September 22, 2025
Olbermann: Trump is the Real Danger to Conservatives
Timothy Birdnow
Keith Olbermann, ever charming!
Keith Olbermann, ever charming!
OLBERMANN: "Now that we can say with some certainty that if Tyler Robinson indeed shot Charlie Kirk, he shot him for personal reasons, because he saw Kirk as a direct threat to somebody he loved, that Robinson was not a stochastic proxy murderer from Antifa or the groypers or the right wingers who had so recently called Kirk a fraud, you know, like Laura Loomer. It is then also clear that there is truly only one person whose words created, amplified, mainstreamed and manufactured this nightmarish environment that has led to Charlie Kirk’s death. The leading threat in this country in this moment to the safety and the lives of conservatives and Republicans and MAGA commentators and politicians and civilians is not George Soros and it’s not Antifa and it’s not a Democrat or a liberal, nor a socialist nor an immigrant nor a transgendered person. The leading threat in this country, in this moment, to the safety and the lives of conservatives and Republicans and MAGA is Donald Trump.”
So it's all Trump's fault!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:28 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
Kimmel and the FCC
Timothy Birdnow
The FCC has strict rules of conduct for what can be said about disasters and crimes. Here are the pertinent restrictions:
1. The statement must be false.
2. The broadcaster must know it’s false or act with reckless disregard for the truth.
3. It must be reasonably foreseeable that broadcasting it will cause harm.
4. There must be actual harm or at least the potential for serious harm.
Jimmy Kimmel arguably violated these criteria. While no actual harm is directly attributable to his statements the social atmosphere is such that Kimmel had to know this had the potential to encourage other radicals to assassinate others.
These are the rules about false information.
Proof of intent is the hard part, but this isn't going to be adjudicated in a court of law - at least not at first. It will be an administrative issue. Yes, ABC could take it to a court, where the Trump Administration would likely lose. But then, ABC would then have opened the door for a closer scrutiny of their affairs.
And all that for a guy who ranks 53rd in the ABC lineup.
Kimmel clearly broke FCC rules according to The Federalist.
I suspect ABC isn't going to the mat for him. But of course he'll wind up on some cable network plying his hate and lies there.
Anyone remember Dan Rather? He got fired for something similar from CBS. Rather promoted the fake story about George W. Bush, claiming falsely Bush hadn't completed his National Guard service. When confrtonted he said "the documents may be fake but I believe the story is true." CBS sacked Rather rather than face the FCC. You can't purposely lie to the public. Just because you are an alleged comedian (and therre is no proof Kimmel is one - he's a political pundit with a late night show who tells bad jokes) you cannot openly lie, especially about a tragedy such as an assassination. If instead he had made a joke he might have been under fire for poor taste, but he wasn't joking.
Sacking Kimmel was right and proper and anyone who frames this as a First Amendment issue (ahem - Senator Paul!) doesn't understand the First Amendment.
The FCC has strict rules of conduct for what can be said about disasters and crimes. Here are the pertinent restrictions:
1. The statement must be false.
2. The broadcaster must know it’s false or act with reckless disregard for the truth.
3. It must be reasonably foreseeable that broadcasting it will cause harm.
4. There must be actual harm or at least the potential for serious harm.
Jimmy Kimmel arguably violated these criteria. While no actual harm is directly attributable to his statements the social atmosphere is such that Kimmel had to know this had the potential to encourage other radicals to assassinate others.
These are the rules about false information.
Proof of intent is the hard part, but this isn't going to be adjudicated in a court of law - at least not at first. It will be an administrative issue. Yes, ABC could take it to a court, where the Trump Administration would likely lose. But then, ABC would then have opened the door for a closer scrutiny of their affairs.
And all that for a guy who ranks 53rd in the ABC lineup.
Kimmel clearly broke FCC rules according to The Federalist.
I suspect ABC isn't going to the mat for him. But of course he'll wind up on some cable network plying his hate and lies there.
Anyone remember Dan Rather? He got fired for something similar from CBS. Rather promoted the fake story about George W. Bush, claiming falsely Bush hadn't completed his National Guard service. When confrtonted he said "the documents may be fake but I believe the story is true." CBS sacked Rather rather than face the FCC. You can't purposely lie to the public. Just because you are an alleged comedian (and therre is no proof Kimmel is one - he's a political pundit with a late night show who tells bad jokes) you cannot openly lie, especially about a tragedy such as an assassination. If instead he had made a joke he might have been under fire for poor taste, but he wasn't joking.
Sacking Kimmel was right and proper and anyone who frames this as a First Amendment issue (ahem - Senator Paul!) doesn't understand the First Amendment.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:08 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 375 words, total size 2 kb.
The Game of Strife
Timothy Birdnow
I guess Parker Brothers turned them down.
Antifa Made a Board Game Modeled on Their Real-Life Violent Tactics…
Trump was right to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization.
I guess Parker Brothers turned them down.
Antifa Made a Board Game Modeled on Their Real-Life Violent Tactics…
Trump was right to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
September 21, 2025
Kirk Gun had no Serial Number
Timothy Birdnow
Hmmm...the plot thickens.
Kirk Assassin's Alleged Gun was Powerful Vintage Hard to Trace
Seems the serial number was filed off.
That suggests someone didn't want this traced. I doubt this kid thought of that, given how poorly he planned this.
Hmmm...the plot thickens.
Kirk Assassin's Alleged Gun was Powerful Vintage Hard to Trace
Seems the serial number was filed off.
That suggests someone didn't want this traced. I doubt this kid thought of that, given how poorly he planned this.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:36 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
We Need Gun Control for Democrats
Timothy Birdnow
They want to ban guns. I'm game; maybe we should ban DEMOCRATS having guns, as it is they who are always the ones shooting up crowds.
Democrat who opened fire at New Hampshire wedding shouted ‘Free Palestine’ before shooting guests.
How does a New Hampshire country club impact Palestine? If this shooter wanted to actually fight for Palestine he would have gone to Palestine. It's easier to kill decent folks who are minding their own business. So sure; let's take their guns! If you are a registered Democrat you should have to turn those weapons in and they can be redistributed to the rest of us.
They want to ban guns. I'm game; maybe we should ban DEMOCRATS having guns, as it is they who are always the ones shooting up crowds.
Democrat who opened fire at New Hampshire wedding shouted ‘Free Palestine’ before shooting guests.
How does a New Hampshire country club impact Palestine? If this shooter wanted to actually fight for Palestine he would have gone to Palestine. It's easier to kill decent folks who are minding their own business. So sure; let's take their guns! If you are a registered Democrat you should have to turn those weapons in and they can be redistributed to the rest of us.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:33 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
Dershovitz: Trump Will Lose in Court
Timothy Birdnow
Alan Dershowitz says Trump's lawsuits against the media are doomed.
Dershowitz Explains Why Trump’s Media Lawsuits Are Set Up to Fail in US Courts
FTA:
But Trump keeps winning these things. Take this with a grain of salt.
Alan Dershowitz says Trump's lawsuits against the media are doomed.
Dershowitz Explains Why Trump’s Media Lawsuits Are Set Up to Fail in US Courts
FTA:
(DCNF)—Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz warned on Newsmax Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s ongoing defamation lawsuits against major media outlets are unlikely to succeed under current U.S. legal standards.
Trump sued The New York Times for $15 billion Monday, accusing the paper of deliberately spreading "falsehoods” to damage his 2024 campaign and reputation. Appearing on "The Record with Greta Van Susteren,” Dershowitz said Trump faces an uphill legal battle because U.S. law requires him to prove not just false statements, but that they were made with "actual malice.”
"In the United States, he would have to prove not only that there were factual misstatements, not opinion, but factual misstatements, but that they were made with malice, that is, they were made with reckless disregard for the truth,” Dershowitz told host Greta Van Susteren.
Trump sued The New York Times for $15 billion Monday, accusing the paper of deliberately spreading "falsehoods” to damage his 2024 campaign and reputation. Appearing on "The Record with Greta Van Susteren,” Dershowitz said Trump faces an uphill legal battle because U.S. law requires him to prove not just false statements, but that they were made with "actual malice.”
"In the United States, he would have to prove not only that there were factual misstatements, not opinion, but factual misstatements, but that they were made with malice, that is, they were made with reckless disregard for the truth,” Dershowitz told host Greta Van Susteren.
But Trump keeps winning these things. Take this with a grain of salt.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
Everything MTP Says is Bullshit: Thank You
Timothy Birdnow
I am watching Meet the Press and the whole thing has nauseated me to no end. It was one lie after another.
I was tempted to use Joe Pesci's opening statement in the trial of his cousin in My Cousin Vinny "everything that guy said was bullshit. Thank you."
First, Josh Shapiro was interviewed and he waxed poetic about the right to free speech and how the Trump Administration was pooping all over them. The hypocrisy is astonishing! Where was he when the Biden Administration was threatening social media if they didn't suppress free speech? I was banned several times and shadow banned repeatedly because I openly disagreed with things the Administration wanted. Where was he when the FBI was going after Turning Point USA, or other conservative activist outlets? Where was he when Biden set up a "misinformation office"?
Second, and this applied to the second speaker, RAnd Paul, threatening to use the FCC licenses to stop hateful speech is no more censorship than the banning of the N word on television, or not allowing a husband and wife being in bed together. It's ALWAYS been censored as the broadcast band is limited and thus regulated by the government since they alone can give out licenses for that bandwidth. Paul kept jawboning about "censorship" but we've ALWAYS censored television.
Shapiro then bragged about how well his state of Pennsylvania is doing. Well, that's because Trump has eased environmental regulations on oil and gas - the very thing making his state rich. Duh.
Kristin Welker, the crone who runs Press the Meat, was a bulldog with Rand Paul, repeatedly demanding him to condemn Trump.
And then there was the nonsense about how Trump evilly got Jimmy Kimmel fired and how that is what tyrants do. But Kimmel's rating were lower than snake poo, and he should have been fired long before. Two top affiliates of ABC said they wouldn't carry him. So they made a business decision. I would add what Rand Paul added, which is every business has a code of conduct and Kimmel clearly broke it.
Of course Welker was apoplectic about Trump pushing his DOJ to prosecute the political hatchet men who went after him, and he was not asking to charge them with anything bogus, but rather with crimes that have already been unearthed. In fact, they can charge him with what they falsly charged HIM with; they were doing what they accused him of doing. Justice requires they be prosecuted.
But of course Welker and the other leftists in the media (meaning all of them) now want an armastice over lawfare when they were happy to use it when it suited them. And of course Trump isn't using lawfare - he's going after actual crime.
Meet the Press is nothing but a carnival of lies these days.
BTW Rand Paul is a REPUBLICAN but not a conservative. He's a libertarian, and thinks very differently than a conservative. If Welker wanted true balance she would have asked Josh Hawley on, or Eric Schmidt, or any other true conservative. She chose Paul because she was looking for a sound byte to bludgeon Trump.
Paul did well enough but he kept on with the "no censorship" business which he should not have done; he should have said this isn't censorship in any new or novel way.
At any rate I don't know why I watch Meet the Press; it's just propaganda.
I am watching Meet the Press and the whole thing has nauseated me to no end. It was one lie after another.
I was tempted to use Joe Pesci's opening statement in the trial of his cousin in My Cousin Vinny "everything that guy said was bullshit. Thank you."
First, Josh Shapiro was interviewed and he waxed poetic about the right to free speech and how the Trump Administration was pooping all over them. The hypocrisy is astonishing! Where was he when the Biden Administration was threatening social media if they didn't suppress free speech? I was banned several times and shadow banned repeatedly because I openly disagreed with things the Administration wanted. Where was he when the FBI was going after Turning Point USA, or other conservative activist outlets? Where was he when Biden set up a "misinformation office"?
Second, and this applied to the second speaker, RAnd Paul, threatening to use the FCC licenses to stop hateful speech is no more censorship than the banning of the N word on television, or not allowing a husband and wife being in bed together. It's ALWAYS been censored as the broadcast band is limited and thus regulated by the government since they alone can give out licenses for that bandwidth. Paul kept jawboning about "censorship" but we've ALWAYS censored television.
Shapiro then bragged about how well his state of Pennsylvania is doing. Well, that's because Trump has eased environmental regulations on oil and gas - the very thing making his state rich. Duh.
Kristin Welker, the crone who runs Press the Meat, was a bulldog with Rand Paul, repeatedly demanding him to condemn Trump.
And then there was the nonsense about how Trump evilly got Jimmy Kimmel fired and how that is what tyrants do. But Kimmel's rating were lower than snake poo, and he should have been fired long before. Two top affiliates of ABC said they wouldn't carry him. So they made a business decision. I would add what Rand Paul added, which is every business has a code of conduct and Kimmel clearly broke it.
Of course Welker was apoplectic about Trump pushing his DOJ to prosecute the political hatchet men who went after him, and he was not asking to charge them with anything bogus, but rather with crimes that have already been unearthed. In fact, they can charge him with what they falsly charged HIM with; they were doing what they accused him of doing. Justice requires they be prosecuted.
But of course Welker and the other leftists in the media (meaning all of them) now want an armastice over lawfare when they were happy to use it when it suited them. And of course Trump isn't using lawfare - he's going after actual crime.
Meet the Press is nothing but a carnival of lies these days.
BTW Rand Paul is a REPUBLICAN but not a conservative. He's a libertarian, and thinks very differently than a conservative. If Welker wanted true balance she would have asked Josh Hawley on, or Eric Schmidt, or any other true conservative. She chose Paul because she was looking for a sound byte to bludgeon Trump.
Paul did well enough but he kept on with the "no censorship" business which he should not have done; he should have said this isn't censorship in any new or novel way.
At any rate I don't know why I watch Meet the Press; it's just propaganda.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:48 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 582 words, total size 4 kb.
September 20, 2025
A Total Crockett
Timothy Birdnow
Gee; I kinda thought that was the very definition of being a criminal.
Jasmine Crockett Claims Committing a Crime ‘Doesn’t Make’ a Person a Criminal
Words mean things, which is why the Left is always changing their meaning. Remember Newspeak from Orwell's 1984; it was intended to make it impossible to even think a thought not approved by the Party by manipulationg the language.
This is why Confucious said to restore a country one must first true the language; a linguistic error means an error in thinking and that means bad policy.
Crockett is nothing but one giant error all around.
Gee; I kinda thought that was the very definition of being a criminal.
Jasmine Crockett Claims Committing a Crime ‘Doesn’t Make’ a Person a Criminal
Words mean things, which is why the Left is always changing their meaning. Remember Newspeak from Orwell's 1984; it was intended to make it impossible to even think a thought not approved by the Party by manipulationg the language.
This is why Confucious said to restore a country one must first true the language; a linguistic error means an error in thinking and that means bad policy.
Crockett is nothing but one giant error all around.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:48 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
The Beast Takes Britain
Timothy Birdnow
And thus is unveiled the Mark of the Beast:
UK Government Moves to Mandate Digital IDs for All Citizens to ‘Tackle Illegal Immigration’
Why does Britain need to have a "digital mandate" to "tackle illegal immigration"? It's fairly easy to check if someone is illegal. This isn't about protecting British citizens but rather is about keeping their thumb on the people in Britain. This is about power and control over the citizenry, nothing more.
Stormer's scheme is also a "how do we fool 'em today" designed to make it appear he's trying to stop the flood. Of course this only applies to illegals, and Britain is chock-full of legal immigrants who are destroying the country and need to go. But this way he can pretend he's doing something about the problem when in fact he's creating a new, even worse problem.
This was and has been the goal of illegal immigration in the Western World all along. It was to break the nations and then impose a strict regulatory scheme to control the citizenry and impose the will of the Ruling Class.
The last Labour government in Britain tried to do this too and was defeated. But like all good leftists their bad ideas never go away.
Remember what the Book of Revelations says, you will not be able to buy nor sell without the mark of the Beast and the number of his name. Sounds a lot like this, doesn't it?
And thus is unveiled the Mark of the Beast:
UK Government Moves to Mandate Digital IDs for All Citizens to ‘Tackle Illegal Immigration’
Why does Britain need to have a "digital mandate" to "tackle illegal immigration"? It's fairly easy to check if someone is illegal. This isn't about protecting British citizens but rather is about keeping their thumb on the people in Britain. This is about power and control over the citizenry, nothing more.
Stormer's scheme is also a "how do we fool 'em today" designed to make it appear he's trying to stop the flood. Of course this only applies to illegals, and Britain is chock-full of legal immigrants who are destroying the country and need to go. But this way he can pretend he's doing something about the problem when in fact he's creating a new, even worse problem.
This was and has been the goal of illegal immigration in the Western World all along. It was to break the nations and then impose a strict regulatory scheme to control the citizenry and impose the will of the Ruling Class.
The last Labour government in Britain tried to do this too and was defeated. But like all good leftists their bad ideas never go away.
Remember what the Book of Revelations says, you will not be able to buy nor sell without the mark of the Beast and the number of his name. Sounds a lot like this, doesn't it?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:27 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
The Reich is Returning
Timothy Birdnow
The swastika is returning to Germany.
Shop Owner In Germany Goes Full 1930s With Sign Banning Jews From Entering
What's next? Making them wear Stars of David?
The swastika is returning to Germany.
Shop Owner In Germany Goes Full 1930s With Sign Banning Jews From Entering
What's next? Making them wear Stars of David?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:15 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
Leftie Shoots up ABC Affiliate
Timothy Birdnow
I thought the Left was supposed to value tolerance and love....
ABC TV station struck by gunfire amid outrage over Jimmy Kimmel getting yanked off the air…
They are growing increasingly violent. Someone sure wants blood.
I thought the Left was supposed to value tolerance and love....
ABC TV station struck by gunfire amid outrage over Jimmy Kimmel getting yanked off the air…
They are growing increasingly violent. Someone sure wants blood.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:42 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
Soros' Broken Society
Timothy Birdnow
How George Soros funds leftist domestic terrorism.
FTA:
read the rest!
BTW Soros was a great admirer of Karl Popper and his philosophy is that chaos and "creative destruction" are the way to make society free and happy. Popper was a horribly destructive force and everyone who ever listened to him wound up advocating anarchy, socialism, and murder.
How George Soros funds leftist domestic terrorism.
FTA:
Since 2020, the Open Society Foundation has given $400,000 to the Center for Third World Organizing, which boasts it "threw down with people in the streets” during the George Floyd riots, CRC noted.
CTWO has consolidated radical groups into its hub, including the Ruckus Society, whose founders and training materials endorse tactics that "may be outside of the law,” CRC said.
The network also includes the BlackOUT Collective, which co-authored a pro-Hamas guide that glorifies the Oct. 7 attacks and references a Ruckus Society manual promoting tactics like property destruction and blockades.
The Open Society Foundations also provided $1,850,000 to Dream Defenders and $18 million to Movement for Black Lives, which collaborated with BlackOut Collective to create the pro-Hamas guide, according to CRC’s report.
Soros’ foundations have given $200,000 to Dissenters, another co-author of the alleged pro-Hamas guide.
Dissenters is listed as an endorser of the Shut It Down for Palestine coalition, which praises shutting down highways and bridges and targeting Israeli arms producers, according to CRC. It partners with the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee to promote illegal avoidance of taxes tied to U.S. defense activities.
CTWO has consolidated radical groups into its hub, including the Ruckus Society, whose founders and training materials endorse tactics that "may be outside of the law,” CRC said.
The network also includes the BlackOUT Collective, which co-authored a pro-Hamas guide that glorifies the Oct. 7 attacks and references a Ruckus Society manual promoting tactics like property destruction and blockades.
The Open Society Foundations also provided $1,850,000 to Dream Defenders and $18 million to Movement for Black Lives, which collaborated with BlackOut Collective to create the pro-Hamas guide, according to CRC’s report.
Soros’ foundations have given $200,000 to Dissenters, another co-author of the alleged pro-Hamas guide.
Dissenters is listed as an endorser of the Shut It Down for Palestine coalition, which praises shutting down highways and bridges and targeting Israeli arms producers, according to CRC. It partners with the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee to promote illegal avoidance of taxes tied to U.S. defense activities.
read the rest!
BTW Soros was a great admirer of Karl Popper and his philosophy is that chaos and "creative destruction" are the way to make society free and happy. Popper was a horribly destructive force and everyone who ever listened to him wound up advocating anarchy, socialism, and murder.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
The Lies of Alexandria Crazy Eyes
Timothy Birdnow
Very filthy pot meet shiny kettle!
AOC Smears Charlie Kirk as ‘Ignorant and Uneducated’ During House Floor Speech
Yes, Crazy Eyes actually said that!
Here is every single lie she could think of rolled into one:
I dare her to prove just one of those assertions.
Charlie was, for instance, a big defender of Israel, and in fact the Fellowship of Christians and Jews was a sponsor of his television program on Salem. (Read more here.
The New York Times misattribued an anti-Semitic statement to Kirk, and retracted it. Apparently the ignorant AOC disregarded the retraction. Of course, since AOC is in New York (which Democrat Jesse Jackson referred to as "Hymietown") so she needs to drive a wedge between Kirk's supporters and the Jews who are increasingly moving to MAGA. But it's all lies - or she really is as ignorant as she accused Mr. Kirk of being.
Mr. Kirk was quoting a Jew Hater and the New York Times falsely attributed that to him.
And of course the rest of that is unsupportable pablum gleened no doubt from Democratic Underground rantings. Where did Mr. Kirk every oppose Civil Rights? He never did. He MAY hav e said at some point the Civil Rights Act led unwittingly to the breakup of the black family, which is a completely true statement. That is in no way a criticism of civil rights but of poorly thought out public policy. Many of us on the right supported the Free Trade movement too and while free trade is an unarguable good the execution of it was horribly destructive and was in dire need of reform. I guess AOC is happy with the breakdown of black families and the swelling of the public dole and rising illigitimacy rates in the black community then?
And, I ask AOC, is it better to leave people to stew in their own juices or is it the loving thing to do to look HONESTLY at a problem? AOC and the Democrats are entirely comfortable with a broken black community; they are a reliable vote for Democrats because their lives are beholden to the Democrat largesse. When a family does an alcohol intervention, for instance, is that an act of spite or love? I'm not saying blacks are all alcoholics or bad people, not by a long shot. But social conditions, most of which began after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed and in many ways fostered by attempts to implement that act, have led to the breakdown of key infrastructure in the black community - the family, schools, security, etc. SHE would call that hate, discussing such things. But who is the hater? Ther person who wants to keep these people trapped, that's who. SHE is the plantation master, not Mr. Kirk.
As for saying black women do not have brain power, this too was a distortion of what he said. He was talking about several black women (Michelle Obama, Joy Reid, Ketanja Brown Jackson) who actually came out and said they were affirmative action hires. He said that they were TELLING US :
Note he was saying that about three specific people, not all black women. And he was simply extending their own arguments to the logical conclusion. It may have been a case of reductio ad absurdum, but that is the worst one can say of what he said. AOC should know this.
As for his comments on Paul Pelosi, I suppose she's never heard irony and satire. This was in mockery of the Democrats who were bailing out BLM and Antifa rioters. He said:
And Kirk clarified this by saying "I'm not qualifying the attack; I think it's awful!" But he asked why the attacker was being held without bond while a murderer in Chicago can just walk free that very day.
Calling for an "amazing patriot in the Bay Area to bail this guy out was what is called sarcasm. He was thinking back to Kamala Harris raising bail for people guilty of equally bad crimes.
To give Crazy Eyes the benefit of the doubt, let me explain how the left-wing blogosphere works. There are professional agitators, hired by Soros-funded non-profits or by the DNC, who troll conservative websites and news outlets. They cherry pick things they know will get their crazies all fired up, then post them in a limited number of outlets. As providing a link to the source being accused only increases their unique visitor counts, the leftists won't link up the original document they are trashing. Then, when it is out there, everyone else writes about it using the troll source. It works just like old-time media, with the news services or the New York Times being the only source anyone gets. So the same errors are repeated in articles.
For instance, I wrote a piece at American Thinker which was mischaracterized all over the web. The thing about it is it was misidentified as being from Townhall, and all sorts of leftists wrote all sorts of things about it with that same mistake. All of them said it was from Townhall. Nobody giving an opinion on the essay had any idea what was actually said there; they just took the word of the troll. So the lefotsphere is chock-full of distortions and misinformation and they don't really care that it isn't accurate. Context, of course, is just plain gone. That's how it is that so many liberals believe to this day that Donald Trump said there were "fine Nazis" at Charlotte. They were too lazy to look up the entire quote. It's why they also believe Trump promoted violence on J6.
That AOC blindly accepts all this proves she is one of those who "do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.” Or worse, she does and is just a liar. Your pick.
Very filthy pot meet shiny kettle!
AOC Smears Charlie Kirk as ‘Ignorant and Uneducated’ During House Floor Speech
Yes, Crazy Eyes actually said that!
Here is every single lie she could think of rolled into one:
Ahead of the vote, Ocasio-Cortez argued the resolution would "bring great pain” to Americans who experienced "segregation, Jim Crow and the legacy of bigotry.”
She said, "We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was. A man who believed that the Civil Right Act that granted black Americans the right to vote was a mistake. Who after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi said, ‘some amazing patriot’ should bail out his brutal assailant and accused Jews of controlling ‘not just the colleges, it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.’ His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans far from ‘working tirelessly to promote unity’ asserted by the majority in this resolution.
She said, "We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was. A man who believed that the Civil Right Act that granted black Americans the right to vote was a mistake. Who after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi said, ‘some amazing patriot’ should bail out his brutal assailant and accused Jews of controlling ‘not just the colleges, it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.’ His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated and sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans far from ‘working tirelessly to promote unity’ asserted by the majority in this resolution.
I dare her to prove just one of those assertions.
Charlie was, for instance, a big defender of Israel, and in fact the Fellowship of Christians and Jews was a sponsor of his television program on Salem. (Read more here.
The New York Times misattribued an anti-Semitic statement to Kirk, and retracted it. Apparently the ignorant AOC disregarded the retraction. Of course, since AOC is in New York (which Democrat Jesse Jackson referred to as "Hymietown") so she needs to drive a wedge between Kirk's supporters and the Jews who are increasingly moving to MAGA. But it's all lies - or she really is as ignorant as she accused Mr. Kirk of being.
Mr. Kirk was quoting a Jew Hater and the New York Times falsely attributed that to him.
And of course the rest of that is unsupportable pablum gleened no doubt from Democratic Underground rantings. Where did Mr. Kirk every oppose Civil Rights? He never did. He MAY hav e said at some point the Civil Rights Act led unwittingly to the breakup of the black family, which is a completely true statement. That is in no way a criticism of civil rights but of poorly thought out public policy. Many of us on the right supported the Free Trade movement too and while free trade is an unarguable good the execution of it was horribly destructive and was in dire need of reform. I guess AOC is happy with the breakdown of black families and the swelling of the public dole and rising illigitimacy rates in the black community then?
And, I ask AOC, is it better to leave people to stew in their own juices or is it the loving thing to do to look HONESTLY at a problem? AOC and the Democrats are entirely comfortable with a broken black community; they are a reliable vote for Democrats because their lives are beholden to the Democrat largesse. When a family does an alcohol intervention, for instance, is that an act of spite or love? I'm not saying blacks are all alcoholics or bad people, not by a long shot. But social conditions, most of which began after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed and in many ways fostered by attempts to implement that act, have led to the breakdown of key infrastructure in the black community - the family, schools, security, etc. SHE would call that hate, discussing such things. But who is the hater? Ther person who wants to keep these people trapped, that's who. SHE is the plantation master, not Mr. Kirk.
As for saying black women do not have brain power, this too was a distortion of what he said. He was talking about several black women (Michelle Obama, Joy Reid, Ketanja Brown Jackson) who actually came out and said they were affirmative action hires. He said that they were TELLING US :
"If we would have said three weeks ago […] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks, we would have been called racist. But now they’re comin’ out and they’re saying it for us! They’re comin’ out and they’re saying, ‘I’m only here because of affirmative action.’ Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.”
Note he was saying that about three specific people, not all black women. And he was simply extending their own arguments to the logical conclusion. It may have been a case of reductio ad absurdum, but that is the worst one can say of what he said. AOC should know this.
As for his comments on Paul Pelosi, I suppose she's never heard irony and satire. This was in mockery of the Democrats who were bailing out BLM and Antifa rioters. He said:
"Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out.
And Kirk clarified this by saying "I'm not qualifying the attack; I think it's awful!" But he asked why the attacker was being held without bond while a murderer in Chicago can just walk free that very day.
Calling for an "amazing patriot in the Bay Area to bail this guy out was what is called sarcasm. He was thinking back to Kamala Harris raising bail for people guilty of equally bad crimes.
To give Crazy Eyes the benefit of the doubt, let me explain how the left-wing blogosphere works. There are professional agitators, hired by Soros-funded non-profits or by the DNC, who troll conservative websites and news outlets. They cherry pick things they know will get their crazies all fired up, then post them in a limited number of outlets. As providing a link to the source being accused only increases their unique visitor counts, the leftists won't link up the original document they are trashing. Then, when it is out there, everyone else writes about it using the troll source. It works just like old-time media, with the news services or the New York Times being the only source anyone gets. So the same errors are repeated in articles.
For instance, I wrote a piece at American Thinker which was mischaracterized all over the web. The thing about it is it was misidentified as being from Townhall, and all sorts of leftists wrote all sorts of things about it with that same mistake. All of them said it was from Townhall. Nobody giving an opinion on the essay had any idea what was actually said there; they just took the word of the troll. So the lefotsphere is chock-full of distortions and misinformation and they don't really care that it isn't accurate. Context, of course, is just plain gone. That's how it is that so many liberals believe to this day that Donald Trump said there were "fine Nazis" at Charlotte. They were too lazy to look up the entire quote. It's why they also believe Trump promoted violence on J6.
That AOC blindly accepts all this proves she is one of those who "do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously.” Or worse, she does and is just a liar. Your pick.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:57 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1220 words, total size 8 kb.
25,000 Child Slaves Freed
Timothy Birdnow
The Trump Administration has rescued 25,000 children from the clutches of human traffickers, rescuing them from lives of slavery, sexual and otherwise.
These children didn't seem to matter to the compassionate Democrat Joe Biden and his ilk.
These children's prospects were grim; prostitution, forced labor, and eventually early death.
Imagine if the shoe were on the other foot and the Republicans were the ones to lead a blind eye to such monstrous evil! The media would have been apoplectic. But now they yawn at this as a non-story. I guess a few innocent children do not matter. Of course, they never cared about unborn children either, so why should they care about some Third World kids being used as sex objects for perverts until they grow sick with STD's or their owners tire of feeding them and kill them.
In fact the Biden Administration was not just wrong, not just incompetent it was evil. (Jimmy Carter was perhaps the worst President in U.S. history but he was just wrong and not evil.) The people who ran things (Biden was just a puppet) were and are some of the most vile people who ever walked the Earth. Monsters, in fact. And more and more we're learning just how bad they are.
They must never, ever be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. Heck; they shouldn't be allowed near schools or playgrounds!
The Trump Administration has rescued 25,000 children from the clutches of human traffickers, rescuing them from lives of slavery, sexual and otherwise.
These children didn't seem to matter to the compassionate Democrat Joe Biden and his ilk.
These children's prospects were grim; prostitution, forced labor, and eventually early death.
Imagine if the shoe were on the other foot and the Republicans were the ones to lead a blind eye to such monstrous evil! The media would have been apoplectic. But now they yawn at this as a non-story. I guess a few innocent children do not matter. Of course, they never cared about unborn children either, so why should they care about some Third World kids being used as sex objects for perverts until they grow sick with STD's or their owners tire of feeding them and kill them.
In fact the Biden Administration was not just wrong, not just incompetent it was evil. (Jimmy Carter was perhaps the worst President in U.S. history but he was just wrong and not evil.) The people who ran things (Biden was just a puppet) were and are some of the most vile people who ever walked the Earth. Monsters, in fact. And more and more we're learning just how bad they are.
They must never, ever be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. Heck; they shouldn't be allowed near schools or playgrounds!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:56 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
The Prancing Killers
Timothy Birdnow
Yet one more piece of evidence that transgenderism is a mental disorder.
Man Who Attempted to Kill Justice Kavanaugh Now Identifying as a Female in Court Filings
The low spiked high heel boys seem at the forefront of murder and mayhem these days. Isn't it about time to maybe reconsider the obvious, that this is a serious and dangerous dellusion and that feeding it won't fix these people.
Yet one more piece of evidence that transgenderism is a mental disorder.
Man Who Attempted to Kill Justice Kavanaugh Now Identifying as a Female in Court Filings
The low spiked high heel boys seem at the forefront of murder and mayhem these days. Isn't it about time to maybe reconsider the obvious, that this is a serious and dangerous dellusion and that feeding it won't fix these people.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
Hunter Was Key Advisor
Timothy Birdnow
Doesn't pardoning Hunter constitute a conspiracy given this?
Hunter Biden Was Involved in Key Meetings at the End of His Father's Term: Former Chief of Staff
BTW we never have learned where that bag of cocaine found in the White House came from.
Doesn't pardoning Hunter constitute a conspiracy given this?
Hunter Biden Was Involved in Key Meetings at the End of His Father's Term: Former Chief of Staff
BTW we never have learned where that bag of cocaine found in the White House came from.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:36 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
September 19, 2025
Labour Advocates Sharia in U.K.
Timothy Birdnow
British politicians are now openly advocating Sharia law be enshrined into the British legal system.
Left-Wing Labour Gov’t Defends Sharia Courts in Britain, Backs Broad ‘Islamophobia’ Definition
The Left wing Establishment has so cemented their power in Britain I fear a revolution is all that will save the once great island nation.
British politicians are now openly advocating Sharia law be enshrined into the British legal system.
Left-Wing Labour Gov’t Defends Sharia Courts in Britain, Backs Broad ‘Islamophobia’ Definition
The Left wing Establishment has so cemented their power in Britain I fear a revolution is all that will save the once great island nation.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:12 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
Trump to Fire Virginia Prosecutor
Timothy Birdnow
And why shouldn't he? James never extended the courtesy of not prosecuting HIM for non-crimes and in fact what James is accused of doing is worse than anything Trump ever did. Oh, and the evidence is on paper and cannot be disputed; James lied on mortgage applications, unquestionably. The fact that this guy is refusing to file charges against Letitia James is proof the Left has weaponized the legal system (and is using it to protect their own now). This clown needs to go.
Trump Poised to Fire U.S. Attorney for Resisting Efforts to Charge Letitia James
FTA:
"No clear evidence"? It couldn't be ANY clearer! James is a lawyer, not a factory worker, and she knew exactly what she was putting on that application. She lied about it being her primary residence so she could get more favorable loan terms. She is savvy enough to know that.
She also listed her father on her mortagage application as her husband. That's not a mistake someone makes by accident; it allows his income to be counted along with hers.
Uh, these prosecutors serve at the pleasure of the President. Bill Clinton fired ALL of the U.S. attorneys when he first took office and nobody objected then because it was understood the President had the authority to do that.
Also, Siebert is only an interim prosecutor, meaning he was only there until Trump found someone better. He had no right to expect to remain in the position.
That's why he refused to file charges in the first place.
Democrats Mark Warner and Tim Kaine both recommended Siebert, and Trump foolishly nominated the man.
So now it's time for him to go. If he wants to play politics and protect someone like James, who campaigned on "I'l get Trump!" and who twisted the law repeatedly to do so proves he is nothing but a partisan and has no business in the Prosecuting Attorney's office.
And why shouldn't he? James never extended the courtesy of not prosecuting HIM for non-crimes and in fact what James is accused of doing is worse than anything Trump ever did. Oh, and the evidence is on paper and cannot be disputed; James lied on mortgage applications, unquestionably. The fact that this guy is refusing to file charges against Letitia James is proof the Left has weaponized the legal system (and is using it to protect their own now). This clown needs to go.
Trump Poised to Fire U.S. Attorney for Resisting Efforts to Charge Letitia James
FTA:
President Donald Trump is expected to fire the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after investigators were unable to find incriminating evidence of mortgage fraud against New York Attorney General Letitia James, according to sources.
Federal prosecutors in Virginia had uncovered no clear evidence to prove that James had knowingly committed mortgage fraud when she purchased a home in the state in 2023, ABC News first reported earlier this week, but Trump officials pushed U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert to nevertheless bring criminal charges against her, according to sources.
Administration officials have told Siebert of Trump's intention to fire him, sources familiar with the matter said. Siebert's last day on the job is expected to be Friday.
Federal prosecutors in Virginia had uncovered no clear evidence to prove that James had knowingly committed mortgage fraud when she purchased a home in the state in 2023, ABC News first reported earlier this week, but Trump officials pushed U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert to nevertheless bring criminal charges against her, according to sources.
Administration officials have told Siebert of Trump's intention to fire him, sources familiar with the matter said. Siebert's last day on the job is expected to be Friday.
"No clear evidence"? It couldn't be ANY clearer! James is a lawyer, not a factory worker, and she knew exactly what she was putting on that application. She lied about it being her primary residence so she could get more favorable loan terms. She is savvy enough to know that.
She also listed her father on her mortagage application as her husband. That's not a mistake someone makes by accident; it allows his income to be counted along with hers.
Abbe Lowell, an attorney for James, called the expected firing a "brazen attack on the rule of law."
"Firing people until he finds someone who will bend the law to carry out his revenge has been the President’s pattern -- and it’s illegal," Lowell said Friday in a statement to ABC News. "Punishing this prosecutor, a Trump appointee, for doing his job sends a clear and chilling message that anyone who dares uphold the law over politics will face the same fate.
"Firing people until he finds someone who will bend the law to carry out his revenge has been the President’s pattern -- and it’s illegal," Lowell said Friday in a statement to ABC News. "Punishing this prosecutor, a Trump appointee, for doing his job sends a clear and chilling message that anyone who dares uphold the law over politics will face the same fate.
Uh, these prosecutors serve at the pleasure of the President. Bill Clinton fired ALL of the U.S. attorneys when he first took office and nobody objected then because it was understood the President had the authority to do that.
Also, Siebert is only an interim prosecutor, meaning he was only there until Trump found someone better. He had no right to expect to remain in the position.
That's why he refused to file charges in the first place.
Democrats Mark Warner and Tim Kaine both recommended Siebert, and Trump foolishly nominated the man.
So now it's time for him to go. If he wants to play politics and protect someone like James, who campaigned on "I'l get Trump!" and who twisted the law repeatedly to do so proves he is nothing but a partisan and has no business in the Prosecuting Attorney's office.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:08 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 528 words, total size 4 kb.
Harris Discriminated Against Buttigieg because he is Gay
Timothy Birdnow
In her new book Kamala Harris admits she didn't choose Pete Booteycall, er, Buttigieg as her Veep because he is homosexual.
"I love Pete, but picking a gay man would have been too risky." the Progressive Harris states.
(Buttigieg) "would have been an ideal partner—if I were a straight white man,”
She would probably have been the ideal partner for him, too, if she were, but that's beside the point. So she gets to settle on geriatrics to backstroke her way to the top.
"But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a woman, a Black woman, a Black woman married to a Jewish man. Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk.”
"And I think Pete also knew that—to our mutual sadness.”
fin
Given she was facing a loss and was an affirmative action candidate anyway, why not go for gold? She certainly would have done better with the Bootie than with Tampon Tim, who was utterly pathetic. This was her first test and she failed.
Of course Buttigieg was a horrible Transportation Secretary, spending most of his efforts at promoting DEI and letting multiple disasters occur on his watch, or handing off disasters in the making to the incoming Administration. For example, he changed the core requirements for air traffic controllers, and the end result was a series of plane crashes as inexperienced and unqualified controllers made mistakes. They were only there because Pete wanted to make this critical job more "inclusive' at the expense of safety. He also messed up the train business, where cargo trains kept derailing.
All Booteycall had to offer was his homosexuality and a somewhat likeable personality.
But Kamala lacked even the courage to pick him, instead choosing a former military guy who is dumb as dirt and appeals to nobody outside of Minnesota. He was the guy who let Minneapolis burn down after George Floyd.
Basically it was the blind leading the blind, But leftists are now busy with revisionist history to rehabilitate the cackling crone.
Good luck with THAT!
In her new book Kamala Harris admits she didn't choose Pete Booteycall, er, Buttigieg as her Veep because he is homosexual.
"I love Pete, but picking a gay man would have been too risky." the Progressive Harris states.
(Buttigieg) "would have been an ideal partner—if I were a straight white man,”
She would probably have been the ideal partner for him, too, if she were, but that's beside the point. So she gets to settle on geriatrics to backstroke her way to the top.
"But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a woman, a Black woman, a Black woman married to a Jewish man. Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk.”
"And I think Pete also knew that—to our mutual sadness.”
fin
Given she was facing a loss and was an affirmative action candidate anyway, why not go for gold? She certainly would have done better with the Bootie than with Tampon Tim, who was utterly pathetic. This was her first test and she failed.
Of course Buttigieg was a horrible Transportation Secretary, spending most of his efforts at promoting DEI and letting multiple disasters occur on his watch, or handing off disasters in the making to the incoming Administration. For example, he changed the core requirements for air traffic controllers, and the end result was a series of plane crashes as inexperienced and unqualified controllers made mistakes. They were only there because Pete wanted to make this critical job more "inclusive' at the expense of safety. He also messed up the train business, where cargo trains kept derailing.
All Booteycall had to offer was his homosexuality and a somewhat likeable personality.
But Kamala lacked even the courage to pick him, instead choosing a former military guy who is dumb as dirt and appeals to nobody outside of Minnesota. He was the guy who let Minneapolis burn down after George Floyd.
Basically it was the blind leading the blind, But leftists are now busy with revisionist history to rehabilitate the cackling crone.
Good luck with THAT!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:43 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 368 words, total size 2 kb.
80kb generated in CPU 0.0357, elapsed 0.2525 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.2347 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
48 queries taking 0.2347 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
