February 10, 2026
Amputating Love
Timothy Birdnow
Kentucky Governor Andy Besheear has been imbibing too much bourbon whiskey, methinks.
Bashear invokes the Bible as justification for promoting transgenderism. Perhaps he ought to actually READ the Bible and not just quote snippets.
After pointing to the Good Samaritan passage (which has nothing to do with human sexuality one way or another) and Jesus calling for us to "love thy neighbor" he goes on to say:
"My faith teaches me, that all children are children of God."
Well and good, but if he wants to actually honor children as "children of God" he must first accept them as they are - as children of God made in His image. God doesn't mistakenly put female souls in male bodies or vice versa.
Truly honoring these disturbed children means protecting them, not mutilating them.
Transgenderism is a form of witchcraft. It is an attempt to use magical thinking to transform what God ordained into something He did not ordaine by an act of human will.
At any rate, my point about Beshear not reading the Bible can be illustrated quite clearly.
Here are multiple relevant Biblical passages condemning transgenderism:
"Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created” (Genesis 5:2).
"He answered, ‘Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Matthew 19:4-6).
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination” (Leviticus 18:22).
Deuteronomy 22:5
"A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God.
Deuteronomy 23:1 ESV / 2,426 helpful votes
"No one whose testicles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall enter the assembly of the Lord.
1Corinthians 6:9
Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Guess Beshear missed all of those.
There is nothing loving about encouraging someone into serious sin, nor facing the penalty, be it corporal or spiritual, for rejecting the Will of God. If you want to love transgendered children you would labor to help them overcome their feelings, which are largely a product of their environment. These are sick children, or confused children at a minimum. They requie care, not encouragement ib their delusions.
If a man says he's Napoleon we lock him up, but if a boy says he's a girl we now treat him like one. If we did the same thing with the Emperor of France everyone would agree that is completely mad.
That's why we are seeing more psychological disorders being accepted and mainstreamed, and eventually pedophilia and necrophilia and other really sick stuff will wind up being called natural.
It's not natural and never will be. It's a psychosis. You love a person with a psycosis but not the psychosis itself. Beshear is promoting lovig the psychosis and not the psychotic.
Man HIS priorities are seriously screwed up.
If someone goes to the doctor with pneumonia do we say that's natural and he should be able to live as a pneumonic-American? Now, we treat them to get rid of the illness. Beshear wants to not treat the illness but rather to do actual physical harm, cutting off breasts and testicles and the like and doing permanent damage to what may well be a temporary psychological hiccup.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:28 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 656 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Guess we have perhaps gone too far by letting women use men's garb for working in the field, or particularly when hunting or camping or mountain-climbing. Granted, their pants and stuff like that are usually tailored for ladies, but I suppose somebody could carp about it.
Anybody want to complain about Hillary's pant-suits? I won't start if you won't.
Anybody want to complain about Hillary's pant-suits? I won't start if you won't.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 10, 2026 11:28 PM (CSo3x)
2
Yes; women wearing men's clothes is forbidden in the Old Testament certainly and we pulled out a thread and where has it led? The OT had good reasons for all of their prohibitions, even if we don't always understand them now.
The problem was in the Victorian era and before women's clothes became so insanely impractical. Women were forever passing out from corsettes for instance. And ladies shoes? Fuggetaboutit. So there were women who started wearing men's clothes and of course the Suffragettes began pushing that trend, and the movies metastasized it, so now it's considered normal. for women to dress like dudes and this whole gender dysphoria business was just a matter of time. Clothes make the man, the old saying went. Put a women in men's clothes and they are no longer LADIES and that changes the whole sociosexual landscape. Then the boys, told they sucked for decades, began following suit, only it wasn't just a fashion statement.
The problem was in the Victorian era and before women's clothes became so insanely impractical. Women were forever passing out from corsettes for instance. And ladies shoes? Fuggetaboutit. So there were women who started wearing men's clothes and of course the Suffragettes began pushing that trend, and the movies metastasized it, so now it's considered normal. for women to dress like dudes and this whole gender dysphoria business was just a matter of time. Clothes make the man, the old saying went. Put a women in men's clothes and they are no longer LADIES and that changes the whole sociosexual landscape. Then the boys, told they sucked for decades, began following suit, only it wasn't just a fashion statement.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 11, 2026 07:54 AM (umJ+Y)
27kb generated in CPU 0.0183, elapsed 0.2815 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2687 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.2687 seconds, 185 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
