An Act of Sedition?

Timothy Birdnow

This story is interesting in a number of ways.

First, it claims the F.B.I. said the mostly peaceful protest in Washington was about seizing control of the government and assassinating lawmakers.

HUH??!!

What kind of coup is conducted without firearms or weapons of any kind? How can the F.B.I. say that with a straight face?

The Blaze claims they have since pulled back that statement.

Here's another interesting piece:

A lawyer for Chansley is reportedly seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump for his client's role in the U.S. Capitol raid.

Chansley has allegedly stated that he "accepted the president's invitation" to march on the U.S. Capitol "with good intentions."

Chansley's attorney, Albert Watkins, issued a statement Thursday on his client, saying that he should be pardoned.

"My client had heard the oft-repeated words of President Trump," Watkins said about the incident. "The words and invitation of a president are supposed to mean something. Given the peaceful and compliant fashion in which Mr. Chansley comported himself, it would be appropriate and honorable for the president to pardon Mr. Chansley and other like-minded, peaceful individuals who accepted the president's invitation with honorable intentions."

Watkins concluded, "Mr. Chansley is an American; he served honorably in the US military. He has zero criminal history. He is a lover of nature, routinely practices meditation, is an active practicer of yoga, and eats only organic food. He took seriously the countless messages of President Trump. He believed in President Trump. Like tens of millions of other Americans, Chansley felt — for the first time in his life — as though his voice was being heard."

See what they are trying to do here? They are trying to set Trump up. They are blaming the President for the violence that Mr. Chamsley committed in penetrating the Capitol.

But he couldn't have gotten there that quickly; he clearly had to have moved BEFORE Mr. Trump addressed the crowd. And even if he did, so what? Somebody can read anything into anything if they want. Nowhere in Trump's speech did he call for violence or vandalism.

But they are trying to lay the blame on Trump. The lawyer knows Trump isn't going to pardon his client; he wants to give the media another tool to bash the President.

More and more this is looking like a false flag.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:08 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 396 words, total size 3 kb.