August 06, 2019
An argument erupted }%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A5}%2C%22dm%22%3A{%22isShare%22%3A0%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A0}%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A5%2C%22targets%22%3A[{%22actor_id%22%3A1348201567%2C%22page_id%22%3A1770261989901866%2C%22post_id%22%3A2327975164130543%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22share_id%22%3A0}]}}&__tn__=R]on Facebook about the nature of Fascism, whether it was a "right wing" ideology or a force from the Left. Tim McNabb argued it was a leftist doctrine and was dismissed by a typically smug liberal. I mae the following reply:
Let's get it from the horse's mouth, shall we.
From Benito Mussolini's 1932 the Doctrine of Fascism.:
Fascism is therefore opposed to all individualistic abstractions based on eighteenth century materialism; and it is opposed to all Jacobinistic utopias and innovations. It does not believe in the possibility of "happiness" on earth as conceived by the economistic literature of the XVIIIth century, and it therefore rejects the theological notion that at some future time the human family will secure a final settlement of all its difficulties. This notion runs counter to experience which teaches that life is in continual flux and in process of evolution. In politics Fascism aims at realism; in practice it desires to deal only with those problems which are the spontaneous product of historic conditions and which find or suggest their own solutions (9). Only by entering in to the process of reality and taking possession of the forces at work within it, can man act on man and on nature (10).
Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity (11). It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual (12). And if liberty is to he the attribute of living men and not of abstract dummies invented by individualistic liberalism, then Fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State (13). The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism, is totalitarian, and the Fascist State - a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values - interprets, develops, and potentates the whole life of a people (14)."
Can anyone argue with a straight face that Fascism is in any way a right wing ideology based on this?
In fact, if found it's roots in Rousseau's The Social Compact, where Rousseau argued that Christianity must be done away with, and to do that he advocated deifying the collective Will and making the State the equivalent of the Church. Rousseau was the father of both Fascism and Socialism. They are kissing cousins - they just disagree on a few things, as Mussolini makes clear in this work. But in the end they are more alike than different.
He also says:
And
Yep - Fascism is Communism without Marx.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:59 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 724 words, total size 6 kb.
35 queries taking 0.2014 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








