Another Blanket Injunction from a Democrat Judge Over Mail-in Voting
Timothy Birdnow
It's like a broken record with these judges! And they simply refuse to obey the Supreme Court ruling that they cannot impose nationwide blanket injunctions!
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from restricting mail-in ballots ahead of midterms
From the El Zoro News article:
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani granted a preliminary injunction preventing the USPS from implementing or enforcing Section 3 of Executive Order 14399 for the Nov. 3 midterm elections, or any earlier federal election.
The ruling prevents USPS from refusing to transmit mail-in or absentee ballots under the challenged section and blocks rulemaking to implement certain regulations outlined in the executive order for the November elections.
The injunction does not prevent the federal government from providing nonbinding USPS guidance on ballot-mail envelopes.
Notice how she has a foreign name - one of many aliens given a judicial seat by the Biden camp, no doubt.
And notice how kind she was in the end, allowing the USPS to read "non-binding guidance from the government" which means exactly nothing as she has already banned any action taken against mail-in ballots.
Hopefully this will be overturned on appeal, but given the Left went judge-shopping and it's in Massachusetts it's going to have an uphill battle.
Question; is the U.S. Postal Service required to deliver all mail? It's not a Federal agency and in fact is a quasi-private organization wholly owned by the United States government. It does not draw money from general revenue - it has to ask if it's in trouble. So how can the courts compel the USPS to disobey Trump on this and think the individual states have a case? Let them run their own program to get mail-in ballots delivered. Maybe cut a deal with Fedex...
Of course Fedex would charge THEM more, and that is the whole point; they want the U.S. taxpayer to underwrite the theft of the election.
We MUST start punishing these lawless judges and rein them in.
1
I'd sure like to see it. It's too bad the Founders didn't foresee this sort of shenanigans and provide a mechanism that forces the various judges to Stay In Their Lanes, at the very least.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at August 12, 2026 03:22 PM (5FaDg)