Timothy Birdnow

A person's sex is a fundamental part of his or her identity. Eliminate that ane people do not know who they are - which makes them easy fodder for reprogramming. Everything the Left does is aimed and breaking down the fundamentals of individualism and family.

Biden's Brave New Transgendered World

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:28 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.

From Steven Chase

CHICAGO/

January: 54 MURDERS this year vs. 35 last January. HUNDREDS of people SHOT, and THOUSANDS of SHOTS Missed.
IF White Supremacists were killing 40 or 50 people, and shooting hundreds EACH MONTH....
Here is a clearly measurable and observable illustration of how MEDIA manipulates the dialog. Why? Because media owners fear the White European more than any other race of man.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:31 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.

This from Richard Cronin:

Of course it is known that Neanderthals interbred with puny, frail humans. Rape certainly. During the Ice Ages, with water locked into glaciers and greatly lower sea levels, early humans subsisted at sea level as fishermen. Atmospheric pressure was greater at sea level and puny lungs were sufficient. Think of the barrel-chested Incas in the high Andes. The upland Neanderthals, with big barrel chests and ability to withstand cold, introduced these advantages to the human line. Ergo, the product was a species with the best of both. Nimble and handy in producing such weapons as the bow and arrow, early humanoids became the first species to "kill at a distance”. The Neanderthals were no match.

Tim adds:

Studies have shown a universal attraction to lighter skin and hair color by men - be they in Europe, Africa, or wherever. The Neanderthals were probably light skinned. We know this because there is significant Neanderthal DNA in Scottish people (You English have been saying that for years about those of us with Scots ancestry) so it may well be the darker Cro Magnon men were turned on by those hot hulking redhead Neanderthal babes! Hubba, hubba! Of course, the Neaderthal men lost every bar fight they got in thanks to the fact they brought only fists to a spear fight...

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:48 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 2 kb.

This from Joe Aurimma

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:44 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.

This from Frank Lasee:

Glaciers give up their treasures from warmer times. Glaciers have been ebbing and flowing since the cold times began, eons ago. Even in the last 10,000 years it has been warmer than it is now. When glaciers were much smaller than now. Without the benefits of CO2 levels at 410 parts per million of the atmosphere. Many glaciers were retreating in the warm 1920s and 1930s.

Chester McAteer adds:

About two years ago researchers found another of the 8 USAF planes that made an emergency landing on Greenland during WWII in 1942, it was buried under 340 feet of snowpack ice. There was also one found in 1995 under 268 feet of snowpack ice, prior to that one was found in 1988 under 240 feet of snowpack ice. Now think about the fact that in the last 77 years, during the period we are told has been one of the greatest warming of the climate, 340 feet of snowpack ice has accumulated over Greenland. Absolutely none of this had to do with the Trace gas CO2 which, throughout the geological record has always tracked temperature increases, not led them.

Think about this for just a moment, Iat the end of 2017 researchers discovered that the island of Zhokhov, in the high Arctic was forested with birch trees just 9000 years ago until about 3000 years ago when the climate became so cold that nothing grew on the island. Not only that but the now uninhabitable island was inhabited by humans who enjoyed temperatures at least 6°C hotter than current temperatures in the high Arctic. An interesting point is that the humans hunted Polar Bears, Seals and Walrus in an Arctic that was almost free of sea ice for most of the year. Oh, the poor polar bears! They have been around for an estimated 1.7 million years and survived every climate whether warm or cold. Does that raise any questions in your mind given the current ideas about global warming?

Temperatures peaked between 7800 and 8000 BC years ago, the period is known as the Holocene Optimal because temperatures were ideal for all plant life, animal and sea life, but since the peak temperatures they have been falling to the point that our temperatures today are closer to those during the period immediately after the end of the last ice age than to those of the peak during the Holocene Maximum.

From the peak temperatures of the Holocene Optimal they dropped to the Minoan Warming Period, then cooler to the Roman Warming Period. During the Roman Warming temperatures were high enough for the Romans to import ancient Mediterranean wine grape vines and cultivate them in the northern part of Britain, not only that but there is evidence that Mediterranean wine grape vines were cultivated in Scandinavia and Northern Russia. That's impossible in today's cold temperatures.

After the Roman Warming Period came the Medieval Warming Period, it was so warm during that time the Vikings colonized Greenland and thrived, importing ancient European Barley, they grew fruit trees and warm weather vegetables until once again it became too cold and they starved. Few realize that most of the Glaciers were gone or greatly reduced during the Holocene Optimal until they began to greatly advance during the Little Ice Age.

Another thing to think about is two years ago researchers found another of the 8 USAF planes that made an emergency landing on Greenland during WWII in 1942, it was buried under 340 feet of snowpack ice. There was also one found in 1995 under 268 feet of snowpack ice, prior to that one was found in 1988 under 240 feet of snowpack ice. Now think about the fact that in the last 77 years, during the period we are told has been one of the greatest warming of the climate, 340 feet of snowpack ice has accumulated over Greenland. Absolutely none of this had to do with the Trace gas CO2 which, throughout the geological record has always tracked temperature increases, not led them.

Antarctica, for instance, contains most of the world's ice, if it didn't put on one more inch of ice each year, it would take 250,000 years for it to be ice free. But it accumulates far more ice than it loses each year.

Greenland did indeed lose a lot of ice last year, in fact it loses a great deal of ice every year and has for thousands of years. The Denmark Ice Tracker reports that while Greenland lost 500 gigatons it gained far more than it lost, as it does every year. Even at that rate, if it lost that much without ever gaining more ice it's been estimated that it would take 12,000 years for it to be ice free. Plus, Greenland, like the Arctic and Antarctica have, it's been recently discovered, massive sub-glacial and submarine volcanic and thermal vent activity contributing to ice loss.

For the fifth year in a row, Greenland's largest Glacier, Jakobshavan Glacier, which was once the fastest retreating Glacier in the world, is now rapidly advancing. The Russian glacier Vavilov, once growing 60 feet a year is now growing 82 feet a day. New Zealand reports that all 58 of their Glaciers are now growing.

NASA reported as far back as 2015 that the ice gain in Antarctica is also far more than the ice loss.

Since a low ice extent in the Arctic in 2012, NASAs MODIS has shown enormous ice extent for the last 5 years, so the evidence is very different than seems to be publicized.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:35 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 935 words, total size 6 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

I was just arguing this with some dope who said chromosomes and genitalia do not determine sex. How do you argue with someone who denies the very definitoion of the word? They are not just Science Deniers but Reality Deniers. This clod provided a link to a study suggesting (dubiously) that trans men's brains are more like women's. I pointed out that a.we don't really have a strong differenetiation between male and female brain wiring and b.neuroplasticity means the brain will rewire as a result of the continual reinforcing of the feminine stereotype by the "trans" man, so it is a pointless exercise. The fact is chromosomes are the only logical determinant.But the Ruling Class wants this as it means no alpha males to resist them. The testosterone levels of American males has dropped precipitously in recent years, as has intelligence. Coincidence? We've been feminizing boys for decades now, forcing them to behave like girls and not assert their male nature. If you want veal you lock up the baby cow. They have made these kids into veal, keeping them from wandering free and exploring their enviromment, forcing them to sit still and obey like good little girls and if they don't putting them on Ridiilin or some other drug, and not letting them leave home or become independent. The end result is a veal-like man boy who has not grown up, lives in his mother's basement, sits around in his jammies and promotes socialism and transgenderism. If Rachel Dolezol and other white people will pretend to be black to fit in with modern society, how much more will some weak children seek to be female to fit in with current conceptions?

From Steven Schueler

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:28 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 338 words, total size 2 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

I was warning about this back in the '90's when so many people were talking about how China was going to convert to Capitalism once they got a taste of it. I knew they never would. But so many, even good conservatives, bought into this. Now we have turned them into a world economic powerhouse and are selling our country to them. I think if we pushed them for any length of time they would meet the same fate as the Soviet Union, but unfortunately our government has been bought by China - and with some of our own tax money.

From Jim Church:

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 01:37 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 381 words, total size 3 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

A study by Princeton, John Hopkins, and UC Berkeley says that children are the primary spreaders of Wuhan, and that just a few "superspreaders" are responsible.

From the article:

Researchers from the Princeton Environmental Institute(PEI), Johns Hopkins University and the University of California, Berkeley, worked with public health officials in the southeast Indian states of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh to track the infection pathways and mortality rate of 575,071 individuals who were exposed to 84,965 confirmed cases of COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. It is the largest contact tracing study —which is the process of identifying people who came into contact with an infected person — conducted in the world for any disease.

Lead researcher Ramanan Laxminarayan, a senior research scholar in PEI, said that the paper is the first large study to capture the extraordinary extent to which SARS-CoV-2hinges on "superspreading,” in which a small percentage of the infected population passes the virus on to more people. The researchers found that 71% of infected individuals did not infect any of their contacts, while a mere 8% of infected individuals accounted for 60% of new infections.

"Our study presents the largest empirical demonstration of superspreading that we are aware of in any infectious disease,” Laxminarayan said. "Superspreading events are the rule rather than the exception when one is looking at the spread of COVID-19, both in India and likely in all affected places.”

Children and young adults were much more likely to contract coronavirus from people their own age, the study found. Across all age groups, people had a greater chance of catching the coronavirus from someone their own age. The overall probability of catching coronavirus ranged from 4.7% for low-risk contacts up to 10.7% for high-risk contacts.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 01:12 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1010 words, total size 8 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

I thought it is warmer than it has been since the Jurassic; how in the world was this forest there? Why, it's as if it was actually warmer just a short millenium ago...

A 1,000 year old forest found under a melting glacier in Alaska.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 12:37 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.

This from Roy Spencer

January 2021 satellite-based global temperature anomaly: +0.12 C. (relative to our new 30-year base period, 1991-2020):

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 12:35 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

I have been arguing about vote fraud with a polite lefty on Facebook. In point of fact, I suspect him of being a hired gun, someone paid to argue with conservatives. That said, part one may be read here.

Below is the continuation:

Derick Dickens replies:

Tim,

I have dealt with most of your objections in the last few months and researched them thoroughly. My goal, though, is not to rehash every point. Let's say, there were some problems, but nothing that would have modified the election. Nothing. Some of what you posted are lies it innuendoes. That is not evidence and should be rejected. Yes, some places the Trump team were not given data they asked for. Why? Because they had no evidence of any wrongdoing and by state law, that information is confidential. Trump made one material claim in Georgia in one county. He was given the records and an audit was performed in that county. However, Trump demanded records in another counties where no evidence of voter fraud existed or was provided. By law, he was denied. For the record, I would oppose both Dem's and Rep's who are going on a fishing expedition. That is illegal and problematic.

I would love to see the thousand sworn affidavits that you mention. It is a repeated claim and what was presented as evidence, I have read. They do not testify of any fraud that would have overturned the election and most do not testify of fraud.

I rely on primary sources for a simple reason: you discover who is lying and who is not.

To answer your last question: Should an investigation occur? If there is evidence of wrongdoing, then of course. No one is afraid of an investigation. However, I doubt it will work. Even when no evidence has existed in a county, I still get people yelling that there was massive fraud. Even when Trump's team admitted there was no fraud, they went online saying that they suspected fraud and demanded the courts step in.

I want to investigate fraud. I don't want to investigate "hunches" and empty accusations.

Guy Layfield says:

Derick Dickenswhen Republicans were denied entrance into the counting areas or shoved into the cheap seats those entire counties should have lost their votes. When people don't play by the rules there will be less (or even no) evidence to show. Hiding fraud by denying access to seeing it happen is the equivalent of Hillary's staff smashing their computers. Saying no evidence or not enough evidence to swing the election is wrong when the evidence was destroyed or access was prevented. There was tremendous evidence that Hillary destroyed evidence. There is significant evidence that Republicans were denied the right to be in the room to see if fraud was occurring. The numbers coming in, the timing of those numbers, and the whole set up indicate that there was clearly fraud. Can it be proven? No. But can it be proven that it is being hidden? Yes, than we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that there is guilt. If someone murders someone and runs with the gun on camera and throws it off a bridge and it cannot be located, plenty of jurors would say, "Yeah I can't prove it but I'm beyond a reasonable doubt."

Derick says:

I agree Republicans were denied and that was wrong. However, that is not fraud. Thet numbers are not signs of fraud nor is the timing. When I analyzed the statistical analysis on how those numbers are unlikely, I noted that those numbers are consistent around the country. In highly democratic areas, those numbers are consistent especially since Trump suppressed that type of voting.

On and on and on and on. There is no evidence of massive fraud. You think there is fraud, but we don't go on speculation.

Which is why I said, even in an investigation, you won't be satisfied. Why? Because you trust the media above doing the research yourself.

Guy Layfield adds:

Derick Dickensno, I don't trust the media. I trust independent videos of people showing the boarded windows, the blocked entrances, etc. Maybe you missed the point... Fraud occurs when it is hidden. I would restate my point but it isn't going to become any clearer.

Derick says:

I am not a lawyer, which is why when working through these briefs that I would consult experts in the field. I, though, am someone who reads primary sources. On my page, I have an agreement with my people that I ensure accuracy of all I report. Thus, I don't listen to either MSNBC or NewsMax. I am a leadership and development expert, professor, and theologian.

I am not citing sources mainly for a couple of reasons. 1. I did all this research on my personal page. 2. No one else is citing sources. 3. I have read both primary sources from both sides.

I would gladly cite my sources. Yet, it is awkward when no one else cites primary sources in trying to prove fraud and then expects me to cite when I dispute your facts. I would believe that the person advancing facts on a positive position must first cite them.

I retort:

Derick Dickens I have looked at the same information and come to a radically different conclusion. Statistics do not bear out a fair election. Why was vote counting stopped in key precincts at three a.m. and resumed only after Republican poll watchers went home? Why did Biden then surge, winning all the votes? It stinks, and I think an honest evaluation of this would agree. It's why they don't want to actually investigate anything. This election was a textbook on what NOT to do according to the Baker Carter Commission. It is clear there was an attempt to manipulate things. Consider how President Trump was treated - electors were blackmailed and threatened when he was first elected, his inaugural was boycotted, articles of impeachment were filed in early 2017, he was harassed by the Mueller probe (which eventually found nothing), it turned out the Obama Administration had indeed been spying on his campaign, and also Obama knew the Hillary Clinton campaign had falsely accused Trump of "Russian Collusion" and paid for the Steele Dossier to frame him. But now you want us to believe everything was on the up and up with this election? They were depserate to get rid of Trump but were pure as the wind driven snow in this election. Right. As I pointed out, one of the very key precincts saw the head go to prison for fraud in '18. There is every reason to believe there was fraud in this election. BTW I do not listen to Newsmax or MSNBC either and do in fact look at primary sources. And I also point out I believe in Science, unlike most fraud deniers who now say science is hokum for saying this is statistically unlikely. Biden didn't campaign. He was very, very old news, having been hanging around D.C. for forty years. He could barely win the priamry. Yet America turned out in record numbers to vote for him, but not to vote against the Republicans? C'mon Man! I notice you have not actually addressed any of this, claiming to have covered it elsewhere. We haven't seen it. Lisa Gale Poore is right; you haven't cited any sources but are demanding them of us. We HAVE cited multiple examples to you, but you are dismissing them. That has been the hallmark of fraud denial, I've seen; stick with talk about court cases and deny, deny, deny. Any rational person would have to admit something smells here. .

Derick Dickins replies:

The statistics do not tell there was voter fraud. The statistics say something happened. In Georgia where one place the counting stopped they did a complete hand count of all ballots. They were accurate. Through the different methods employed, it is highly unlikely enough votes could have changed.

Trump’s team only questioned less than 30,000 votes in Georgia. Among those, they claimed dead people voted in the thousands. When the audit was performed they found only 2. Trump’s team claimed people moved in from other states to vote. When they audited the names, the vast majority of them moved out of Georgia and and later moved back into Georgia years before the election. They were permanent residences before 2020 and most before 2021.

Statistics tell a story but they don’t tell what the story is. We abuse statistics when we try to fill in that story with our own preconceived notions. I do not think the data is too surprising when looked into context. Rather, most who know the data say it is not atypical

I reply:

Derick Dickens

Joe Biden won Georgia by fewer than 15,000 votes, so ANY fraud was meaningful.

Georgia Sec State admitted that a thousand people voted twice in Georgia's June primary election. This shows that there clearly WAS vote fraud leading up to the general. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/08/910653086/georgia-reveals-double-voting-cases-but-no-evidence-of-malign-intentions This is an NPR article, hardly a right wing extremist site.

You yourself admit there were two. Why? That very fact suggests there were a lot more; you don't risk a prison sentence for just two votes. That much should be clear to anyone. Why cast two fake ballots if you are not going all in?

You say:

" In Georgia where one place the counting stopped they did a complete hand count of all ballots. They were accurate. "

As Joe Biden would say "Cmon Man!" The same people did the hand count; OF COURSE the count came out the same. Did you really expect anything different?

You say:

"When they audited the names, the vast majority of them moved out of Georgia and and later moved back into Georgia years before the election. They were permanent residences before 2020 and most before 2021."

What evidence do you have of that? It's easy to make such an assertion but can you prove it? That is the whole problem with mail-in voting; there is no way to prove a person is legally entitled to vote - which is why the Democrats were hell-bent on promoting this. And it's why judges and some Democrat Governors overruled election laws which state only state legislatures can change the law and imposed this.

What of the low rejection rates? In Georgia the 2016 rejection rate of absentee ballots was 2.90% and in 2018 it was 3.46% while in 2020 it was just .034%. How do you explain this? It makes it clear something was afoot.

A judge stopped Georgia from purging nearly four thousand bad voter registrations at the last minute.  That judge happened to be the sister of sore loser Democrat Stacey Abrams. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federal-judge-the-sister-of-stacey-abrams-halts-georgia-voter-purge-ahead-of-runoff-elections/ar-BB1ckc3i

But there is NOTHING fishy going on here!

BTW, if you doubt statistical analysis of this election, then you can be classed as a Science Denier. Statistics are the foundation of many of our policies, including Climate Change. If you say we should disregard them here then we can disregard them anywhere. Why are we using them to apportion Congressional seats? For hiring practices?

You say:

" I do not think the data is too surprising when looked into context. Rather, most who know the data say it is not atypical. "

Well, statisticians who analyzed this data disagree with you. See here https://wmbriggs.com/post/33400/ and here https://wmbriggs.com/post/33377/for   examples. See also https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2021/01/01/a-statistically-meaningful-analysis-of-mail-in-voting-patterns-proves-vote-fraud-in-georgia-and-pennsylvania-n302853 and https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020

BTW the Heritage Foundation produced a map of voter fraud that is interesting. https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

I haven't even touched on possible tampering with voting machines, which was a concern to the Democrats in 2018. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democratic-senators-warned-of-potential-vote-switching-by-dominion-voting-machines-prior-to-2020-election/ar-BB1aZAYf
and have concerned people since. https://leohohmann.com/2020/11/13/software-engineers-report-dominion-flipped-minimum-of-138000-votes-from-trump-to-biden-in-michigan/ and https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/dominion-voting-machines-all-include-weighted-race-feature-whose-only-purpose-is-cheat-in-elections-we-contacted-dominion-but-did-not-get-a-response/ also https://www.salon.com/2019/03/28/new-hybrid-voting-system-can-change-paper-ballot-after-its-been-cast_partner/ Also https://evidence2020.wordpress.com/2020/11/12/dominion-vote-flipping-against-trump-cries-out-for-ballot-images-to-be-made-public/  While I don't know enough about these machines, I do know Mark Zuckerberg was paying counties to upgrade to this technology, and to the tune of  350 million dollars - a staggering sum. One rather doubts he did it simply to be a good citizen. 

Be that as it may (and the machines are a whole other ball of wax) , there are far more questions than answers about this election and nobody is even trying to provide those answers to shore up voter confidence; instead they are dissembling and denying.

Do you really think Joe Biden outperformed Barack Obama's 2012 performance by 15 million votes? And it didn't translate into coattails? And do you really think Biden could underperform Hillary's urban center votes EXCEPT in the key battlegrounds? This was a guy who won a record low share of votes in the primary. Biden has run and failed in the past too. There is nothing new or exciting about Lunch Pail Joe, but he overperformed exactly where he needed. That doesn't seem strange to you? After fifty years in office Biden turns out 80 million votes! This from a guy who did not even campaign, and when he did he could hardly fill a fast food men's room with people.

In 150 years no President has gained votes in his re-election bid and lost, by the way. 

Again, this comes down to what you choose to believe. IF you truly want Biden accepted as the legitimate President and the public to have confidence in election integrity you would be willing to look into the matter. That so many on your side are not willing to do this speaks volumes. And that the Democrats now want to make mail-in voting the norm says even more.

Derick Dickens you say "I agree Republicans were denied and that was wrong. However, that is not fraud." Well what is it then? What purpose does it serve? They weren't denying access because they wanted to make sure these Republicans got a healthy eight hours of sleep.

Derick replies:

Again, you are asking for an audit where the audit did not reveal fraud in that situation. If the goal is for an investigation and an investigation occurred by a Republican and the investigation turned up nothing, then further investigations won’t change people’s minds.

Yet, thanks for admitting that you are calling something fraud on mere speculation. That is the point I am making. All you have is speculation.

I retort:

Not asking for an audit Derick Dickins but a major investigation, a free and fair investigation.A

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 12:11 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 2706 words, total size 18 kb.

This from Frank Lasee

The cost of electricity is going up in New York. Offshore wind is very expensive. And it requires huge amounts of get this oil to build and maintain.

Dirty Secret Behind Wind Turbines, They Need Lots Of Oil

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:32 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

They used to call extremely ugly women double baggers. I guess Fauci hangs out with a homely crowd...

University Infectious Disease Expert: Fauci Wrong on Double Masking

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:21 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

Absolutely bonkers! By any metric a warmer world would be better for the poor, which is what we are told Black folks are. And of course, a strong economy stems from energy usage, so a carbon-neutral world would be poorer and as a result would disproportionately affect minorities.

Biden Administration cites Climate Change as a 'Racial Justice' Issue

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:11 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.

Warner Todd Huston

State Attorneys General Sign Letter Accusing Biden of Being a Dictator Over Dozens of Executive Orders

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:32 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.

Richard Cronin

The stock market kerfluffle over GameStop was only a false flag for the hedge fund managers to move their money before the hammer comes down. Frozen assets to follow. Precious metals, the last bastion of financial security, are skyrocketing. Executive Order 13848 has come alive.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:55 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.

James Doogue

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:47 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

Biden's economy crushing Covid "relief" scheme.

https://fee.org/articles/3-glaring-problems-with-joe-biden-s-new-multi-trillion-covid-package/?fbclid=IwAR1RBdVdZYQv0H5DKwQpHWe1q41xzLbQ7Li8H4reQDq4eY9XmED7x_sOQKo

It includes a $15 minimum wage, which will KILL the local economy.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:43 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.

Timothy Birdnow

Having an argument on Facebook about vote fraud.

Guy Layfield makes the case:

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:20 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1275 words, total size 8 kb.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:39 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.