December 31, 2024
Appeals Court Dismisses Trump E. Jean Carroll Appeal
Timothy Birdnow
Trump's team lost in an appeal to a federal court of the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit.
I was unable to find out who appointed the panel of judges for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals,but I suspect it was Obama mostly, and maybe Biden.
I also would like to point out to the Blaze author that Mr. Trump did NOT say he grabbed women by the calicos but rather he said when you are rich and powerful some women will LET you grab them in such an ungentlemanly manner. This is a key distinction, one I wish our side would make. It doesn't mean Trump went around with forefinger and thumb in imitation of a lobster.
Also, where was the Access Hollywood tape made? New York is a one-party consent law state, but California requires consent of both parties. AH is produced in Hollywood, although it seems likely Trump was in New York having this conversation. I have not really been able to ascertaine where Trump was when it was made. The law is clearly murky on this.
At any rate the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit was nothing but a money grab and attempt to take Trump out, and that alone warrants a new trial, one conducted outside of New York.
Trump's team lost in an appeal to a federal court of the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit.
Carroll accused Trump of sexually abusing her in a department store dressing room in Manhattan in the 1990s. Trump has denied the allegations, but a New York jury found him liable last year for the abuse as well as for defamation stemming from statements he made insulting Carroll.
'The Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax ... will continue to be appealed.'
Trump's attorneys argued for a new trial based on the claim that the jury heard improper testimony and also because they were not allowed to ask Carroll certain questions during cross-examination. Among the testimony they called improper was the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape in which Trump made comments about sexually grabbing women.
A federal appeals court panel denied both claims on Monday and reaffirmed the verdict against Trump.
"Mr. Trump’s statements in the tape, together with the testimony of Ms. Leeds and Ms. Stoynoff, establish a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct consistent with what Ms. Carroll alleged,” wrote the panel, referring to other women who had accused Trump of sexual assault.
"On review for abuse of discretion, we conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,” the panel added.
'The Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax ... will continue to be appealed.'
Trump's attorneys argued for a new trial based on the claim that the jury heard improper testimony and also because they were not allowed to ask Carroll certain questions during cross-examination. Among the testimony they called improper was the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape in which Trump made comments about sexually grabbing women.
A federal appeals court panel denied both claims on Monday and reaffirmed the verdict against Trump.
"Mr. Trump’s statements in the tape, together with the testimony of Ms. Leeds and Ms. Stoynoff, establish a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct consistent with what Ms. Carroll alleged,” wrote the panel, referring to other women who had accused Trump of sexual assault.
"On review for abuse of discretion, we conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,” the panel added.
I was unable to find out who appointed the panel of judges for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals,but I suspect it was Obama mostly, and maybe Biden.
I also would like to point out to the Blaze author that Mr. Trump did NOT say he grabbed women by the calicos but rather he said when you are rich and powerful some women will LET you grab them in such an ungentlemanly manner. This is a key distinction, one I wish our side would make. It doesn't mean Trump went around with forefinger and thumb in imitation of a lobster.
Also, where was the Access Hollywood tape made? New York is a one-party consent law state, but California requires consent of both parties. AH is produced in Hollywood, although it seems likely Trump was in New York having this conversation. I have not really been able to ascertaine where Trump was when it was made. The law is clearly murky on this.
At any rate the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit was nothing but a money grab and attempt to take Trump out, and that alone warrants a new trial, one conducted outside of New York.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:38 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Ridiculous! This is just an example of people figuring "Oh, go after him, he can afford it."
There's no way Trump was in that store with that floozy (yes, if she's doing this, she's a floozy), especially in the lingerie section. The fact that she can't recall the year in which this supposedly happened is reason enough for this whole thing to be thrown out of court, in my estimation. This whole case is crap!
There's no way Trump was in that store with that floozy (yes, if she's doing this, she's a floozy), especially in the lingerie section. The fact that she can't recall the year in which this supposedly happened is reason enough for this whole thing to be thrown out of court, in my estimation. This whole case is crap!
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at December 31, 2024 11:36 PM (Idemf)
2
This has given me a lot to think about. Great post! smm cheapest panel
Posted by: SMM World at April 06, 2025 02:23 AM (zXmeR)
23kb generated in CPU 0.0822, elapsed 0.4729 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.4667 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.4667 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
