffries background. They would have a case if Trump had done that (although I think we all need to lighten up a bit on good-natured charicaturing). I would point out that until recent years political cartoonists often portrayed politicians as obesely fat and nobody thought the worse of that. Now you can only do such things to Christians and MAGA folks.
If the Democrats and the media don't like this they shouldn't practice it against the other side. The do such things all the time to Conservatives. Look at the things they said and did about Rush Limbaugh because he had a weight problem, for instance. And of course if they aren't poking fun at Conservatives they are calling us Hitler and Fascists and saying we hate all Mankind. Look at what's been said about Charlie Kirk in recent weeks! That's apparently o.k. while it's not o.k. to use a computer to put a sombrero on Hakeem Jeffries.
Saul Alinski said ridicule is Man's most potent weapon and the Democrats and the media understand the power of what Mr. Trump is doing here; he's ridiculing Jeffries and the Democrats and they have no way to stop it. Their solution is to scream "RACIST!" because they can't answer this in any way. And they dare not allow Republicans to ridicule them because then they look weak and stupid and everyone laughs at them as they are walking away.
It's why the media wouldn't allow a single laugh at Obama; he had to be protected from any and all ridicule, despite his being a ridiculous stick-figure of a man with enormous Dumbo elephant ears and a face that resembled the Joker from Batman. Remember when Maureen Dowd made a crack about his ears and he personally confronted her and demanded she desist "I'm sensitive about my ears" and Dowd said "I was trying to toughen you up". That set the tone; the media would allow not one single light-hearted crack about Obama in any way. They had read their Alinsky.
Jimmy Kimmel has appeared in blackface more than once publicly, by the way. Why wasn't that racist?
Why wasn't it racist when Hillary Clinton met with black supporters (I believe it was the NAACP but don't recall exactly) and adopted a black southern accent "I ain't in now ways tired, I come to far to turn back now" she said in a Souther Baptist drawl. That wasn't the first time she would do that, and it wasn't the last. It was entirely disingenuous; Hillary is the whitest of white bread women, born and raised in Chicago (she still has a Chicago accent after all these years elsewhere) and spending her youth in Washington and the surrounding areas. Her only exposure to the South was her years in Little Rock, and she lived in the Governor's mansion most of them and thus was not exposed to Southern ways. I doubt she had any friends down there (she's a horribly dislikable person) and those she did were very wealthy and did not rub elbows with poor people, white or black. Yet Hillary was given a pass for insulting black Southerners. Trump puts one sombrero and one mustache on a BLACK American and he's somehow being racist.
The article points to a series of statement by Chuck U. Schumer (Rush Limbaugh used to call him that) that were both startlingly candid and probably why Chuckie is in so much trouble now with his party:
I haven't verified these statement - they were part of the article I cited from Western Journalism. I suspect a few of them are not accurate. But he no doubt did say something similar (if less vitriolic) and he and the other old line leaders of the party undoubtedly realize that the Democrats have walked down a cul-de-sac and are now facing an unclimbable wall. So they have to attack, attack, attack; it's all you can do when your back is against the wall.
It's all Democrats know HOW to do anyway. They haven't had to fight a defensive battle since FDR, or at least Jimmy Carter.
So the "sombrero is racist" accusation is what is left them. Such attacks always worked in the past. They just don't understand Mr. Trump is cut from a different cloth than the career Republicans who have haunted the Capital all these years. Oh, and the media is not trusted. And people video this stuff with their phones so the Democrats can't deny it any longer. And the Democrats have overused racism, much like the Boy Who Cried Wolf. They have nothing new to deploy at this point.
I wonder what they think of people like, say, Harry Belafonte' and his songs about Carribean laborers? How is The Banana Boat Song any better than Jeffries in a Sombrero? Are the Democrats ready to denounce the late Belafonte' as a racist? He was certainl a good Democrat.
This from the party that gave America Robert Byrd.
Hopeless Hypocrites: Same Dems Calling Jeffries Sombrero Meme Racist Fought to Put Blackface Kimmel Back on TV
Byrd was actually a grand cyclops, or grand cleagle, or whatever they call their ripest cheese, in the Ku Klux Klan and he was an honored Senator for decades - a DEMOCRAT.
And it was the Democrats who opposed the Civil Rights ACt, not Republicans.
Naturally Trump poking fun at Democrats with Hakeem Jeffries wearing a sombrero led to immediate charges of "racism!" I would like these people to actually give a definition of racism, a concrete definition. The word has stretched like Plastic Man until it no longer has any meaning at all except "you suck".
Racism is a specific thing, and it means to HATE other races and wish them ill. It is NOT having a little fun at the Democrat's expense. Back in the '70's they used to use a term "prjudice" which was a catch-all that the word racist now replaces, and it meant out of ignorance or perhaps even out of a poor-taste sense of humor feeding into stereotypes. It was itself created to tar anyone on the right, but it lacked the punch of racist so it was retired in favor of the more vile term. Racism equates with Naziism and the Klan and other truly evil things.
How, pray tell, does an AI image of Jeffries - a black man - in a sombrero (a Mexican and other Latin American article of clothing) insult anyone BUT Mr. Jeffries? What if they had put Jeffries in a big afro hairdo and had him holding fried chicken, would that be better? That at least would be a "racist" representation that comports with Mr. Jeffries background. They would have a case if Trump had done that (although I think we all need to lighten up a bit on good-natured charicaturing). I would point out that until recent years political cartoonists often portrayed politicians as obesely fat and nobody thought the worse of that. Now you can only do such things to Christians and MAGA folks.
If the Democrats and the media don't like this they shouldn't practice it against the other side. The do such things all the time to Conservatives. Look at the things they said and did about Rush Limbaugh because he had a weight problem, for instance. And of course if they aren't poking fun at Conservatives they are calling us Hitler and Fascists and saying we hate all Mankind. Look at what's been said about Charlie Kirk in recent weeks! That's apparently o.k. while it's not o.k. to use a computer to put a sombrero on Hakeem Jeffries.
Saul Alinski said ridicule is Man's most potent weapon and the Democrats and the media understand the power of what Mr. Trump is doing here; he's ridiculing Jeffries and the Democrats and they have no way to stop it. Their solution is to scream "RACIST!" because they can't answer this in any way. And they dare not allow Republicans to ridicule them because then they look weak and stupid and everyone laughs at them as they are walking away.
It's why the media wouldn't allow a single laugh at Obama; he had to be protected from any and all ridicule, despite his being a ridiculous stick-figure of a man with enormous Dumbo elephant ears and a face that resembled the Joker from Batman. Remember when Maureen Dowd made a crack about his ears and he personally confronted her and demanded she desist "I'm sensitive about my ears" and Dowd said "I was trying to toughen you up". That set the tone; the media would allow not one single light-hearted crack about Obama in any way. They had read their Alinsky.
Jimmy Kimmel has appeared in blackface more than once publicly, by the way. Why wasn't that racist?
Why wasn't it racist when Hillary Clinton met with black supporters (I believe it was the NAACP but don't recall exactly) and adopted a black southern accent "I ain't in now ways tired, I come to far to turn back now" she said in a Souther Baptist drawl. That wasn't the first time she would do that, and it wasn't the last. It was entirely disingenuous; Hillary is the whitest of white bread women, born and raised in Chicago (she still has a Chicago accent after all these years elsewhere) and spending her youth in Washington and the surrounding areas. Her only exposure to the South was her years in Little Rock, and she lived in the Governor's mansion most of them and thus was not exposed to Southern ways. I doubt she had any friends down there (she's a horribly dislikable person) and those she did were very wealthy and did not rub elbows with poor people, white or black. Yet Hillary was given a pass for insulting black Southerners. Trump puts one sombrero and one mustache on a BLACK American and he's somehow being racist.
The article points to a series of statement by Chuck U. Schumer (Rush Limbaugh used to call him that) that were both startlingly candid and probably why Chuckie is in so much trouble now with his party:
"Nobody likes Democrats anymore.
We have no voters left because of all of our woke trans bulls***.
Not even black people want to vote for us anymore.
Even Latinos hate us, so we need new voters.
Advertisement - story continues below
And if we give all these illegal aliens free healthcare, we might be able to get them on our side, so they can vote for us.
They can’t even speak English, so they won’t realize we’re just a bunch of woke pieces of s***, you know, at least for a while, until they learn English.
And they realize they hate us, too.
We have no voters left because of all of our woke trans bulls***.
Not even black people want to vote for us anymore.
Even Latinos hate us, so we need new voters.
Advertisement - story continues below
And if we give all these illegal aliens free healthcare, we might be able to get them on our side, so they can vote for us.
They can’t even speak English, so they won’t realize we’re just a bunch of woke pieces of s***, you know, at least for a while, until they learn English.
And they realize they hate us, too.
I haven't verified these statement - they were part of the article I cited from Western Journalism. I suspect a few of them are not accurate. But he no doubt did say something similar (if less vitriolic) and he and the other old line leaders of the party undoubtedly realize that the Democrats have walked down a cul-de-sac and are now facing an unclimbable wall. So they have to attack, attack, attack; it's all you can do when your back is against the wall.
It's all Democrats know HOW to do anyway. They haven't had to fight a defensive battle since FDR, or at least Jimmy Carter.
So the "sombrero is racist" accusation is what is left them. Such attacks always worked in the past. They just don't understand Mr. Trump is cut from a different cloth than the career Republicans who have haunted the Capital all these years. Oh, and the media is not trusted. And people video this stuff with their phones so the Democrats can't deny it any longer. And the Democrats have overused racism, much like the Boy Who Cried Wolf. They have nothing new to deploy at this point.
I wonder what they think of people like, say, Harry Belafonte' and his songs about Carribean laborers? How is The Banana Boat Song any better than Jeffries in a Sombrero? Are the Democrats ready to denounce the late Belafonte' as a racist? He was certainl a good Democrat.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1227 words, total size 7 kb.
Leo Fiddles While the World Burns
Timothy Birdnow
So where was Pope Leo when this was happening? Consecrating blocks of ice with tree worshipping pagans!
Trump Administration 'Deeply Concerned' as Radical Muslims Massacre Christians in Nigeria
Leo worries about the ttemperature of the planet and the "plight of the poor" who are doing better now than at any time in the past while ignoring murder and rape and torture by enemies of Christ.
If you ask me Leo is more the Cowardly Lion.
So where was Pope Leo when this was happening? Consecrating blocks of ice with tree worshipping pagans!
Trump Administration 'Deeply Concerned' as Radical Muslims Massacre Christians in Nigeria
Leo worries about the ttemperature of the planet and the "plight of the poor" who are doing better now than at any time in the past while ignoring murder and rape and torture by enemies of Christ.
If you ask me Leo is more the Cowardly Lion.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
October 02, 2025
Johnson Destroys Demo Claim
Timothy Birdnow
Mike "Tiny" Johnson cites chapter and verse with Fox News host John Roberts on the Democrat budget proposal.
Roberts hemmed and hawed and said it wsn't clear. I guess not to a guy whose only qualification is a degree in journalism.
The B cubed bill kicked unqualified people off medicaid rolls, including many illegal aliens. All these people will simply be put back on if Chuck U. Schumer gets his way.
The sky did not fall when the BBB passed and the Democrats know that. They are trying to win a battle they already lost.
Of course the media will carry Chuckie's water and say Republicans are trying to kill your poor old granny. But I suspect this doesn't work as well as it once did and anyone who is interested can find the arguments involved.
Mike "Tiny" Johnson cites chapter and verse with Fox News host John Roberts on the Democrat budget proposal.
"I say they obviously have not read their bill. This counterproposal that he filed, everybody can Google it, go pull it up. It’s on the Senate’s website and in the legislative text,” Johnson said. "Go to page 57 of Chuck Schumer’s bill and look at section 2141. It says right there in plain language [that] they want to repeal the health provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill.
Roberts hemmed and hawed and said it wsn't clear. I guess not to a guy whose only qualification is a degree in journalism.
The B cubed bill kicked unqualified people off medicaid rolls, including many illegal aliens. All these people will simply be put back on if Chuck U. Schumer gets his way.
The sky did not fall when the BBB passed and the Democrats know that. They are trying to win a battle they already lost.
Of course the media will carry Chuckie's water and say Republicans are trying to kill your poor old granny. But I suspect this doesn't work as well as it once did and anyone who is interested can find the arguments involved.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:53 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.
Trump Offers Security Guarantee to Qatar
Timothy Birdnow
And well he should. There is no good reason to guaranttee Qatari security; they've been housing and protecting Hamas for decades. Until they kick every last terrorist out of their country they are at war with Israel.
Trump is catching heat for security guarantee to Qatar.
Imagine what would happen if, say, a country like Afghanistan were to offer protection to, say, osama Bin Laden. How would we react? Oh, wait...
And well he should. There is no good reason to guaranttee Qatari security; they've been housing and protecting Hamas for decades. Until they kick every last terrorist out of their country they are at war with Israel.
Trump is catching heat for security guarantee to Qatar.
Imagine what would happen if, say, a country like Afghanistan were to offer protection to, say, osama Bin Laden. How would we react? Oh, wait...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:31 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
Canadian Bacon (no Sausage)
Timothy Birdnow
Good!Considering how many of them have murdered innocent people in recent days I would say the fewer the better!
Canada Issues Travel Warning to Transgendered Visiting the United States
We should issue our own travel warning about Canada, letting everyone know the Canadians are complete screwballs and should be avoided as one avoids a naked guy wandering around talking to himself.
Good!Considering how many of them have murdered innocent people in recent days I would say the fewer the better!
Canada Issues Travel Warning to Transgendered Visiting the United States
We should issue our own travel warning about Canada, letting everyone know the Canadians are complete screwballs and should be avoided as one avoids a naked guy wandering around talking to himself.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:21 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
Biden Not Home
Timothy Birdnow
We didn't learrn the half of it; Biden was so out of it his staff had to have cue cards to remind him who Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer were!
Biden's ElderCare Staffers Didn't Just Prepare Note Cards With the Names and Faces of Leftwing "Journalist" Plants to Call On.
His Memory Was So Degraded They Prepared Photo-Cards of Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer
And it was this whom the media protected and the Democrats stood in solidarity with. A man who belonged in a nursing home!
So who was running the country over those last four years?
We didn't learrn the half of it; Biden was so out of it his staff had to have cue cards to remind him who Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer were!
Biden's ElderCare Staffers Didn't Just Prepare Note Cards With the Names and Faces of Leftwing "Journalist" Plants to Call On.
His Memory Was So Degraded They Prepared Photo-Cards of Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer
And it was this whom the media protected and the Democrats stood in solidarity with. A man who belonged in a nursing home!
So who was running the country over those last four years?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:17 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
112kb generated in CPU 0.0583, elapsed 0.2803 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.2577 seconds, 266 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
48 queries taking 0.2577 seconds, 266 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
