January 09, 2023
The United States today stands as a living contradiction to the ‘great man theory of history’. For the US is a great country led by small minds. In recent times, it has been ruled by a narcissistic moral reprobate and it is now being run by a cognitively deficient and scandal-plagued politician. There is a growing feeling, particularly among the young, that today’s America is diminished. Yet the US remains the world’s premier power, and its last best hope against a rising authoritarian tide.
So, how does an America led by mediocrities succeed? The secret sauce lies in two great assets – America’s geography and its constitution.
America enjoys an enormous expanse of arable land, the largest in the world, bigger than that of Russia and Ukraine combined, and nearly 100million acres more than China. It is not only by far the largest food exporter in the world, but it also leads all countries, including Russia and Saudi Arabia, in the production of fossil fuels, which are now being consumed more than ever. And not to be overlooked are America’s vast reserves of fresh water, the third largest on the planet.
These assets separate America from its largest rivals. Neither China nor Europe has adequate domestic energy supplies, making both ever reliant, like Tennessee Williams’ Blanche DuBois, on the ‘kindness of strangers’. Shortages and high prices are already hammering Germany’s industrial economy, from its dynamic mid-sized firms to the giants of its chemicals industry, despite the German government spending a massive half-a-trillion dollars on energy subsidies. Europe is now desperately firing up coal plants and reconsidering nuclear energy, but in the near-term its energy salvation will most likely lie in the oil fields of the Permian basin and other hotbeds of US energy production.
[...]
Yet perhaps even more than nature’s gifts, America’s greatest asset may lie in its centuries-old constitutional order. This is very different to the much ballyhooed, bureaucratic ‘rules-based’ system so attractive to Eurocrats and their American admirers. In Europe, decisions are based on the political fashions of the moment. Only a bureaucracy in thrall to green ideology, for instance, could have ignored all the warning signs of the current energy crisis and placed ever more bets on unreliable wind and solar in the name of stopping climate change – even while China, by far the world’s biggest emitter of CO2, is building more coal plants to power its homes and industries. Today, coal is now being consumed more than at any time in history.
Although it looks less ‘professional’ than the Brussels bureaucracy, the US’s constitutionally directed democratic governance has survived other chaotic periods like this one. As bad as our leaders may be, they are fortunately not omnipotent. In contrast, while unencumbered leaders can at times make enormous strides in catching up with more advanced countries, they almost always fail in the long run – bad news for Xi and Putin.
These lessons have still not been learned in academia and the media, which continue the old Western intellectual habit, visible in the 1930s and again in the 1960s, of eulogising foreign despotisms. For years now, many have regarded the ascendency of China’s ‘stronger government’ model as inevitable. Yet now, even China’s supreme leader admits its growth will be slowing and that surpassing the US in the medium term is no longer assured.
I hope this has whetted your appetite for the entire article, found here: https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/01/08/america-a-nation-of-giants-led-by-pygmies/
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 592 words, total size 7 kb.
I think he's still looking at this through the old prism of politics. I don't think he gets that the seeming incompetence of our political class is entirely purposeful and that the bureaucracy already owns the country, for instance.
Also, America is greatly blessed in terms of natural resources, but many of those blessings were made useful by Americans as opposed to us simply having what others needed. Certainly oil is a prime example; we have more oil than anyone now because we pioneered fracking, something other countries could have done. That was the free market being unleashed.
When I was in school I took a course on Latin America, and the professor said that in the early 20th century everyone thought Argentina would be the next U.S. It had very similar geography and is lousy with natural resources. But it has never even dominated South America. Why?
Because unlike the U.S. it adopted socialism. Peron ruined the country with his "Third Path". To this day Argentina is pretty much a basket case. And it won't be rising soon.
At any rate it is a good article; thanks for posting it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 10, 2023 07:16 AM (22o5K)
Posted by: hublot big bang replica at May 20, 2023 08:22 AM (dbOdi)
37 queries taking 0.2501 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








