January 30, 2025
Crybabies on the Bus go Wha Wha Wha!
Timothy Birdnow
The babies are having tantrums.
Government official refuses to comply after getting fired by Trump and has to be physically escorted out by security: Report
This reminds me of just after the Civil War when Edwin Stanton refused to leave office after being removed by Andrew Johnson and he barricaded himself into his office. A two week seige ended with Stanton waiving a little white flag and surrendering.
What a bunch of babies!
FTA:
The babies are having tantrums.
Government official refuses to comply after getting fired by Trump and has to be physically escorted out by security: Report
This reminds me of just after the Civil War when Edwin Stanton refused to leave office after being removed by Andrew Johnson and he barricaded himself into his office. A two week seige ended with Stanton waiving a little white flag and surrendering.
What a bunch of babies!
FTA:
The report said that Phyllis Fong was escorted by security agents, according to sourceswho spoke to Reuters. Fong had reportedly told people that she was not going to leave because she believed the administration did not follow the proper protocols in ordering her to be fired.
The USDA investigates food safety and has recently been spearheading government action on the spread of bird flu.
A memo written by Fong explained to colleagues that the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency "has taken the position that these termination notices do not comply with the requirements set out in law and therefore are not effective at this time.”
Fong was a 22-year veteran of the department.
She was fired along with 16 other government watchdogs on Friday. The White House defended the firings in a brief statement.
"These rogue, partisan bureaucrats," the statement said, "have been relieved of their duties in order to make room for qualified individuals who will uphold the rule of law and protect Democracy."
On Monday, a statement from the House Committee on Education and Workforce accused Fong of looking the other way as fraud siphoned away taxpayer money.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:29 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 278 words, total size 2 kb.
January 28, 2025
Cop Kills J6 Protester Days AfterHe's Released
Timothy Birdnow
Here we go.
Matthew Huttle,who served six months in prison for his attending the January 6 self-guided Capitol tour, was shot to death by police in Indian in a traffic stop incident.
This mirrors what has happened to those who slipped out of the clutches of the Deep State in bygone days. Take the "White Hispanic" George Zimmerman after he was charged with murder for kiling Trayvon Martin, a man who was on top of him and beating him senseless. Zimmerman was hounded by the authorities ever after, being arrested several times on trumped up charges. Or Officer Darren Wilson, who shot the "Gentle Giant" Mike Brown in Ferguson. I think he's a mall cop in Nome Alaska these days.
The Deep State punishes those they first abused. You are supposed to take it and like it.
The article states ""The investigation also shows that during the traffic stop, the suspect was in possession of a firearm,” state police added."
He was pardoned; he can legally carry a firearm. Not sure of Indiana state law but I suspect he was within his Constitutional rights.
While it seems abit far-fetched to think a local sheriff's deputy would be in on it, we know that there are Democrats who would do it without being formally recruited. And who knows; maybe he was paid money by someone? It may be they knew Huttle would be passing through that way.
I don't know but it sure smells to me.
Here we go.
Matthew Huttle,who served six months in prison for his attending the January 6 self-guided Capitol tour, was shot to death by police in Indian in a traffic stop incident.
This mirrors what has happened to those who slipped out of the clutches of the Deep State in bygone days. Take the "White Hispanic" George Zimmerman after he was charged with murder for kiling Trayvon Martin, a man who was on top of him and beating him senseless. Zimmerman was hounded by the authorities ever after, being arrested several times on trumped up charges. Or Officer Darren Wilson, who shot the "Gentle Giant" Mike Brown in Ferguson. I think he's a mall cop in Nome Alaska these days.
The Deep State punishes those they first abused. You are supposed to take it and like it.
The article states ""The investigation also shows that during the traffic stop, the suspect was in possession of a firearm,” state police added."
He was pardoned; he can legally carry a firearm. Not sure of Indiana state law but I suspect he was within his Constitutional rights.
While it seems abit far-fetched to think a local sheriff's deputy would be in on it, we know that there are Democrats who would do it without being formally recruited. And who knows; maybe he was paid money by someone? It may be they knew Huttle would be passing through that way.
I don't know but it sure smells to me.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.
Tranny Terrorism
Timothy Birdnow
The biggest story not being discussed. Yes, there appears to be an organized terrorist group of transsexuals.
Update — Vermont Border Patrol agent murdered by Transgender couple with ties to Trans terror cell.
But the media remains silent on the terrorist attacks by their favorite "oppressed" group. We never did get the full story on the Nashville shootings.
The biggest story not being discussed. Yes, there appears to be an organized terrorist group of transsexuals.
Update — Vermont Border Patrol agent murdered by Transgender couple with ties to Trans terror cell.
But the media remains silent on the terrorist attacks by their favorite "oppressed" group. We never did get the full story on the Nashville shootings.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
You Can't See Ref!
Timothy Birdnow
This is priceless!
Lasik Experts Hilariously Offer NFL Refs Free Eye Surgery After Chiefs-Bills Game
Another bad call sends the Chiefs to the Superbowl.
If the Chiefs were women I'd ask who they were doing to get the gig. Oh wait, the Chiefs have Taylor Swift...
I remember a commercial years ago where a baseball manager was yelling at the ref for a bad call "you can't see!" The ref threatened to throw him out but the manager said "you can't throw me out because you can't see me!" It's kinda like that.
This is priceless!
Lasik Experts Hilariously Offer NFL Refs Free Eye Surgery After Chiefs-Bills Game
Another bad call sends the Chiefs to the Superbowl.
If the Chiefs were women I'd ask who they were doing to get the gig. Oh wait, the Chiefs have Taylor Swift...
I remember a commercial years ago where a baseball manager was yelling at the ref for a bad call "you can't see!" The ref threatened to throw him out but the manager said "you can't throw me out because you can't see me!" It's kinda like that.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:12 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
Denmark Beefing Up Greenland Defenses
Timothy Birdnow
Denmark is getting desperate. Terrified of Trump's threats to take the enormous island of Greenland (which is actually a subcontinent) they are beefing up their military presence there by $2.05 billion.
What's the point? Not to deter us militarily, obviously; we'd wipe Danish defenses away in minutes. It's to provide Trump with a fait-accompli, to show they are fully cooperating with the u.S. and willing to defend the island.
Look what Trump can do just by running his mouth!
Denmark is getting desperate. Terrified of Trump's threats to take the enormous island of Greenland (which is actually a subcontinent) they are beefing up their military presence there by $2.05 billion.
What's the point? Not to deter us militarily, obviously; we'd wipe Danish defenses away in minutes. It's to provide Trump with a fait-accompli, to show they are fully cooperating with the u.S. and willing to defend the island.
Look what Trump can do just by running his mouth!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
DEI Simply Moved at the FBI
Timothy Birdnow
The Deep State has deep tentacles indeed.
Blaze News original: FBI whistleblower warns Patel: DEI rot at FBI deeper than you can imagine
The article states:
I have little doubt these people just went to ground for a short time to operate in the shadows until Trump was taken down or leaves office. Leftists are good at doing that.
Trump had better take the threat of the FBI seriously. They led the charge against him in the past and these same people remain.
The Deep State has deep tentacles indeed.
Blaze News original: FBI whistleblower warns Patel: DEI rot at FBI deeper than you can imagine
The article states:
" To demonstrate, Friend then read aloud to Blaze News an internal memo confirming that rather than losing their jobs, the DEI proponents formerly of the ODI had transferred to the equal employment office, a subdivision of human resources: "In recent weeks, the FBI took steps to close the Office of Diversity and Inclusion, effective December 2024. Special emphasis programs have been realigned under the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity Affairs."
The OEEOA may be a separate entity from the ODI, but the newcomers at the OEEOA may find their colleagues amenable to their previous DEI advocacy. A memo regarding job openings at the FBI, issued on an unknown date, claimed that the OEEOA's mission, in order "to ensure the fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans, the Department of Justice is committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment."
Then, in an EEO-related policy statement, which is also undated, the FBI noted the "diverse" nature of the American citizenry. "Consistent with the FBI’s Core Values, and just as the FBI is committed to serving every United States citizen regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or any other protected basis," the statement continued. "
The OEEOA may be a separate entity from the ODI, but the newcomers at the OEEOA may find their colleagues amenable to their previous DEI advocacy. A memo regarding job openings at the FBI, issued on an unknown date, claimed that the OEEOA's mission, in order "to ensure the fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans, the Department of Justice is committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment."
Then, in an EEO-related policy statement, which is also undated, the FBI noted the "diverse" nature of the American citizenry. "Consistent with the FBI’s Core Values, and just as the FBI is committed to serving every United States citizen regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or any other protected basis," the statement continued. "
I have little doubt these people just went to ground for a short time to operate in the shadows until Trump was taken down or leaves office. Leftists are good at doing that.
Trump had better take the threat of the FBI seriously. They led the charge against him in the past and these same people remain.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 287 words, total size 2 kb.
Comer; There is Evidence of Debanking"
Timothy Birdnow
We know it's true.
James Comer: ‘We Have Evidence Banks Are De-Banking Conservatives’
FTA:
We know it's true.
James Comer: ‘We Have Evidence Banks Are De-Banking Conservatives’
FTA:
During a broadcast of "Sunday Morning Futures,” Maria Bartiromo asked Comer, "Are you investigating whether or not US Banks are debanking conservatives?”
"Yes, we are. We’ve heard numerous instances of conservatives being debanked and what we want to know is this a process of the bank’s ESG policy, or is this our government stepping in like what we found with Twitter and Facebook, where the government stepped in and said they wanted certain conservatives deplatformed and censored,” Comer said.
"We want to know again, is this is the government involvement another dirty trick by the Joe Biden administration, or is this just bad liberal policy that discriminates against conservatives by the bank,” Comer continued.
"So, you have evidence of some banks debanking conservatives?” Bartiromo asked.
"Yes, especially people that were involved in different energy type businesses and things like that, as well as very well spoken, outspoken conservative activists, so, there are numerous instances, enough to open an investigation,” Comer continued.
"Yes, we are. We’ve heard numerous instances of conservatives being debanked and what we want to know is this a process of the bank’s ESG policy, or is this our government stepping in like what we found with Twitter and Facebook, where the government stepped in and said they wanted certain conservatives deplatformed and censored,” Comer said.
"We want to know again, is this is the government involvement another dirty trick by the Joe Biden administration, or is this just bad liberal policy that discriminates against conservatives by the bank,” Comer continued.
"So, you have evidence of some banks debanking conservatives?” Bartiromo asked.
"Yes, especially people that were involved in different energy type businesses and things like that, as well as very well spoken, outspoken conservative activists, so, there are numerous instances, enough to open an investigation,” Comer continued.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
Why Trump's IG Firings Were Legal
Timothy Birdnow
The firing of Inspector Generals was entirely proper and standard operating procedure.
This article from the Blaze explains:
Yes, there is that matter of notifying Congress no later than 30 days before the removal. But one law professor deals with it:
These are not advice and consent positions but staffers.
Anyone remember Bill Clinton firing all the U.S. atttorneys when he first took office? No? The media doesn't like to discuss that. But he did it, and Obama did much the same when he took power. These were U.S. Attorneys, who actually could bring charges against people, and not merely I.G.s whose total authority is to advise the President so as to manage his own branch of government better.
The same people howling for Trump's head over this were the same folks who said it was just fine when Clinton fired the attorneys.
Another point - ever heard of the Tenure of Office Act?
The Tenure of Office act was a nasty little party favor from the Civil War. Since Lincoln had appointed a Southern Democrat as his Vice President and tthat man - Andrew Johnson - assumed the office of President upon Lincoln's assassination Congress passed the TOOA to control him. It said the President could not fire anybody appointed by the previous president in the event of assassination. The idea was Johnson was stuck with Lincoln's people like it or not.
It all came to a head when he was forced to fire Sec. State Edwin Stanton. Stanton simply refused to leave and he actually barricaded himself in his office and had to be removed by a seige! This was the primary article of impeachment against Johnson (the other 19 were all throwaways. For instance they said he was drunk at his inaugural - something not illegal - but in fact Johnson didn't drink but was a bit loopy because his doctors gave him cough medicine.)
Anyway Congress repealed the Tenure of Office Act in 1883,and it was declared unconstitutional in Myers v. United States (1926). It took so long because it was only enforced the one time -against Johnson.
The point is this law is essentially an updated version of the Tenure of Office Act. The Courts have already spoken.
Trump had every right to do what he did and Congress can suck on it.
Of course some liberal group will file suit and eventtually lose but they can make hay while the sun is shining. Their inevitable loss will be buried on page eight of the newspaper. All that will matter will be the fact of a legal challenge and the media hysterically calling for impeachment for breaking the law.
The firing of Inspector Generals was entirely proper and standard operating procedure.
This article from the Blaze explains:
"Inspectors general have the responsibility of conducting audits and other oversight measures to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in various federal agencies. According to the website for the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency: "The President nominates IGs at Cabinet-level departments and major agencies with Senate confirmation. These IGs can only be removed by the President. The agency heads appoint and can remove IGs at designated Federal entities."
The website further adds that "both houses of Congress must be notified if an IG is removed by the President or an agency head," though the statute notes that the notification must come no "later than 30 days before the removal." That stipulation regarding congressional notification was added to the Inspector General Act in 2022.
'The Inspectors General ... are simple members of the executive branch agencies. Even if Congress attempts to place conditions on their removal, those conditions are unconstitutional.'
Liberals have since bewailed the so-called "Friday night massacre" of IGs.
The website further adds that "both houses of Congress must be notified if an IG is removed by the President or an agency head," though the statute notes that the notification must come no "later than 30 days before the removal." That stipulation regarding congressional notification was added to the Inspector General Act in 2022.
'The Inspectors General ... are simple members of the executive branch agencies. Even if Congress attempts to place conditions on their removal, those conditions are unconstitutional.'
Liberals have since bewailed the so-called "Friday night massacre" of IGs.
Yes, there is that matter of notifying Congress no later than 30 days before the removal. But one law professor deals with it:
"What's more, John Yoo, a well-respected law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and a longtime supporter of Trump, believes the president is on solid legal footing with the firings, despite the caterwauling on the left.
"President Trump is well within his power to remove members of the executive branch at will. In Seila Law v. CFPB (2020), the Supreme Court held that Congress could not protect officers of the United States from removal by the President. ... In Seila Law, the Court said that the only officers that Congress might be able to protect are those that are members of multi-body commissions, like the FCC or the SEC," Yoo said, according to Newsweek.
"The Inspectors General do not have that status; they are simple members of the executive branch agencies. Even if Congress attempts to place conditions on their removal, those conditions are unconstitutional. Any Inspector General that attempts to challenge their removal in court — they would still have to leave office and just sue for back pay — will be wasting their money in lawyers fees."
"President Trump is well within his power to remove members of the executive branch at will. In Seila Law v. CFPB (2020), the Supreme Court held that Congress could not protect officers of the United States from removal by the President. ... In Seila Law, the Court said that the only officers that Congress might be able to protect are those that are members of multi-body commissions, like the FCC or the SEC," Yoo said, according to Newsweek.
"The Inspectors General do not have that status; they are simple members of the executive branch agencies. Even if Congress attempts to place conditions on their removal, those conditions are unconstitutional. Any Inspector General that attempts to challenge their removal in court — they would still have to leave office and just sue for back pay — will be wasting their money in lawyers fees."
These are not advice and consent positions but staffers.
Anyone remember Bill Clinton firing all the U.S. atttorneys when he first took office? No? The media doesn't like to discuss that. But he did it, and Obama did much the same when he took power. These were U.S. Attorneys, who actually could bring charges against people, and not merely I.G.s whose total authority is to advise the President so as to manage his own branch of government better.
The same people howling for Trump's head over this were the same folks who said it was just fine when Clinton fired the attorneys.
Another point - ever heard of the Tenure of Office Act?
The Tenure of Office act was a nasty little party favor from the Civil War. Since Lincoln had appointed a Southern Democrat as his Vice President and tthat man - Andrew Johnson - assumed the office of President upon Lincoln's assassination Congress passed the TOOA to control him. It said the President could not fire anybody appointed by the previous president in the event of assassination. The idea was Johnson was stuck with Lincoln's people like it or not.
It all came to a head when he was forced to fire Sec. State Edwin Stanton. Stanton simply refused to leave and he actually barricaded himself in his office and had to be removed by a seige! This was the primary article of impeachment against Johnson (the other 19 were all throwaways. For instance they said he was drunk at his inaugural - something not illegal - but in fact Johnson didn't drink but was a bit loopy because his doctors gave him cough medicine.)
Anyway Congress repealed the Tenure of Office Act in 1883,and it was declared unconstitutional in Myers v. United States (1926). It took so long because it was only enforced the one time -against Johnson.
The point is this law is essentially an updated version of the Tenure of Office Act. The Courts have already spoken.
Trump had every right to do what he did and Congress can suck on it.
Of course some liberal group will file suit and eventtually lose but they can make hay while the sun is shining. Their inevitable loss will be buried on page eight of the newspaper. All that will matter will be the fact of a legal challenge and the media hysterically calling for impeachment for breaking the law.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:40 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 796 words, total size 5 kb.
January 27, 2025
No Legal Birthright Citizenship
Timothy Birdnow
Daniel Horowitz explains the legal case against anchor babies.
The legal case against anchor-baby citizenship
I find this hard to excerpt without gutting it so you have to go and read it yourself. But he makes a compelling legal case for no birthright citizenship. Do read it.
Daniel Horowitz explains the legal case against anchor babies.
The legal case against anchor-baby citizenship
I find this hard to excerpt without gutting it so you have to go and read it yourself. But he makes a compelling legal case for no birthright citizenship. Do read it.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
Playing Both Sides
Timothy Birdnow
US Passed Secret Intelligence To AQ-Linked Rulers Of Syria: WaPo
From the article:
Hayʼat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which rules Syria from Damascus under Jolani, is still a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization under US law. The only change which happened at the end of the Biden administration was that the US $10 million bounty on Jolani's head was removed, at a moment Western officials have engaged the new regime in Damascus on a diplomatic level.
But The Washington Post has just revealed that American intelligence officials met with HTS representatives and passed them classified intelligence information. This happened during the tail-end of the Biden White House.
The Washington Post report begins, "In the chaotic days after the fall of [Bashar] al-Assad, the Biden administration began to engage cautiously with HTS and its leader, Abu Mohammed al-Julani."
"The intelligence exchange with HTS has occurred in direct encounters between US intelligence officials and representatives of HTS, rather than via third parties." The Post continues.
The report adds that this "has involved exchanges between the two sides, in Syria and a third country. It began roughly two weeks after HTS came to power on Dec. 8."
This is being presented by US officials as to combat threats being presented by a resurgent ISIS. For example, there have been recent reported plots against a key Shia religious pilgrimage site on the outskirts of Damascus, the Sayyidah Zaynab Mosque.
"In at least one case, the U.S. intelligence helped thwart an ISIS plot to attack a religious shrine outside Damascus earlier this month, according to the officials," the WaPo report says.
The serious contradiction in all of this is that American companies and citizens are still unable to do business or any interactions with Syrian entities under US counterterrorism laws and due to the long-existent sanctions. And yet, US intelligence is passing on classified information to Syrian leaders despite the terror designation and ongoing sanctions.
The other glaring contradiction is that the separation between HTS and ISIS ideology is thin and slim. Jolani himself was once the personal emissary of ISIS chief pf Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in the early days of the anti-Assad war for regime change.
AntiWar.com has written the following review:
HTS grew out of the al-Nusra Front, an organization that Julani formed in 2009 in coordination with al-Qaeda’s central leadership. Juliani is a veteran of the Iraq War, where he fought for al-Qaeda in Iraq against US forces.
Even with this background, the Biden administration elected to try to develop ties with Julani. "It’s the right, prudent and appropriate thing to do, given that there was credible, specific information [about ISIS threats], and coupled with our efforts to cultivate a relationship with these guys,” one former US official told The Post.
US Passed Secret Intelligence To AQ-Linked Rulers Of Syria: WaPo
From the article:
Hayʼat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which rules Syria from Damascus under Jolani, is still a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization under US law. The only change which happened at the end of the Biden administration was that the US $10 million bounty on Jolani's head was removed, at a moment Western officials have engaged the new regime in Damascus on a diplomatic level.
But The Washington Post has just revealed that American intelligence officials met with HTS representatives and passed them classified intelligence information. This happened during the tail-end of the Biden White House.
The Washington Post report begins, "In the chaotic days after the fall of [Bashar] al-Assad, the Biden administration began to engage cautiously with HTS and its leader, Abu Mohammed al-Julani."
"The intelligence exchange with HTS has occurred in direct encounters between US intelligence officials and representatives of HTS, rather than via third parties." The Post continues.
The report adds that this "has involved exchanges between the two sides, in Syria and a third country. It began roughly two weeks after HTS came to power on Dec. 8."
This is being presented by US officials as to combat threats being presented by a resurgent ISIS. For example, there have been recent reported plots against a key Shia religious pilgrimage site on the outskirts of Damascus, the Sayyidah Zaynab Mosque.
"In at least one case, the U.S. intelligence helped thwart an ISIS plot to attack a religious shrine outside Damascus earlier this month, according to the officials," the WaPo report says.
The serious contradiction in all of this is that American companies and citizens are still unable to do business or any interactions with Syrian entities under US counterterrorism laws and due to the long-existent sanctions. And yet, US intelligence is passing on classified information to Syrian leaders despite the terror designation and ongoing sanctions.
The other glaring contradiction is that the separation between HTS and ISIS ideology is thin and slim. Jolani himself was once the personal emissary of ISIS chief pf Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in the early days of the anti-Assad war for regime change.
AntiWar.com has written the following review:
HTS grew out of the al-Nusra Front, an organization that Julani formed in 2009 in coordination with al-Qaeda’s central leadership. Juliani is a veteran of the Iraq War, where he fought for al-Qaeda in Iraq against US forces.
Even with this background, the Biden administration elected to try to develop ties with Julani. "It’s the right, prudent and appropriate thing to do, given that there was credible, specific information [about ISIS threats], and coupled with our efforts to cultivate a relationship with these guys,” one former US official told The Post.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:38 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 459 words, total size 3 kb.
The Nazi Way
Timothy Birdnow
Here is the story of a police officer who simply walked on the grass on J6 and was horribly abused by an out-of-control system.
Do read the whole thing; it's more like something out of Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia than America.
I hope this guy sues and wins a huge, huge settlement and that everyone who was involved in this case gets fired and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Here is the story of a police officer who simply walked on the grass on J6 and was horribly abused by an out-of-control system.
Do read the whole thing; it's more like something out of Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia than America.
I hope this guy sues and wins a huge, huge settlement and that everyone who was involved in this case gets fired and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:24 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
Cal. Dems Want to Secede
Timothy Birdnow
More power to 'em!
California democrats want to secede.
They are whining about how they need FEMA to bail them out now. A Republic of California would be bankrupt inside of three months.
Notice how the Democrats are reaching for nullification and secession again; it's their go-to when things don't go their way.
I for one will bid them a fond adieu.
More power to 'em!
California democrats want to secede.
They are whining about how they need FEMA to bail them out now. A Republic of California would be bankrupt inside of three months.
Notice how the Democrats are reaching for nullification and secession again; it's their go-to when things don't go their way.
I for one will bid them a fond adieu.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:02 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
How it's Done
Timothy Birdnow
Columbia just caved on accepting back the aliens it sent to the U.S. after Trump made it clear he wasn't playing with them.
He had just imposed a 25% tariff on all goods coming from Columbia.
Don't mess with the big dog!
Columbia just caved on accepting back the aliens it sent to the U.S. after Trump made it clear he wasn't playing with them.
He had just imposed a 25% tariff on all goods coming from Columbia.
Don't mess with the big dog!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:43 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Not Real Football
Timothy Birdnow
I've said it before and I'll say it again; the NFL is barely a step above the WWE in terms of honesty of outcome.
Case in point.
I've largely quit watching the NFL because it appeared increasingly fixed. One need but look at the last quarter of a century of Superbowls to realize this statement is true.
Back in the '80's and into the '90's Superbowls were usually disappointing with lopsided wins. It all changed at the end of the nineties. Super Bowl XXXIV (the first example I noticed) saw a sea change where the officiating profoundly affected the game, and that game went down to the final run by the Titans where they were stopped just short of the goal line and the Rams won. The next year the game was clearly stolen from the Rams by the Patriots and the help they were getting form the officals - or lack thereof the Rams were receiving. There were no penalties being called and the Pats were mugging people not even in the play. It turned out the Pats had stolen the Rams playbook and knew what they were running - and only got a fine for doing so.
This was right after the 011 attacks. Paul McCartney was being interviewed before the game and said "wouldn't it be wonderful if a team called the Patriots won the Superbowl" - it was then I knew the fix was in.
That cheating handed a dynasty to New England and started an era where every Superbowl is nip-and-tuck and the officials always seem to have a profound impact on the game.
At the same time we saw Colin Kapernick and the others jumping into the BLM protests and taking a knee to show their disrespect for America and their fans and the NFL nurtured this. One order from the owners would have put an end to it but they didn't.
Why not? Probably because they were fearful of being sued over brain trauma by former players. Our government most likely promoted all of this.
So the League decided they were best served in pushing close games with high flying passes and long, exciting runs. No smashmouth football anymore,no grinding.
They made a series of rule changes making the game softer and gentler. And at the same time they embarked on a series of morality plays.
It has increasingly looked like pro wrestling in recent years. Fun but fake.
Somehow the powers that be decided Kansas City should be the standard-bearer for the League, and they are taking pains to see to it they have a dynasty.
Now,being a Missourian and with the UFL out of season I'll root for K.C. but that doesn't mean I am willing to close my eyes to this.
Part of what makes sports interesting is that two teams (or people) play by the same rules and anything can happen. Managing outcomes may make for an interesting spectacle but it's not sports.
I doubt I'll even watch the Superbowl this year. There's probably a truck and tractor pull on, or maybe roller derby somewhere. They may be fake too but at least they aren't a bunch of ungrateful millionaires laughing at the stupidity of their fans.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; the NFL is barely a step above the WWE in terms of honesty of outcome.
Case in point.
I've largely quit watching the NFL because it appeared increasingly fixed. One need but look at the last quarter of a century of Superbowls to realize this statement is true.
Back in the '80's and into the '90's Superbowls were usually disappointing with lopsided wins. It all changed at the end of the nineties. Super Bowl XXXIV (the first example I noticed) saw a sea change where the officiating profoundly affected the game, and that game went down to the final run by the Titans where they were stopped just short of the goal line and the Rams won. The next year the game was clearly stolen from the Rams by the Patriots and the help they were getting form the officals - or lack thereof the Rams were receiving. There were no penalties being called and the Pats were mugging people not even in the play. It turned out the Pats had stolen the Rams playbook and knew what they were running - and only got a fine for doing so.
This was right after the 011 attacks. Paul McCartney was being interviewed before the game and said "wouldn't it be wonderful if a team called the Patriots won the Superbowl" - it was then I knew the fix was in.
That cheating handed a dynasty to New England and started an era where every Superbowl is nip-and-tuck and the officials always seem to have a profound impact on the game.
At the same time we saw Colin Kapernick and the others jumping into the BLM protests and taking a knee to show their disrespect for America and their fans and the NFL nurtured this. One order from the owners would have put an end to it but they didn't.
Why not? Probably because they were fearful of being sued over brain trauma by former players. Our government most likely promoted all of this.
So the League decided they were best served in pushing close games with high flying passes and long, exciting runs. No smashmouth football anymore,no grinding.
They made a series of rule changes making the game softer and gentler. And at the same time they embarked on a series of morality plays.
It has increasingly looked like pro wrestling in recent years. Fun but fake.
Somehow the powers that be decided Kansas City should be the standard-bearer for the League, and they are taking pains to see to it they have a dynasty.
Now,being a Missourian and with the UFL out of season I'll root for K.C. but that doesn't mean I am willing to close my eyes to this.
Part of what makes sports interesting is that two teams (or people) play by the same rules and anything can happen. Managing outcomes may make for an interesting spectacle but it's not sports.
I doubt I'll even watch the Superbowl this year. There's probably a truck and tractor pull on, or maybe roller derby somewhere. They may be fake too but at least they aren't a bunch of ungrateful millionaires laughing at the stupidity of their fans.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:28 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 543 words, total size 3 kb.
Illinois Governor Vows to resist Deportations
Timothy Birdnow
Don't pick a fight you can't win J.B....
Pritzker Threatens Trump Admin — Local Law Enforcement Will Stand Up for ‘Law-Abiding Undocumented People’
They ain't law abiding if they are illegal aliens dumbass.
FTA:
I dare that no-necked dimwit to give one, just one, example of someone who is a "law abiding undocumented person" that Trump has dragged away.
Of course just by invading our country without permission they are not law-abiding. And in fact many of them are purely criminal and here because it's easy pickings.
I notice Pritzker doesn't have a bunch of illegals living in his mansion. Why not? If America has to let people invade why should his particular slice of America be exempt?
I hope it comes down to a struggle and Pritzker gets indicted. This is a fight he can't win.
What is happening here is NULLIFICATION, the same nullification that fomented the Civil War (and by Democrats then and now). It's the same nullification they were so bitterly opposed to when, say, Texas or Arizona tried to secure their own border. Suddenly they found nullification a terrible idea, an attempt to reimpose the Confederacy. But they do it with immpunity where their own interests are concerned.
There are laws in this country and these illegals have broken them and Mr. Pritzker is threatening to break them now. He should be held accountable.
Don't pick a fight you can't win J.B....
Pritzker Threatens Trump Admin — Local Law Enforcement Will Stand Up for ‘Law-Abiding Undocumented People’
They ain't law abiding if they are illegal aliens dumbass.
FTA:
Host Dana Bash said, "How are you preparing, particularly if they do target schools, churches and small businesses as they are now allowed to do?”
Pritzker said, "Well, let me start by being clear that when we’re talking about violent criminals who have been convicted and who are undocumented, we don’t want them in our state. We want them out of the country. We hope they do get deported. And if that’s who they’re picking up, we’re all for it. They show up with a warrant, and we’re going to hand over people who are in our prisons or in our jails who fit that description. Now, what they’re also doing, though, and it’s quite disturbing, is they’re going after people who are law-abiding, who are holding down jobs, who have families here who may have been here for a decade or two decades, and they’re often our neighbors and our friends. And why are we going after them? These are not people who are causing problems in our country. What we need is a path to citizenship for them. We need to secure our border. We need to get rid of the violent criminals, but we also need to protect people, at least the residents of Illinois and all across the nation, who are just doing what we hope that immigrants will do.
He added, "We also have a law on the books in Illinois that says that our local law enforcement will stand up for those law-abiding, undocumented people in our state who are doing the right thing. And we’re not going to help federal officials just drag them away because somebody pointed at them and said, oh, that person’s brown or that person’s not from here. Check it out. Maybe they’re undocumented.
Pritzker said, "Well, let me start by being clear that when we’re talking about violent criminals who have been convicted and who are undocumented, we don’t want them in our state. We want them out of the country. We hope they do get deported. And if that’s who they’re picking up, we’re all for it. They show up with a warrant, and we’re going to hand over people who are in our prisons or in our jails who fit that description. Now, what they’re also doing, though, and it’s quite disturbing, is they’re going after people who are law-abiding, who are holding down jobs, who have families here who may have been here for a decade or two decades, and they’re often our neighbors and our friends. And why are we going after them? These are not people who are causing problems in our country. What we need is a path to citizenship for them. We need to secure our border. We need to get rid of the violent criminals, but we also need to protect people, at least the residents of Illinois and all across the nation, who are just doing what we hope that immigrants will do.
He added, "We also have a law on the books in Illinois that says that our local law enforcement will stand up for those law-abiding, undocumented people in our state who are doing the right thing. And we’re not going to help federal officials just drag them away because somebody pointed at them and said, oh, that person’s brown or that person’s not from here. Check it out. Maybe they’re undocumented.
I dare that no-necked dimwit to give one, just one, example of someone who is a "law abiding undocumented person" that Trump has dragged away.
Of course just by invading our country without permission they are not law-abiding. And in fact many of them are purely criminal and here because it's easy pickings.
I notice Pritzker doesn't have a bunch of illegals living in his mansion. Why not? If America has to let people invade why should his particular slice of America be exempt?
I hope it comes down to a struggle and Pritzker gets indicted. This is a fight he can't win.
What is happening here is NULLIFICATION, the same nullification that fomented the Civil War (and by Democrats then and now). It's the same nullification they were so bitterly opposed to when, say, Texas or Arizona tried to secure their own border. Suddenly they found nullification a terrible idea, an attempt to reimpose the Confederacy. But they do it with immpunity where their own interests are concerned.
There are laws in this country and these illegals have broken them and Mr. Pritzker is threatening to break them now. He should be held accountable.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:26 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 532 words, total size 3 kb.
Woman's Prison Blues
Timothy Birdnow
No less than 15% of "women" in prisons are actually men. It's a pure scam to avoid hard time.
Jaw-Dropping Number of Inmates in Women’s Prisons Are Actually Just Opportunistic Men
From the Daily Caller article:
Who wouldn't want to avoid men's prison and go into a woman's? You'll do less fighting and if you do fight you'll win, so you will run the cell block. Meanwhile you can get some action when the guards aren't looking. As hard time goes it would be a sweetheart deal. All you have to be willing to do is wear women's clothes.
It was a terrible injustice to the women incarcerated to put them in with these dudes in dresses. They committed crimes and are paying their debt to society - that debt doesn't include being raped by some thug who tricked an idiot court.
No less than 15% of "women" in prisons are actually men. It's a pure scam to avoid hard time.
Jaw-Dropping Number of Inmates in Women’s Prisons Are Actually Just Opportunistic Men
From the Daily Caller article:
The order, which prohibits federal funds for gender transition medical procedures, drugs and treatment, mandates that the federal government only recognize male and female sexes and requires inmates to be housed according to their biological sex. Of the 10,047 total inmates in women’s federal facilities, 1,538 are biological males, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
"The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers,” the order reads. It adds that no federal funds shall be expended for "any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.”
President Donald Trump signs an executive order "protecting women from radical gender ideology” ✍️
pic.twitter.com/jAsDjETha3
— Daily Loud (@DailyLoud) January 21, 2025
The order also reversed the past policy of allowing biological males into ostensibly "single-sex” domestic abuse shelters for women and mandated that government-issued identification reflect the bearer’s biological sex — meaning no "X” marker designating an undefined or unlisted gender will be recognized.
"The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers,” the order reads. It adds that no federal funds shall be expended for "any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.”
President Donald Trump signs an executive order "protecting women from radical gender ideology” ✍️
pic.twitter.com/jAsDjETha3
— Daily Loud (@DailyLoud) January 21, 2025
The order also reversed the past policy of allowing biological males into ostensibly "single-sex” domestic abuse shelters for women and mandated that government-issued identification reflect the bearer’s biological sex — meaning no "X” marker designating an undefined or unlisted gender will be recognized.
Who wouldn't want to avoid men's prison and go into a woman's? You'll do less fighting and if you do fight you'll win, so you will run the cell block. Meanwhile you can get some action when the guards aren't looking. As hard time goes it would be a sweetheart deal. All you have to be willing to do is wear women's clothes.
It was a terrible injustice to the women incarcerated to put them in with these dudes in dresses. They committed crimes and are paying their debt to society - that debt doesn't include being raped by some thug who tricked an idiot court.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
The Mark of the U.N.
Timothy Birdnow
Time to withdraw from the U.N.
Absurd: UN Calls for Widespread Adoption of Digital ID Systems to Combat Climate Change
I am mindful of Revelation 13:16-18:
The article gives these bullet points:
This is Agenda 30,the Kingdom of Antichrist. These people are serious and will implement this in time if given the chance. In fact they are going to be more desperate than ever to implement it as there has been a great backlash against their programs and they need to stifle any and all dissent.
If an unelected global entity can simply impose identity verification on the public how do we have sovereign nations? This would be the definition of tyranny. Tyrants number their population so they can control them.
They will use this to restrict where you go, how far you go, what you eat, how warm or cool you keep your home, etc. This scheme will ensure everyone is a slave to the rulers.
It will not end well.
Time to withdraw from the U.N.
Absurd: UN Calls for Widespread Adoption of Digital ID Systems to Combat Climate Change
I am mindful of Revelation 13:16-18:
16 It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads,
17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
18 This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man.[e] That number is 666.
17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
18 This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man.[e] That number is 666.
The article gives these bullet points:
* The United Nations (UN) is promoting the adoption of digital identity systems to address the global climate crisis, focusing on monitoring energy consumption and promoting sustainable practices.
* This initiative is part of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under Agenda 2030, which aims to provide legal identity for all individuals, including birth registration, by 2030.
* The UNDP claims that digital IDs will allow governments to track populations during environmental emergencies, collect data on energy consumption and inspire "behavior change” to enhance sustainability measures.
* Critics and privacy advocates are worried about potential government overreach, intrusive monitoring and risks to individual privacy, including the potential for widespread surveillance and diminished personal freedoms.
* The push for digital IDs highlights the tension between effective climate action and preserving individual privacy, emphasizing the need for measures that respect democratic principles and individual freedoms.
* This initiative is part of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under Agenda 2030, which aims to provide legal identity for all individuals, including birth registration, by 2030.
* The UNDP claims that digital IDs will allow governments to track populations during environmental emergencies, collect data on energy consumption and inspire "behavior change” to enhance sustainability measures.
* Critics and privacy advocates are worried about potential government overreach, intrusive monitoring and risks to individual privacy, including the potential for widespread surveillance and diminished personal freedoms.
* The push for digital IDs highlights the tension between effective climate action and preserving individual privacy, emphasizing the need for measures that respect democratic principles and individual freedoms.
This is Agenda 30,the Kingdom of Antichrist. These people are serious and will implement this in time if given the chance. In fact they are going to be more desperate than ever to implement it as there has been a great backlash against their programs and they need to stifle any and all dissent.
If an unelected global entity can simply impose identity verification on the public how do we have sovereign nations? This would be the definition of tyranny. Tyrants number their population so they can control them.
They will use this to restrict where you go, how far you go, what you eat, how warm or cool you keep your home, etc. This scheme will ensure everyone is a slave to the rulers.
It will not end well.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:44 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 3 kb.
January 26, 2025
Christianity is Not a Suicide Pact
Timothy Birdnow
Maybe Tom Homan should fly the deportees to Vatican City,since Pope Francis is so eager to embrace them.
Homan Calls Popes Bluff, Highlights Vatican Walls
I am not kidding; it worked in New York City. Ditto in California. The public was furious at the huge influx of illegal aliens when before they were just fine with Red states having to accept them. Not In My Backyard is a real thing.
So Francis can house them in St. Peters and in his own residence. He's always bragged about his care and concern for the poor; let him show it now.
The Gospels make it quite plain Jesus had limits to what he was giving. There were times He tried to dodge the crowds, and avoid being recognized, because He knew there were limits to what He could do. In fact Jesus once got in a boat and rowed away just to avoid the crowd. What does that tell us? It tells me that we are supposed to give charitably but there are limits and we are not expected to give until it ruins us. This immigration business is about America giving far more than we can and it is ruining us.
Shel Silverstein wrote the classic children's book The Giving Tree that illustrates the point I'm trying to make here. The tree gave and gave out of love and the boy took and took until the tree was no more, burned up as firewood. That is what has been happening to America.
At any rate the Gospel of John 10:1 shows how Jesus saw things:
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the fold of the sheep, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber."
And yet here we have Pope Francis demanding we accept thieves and robbers into the sheepfold, and do so until we destroy our very substance as these folks take and take.
Christianity is not a suicide pact.
It's easy for the likes of Francis, who has never actually lived with the consequences of policies he advocates. He was always protected by his offices in the Church, going well back to his days in Argentina. He now sits in a fortress inside a place so xenophobic it's a private country, complete with its own military and border guards watching the gate. But America must keep giving and giving and if it should collapse well, that's the price of discipleship, or so Francis would console himself.
Maybe Il Papa needs a lesson in empathy. A few ten thousands of illegal aliens might give him a new, more Godly perspective on things.
Maybe Tom Homan should fly the deportees to Vatican City,since Pope Francis is so eager to embrace them.
Homan Calls Popes Bluff, Highlights Vatican Walls
I am not kidding; it worked in New York City. Ditto in California. The public was furious at the huge influx of illegal aliens when before they were just fine with Red states having to accept them. Not In My Backyard is a real thing.
So Francis can house them in St. Peters and in his own residence. He's always bragged about his care and concern for the poor; let him show it now.
The Gospels make it quite plain Jesus had limits to what he was giving. There were times He tried to dodge the crowds, and avoid being recognized, because He knew there were limits to what He could do. In fact Jesus once got in a boat and rowed away just to avoid the crowd. What does that tell us? It tells me that we are supposed to give charitably but there are limits and we are not expected to give until it ruins us. This immigration business is about America giving far more than we can and it is ruining us.
Shel Silverstein wrote the classic children's book The Giving Tree that illustrates the point I'm trying to make here. The tree gave and gave out of love and the boy took and took until the tree was no more, burned up as firewood. That is what has been happening to America.
At any rate the Gospel of John 10:1 shows how Jesus saw things:
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the fold of the sheep, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber."
And yet here we have Pope Francis demanding we accept thieves and robbers into the sheepfold, and do so until we destroy our very substance as these folks take and take.
Christianity is not a suicide pact.
It's easy for the likes of Francis, who has never actually lived with the consequences of policies he advocates. He was always protected by his offices in the Church, going well back to his days in Argentina. He now sits in a fortress inside a place so xenophobic it's a private country, complete with its own military and border guards watching the gate. But America must keep giving and giving and if it should collapse well, that's the price of discipleship, or so Francis would console himself.
Maybe Il Papa needs a lesson in empathy. A few ten thousands of illegal aliens might give him a new, more Godly perspective on things.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:01 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 454 words, total size 3 kb.
Hegseth Accuser was "Promised"
Timothy Birdnow
Pete Hegseth's accuser has admitted to being recruited to sign an affidavit and said she was "promised her statement would corroborate others and affect key votes". It's clear she was recruited by Democrats to help take down Hegseth.
Who?
In what has become a classic pattern in the politics of personal destruction this woman - Hegseth's former sister-in-law - came forward at the last minute to accuse Hegseth of abusing his wife (who denied the allegations).
How many times have we seen this pattern in the past, these last minute accusations shepherded by Democrats? Remember Brett Kavanaugh? How about Clarence Thomas?
For that matter this is what they did to Missouri Governor Eric Greitens; recruited a woman who had admitted to a voluntary affair with Greitens to bring charges.
This is the politics of personal destruction. It's the nastiest, most vile form of political theater there is.
Who promised this woman? Who was she working with? The FBI should investigate.
Pete Hegseth's accuser has admitted to being recruited to sign an affidavit and said she was "promised her statement would corroborate others and affect key votes". It's clear she was recruited by Democrats to help take down Hegseth.
Who?
In what has become a classic pattern in the politics of personal destruction this woman - Hegseth's former sister-in-law - came forward at the last minute to accuse Hegseth of abusing his wife (who denied the allegations).
How many times have we seen this pattern in the past, these last minute accusations shepherded by Democrats? Remember Brett Kavanaugh? How about Clarence Thomas?
For that matter this is what they did to Missouri Governor Eric Greitens; recruited a woman who had admitted to a voluntary affair with Greitens to bring charges.
This is the politics of personal destruction. It's the nastiest, most vile form of political theater there is.
Who promised this woman? Who was she working with? The FBI should investigate.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:36 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
January 25, 2025
Min. Dem. Supreme Court Steals Republican House Control
Timothy Birdnow
This is why it's so important to control the courts in the states.
Minnesota high court sides with Democrats in struggle with Republicans over control of state House
The GOP held a 67 to 66 majority in the state House and Democrats sued to argue there was no quorum and thus they should retain control of that chamber. Republicans tried to actually set up as the rightful leaders but now the state supreme court has sided with the Democrats and stolen the state House from the GOP.
Disgraceful and shocking but not surprising.
Democrats had ditched their responsibilities, refusing to show up at the state cpitol to prevent the Republicans from setting up and voting in a Speaker.
The court issued a judgment without a legal argument and the Chief Just-ass said that would come later - in other words there was none, they were just making up law as they went along. Now they need time to find ways to make this stick.
The Justice said he assumed all parties would obey the order. The GOP should tells this guy to pound sand. Democrats are now saying all actions by Republicans are null and void.
There is a special election being held to fill a vacant seat caused by the Democrat elected not living in the district. She was disqualified (the Democrat Secretary of State let her assume office but a court kicked her out.)
Democrats always try to find a way to circumvent the law and to steal power where they do not acquire it honestly. They have become masters of using the courts.
This is why it's so important to control the courts in the states.
Minnesota high court sides with Democrats in struggle with Republicans over control of state House
The GOP held a 67 to 66 majority in the state House and Democrats sued to argue there was no quorum and thus they should retain control of that chamber. Republicans tried to actually set up as the rightful leaders but now the state supreme court has sided with the Democrats and stolen the state House from the GOP.
Disgraceful and shocking but not surprising.
Democrats had ditched their responsibilities, refusing to show up at the state cpitol to prevent the Republicans from setting up and voting in a Speaker.
The court issued a judgment without a legal argument and the Chief Just-ass said that would come later - in other words there was none, they were just making up law as they went along. Now they need time to find ways to make this stick.
The Justice said he assumed all parties would obey the order. The GOP should tells this guy to pound sand. Democrats are now saying all actions by Republicans are null and void.
There is a special election being held to fill a vacant seat caused by the Democrat elected not living in the district. She was disqualified (the Democrat Secretary of State let her assume office but a court kicked her out.)
Democrats always try to find a way to circumvent the law and to steal power where they do not acquire it honestly. They have become masters of using the courts.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:14 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
90kb generated in CPU 0.0598, elapsed 0.6214 seconds.
43 queries taking 0.6085 seconds, 235 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
43 queries taking 0.6085 seconds, 235 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
