March 05, 2017
Moonbats
Dana Mathewson
From my brother-in-law. You can take this as your Laugh-Of-The-Week, or whatever.
-----------------------------
The Award for Most Ridiculous Democrat On the Planet in 2017 goes to:
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/01/dem-candidate-moon-colonizing-companies-could-destroy-cities-by-dropping-rocks/
Dem Candidate: Moon-Colonizing Companies Could Destroy Cities by Dropping Rocks
A NOTE FROM TIM:
She doesn't understand that they have to LIFT those rocks with inadequate vehicles.
Still they could implement Project Thor, an old Cold War idea of orbiting crowbars to kersplat an enemy tank or weapon. Nasty weapon, but hardly city busters. https://www.quora.com/How-realistic-was-USAFs-Project-Thor-in-terms-of-implementation You would need something larger for that.
From my brother-in-law. You can take this as your Laugh-Of-The-Week, or whatever.
-----------------------------
The Award for Most Ridiculous Democrat On the Planet in 2017 goes to:
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/01/dem-candidate-moon-colonizing-companies-could-destroy-cities-by-dropping-rocks/
Dem Candidate: Moon-Colonizing Companies Could Destroy Cities by Dropping Rocks
A NOTE FROM TIM:
She doesn't understand that they have to LIFT those rocks with inadequate vehicles.
Still they could implement Project Thor, an old Cold War idea of orbiting crowbars to kersplat an enemy tank or weapon. Nasty weapon, but hardly city busters. https://www.quora.com/How-realistic-was-USAFs-Project-Thor-in-terms-of-implementation You would need something larger for that.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
Why Trump Ditched the WH Correspondents Dinner
Dana Mathewson
http://www.townhallmail.com/grlqcfhkqqldckqkdkcghdjttmdttkmhnngfpclmtnlnln_vpvvhvpjpkr.html?a=&b=
And people complained. But this author says "Good for Trump." And
explains why. I hadn't thought of it this way, but this is very good.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
The Democrat High Priestesses in White
Fay Voshell
There have been many interpretations concerning the mysterious bloc of women Democrats robed in white -- all the while pointedly ignoring President Trump’s speech to the joint session of Congress.
Some critics compared the ladies to devotees of the Ku Klux Klan. Photoshopped images of them wearing the pointed hoods of the KKK almost immediately appeared http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/03/01/house-dems-wear-white-protest-trump-joint-address-turns-bad-decision-454030, as some recalled the Democrat Party’s commitment to the Klan, particularly in the 1920s.
The women themselves have said they were honoring the suffragettes of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries while indicating their ongoing commitment to women’s rights issues such as equal pay for equal work.
But not many conservatives believe the white wall of women was intended to be a merely symbolic gesture of solidarity with suffragettes.
Whatever each intended to convey by her choice of clothing, the entire bloc of women in white was virtue signaling. That is one reason they chose white clothing.
The choice of white garments has long signified the sacred. Being dressed in white indicates being set apart, dedicated to sacred ideals, spiritually separated from the crowd as seeking to attain righteousness and purity. Whether Vestal virgins or, in the Christian tradition, the scared rituals of baptism and first communion, white is the garment of choice. It indicates purity of life and deeds which the rest of the world should seek to attain.
In the case of many, if not all of the feminists who sat on their hands and refused to stand as a gesture of support for Carryn Owens, widow of Navy SEAL Ryan Owens, the garments indicated they are the chosen priestesses of the pious Left, the defenders of the feminist faith.
To look at the bloc of white garbed Democrat women was to look at oracles of Delphi who have mystically discerned the most sacred right of women is the right to sacrifice their own offspring. To look at the high priestesses dedicated to the religion of radical feminism is to see leaders of a cult, the chief sacrament of which is abortion.
For nearly all leftist feminists, abortion is a holy rite, a religious ritual to be conducted in the cathedrals of Planned Parenthood and to be blessed by "faith leaders.â€
Yes, you read that correctly. Blessed.
High priests and priestesses inside and outside the Beltway have committed to "blessing†abortion both by law and by religious rituals.
According to a recent Huffington Post article entitled "Religious Leaders Bless Planned Parenthood Health Center,†http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/interfaith-blessing-planned-parenthood_us_5873a2a0e4b02b5f8589ee75 an group of clergy representing "Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and secular leaders gathered inside Planned Parenthood Metro Washington’s new Carol Whitehill Moses health center on Tuesday to perform a blessing of the space.†https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-metropolitan-washington-dc
The article goes on to cite Dr. Laura Meyers, President & CEO of Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, who told the Huffington Post that "progressive†voices of faith should speak up for women:
"Having a group of interfaith clergy perform a ceremony focused on unity and wholeness therefore takes on special meaning to empower and celebrate rather than to stigmatize, control and dehumanize. Having such a ceremony take place at this moment in history is especially powerful for us as we seek to mobilize our communities of different faiths to come together to affirm and support the reproductive freedoms we cherish and have fought so hard to achieve.â€
In the midst of all Meyers’ Newspeak, the most significant term is "reproductive freedom,†which is actually the Left’s code word for abortion on demand throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy. Abortion on demand is the freedom to be cherished and blessed.
According to HuffPo, Rev. Dr. Christine Y. Wiley, participant in the sacred blessing ceremony and co-pastor of Washington, D.C.’s Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, stated her Christian faith inspired her to support abortion:
"Many people do not understand that there are many kinds of Christians. Conservative Christians dominate the television and Radio media and influence people to think that this brand of Christianity ‘is’ Christianity. Although they have great influence, this stance is far from representing the true tenets of the person of Jesus Christ. As a progressive Womanist Christian who is concerned about wholeness in the community, especially for those who are marginalized and disenfranchised, my task is to do what Jesus did, to meet people where they are with love and understanding, and bring healing and freedom to them.â€
For Reverend Wiley, Jesus, being filled with love and understanding, is all for abortion.
Is the reverend aware of the Jesus who said that if anyone harmed little ones, he or she should be cast into the sea with a millstone around his neck? Does she recall that Jesus said to his disciples, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." Is she aware the Christian Church she claims to represent has been against abortion from its founding in the first century?
Is Wiley, who is black, aware that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, targets blacks? Has she looked at the facts: 78% of Planned Parenthood’s clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but account for 35% of the abortions in America. http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html
But to the clergy of the Left, be they black or white, within or outside congress, neither statistics indicating black genocide nor the horrors of sex select abortion nor the death sentences passed on Down Syndrome babies will ever temper their support of abortion on demand. It is an inalienable right that transcends the actualities of the abattoir that is the church of Planned Parenthood, whose representatives have been filmed bargaining over the sale of baby body parts.
Most of the women in white belong to an essentially pagan death cult that elevates abortion to a sacred right and rite that is impervious to the claims of science and Christian morality.
That is why Nancy Pelosi’s claim that she is a Roman Catholic while she is a leader of the women in white is laughable. Her prime allegiance is to another faith altogether.
The allegiance to the ritual of child sacrifice is why the bloc of white robed women will fight the Trump administration tooth and nail when it comes to defunding the temples of Planned Parenthood. That is why they will wage war on any pro-life justice who might threaten to overturn Roe. v. Wade. That is why they will not do anything to defend the rights of little women in the womb. That is why they will continue to support the extermination of the handicapped within the womb.
Abortion is the sacrament that unites the Democrats’ women in white as surely as the sacraments of the Christian Church unite believers.
Christians are often dressed in white for sacred occasions: baptisms, confirmations, and weddings. Being dressed in white is a sign of new life, new beginnings, being born again, being redeemed.
That is why those who are believers are depicted in the book of Revelation as being given a white robe, the sign of the redeemed who have believed in the blood sacrifice of the God Man Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God whose innocent blood was given for all who believe. They are transported with joy.
What will this same Christ will say to those who unrepentantly and proudly wear robes soiled with the blood of innocents? What will he say to those who bless death?
Will he bless them, or will he say, "Depart from me. I never knew you.â€
Fay Voshell holds a M.Div. from Princeton Theological Seminary, which awarded her its prize for excellence in systematic theology. A frequent contributor to American Thinker, her thoughts also have appeared in many online magazines, including Fox News, CNS, National Review, RealClearReligion and Russia Insider. She may be reached at fvoshell@yahoo.com
There have been many interpretations concerning the mysterious bloc of women Democrats robed in white -- all the while pointedly ignoring President Trump’s speech to the joint session of Congress.
Some critics compared the ladies to devotees of the Ku Klux Klan. Photoshopped images of them wearing the pointed hoods of the KKK almost immediately appeared, as some recalled the Democrat Party’s commitment to the Klan, particularly in the 1920s.
The women themselves have said they were honoring the suffragettes of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries while indicating their ongoing commitment to women’s rights issues such as equal pay for equal work.
But not many conservatives believe the white wall of women was intended to be a merely symbolic gesture of solidarity with suffragettes.
Whatever each intended to convey by her choice of clothing, the entire bloc of women in white was virtue signaling. That is one reason they chose white clothing.
The choice of white garments has long signified the sacred. Being dressed in white indicates being set apart, dedicated to sacred ideals, spiritually separated from the crowd as seeking to attain righteousness and purity. Whether Vestal virgins or, in the Christian tradition, the scared rituals of baptism and first communion, white is the garment of choice. It indicates purity of life and deeds which the rest of the world should seek to attain.
In the case of many, if not all of the feminists who sat on their hands and refused to stand as a gesture of support for Carryn Owens, widow of Navy SEAL Ryan Owens, the garments indicated they are the chosen priestesses of the pious Left, the defenders of the feminist faith.
To look at the bloc of white garbed Democrat women was to look at oracles of Delphi who have mystically discerned the most sacred right of women is the right to sacrifice their own offspring. To look at the high priestesses dedicated to the religion of radical feminism is to see leaders of a cult, the chief sacrament of which is abortion.
For nearly all leftist feminists, abortion is a holy rite, a religious ritual to be conducted in the cathedrals of Planned Parenthood and to be blessed by "faith leaders.â€
Yes, you read that correctly. Blessed.
High priests and priestesses inside and outside the Beltway have committed to "blessing†abortion both by law and by religious rituals.
According to a recent Huffington Post article entitled "Religious Leaders Bless Planned Parenthood Health Center,†an group of clergy representing "Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and secular leaders gathered inside Planned Parenthood Metro Washington’s new Carol Whitehill Moses health center on Tuesday to perform a blessing of the space.â€
The article goes on to cite Dr. Laura Meyers, President & CEO of Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, who told the Huffington Post that "progressive†voices of faith should speak up for women:
"Having a group of interfaith clergy perform a ceremony focused on unity and wholeness therefore takes on special meaning to empower and celebrate rather than to stigmatize, control and dehumanize. Having such a ceremony take place at this moment in history is especially powerful for us as we seek to mobilize our communities of different faiths to come together to affirm and support the reproductive freedoms we cherish and have fought so hard to achieve.â€
In the midst of all Meyers’ Newspeak, the most significant term is "reproductive freedom,†which is actually the Left’s code word for abortion on demand throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy. Abortion on demand is the freedom to be cherished and blessed.
According to HuffPo, Rev. Dr. Christine Y. Wiley, participant in the sacred blessing ceremony and co-pastor of Washington, D.C.’s Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, stated her Christian faith inspired her to support abortion:
"Many people do not understand that there are many kinds of Christians. Conservative Christians dominate the television and Radio media and influence people to think that this brand of Christianity ‘is’ Christianity. Although they have great influence, this stance is far from representing the true tenets of the person of Jesus Christ. As a progressive Womanist Christian who is concerned about wholeness in the community, especially for those who are marginalized and disenfranchised, my task is to do what Jesus did, to meet people where they are with love and understanding, and bring healing and freedom to them.â€
For Reverend Wiley, Jesus, being filled with love and understanding, is all for abortion.
Is the reverend aware of the Jesus who said that if anyone harmed little ones, he or she should be cast into the sea with a millstone around his neck? Does she recall that Jesus said to his disciples, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." Is she aware the Christian Church she claims to represent has been against abortion from its founding in the first century?
Is Wiley, who is black, aware that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, targets blacks? Has she looked at the facts: 78% of Planned Parenthood’s clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but account for 35% of the abortions in America.
But to the clergy of the Left, be they black or white, within or outside congress, neither statistics indicating black genocide nor the horrors of sex select abortion nor the death sentences passed on Down Syndrome babies will ever temper their support of abortion on demand. It is an inalienable right that transcends the actualities of the abattoir that is the church of Planned Parenthood, whose representatives have been filmed bargaining over the sale of baby body parts.
Most of the women in white belong to an essentially pagan death cult that elevates abortion to a sacred right and rite that is impervious to the claims of science and Christian morality.
That is why Nancy Pelosi’s claim that she is a Roman Catholic while she is a leader of the women in white is laughable. Her prime allegiance is to another faith altogether.
The allegiance to the ritual of child sacrifice is why the bloc of white robed women will fight the Trump administration tooth and nail when it comes to defunding the temples of Planned Parenthood. That is why they will wage war on any pro-life justice who might threaten to overturn Roe. v. Wade. That is why they will not do anything to defend the rights of little women in the womb. That is why they will continue to support the extermination of the handicapped within the womb.
Abortion is the sacrament that unites the Democrats’ women in white as surely as the sacraments of the Christian Church unite believers.
Christians are often dressed in white for sacred occasions: baptisms, confirmations, and weddings. Being dressed in white is a sign of new life, new beginnings, being born again, being redeemed.
That is why those who are believers are depicted in the book of Revelation as being given a white robe, the sign of the redeemed who have believed in the blood sacrifice of the God Man Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God whose innocent blood was given for all who believe. They are transported with joy.
What will this same Christ will say to those who unrepentantly and proudly wear robes soiled with the blood of innocents? What will he say to those who bless death?
Will he bless them, or will he say, "Depart from me. I never knew you.â€
A NOTE FROM JACK KEMP
"Is the reverend aware of the Jesus who said that if anyone harmed little ones, he or she should be cast into the sea with a millstone around his neck?"
Having lived in Israel and studied Hebrew there, I believe Jesus was well aware of the child sacrafice cults of the pagans such as the Moloch worshipers mentioned in the Old Testament.
There have been many interpretations concerning the mysterious bloc of women Democrats robed in white -- all the while pointedly ignoring President Trump’s speech to the joint session of Congress.
Some critics compared the ladies to devotees of the Ku Klux Klan. Photoshopped images of them wearing the pointed hoods of the KKK almost immediately appeared http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/03/01/house-dems-wear-white-protest-trump-joint-address-turns-bad-decision-454030, as some recalled the Democrat Party’s commitment to the Klan, particularly in the 1920s.
The women themselves have said they were honoring the suffragettes of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries while indicating their ongoing commitment to women’s rights issues such as equal pay for equal work.
But not many conservatives believe the white wall of women was intended to be a merely symbolic gesture of solidarity with suffragettes.
Whatever each intended to convey by her choice of clothing, the entire bloc of women in white was virtue signaling. That is one reason they chose white clothing.
The choice of white garments has long signified the sacred. Being dressed in white indicates being set apart, dedicated to sacred ideals, spiritually separated from the crowd as seeking to attain righteousness and purity. Whether Vestal virgins or, in the Christian tradition, the scared rituals of baptism and first communion, white is the garment of choice. It indicates purity of life and deeds which the rest of the world should seek to attain.
In the case of many, if not all of the feminists who sat on their hands and refused to stand as a gesture of support for Carryn Owens, widow of Navy SEAL Ryan Owens, the garments indicated they are the chosen priestesses of the pious Left, the defenders of the feminist faith.
To look at the bloc of white garbed Democrat women was to look at oracles of Delphi who have mystically discerned the most sacred right of women is the right to sacrifice their own offspring. To look at the high priestesses dedicated to the religion of radical feminism is to see leaders of a cult, the chief sacrament of which is abortion.
For nearly all leftist feminists, abortion is a holy rite, a religious ritual to be conducted in the cathedrals of Planned Parenthood and to be blessed by "faith leaders.â€
Yes, you read that correctly. Blessed.
High priests and priestesses inside and outside the Beltway have committed to "blessing†abortion both by law and by religious rituals.
According to a recent Huffington Post article entitled "Religious Leaders Bless Planned Parenthood Health Center,†http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/interfaith-blessing-planned-parenthood_us_5873a2a0e4b02b5f8589ee75 an group of clergy representing "Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and secular leaders gathered inside Planned Parenthood Metro Washington’s new Carol Whitehill Moses health center on Tuesday to perform a blessing of the space.†https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-metropolitan-washington-dc
The article goes on to cite Dr. Laura Meyers, President & CEO of Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, who told the Huffington Post that "progressive†voices of faith should speak up for women:
"Having a group of interfaith clergy perform a ceremony focused on unity and wholeness therefore takes on special meaning to empower and celebrate rather than to stigmatize, control and dehumanize. Having such a ceremony take place at this moment in history is especially powerful for us as we seek to mobilize our communities of different faiths to come together to affirm and support the reproductive freedoms we cherish and have fought so hard to achieve.â€
In the midst of all Meyers’ Newspeak, the most significant term is "reproductive freedom,†which is actually the Left’s code word for abortion on demand throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy. Abortion on demand is the freedom to be cherished and blessed.
According to HuffPo, Rev. Dr. Christine Y. Wiley, participant in the sacred blessing ceremony and co-pastor of Washington, D.C.’s Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, stated her Christian faith inspired her to support abortion:
"Many people do not understand that there are many kinds of Christians. Conservative Christians dominate the television and Radio media and influence people to think that this brand of Christianity ‘is’ Christianity. Although they have great influence, this stance is far from representing the true tenets of the person of Jesus Christ. As a progressive Womanist Christian who is concerned about wholeness in the community, especially for those who are marginalized and disenfranchised, my task is to do what Jesus did, to meet people where they are with love and understanding, and bring healing and freedom to them.â€
For Reverend Wiley, Jesus, being filled with love and understanding, is all for abortion.
Is the reverend aware of the Jesus who said that if anyone harmed little ones, he or she should be cast into the sea with a millstone around his neck? Does she recall that Jesus said to his disciples, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." Is she aware the Christian Church she claims to represent has been against abortion from its founding in the first century?
Is Wiley, who is black, aware that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, targets blacks? Has she looked at the facts: 78% of Planned Parenthood’s clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but account for 35% of the abortions in America. http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html
But to the clergy of the Left, be they black or white, within or outside congress, neither statistics indicating black genocide nor the horrors of sex select abortion nor the death sentences passed on Down Syndrome babies will ever temper their support of abortion on demand. It is an inalienable right that transcends the actualities of the abattoir that is the church of Planned Parenthood, whose representatives have been filmed bargaining over the sale of baby body parts.
Most of the women in white belong to an essentially pagan death cult that elevates abortion to a sacred right and rite that is impervious to the claims of science and Christian morality.
That is why Nancy Pelosi’s claim that she is a Roman Catholic while she is a leader of the women in white is laughable. Her prime allegiance is to another faith altogether.
The allegiance to the ritual of child sacrifice is why the bloc of white robed women will fight the Trump administration tooth and nail when it comes to defunding the temples of Planned Parenthood. That is why they will wage war on any pro-life justice who might threaten to overturn Roe. v. Wade. That is why they will not do anything to defend the rights of little women in the womb. That is why they will continue to support the extermination of the handicapped within the womb.
Abortion is the sacrament that unites the Democrats’ women in white as surely as the sacraments of the Christian Church unite believers.
Christians are often dressed in white for sacred occasions: baptisms, confirmations, and weddings. Being dressed in white is a sign of new life, new beginnings, being born again, being redeemed.
That is why those who are believers are depicted in the book of Revelation as being given a white robe, the sign of the redeemed who have believed in the blood sacrifice of the God Man Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God whose innocent blood was given for all who believe. They are transported with joy.
What will this same Christ will say to those who unrepentantly and proudly wear robes soiled with the blood of innocents? What will he say to those who bless death?
Will he bless them, or will he say, "Depart from me. I never knew you.â€
Fay Voshell holds a M.Div. from Princeton Theological Seminary, which awarded her its prize for excellence in systematic theology. A frequent contributor to American Thinker, her thoughts also have appeared in many online magazines, including Fox News, CNS, National Review, RealClearReligion and Russia Insider. She may be reached at fvoshell@yahoo.com
There have been many interpretations concerning the mysterious bloc of women Democrats robed in white -- all the while pointedly ignoring President Trump’s speech to the joint session of Congress.
Some critics compared the ladies to devotees of the Ku Klux Klan. Photoshopped images of them wearing the pointed hoods of the KKK almost immediately appeared, as some recalled the Democrat Party’s commitment to the Klan, particularly in the 1920s.
The women themselves have said they were honoring the suffragettes of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries while indicating their ongoing commitment to women’s rights issues such as equal pay for equal work.
But not many conservatives believe the white wall of women was intended to be a merely symbolic gesture of solidarity with suffragettes.
Whatever each intended to convey by her choice of clothing, the entire bloc of women in white was virtue signaling. That is one reason they chose white clothing.
The choice of white garments has long signified the sacred. Being dressed in white indicates being set apart, dedicated to sacred ideals, spiritually separated from the crowd as seeking to attain righteousness and purity. Whether Vestal virgins or, in the Christian tradition, the scared rituals of baptism and first communion, white is the garment of choice. It indicates purity of life and deeds which the rest of the world should seek to attain.
In the case of many, if not all of the feminists who sat on their hands and refused to stand as a gesture of support for Carryn Owens, widow of Navy SEAL Ryan Owens, the garments indicated they are the chosen priestesses of the pious Left, the defenders of the feminist faith.
To look at the bloc of white garbed Democrat women was to look at oracles of Delphi who have mystically discerned the most sacred right of women is the right to sacrifice their own offspring. To look at the high priestesses dedicated to the religion of radical feminism is to see leaders of a cult, the chief sacrament of which is abortion.
For nearly all leftist feminists, abortion is a holy rite, a religious ritual to be conducted in the cathedrals of Planned Parenthood and to be blessed by "faith leaders.â€
Yes, you read that correctly. Blessed.
High priests and priestesses inside and outside the Beltway have committed to "blessing†abortion both by law and by religious rituals.
According to a recent Huffington Post article entitled "Religious Leaders Bless Planned Parenthood Health Center,†an group of clergy representing "Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and secular leaders gathered inside Planned Parenthood Metro Washington’s new Carol Whitehill Moses health center on Tuesday to perform a blessing of the space.â€
The article goes on to cite Dr. Laura Meyers, President & CEO of Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, who told the Huffington Post that "progressive†voices of faith should speak up for women:
"Having a group of interfaith clergy perform a ceremony focused on unity and wholeness therefore takes on special meaning to empower and celebrate rather than to stigmatize, control and dehumanize. Having such a ceremony take place at this moment in history is especially powerful for us as we seek to mobilize our communities of different faiths to come together to affirm and support the reproductive freedoms we cherish and have fought so hard to achieve.â€
In the midst of all Meyers’ Newspeak, the most significant term is "reproductive freedom,†which is actually the Left’s code word for abortion on demand throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy. Abortion on demand is the freedom to be cherished and blessed.
According to HuffPo, Rev. Dr. Christine Y. Wiley, participant in the sacred blessing ceremony and co-pastor of Washington, D.C.’s Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, stated her Christian faith inspired her to support abortion:
"Many people do not understand that there are many kinds of Christians. Conservative Christians dominate the television and Radio media and influence people to think that this brand of Christianity ‘is’ Christianity. Although they have great influence, this stance is far from representing the true tenets of the person of Jesus Christ. As a progressive Womanist Christian who is concerned about wholeness in the community, especially for those who are marginalized and disenfranchised, my task is to do what Jesus did, to meet people where they are with love and understanding, and bring healing and freedom to them.â€
For Reverend Wiley, Jesus, being filled with love and understanding, is all for abortion.
Is the reverend aware of the Jesus who said that if anyone harmed little ones, he or she should be cast into the sea with a millstone around his neck? Does she recall that Jesus said to his disciples, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these." Is she aware the Christian Church she claims to represent has been against abortion from its founding in the first century?
Is Wiley, who is black, aware that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, targets blacks? Has she looked at the facts: 78% of Planned Parenthood’s clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but account for 35% of the abortions in America.
But to the clergy of the Left, be they black or white, within or outside congress, neither statistics indicating black genocide nor the horrors of sex select abortion nor the death sentences passed on Down Syndrome babies will ever temper their support of abortion on demand. It is an inalienable right that transcends the actualities of the abattoir that is the church of Planned Parenthood, whose representatives have been filmed bargaining over the sale of baby body parts.
Most of the women in white belong to an essentially pagan death cult that elevates abortion to a sacred right and rite that is impervious to the claims of science and Christian morality.
That is why Nancy Pelosi’s claim that she is a Roman Catholic while she is a leader of the women in white is laughable. Her prime allegiance is to another faith altogether.
The allegiance to the ritual of child sacrifice is why the bloc of white robed women will fight the Trump administration tooth and nail when it comes to defunding the temples of Planned Parenthood. That is why they will wage war on any pro-life justice who might threaten to overturn Roe. v. Wade. That is why they will not do anything to defend the rights of little women in the womb. That is why they will continue to support the extermination of the handicapped within the womb.
Abortion is the sacrament that unites the Democrats’ women in white as surely as the sacraments of the Christian Church unite believers.
Christians are often dressed in white for sacred occasions: baptisms, confirmations, and weddings. Being dressed in white is a sign of new life, new beginnings, being born again, being redeemed.
That is why those who are believers are depicted in the book of Revelation as being given a white robe, the sign of the redeemed who have believed in the blood sacrifice of the God Man Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God whose innocent blood was given for all who believe. They are transported with joy.
What will this same Christ will say to those who unrepentantly and proudly wear robes soiled with the blood of innocents? What will he say to those who bless death?
Will he bless them, or will he say, "Depart from me. I never knew you.â€
A NOTE FROM JACK KEMP
"Is the reverend aware of the Jesus who said that if anyone harmed little ones, he or she should be cast into the sea with a millstone around his neck?"
Having lived in Israel and studied Hebrew there, I believe Jesus was well aware of the child sacrafice cults of the pagans such as the Moloch worshipers mentioned in the Old Testament.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 2641 words, total size 17 kb.
Media Gets Cold Splash of Reality over Religion of Peace
William Been
Watching the video tells the entire story.
Date: March 1, 2017 at 1:36:38 PM PST
Subject: FW: . WATCH – ’60 Minutes’ Wanted to Prove Muslim Refugees ‘Peaceful’ – Blows Up in Their Faces
WATCH – ’60 Minutes’ Wanted to Prove Muslim Refugees ‘Peaceful’ – Blows Up in Their Face
>
> .
>
> A 60 Minutes crew went to Sweden to do a feel-good piece about the wonderful impact Muslim refugees from places like Syria have had on the nation. What the camera lens caught instead was a violent attack on the reporter and news crew.
>
> https://youtu.be/AJ1_6s5OFmM
>
> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AJ1_6s5OFmM/hqdefault.jpg
>
>
> Migrants Attack 60 Minutes Crew In Sweden
>
> youtu.be
>
> Muslim Migrants Attack 60 Minutes Crew In Sweden. Tolerance! Islamic Migrants Violently Attack Sympathetic ’60 Minutes’ Crew… It’s nice when leftist news out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ1_6s5OFmM&feature=youtu.be
>
>
>
> The journalists were forced to duck for cover after the Muslim refugees brutally attacked them and forcefully threw objects at them. It does not seem assimilating into the culture of their new land is at all a priority for the Muslim refugees in Sweden, or in many other European countries who laid out the welcome mat for them.
>
> refugees can resort to violence without any type of provocation whatsoever. When the reporter tried to ask the Muslim men a couple simple questions, the driver ran over the cameraman’s feet!
>
> ISIS has vowed to infiltrate the swelling ranks of refugees being "resettled†in Europe and the United States. They have reportedly stolen passport printing machines and have been working their plan to sneak into America for many months.
>
> How do we tell the difference between a potential terrorist and a decent person during the lackluster vetting process now used? We are not even sure if the names given by the refugees are accurate, let alone the background information they provide to interviewers. In other words, we have no way of knowing if we are letting a terrorist in or not.
>
William Been
Watching the video tells the entire story.
Date: March 1, 2017 at 1:36:38 PM PST
Subject: FW: . WATCH – ’60 Minutes’ Wanted to Prove Muslim Refugees ‘Peaceful’ – Blows Up in Their Faces
WATCH – ’60 Minutes’ Wanted to Prove Muslim Refugees ‘Peaceful’ – Blows Up in Their Face
>
> .
>
> A 60 Minutes crew went to Sweden to do a feel-good piece about the wonderful impact Muslim refugees from places like Syria have had on the nation. What the camera lens caught instead was a violent attack on the reporter and news crew.
>
> https://youtu.be/AJ1_6s5OFmM
>
> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AJ1_6s5OFmM/hqdefault.jpg
>
>
> Migrants Attack 60 Minutes Crew In Sweden
>
> youtu.be
>
> Muslim Migrants Attack 60 Minutes Crew In Sweden. Tolerance! Islamic Migrants Violently Attack Sympathetic ’60 Minutes’ Crew… It’s nice when leftist news out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ1_6s5OFmM&feature=youtu.be
>
>
>
> The journalists were forced to duck for cover after the Muslim refugees brutally attacked them and forcefully threw objects at them. It does not seem assimilating into the culture of their new land is at all a priority for the Muslim refugees in Sweden, or in many other European countries who laid out the welcome mat for them.
>
> refugees can resort to violence without any type of provocation whatsoever. When the reporter tried to ask the Muslim men a couple simple questions, the driver ran over the cameraman’s feet!
>
> ISIS has vowed to infiltrate the swelling ranks of refugees being "resettled†in Europe and the United States. They have reportedly stolen passport printing machines and have been working their plan to sneak into America for many months.
>
> How do we tell the difference between a potential terrorist and a decent person during the lackluster vetting process now used? We are not even sure if the names given by the refugees are accurate, let alone the background information they provide to interviewers. In other words, we have no way of knowing if we are letting a terrorist in or not.
>
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 355 words, total size 2 kb.
Ted Cruz: Right Way to end Obamacare
Jack Kemp
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/ted-cruz-obamacare-repeal-214854
The Right Way to Repeal Obamacare
By Sen. Ted Cruz
March 02, 2017
"Is Obamacare Republicans’ Waterloo?†That was the question a reporter posed a couple weeks ago. It’s the narrative increasingly being pushed by the media, and starting to become conventional wisdom in Washington.
My response? What the press doesn’t understand is that Obamacare, in practice, has proven to be a disaster, and it’s hurting millions of people. We’ve had three elections that focused on Obamacare repeal, 2010, 2014 and 2016. All three were massive victories for Republicans. If that’s Waterloo, we could use a few more of them.
So, how do we go forward? Here are two overarching principles, three concrete steps and six areas of consensus to guide us.
Two overarching principles
First principle: Honor our promise. When you spend six years promising, "If only we get elected, we’ll repeal Obamacare,†you cannot renege on that promise. Failure is not an option. Breaking our word would be catastrophe. The voters would, quite rightly, never again trust Republicans to deliver on anything.
The second principle is don’t make it worse. The Pottery Barn rule applies: If you break it, you own it. Democrats broke health care: Since Obamacare passed, millions of people have had their plans canceled; average family premiums on employer-sponsored plans have risen by about $5,000; and average family deductibles on the individual market have also risen $5,000. Consumers are paying more for less, and that’s hurting a lot of families. Republicans can’t make it worse; instead, we’ve got to fix the problem.
End excerpt.
Senator Cruz lays out a solid, comprehensive approach; read the whole thing.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/ted-cruz-obamacare-repeal-214854
The Right Way to Repeal Obamacare
By Sen. Ted Cruz
March 02, 2017
"Is Obamacare Republicans’ Waterloo?†That was the question a reporter posed a couple weeks ago. It’s the narrative increasingly being pushed by the media, and starting to become conventional wisdom in Washington.
My response? What the press doesn’t understand is that Obamacare, in practice, has proven to be a disaster, and it’s hurting millions of people. We’ve had three elections that focused on Obamacare repeal, 2010, 2014 and 2016. All three were massive victories for Republicans. If that’s Waterloo, we could use a few more of them.
So, how do we go forward? Here are two overarching principles, three concrete steps and six areas of consensus to guide us.
Two overarching principles
First principle: Honor our promise. When you spend six years promising, "If only we get elected, we’ll repeal Obamacare,†you cannot renege on that promise. Failure is not an option. Breaking our word would be catastrophe. The voters would, quite rightly, never again trust Republicans to deliver on anything.
The second principle is don’t make it worse. The Pottery Barn rule applies: If you break it, you own it. Democrats broke health care: Since Obamacare passed, millions of people have had their plans canceled; average family premiums on employer-sponsored plans have risen by about $5,000; and average family deductibles on the individual market have also risen $5,000. Consumers are paying more for less, and that’s hurting a lot of families. Republicans can’t make it worse; instead, we’ve got to fix the problem.
End excerpt.
Senator Cruz lays out a solid, comprehensive approach; read the whole thing.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
More Biden son scandals...drugs, kicked out of US Navy
Jack Kemp
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/02/bidens-place-drugs-hookers-and-booze-oh-my/#comments
Vice President Joe Biden’s youngest son, Hunter Biden, was kicked out of the Navy Reserve in 2014 after testing positive for cocaine use.
♦ Vice President Joe Biden’s oldest son, Beau Biden, died in May of 2015 from brain cancer.
Beau Biden’s widow, Hallie Biden, began having an affair with Hunter Biden (her married brother-in-law).
Hunter Biden’s wife, Kathleen Buhle Biden, discovered the affair and filed for divorce from Hunter…. Now this:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/02/bidens-place-drugs-hookers-and-booze-oh-my/#comments
Vice President Joe Biden’s youngest son, Hunter Biden, was kicked out of the Navy Reserve in 2014 after testing positive for cocaine use.
♦ Vice President Joe Biden’s oldest son, Beau Biden, died in May of 2015 from brain cancer.
Beau Biden’s widow, Hallie Biden, began having an affair with Hunter Biden (her married brother-in-law).
Hunter Biden’s wife, Kathleen Buhle Biden, discovered the affair and filed for divorce from Hunter…. Now this:
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
Man Arrested For String of Anti-Semitic Threats is Trump-Hating Journalist
Jack Kemp
If you go to the link, you will see text of tweets that I could not copy. The alleged perpatratior is the black guy in the picture. The white guy in the smaller picture is the author of this article
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/03/03/wow-man-arrested-for-string-of-antisemitic-threats-is-liberal-journalist-fired-for-spreading-fake-news-n2293650?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=
Wow: Man Arrested For String of Anti-Semitic Threats is Trump-Hating Journalist Fired for Spreading Fake News
Guy Benson
Let's start with an important caveat: The man just arrested for phoning in bomb threats to Jewish centers is not the party responsible for the large majority of those recent hateful acts. That perpetrator, or those perpetrators, remain unknown and at large, according to authorities. No, Mr. Thompson was a copycat offender (eight times over, allegedly), and -- in light of The Narrative on such things -- quite a surprising one at that. Unreal:
A man allegedly waging an intense campaign of harassment against a former lover was responsible for bomb threats against the Anti-Defamation League and some Jewish centers around the country, authorities said Friday. Law enforcement sources told NBC 4 New York the 31-year-old suspect, Juan Thompson, was arrested in St. Louis in connection with multiple threats against Jewish centers, including some in the New York tri-state area...he FBI complaint quotes Thompson’s purported Twitter account as saying on Feb. 24, "Know any good lawyers? Need to stop this nasty/racist #whitegirl I dated who sent a bomb threat in my name & wants me to be raped in jail.†That same Twitter account was also linked to a journalist, Juan Thompson, who wrote for online publication The Intercept from late 2014 until early 2016. In February 2016, The Intercept said Thompson fabricated quotes in his stories and created fake email accounts to impersonate people.
I've long been a proponent of refusing to hold the terrible actions of one person, or a small group of people, against their entire political "side." Partisans on both ends of the spectrum engage in this sort of guilt-by-association demaogoguery -- whether it's liberals tarring the pro-life movement when some maniac plants a bomb or attacks a clinic, or conservatives maligning the entirety of Black Lives Matter based on words or conduct of indefensible outliers. But because many on the Left and in the media have simply assumed that a recent spate of anti-Semitic threats must have come from a white nationalist, this glimpse into Mr. Thompson's apparent worldview seems relevant:
It appears as though the man is an unstable, Trump-hating racist, as his Twitter feed is littered with anti-Trump, anti-capitalism, and anti-white messages. A few examples:
He also expressed moral indignation over -- wait for it -- violent threats against Jewish centers:
READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT tOWNHALL
If you go to the link, you will see text of tweets that I could not copy. The alleged perpatratior is the black guy in the picture. The white guy in the smaller picture is the author of this article
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/03/03/wow-man-arrested-for-string-of-antisemitic-threats-is-liberal-journalist-fired-for-spreading-fake-news-n2293650?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=
Wow: Man Arrested For String of Anti-Semitic Threats is Trump-Hating Journalist Fired for Spreading Fake News
Guy Benson
Let's start with an important caveat: The man just arrested for phoning in bomb threats to Jewish centers is not the party responsible for the large majority of those recent hateful acts. That perpetrator, or those perpetrators, remain unknown and at large, according to authorities. No, Mr. Thompson was a copycat offender (eight times over, allegedly), and -- in light of The Narrative on such things -- quite a surprising one at that. Unreal:
A man allegedly waging an intense campaign of harassment against a former lover was responsible for bomb threats against the Anti-Defamation League and some Jewish centers around the country, authorities said Friday. Law enforcement sources told NBC 4 New York the 31-year-old suspect, Juan Thompson, was arrested in St. Louis in connection with multiple threats against Jewish centers, including some in the New York tri-state area...he FBI complaint quotes Thompson’s purported Twitter account as saying on Feb. 24, "Know any good lawyers? Need to stop this nasty/racist #whitegirl I dated who sent a bomb threat in my name & wants me to be raped in jail.†That same Twitter account was also linked to a journalist, Juan Thompson, who wrote for online publication The Intercept from late 2014 until early 2016. In February 2016, The Intercept said Thompson fabricated quotes in his stories and created fake email accounts to impersonate people.
I've long been a proponent of refusing to hold the terrible actions of one person, or a small group of people, against their entire political "side." Partisans on both ends of the spectrum engage in this sort of guilt-by-association demaogoguery -- whether it's liberals tarring the pro-life movement when some maniac plants a bomb or attacks a clinic, or conservatives maligning the entirety of Black Lives Matter based on words or conduct of indefensible outliers. But because many on the Left and in the media have simply assumed that a recent spate of anti-Semitic threats must have come from a white nationalist, this glimpse into Mr. Thompson's apparent worldview seems relevant:
It appears as though the man is an unstable, Trump-hating racist, as his Twitter feed is littered with anti-Trump, anti-capitalism, and anti-white messages. A few examples:
He also expressed moral indignation over -- wait for it -- violent threats against Jewish centers:
READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT tOWNHALL
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 455 words, total size 3 kb.
4 Schumer scandals
Jack Kemp forwards this:
www.wnd.com/2017/03/4-schumer-scandals-ive-begun-to-uncover/
Larry Clayman
Fabrications of a link between Russia and President Donald Trump’s election campaign are reaching a fevered pitch in Washington. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is demanding that Attorney General Jeff Sessions resign after only about 22 days on the job.
President Trump is aiming to drain the swamp in the District of Corruption (D.C.) and hired Sessions as the principal government leader in that effort. Well, Schumer is one of the chief alligators in that swamp. Schumer is the successor to former corrupt Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid in more ways than one, including as the chief proponent of hypocrisy and deceit. Not surprisingly, it turns out the alligators don’t want to see the swamp drained.
As a former federal prosecutor of the U.S. Department of Justice, I take special interest and particular affront at watching calls for Sessions to resign. Inside the Department of Justice (DOJ), when there is no evidence whatsoever of anything to investigate much less of any wrongdoing, the DOJ I knew did not generally chase phantoms.
[...]
Second, as the Gateway Pundit reported Friday, Schumer hosted Putin in New York in 2003 at the opening of the first LUKOIL gas station in the U.S. Multiple photographs, including from the Associated Press, of Schumer and Putin are now surfacing.
But this goes deeper. Arranging for Russia’s massive oil empire, chiefly LUKOIL, to open up in New York state surely required a great deal of government maneuvering, meaning "grease,†by the senior senator from New York, Chuck Schumer. What deals were struck between Putin and Schumer to get Russia’s premiere oil company to do business in New York? How did the current minority leader of the U.S. Senate get LUKOIL through regulatory hurdles, environmental regulation, etc.? It is hard for a U.S. citizen to start a business. But Russia had no problem opening up gas stations in Schumer’s home state?
The public has a right to know all the facts. What favors did Schumer receive from Russia? Schumer implies that Russia is corrupt and engages in payoffs. Why is Schumer so convinced of that, after personally doing deals with Putin to bring LUKOIL to New York? New York state has an enormous ethnic Russian population, including at Brighton Beach. New York City even has its own Russian-language radio station. What are Schumer’s connections to the Kremlin, through the large Russian constituency in his home state?
It is ironic and more than hypocritical that Schumer and his leftist comrades, like Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Holder, the ACLU, George Soros and other socialist agitators and counter-revolutionaries, are so exercised over Trump’s contacts with Russia. In reality, these leftists feel more affinity to the former Soviet Union and now Russia than this country. Bernie even took his honeymoon in Moscow, the mecca of the left.
Third, Schumer helped cause the collapse of IndyMac Bank, which was a primary trigger of the 2008 collapse of the housing market and mortgage industry and resulting economic crisis. Schumer’s (unnecessarily) public letter claiming that IndyMac was insolvent helped spark a panic that created a self-fulfilling prophesy. We will find out what Schumer did to help create the worst economic collapse since President Carter.
Fourth, Schumer helped spark the inquisition of tea party groups. Schumer’s public letter to the Internal Revenue Service urged a redefinition of 501(c)(4) organizations to target conservative public-policy efforts. Lois Lerner and others implemented that detailed attack in persecuting tea party and other conservative organizations. We will demand all documents of Schumer’s involvement in attacking the First Amendment rights of U.S. citizens.
Read the rest!
www.wnd.com/2017/03/4-schumer-scandals-ive-begun-to-uncover/
Larry Clayman
Fabrications of a link between Russia and President Donald Trump’s election campaign are reaching a fevered pitch in Washington. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is demanding that Attorney General Jeff Sessions resign after only about 22 days on the job.
President Trump is aiming to drain the swamp in the District of Corruption (D.C.) and hired Sessions as the principal government leader in that effort. Well, Schumer is one of the chief alligators in that swamp. Schumer is the successor to former corrupt Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid in more ways than one, including as the chief proponent of hypocrisy and deceit. Not surprisingly, it turns out the alligators don’t want to see the swamp drained.
As a former federal prosecutor of the U.S. Department of Justice, I take special interest and particular affront at watching calls for Sessions to resign. Inside the Department of Justice (DOJ), when there is no evidence whatsoever of anything to investigate much less of any wrongdoing, the DOJ I knew did not generally chase phantoms.
[...]
Second, as the Gateway Pundit reported Friday, Schumer hosted Putin in New York in 2003 at the opening of the first LUKOIL gas station in the U.S. Multiple photographs, including from the Associated Press, of Schumer and Putin are now surfacing.
But this goes deeper. Arranging for Russia’s massive oil empire, chiefly LUKOIL, to open up in New York state surely required a great deal of government maneuvering, meaning "grease,†by the senior senator from New York, Chuck Schumer. What deals were struck between Putin and Schumer to get Russia’s premiere oil company to do business in New York? How did the current minority leader of the U.S. Senate get LUKOIL through regulatory hurdles, environmental regulation, etc.? It is hard for a U.S. citizen to start a business. But Russia had no problem opening up gas stations in Schumer’s home state?
The public has a right to know all the facts. What favors did Schumer receive from Russia? Schumer implies that Russia is corrupt and engages in payoffs. Why is Schumer so convinced of that, after personally doing deals with Putin to bring LUKOIL to New York? New York state has an enormous ethnic Russian population, including at Brighton Beach. New York City even has its own Russian-language radio station. What are Schumer’s connections to the Kremlin, through the large Russian constituency in his home state?
It is ironic and more than hypocritical that Schumer and his leftist comrades, like Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Holder, the ACLU, George Soros and other socialist agitators and counter-revolutionaries, are so exercised over Trump’s contacts with Russia. In reality, these leftists feel more affinity to the former Soviet Union and now Russia than this country. Bernie even took his honeymoon in Moscow, the mecca of the left.
Third, Schumer helped cause the collapse of IndyMac Bank, which was a primary trigger of the 2008 collapse of the housing market and mortgage industry and resulting economic crisis. Schumer’s (unnecessarily) public letter claiming that IndyMac was insolvent helped spark a panic that created a self-fulfilling prophesy. We will find out what Schumer did to help create the worst economic collapse since President Carter.
Fourth, Schumer helped spark the inquisition of tea party groups. Schumer’s public letter to the Internal Revenue Service urged a redefinition of 501(c)(4) organizations to target conservative public-policy efforts. Lois Lerner and others implemented that detailed attack in persecuting tea party and other conservative organizations. We will demand all documents of Schumer’s involvement in attacking the First Amendment rights of U.S. citizens.
Read the rest!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 606 words, total size 4 kb.
March 03, 2017
Threats to Jewish Centers Came from a Black Bernie Supporter
Timothy Birdnow
Looks like one of the scumbags who have been threatening Jewish synogogues nationwide is a black man from north St. Louis - and a Bernie Sanders supporter.
Gateway Pundit has the scoop:
"Juan Thompson, from North St. Louis, made threats to at least 8 different Jewish Centers.
Thompson was making bomb threats in his former girlfriend’s name to Jewish Centers."
End excerpt.
And apparently he was some kind of a journalist!
I have stated publicly that the desecration of a Jewish cemetary in University City was probably an act by Black Lives Matter and not some white Trumpians. This only buttresses my argument.
How much air time will the media give this? They have purposely given a false impression and will now be quite cavalier in setting the record straight.
Looks like one of the scumbags who have been threatening Jewish synogogues nationwide is a black man from north St. Louis - and a Bernie Sanders supporter.
Gateway Pundit has the scoop:
"Juan Thompson, from North St. Louis, made threats to at least 8 different Jewish Centers.
Thompson was making bomb threats in his former girlfriend’s name to Jewish Centers."
End excerpt.
And apparently he was some kind of a journalist!
I have stated publicly that the desecration of a Jewish cemetary in University City was probably an act by Black Lives Matter and not some white Trumpians. This only buttresses my argument.
How much air time will the media give this? They have purposely given a false impression and will now be quite cavalier in setting the record straight.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
Claire McCaskill Lies About Meeting with Russian Ambassador
Timothy Birdnow
With Democrats launching ferocious attacks on Attorney General Jeff Sessions, "Air Claire" McCaskill, Missouri's answer to Snow White's Evil Queen, has pointed her crooked finger while failing to gaze into the mirror to honesty appraise her own visage. In point of fact, she has lied to the media about her own meetings with the Russian ambassador, despite photographic evidence proving she is not truthful.
Here is the evidence:
The internet just doesn't forget, Claire old girl. And watch those poison apples; you might accidentally bite one yourself.
With Democrats launching ferocious attacks on Attorney General Jeff Sessions, "Air Claire" McCaskill, Missouri's answer to Snow White's Evil Queen, has pointed her crooked finger while failing to gaze into the mirror to honesty appraise her own visage. In point of fact, she has lied to the media about her own meetings with the Russian ambassador, despite photographic evidence proving she is not truthful.
Here is the evidence:
The internet just doesn't forget, Claire old girl. And watch those poison apples; you might accidentally bite one yourself.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:07 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
Jeff Sessions Makes a Yuuggee Mistake
Timothy Birdnow
Over at American Thinker J. Marsolo argues quite convincingly that Jeff Sessions made a big mistake in recusing himself from any investigations over Russia. I concur; it was a serious, profound mistake and may wind up costing Sessions his job or at best make him an impotent AG.
Marsolo writes:
"As part of the Opposition Party's campaign, it is now a political crime for a member of the Trump administration to have spoken with anyone from the Russian government before the election, and there must be investigations.
First we had General Flynn. Now the Opposition Party is in full attack mode. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck "Lightweight" Schumer demand the resignation of Attorney General Sessions because he spoke with the Russian ambassador.
This had its intended effect. Sessions announced on March 3 that he will recuse himself from any investigation of Russian "interference" in our election.
Sessions should not have recused himself. He did nothing wrong. By recusing himself, he adds credibility to the baseless charges. He spoke with the Russian ambassador? Big deal. He did not sell uranium to Russia. He did not run guns to Mexico as Eric Holder did in Fast and Furious. He did not meet, as Loretta Lynch did, with Bill Clinton the day before the FBI questioned Hillary, not under oath, and then the FBI gave Hillary a pass.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/03/jeff_sessions_should_not_have_recused_himself.html#ixzz4aHK7f3H4
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook"
End excerpt.
No he should not have. There are multiple reasons; first, there is no crime here and there is no conflict of interest so Sessions had no reason to do this. The reality is such a recusal makes Sessions LOOK guilty; this is the old "have you stopped beating your wife" routine and Sessions just said "why yes I have". Don't think for a minute that this recusal won't be used against him and other Trump people now that it's on record.
Second, it must be understood what the Democrats and media hope to achieve here. In general they want an atmosphere of corruption, to make it look like Trump has been in bed with the Russians all along and to alter the history books so that it becomes an established fact that the Russians stole the election for him. This is the Big Lie spoken of by Joseph Goebbles; tell a big enough lie and nobody will disbelieve it. In the end it beccomes the truth as far as many are concerned. So Trump becomes an illigitimate President. But they can't get Trump himself on this (not for lack of trying) so they are going to pick away at his people. Sessions is perhaps the most important of them all, because he has the power to dig into the corruption that has infected the Democratic Party and they full well know it. Why do you think Trump dropped the business about prosecuting Hillary after the election? Because he knew this wass what would happen, and he hoped to get Sessions in securely enough. The Attorney General is the one who will conduct investigations, investigations of the Clinton Foundation, of vote fraud, of collusion between the Clinton camp and the DNC and the media. Sessions is the guy who can get the truth on some of the more annoying Republicans too, like John McCain or any of the NeverTrumpers who actively worked with the Democrats to fix the election. The Democratic Party has been a criminal. enterprise for some time now, cheating at will, and a strong, active AG could bring their political empire crashing down. There really is no choice; they must either remove Sessions and replace him with a more pliant guy or neuter him with fake scandal.
As Senator Palpatine said in Star Wars; the Phantom Menace "he is mired by baseless accusation of scandal". Now, so many of the Democrats and media types saw that movie...
Sessions must be mired by such accusations. They know that.
Which is why Sessions should not have given them the time of day here, and certainly should not have made this pledge. It makes him look guilty. It also chums the water, attracting the school of sharks, who see Sessions as vulnerable. This was why Trump should never have asked for Michael Flynn's resignation; you give these people a crack and they will push it open, like a weed.
Yesterday I heard Mark Davis, sitting in for Dennis Praeger on his radio show, sneer at a caller who suggested we launch counter-investigations. The caller suggested we bring back the Hillary e-mails, or dig up some new dirt, and Davis mocked the idea, saying it was old news and stupid. "we need to be doing exactly what we are doing" Davis admonished. Davis is profoundly wrong; this is the traditional way Republicans handled these kinds of attacks, and they are why the GOP has failed so miserably to advance any sort of agenda over the decades. The caller was absolutely correct; the best defense is a strong offense. You change the subject when you attack, and the Democrats and media then are forced to defend. It really is simple; any football fan knows the fastest way to lose a game is to go into the prevent defense. That's exactly what happened in the last Super Bowl where the Atlanta Falcons had what should have been an insurmountable lead but lost the game after wasting a half trying to protect that lead rather than increase it. Or, as George Patton once said, fixed fortifications are a monument to Man's stupidity, meaning if all you do is defend you will be destroyed.
Trump never fought that way; he always counter-attacked. Yet so many - even on our own side - keep pushing the ridiculous notion that Trump should tone it down, should quit counterpunching. I hate to remind everyone but Trump won both in the primaries and the general election by punching back. If he starts listening to the conventional wisdom he will be George W. Bushed. This imbecilic advice has never worked, yet the GOP seems incapable of learning that fact. The Democrats never do what the GOP advises sTrump or others to do; why should anyone listen to the perennial losers?
But it appears Trump's ear is being bent here, and he's making the unfortunate mistake of giving an inch.
I fear Trump is used to real negotiations where there is a give and take. He doesn't understand that the Left, the Democrats, and the media don't think they have to give. Any concession is viewed as weakness.
Sadly, Jeff Sessions just stepped into the quicksand. They laid a trap for him and now he is ensnared. If he does get out he will have to be a good little boy or face renewed wrath. It's how the Democrats have done things for decades.
Anyone remember the attacks on Reagan's people? James Watts, for instance, was forced out for absolutely no good reason; he used some not politically correct terms when describing a committee ("we have a jew, a woman, a black, and a cripple") and was forced out. This is an old tactic the Democrats have used. It should never be allowed; a firewall is needed to block the attacks. Like a classic crust defense, the line will be overrun if one break occurs. Our side simply must get that through their thick skulls.
Over at American Thinker J. Marsolo argues quite convincingly that Jeff Sessions made a big mistake in recusing himself from any investigations over Russia. I concur; it was a serious, profound mistake and may wind up costing Sessions his job or at best make him an impotent AG.
Marsolo writes:
"As part of the Opposition Party's campaign, it is now a political crime for a member of the Trump administration to have spoken with anyone from the Russian government before the election, and there must be investigations.
First we had General Flynn. Now the Opposition Party is in full attack mode. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck "Lightweight" Schumer demand the resignation of Attorney General Sessions because he spoke with the Russian ambassador.
This had its intended effect. Sessions announced on March 3 that he will recuse himself from any investigation of Russian "interference" in our election.
Sessions should not have recused himself. He did nothing wrong. By recusing himself, he adds credibility to the baseless charges. He spoke with the Russian ambassador? Big deal. He did not sell uranium to Russia. He did not run guns to Mexico as Eric Holder did in Fast and Furious. He did not meet, as Loretta Lynch did, with Bill Clinton the day before the FBI questioned Hillary, not under oath, and then the FBI gave Hillary a pass.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/03/jeff_sessions_should_not_have_recused_himself.html#ixzz4aHK7f3H4
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook"
End excerpt.
No he should not have. There are multiple reasons; first, there is no crime here and there is no conflict of interest so Sessions had no reason to do this. The reality is such a recusal makes Sessions LOOK guilty; this is the old "have you stopped beating your wife" routine and Sessions just said "why yes I have". Don't think for a minute that this recusal won't be used against him and other Trump people now that it's on record.
Second, it must be understood what the Democrats and media hope to achieve here. In general they want an atmosphere of corruption, to make it look like Trump has been in bed with the Russians all along and to alter the history books so that it becomes an established fact that the Russians stole the election for him. This is the Big Lie spoken of by Joseph Goebbles; tell a big enough lie and nobody will disbelieve it. In the end it beccomes the truth as far as many are concerned. So Trump becomes an illigitimate President. But they can't get Trump himself on this (not for lack of trying) so they are going to pick away at his people. Sessions is perhaps the most important of them all, because he has the power to dig into the corruption that has infected the Democratic Party and they full well know it. Why do you think Trump dropped the business about prosecuting Hillary after the election? Because he knew this wass what would happen, and he hoped to get Sessions in securely enough. The Attorney General is the one who will conduct investigations, investigations of the Clinton Foundation, of vote fraud, of collusion between the Clinton camp and the DNC and the media. Sessions is the guy who can get the truth on some of the more annoying Republicans too, like John McCain or any of the NeverTrumpers who actively worked with the Democrats to fix the election. The Democratic Party has been a criminal. enterprise for some time now, cheating at will, and a strong, active AG could bring their political empire crashing down. There really is no choice; they must either remove Sessions and replace him with a more pliant guy or neuter him with fake scandal.
As Senator Palpatine said in Star Wars; the Phantom Menace "he is mired by baseless accusation of scandal". Now, so many of the Democrats and media types saw that movie...
Sessions must be mired by such accusations. They know that.
Which is why Sessions should not have given them the time of day here, and certainly should not have made this pledge. It makes him look guilty. It also chums the water, attracting the school of sharks, who see Sessions as vulnerable. This was why Trump should never have asked for Michael Flynn's resignation; you give these people a crack and they will push it open, like a weed.
Yesterday I heard Mark Davis, sitting in for Dennis Praeger on his radio show, sneer at a caller who suggested we launch counter-investigations. The caller suggested we bring back the Hillary e-mails, or dig up some new dirt, and Davis mocked the idea, saying it was old news and stupid. "we need to be doing exactly what we are doing" Davis admonished. Davis is profoundly wrong; this is the traditional way Republicans handled these kinds of attacks, and they are why the GOP has failed so miserably to advance any sort of agenda over the decades. The caller was absolutely correct; the best defense is a strong offense. You change the subject when you attack, and the Democrats and media then are forced to defend. It really is simple; any football fan knows the fastest way to lose a game is to go into the prevent defense. That's exactly what happened in the last Super Bowl where the Atlanta Falcons had what should have been an insurmountable lead but lost the game after wasting a half trying to protect that lead rather than increase it. Or, as George Patton once said, fixed fortifications are a monument to Man's stupidity, meaning if all you do is defend you will be destroyed.
Trump never fought that way; he always counter-attacked. Yet so many - even on our own side - keep pushing the ridiculous notion that Trump should tone it down, should quit counterpunching. I hate to remind everyone but Trump won both in the primaries and the general election by punching back. If he starts listening to the conventional wisdom he will be George W. Bushed. This imbecilic advice has never worked, yet the GOP seems incapable of learning that fact. The Democrats never do what the GOP advises sTrump or others to do; why should anyone listen to the perennial losers?
But it appears Trump's ear is being bent here, and he's making the unfortunate mistake of giving an inch.
I fear Trump is used to real negotiations where there is a give and take. He doesn't understand that the Left, the Democrats, and the media don't think they have to give. Any concession is viewed as weakness.
Sadly, Jeff Sessions just stepped into the quicksand. They laid a trap for him and now he is ensnared. If he does get out he will have to be a good little boy or face renewed wrath. It's how the Democrats have done things for decades.
Anyone remember the attacks on Reagan's people? James Watts, for instance, was forced out for absolutely no good reason; he used some not politically correct terms when describing a committee ("we have a jew, a woman, a black, and a cripple") and was forced out. This is an old tactic the Democrats have used. It should never be allowed; a firewall is needed to block the attacks. Like a classic crust defense, the line will be overrun if one break occurs. Our side simply must get that through their thick skulls.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:19 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1239 words, total size 8 kb.
Kaepernick news, pt. 2
Jack Kemp
"Former San Fransisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick created quite the controversy last year by refusing to stand for the National Anthem before football games. Now that he's a free agent in need of a gig, he'll be standing for the 2017 season according to ESPN:
Sure he'll stand. He's got no paycheck and is desperately trying to get a job.
The trouble is, those pick up games in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park with ex-high school players don't usually have any one singing the National Anthem before they start on a Saturday afternoon.
And he may indeed eventually stand for the National Anthem....But it will be "O Canada."
You know, speaking of Kaepernick soon possibly having to stand for "O Canada," when I was in my teens and twenties, I attended National Hockey League games in New York City. Before the game, they played the Canadian National Anthem along with The Star Spangled Banner. Just about everyone in the arena stood, out of respect, for the national anthem of a country that still was and is loyal to the British Crown. In fact, since "O Canada" wasn't officially made the National Anthem until 1967, as best I recall, I may have well have stood for none less than the music of "God Save the Queen" or a similar alternative Canadian anthem. I certainly do not share the political allegences of the Canadians. But all us snarky New Yorkers stood out of respect for the other country which supplied two teams to the League, the Montreal Canadiens and the Toronto Maple Leafs, and whose citizens were the vast majority of the players on all of its teams. Perhaps Kaepernick should go to a home game of the nearby NHL San Jose (California) Sharks and practice standing for two national anthems. He might begin to learn something. Of course, after "leading" the 49ers to a two wins and fourteen losses season and being cut from the team, he may have begun to learn something already.
Jack Kemp
"Former San Fransisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick created quite the controversy last year by refusing to stand for the National Anthem before football games. Now that he's a free agent in need of a gig, he'll be standing for the 2017 season according to ESPN:
Sure he'll stand. He's got no paycheck and is desperately trying to get a job.
The trouble is, those pick up games in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park with ex-high school players don't usually have any one singing the National Anthem before they start on a Saturday afternoon.
And he may indeed eventually stand for the National Anthem....But it will be "O Canada."
You know, speaking of Kaepernick soon possibly having to stand for "O Canada," when I was in my teens and twenties, I attended National Hockey League games in New York City. Before the game, they played the Canadian National Anthem along with The Star Spangled Banner. Just about everyone in the arena stood, out of respect, for the national anthem of a country that still was and is loyal to the British Crown. In fact, since "O Canada" wasn't officially made the National Anthem until 1967, as best I recall, I may have well have stood for none less than the music of "God Save the Queen" or a similar alternative Canadian anthem. I certainly do not share the political allegences of the Canadians. But all us snarky New Yorkers stood out of respect for the other country which supplied two teams to the League, the Montreal Canadiens and the Toronto Maple Leafs, and whose citizens were the vast majority of the players on all of its teams. Perhaps Kaepernick should go to a home game of the nearby NHL San Jose (California) Sharks and practice standing for two national anthems. He might begin to learn something. Of course, after "leading" the 49ers to a two wins and fourteen losses season and being cut from the team, he may have begun to learn something already.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 339 words, total size 2 kb.
Ted Cruz: Right Way to end Obamacare
Jack Kemp
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/ted-cruz-obamacare-repeal-214854
"Is Obamacare Republicans’ Waterloo?†That was the question a reporter posed a couple weeks ago. It’s the narrative increasingly being pushed by the media, and starting to become conventional wisdom in Washington.
My response? What the press doesn’t understand is that Obamacare, in practice, has proven to be a disaster, and it’s hurting millions of people. We’ve had three elections that focused on Obamacare repeal, 2010, 2014 and 2016. All three were massive victories for Republicans. If that’s Waterloo, we could use a few more of them.
So, how do we go forward? Here are two overarching principles, three concrete steps and six areas of consensus to guide us.
Two overarching principles
Read the entire article at Politico.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/ted-cruz-obamacare-repeal-214854
"Is Obamacare Republicans’ Waterloo?†That was the question a reporter posed a couple weeks ago. It’s the narrative increasingly being pushed by the media, and starting to become conventional wisdom in Washington.
My response? What the press doesn’t understand is that Obamacare, in practice, has proven to be a disaster, and it’s hurting millions of people. We’ve had three elections that focused on Obamacare repeal, 2010, 2014 and 2016. All three were massive victories for Republicans. If that’s Waterloo, we could use a few more of them.
So, how do we go forward? Here are two overarching principles, three concrete steps and six areas of consensus to guide us.
Two overarching principles
Read the entire article at Politico.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:08 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
March 02, 2017
Liberals Attempt to NcCarthy Jeff Sessions
Timothy Birdnow
The fake news media is now employing the Russian scare to try to take out Jeff Sessions.
http://therightscoop.com/breaking-doj-says-jeff-sessions-talked-with-russians-before-election-did-not-disclose/
That is why you never give them an inch; when the media got one scalp over this business they taasted blood and liked it. Now they are going big game hunting.
This is not an issue in any sense of the word; Sessions was not in the Trump campaign if and when he spoke to a Russian; he was a U.S. Senator.
Funny how Ted Kennedy's letter to the Soviets to work out a way to counteract the Reagan policies was perfectly fine, but if anyone in the Trump camp has so much as bade a good morning to a Russian they are traitors.
The fake news media is now employing the Russian scare to try to take out Jeff Sessions.
http://therightscoop.com/breaking-doj-says-jeff-sessions-talked-with-russians-before-election-did-not-disclose/
That is why you never give them an inch; when the media got one scalp over this business they taasted blood and liked it. Now they are going big game hunting.
This is not an issue in any sense of the word; Sessions was not in the Trump campaign if and when he spoke to a Russian; he was a U.S. Senator.
Funny how Ted Kennedy's letter to the Soviets to work out a way to counteract the Reagan policies was perfectly fine, but if anyone in the Trump camp has so much as bade a good morning to a Russian they are traitors.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:58 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
Hypocrisy of Liberal Media and Dems Criticizing Gold Star Mom
Timothy Birdnow
Liberals are aghast at Trump for honoring the widow of a fallen special forces soldier; on the View the bevvy of harpies slammed Trump for "exploiting" Carryn Owens, wife of fallen hero and Navy Seal Ryan Owens. And not to be outdone lefty Democrat operative Dan Grilo called the grieving widow an "idiot". Mark Halperin called it "unseemly" and so did just about every other media and political figure on the left.
Strange; none of them complained when Hillary used the Khan family to attack Donald Trump. Then the gold star Muslim parents had "absolute moral authority".
Funny, they never questioned Cindy Sheehan, the gold star mom who called George W. Bush a "war criminal".
There were no complaints when Sharon Belkafor, a gold star mom, introduced Barack Hussein Obama (peace be upon him) at the 2015 Democratic National Convention.
How about Michelle DeFord, who lost a son in Iraq and was exploited by the Democrats in anti-Trump ads during the election?
The hypocrisy of the Dems is understandable; they are in the business to hurt Republicans, not play nice. But the media is another matter, and if they want to have any credibility they have to maintain some level of objectivity. To trash Donald Trump for this is the heighth of hypocrisy.
Liberals are aghast at Trump for honoring the widow of a fallen special forces soldier; on the View the bevvy of harpies slammed Trump for "exploiting" Carryn Owens, wife of fallen hero and Navy Seal Ryan Owens. And not to be outdone lefty Democrat operative Dan Grilo called the grieving widow an "idiot". Mark Halperin called it "unseemly" and so did just about every other media and political figure on the left.
Strange; none of them complained when Hillary used the Khan family to attack Donald Trump. Then the gold star Muslim parents had "absolute moral authority".
Funny, they never questioned Cindy Sheehan, the gold star mom who called George W. Bush a "war criminal".
There were no complaints when Sharon Belkafor, a gold star mom, introduced Barack Hussein Obama (peace be upon him) at the 2015 Democratic National Convention.
How about Michelle DeFord, who lost a son in Iraq and was exploited by the Democrats in anti-Trump ads during the election?
The hypocrisy of the Dems is understandable; they are in the business to hurt Republicans, not play nice. But the media is another matter, and if they want to have any credibility they have to maintain some level of objectivity. To trash Donald Trump for this is the heighth of hypocrisy.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 225 words, total size 2 kb.
Only if they Assimilate
Dana Mathewson
Dennis Prager nails it (as usual). https://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2017/02/28/a-nation-of-immigrants--only-if-they-assimilate-n2291580?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=
A NOTE FROM TIM:
Yep. You aren't an immigrant if you plan to keep your own culture after you come here - you are an invader. Lot of good that did for the Austrian Empire, or the Romans...
Dennis Prager nails it (as usual). https://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2017/02/28/a-nation-of-immigrants--only-if-they-assimilate-n2291580?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=
A NOTE FROM TIM:
Yep. You aren't an immigrant if you plan to keep your own culture after you come here - you are an invader. Lot of good that did for the Austrian Empire, or the Romans...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:58 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
March 01, 2017
Trump Rightly Blames Obama for Rioting, Protests
Dana Mathewson
He's absolutely right; but it doesn't look good for him to say it. It should come from someone else.
Trump: Obama and former aides behind protests, leaks.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/28/trump-obama-and-former-aides-behind-protests-leaks.html
President Trump said Tuesday he believes former President Barack Obama and his top aides are behind the protests and leaks that have tormented the new administration – and he doesn’t expect it to stop anytime soon.
He's absolutely right; but it doesn't look good for him to say it. It should come from someone else.
Trump: Obama and former aides behind protests, leaks.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/28/trump-obama-and-former-aides-behind-protests-leaks.html
President Trump said Tuesday he believes former President Barack Obama and his top aides are behind the protests and leaks that have tormented the new administration – and he doesn’t expect it to stop anytime soon.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
03:50 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
A Case Study of Fake News
Dana Mathewson
A good one from Power Line.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/02/fake-news-a-case-study.php
A good one from Power Line.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/02/fake-news-a-case-study.php
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
03:49 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
The Pen is Mightier than the Sword
Dana Mathewson
Received this from a former boss. Sounds like a good idea. You see anything wrong with it?
See our website at: www.danamarthamusic.com
He is delivering, and now it’s time to show your support for our new President.
Let's show the media, hollyweed, and Chuckie Schumer that the majority rules. If not for anything it will be a riot watching the aforementioned squirm around this one.
On March 13th, each of us should mail President Trump a postcard that publicly expresses our approval to him. And we, in vast numbers, from all corners of the world, will overwhelm the man with his popularity.
We will show the media and the politicians what standing against him — and against us — means.
We show'd the Oscars giving them the lowest viewing in history and now it's time to show the libs in congress, CNN and the rest of the Fake Media.
Hank Aaron currently holds the record for fan mail, having received 900,000 pieces in a year. We’re hoping to set a new record with millions of pieces in a day, with not a single negative word said!
So sharpen your wit, then, on March 13th, mail your messages to:
President Donald J. Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
This will be a RIOT!
Received this from a former boss. Sounds like a good idea. You see anything wrong with it?
See our website at: www.danamarthamusic.com
He is delivering, and now it’s time to show your support for our new President.
Let's show the media, hollyweed, and Chuckie Schumer that the majority rules. If not for anything it will be a riot watching the aforementioned squirm around this one.
On March 13th, each of us should mail President Trump a postcard that publicly expresses our approval to him. And we, in vast numbers, from all corners of the world, will overwhelm the man with his popularity.
We will show the media and the politicians what standing against him — and against us — means.
We show'd the Oscars giving them the lowest viewing in history and now it's time to show the libs in congress, CNN and the rest of the Fake Media.
Hank Aaron currently holds the record for fan mail, having received 900,000 pieces in a year. We’re hoping to set a new record with millions of pieces in a day, with not a single negative word said!
So sharpen your wit, then, on March 13th, mail your messages to:
President Donald J. Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
This will be a RIOT!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
03:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 1 kb.
liberal U.S. Jews welcoming refugees who want to expell or kill Jews
Jack Kemp forwards this:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/not_all_refugees_are_created_equal.html
February 28, 2017
Not all refugees are created equal
By Jack Golbert
Suppose the Communists had deposed Hitler and were hunting the Nazis down, killing them or shipping them off to gulags (meaning "concentration camps"). And suppose a great many Nazis managed to flee the country. Would the Jews have besieged the government and the media, pressuring the government to allow unlimited numbers of them to enter to the U.S. as refugees? After all, "we too have been refugees." Would that have even been rational?
That is exactly what most American Jews today are doing, but the Nazis this time are Islamo-Nazis, literally. The Muslim Brotherhood is the Islamic branch of the Nazi Movement, unrepentant and unpunished. The founder of the Brotherhood, Hassan al-Bannah, teamed up with the Nazis in the early 1930s and grew under Nazi tutelage. (Bing [or Google] the parameters bannah nazi and read what comes up.) The infamous grand mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, had connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in the early 1930s and was the undisputed creator and leader of the Palestinian national movement. He went to Berlin in 1941, was received by Hitler personally, and forged an alliance with him.
Haj Amin al Husseini raised Islamic divisions for the Waffen SS and was to rule the Middle East under Hitler when Germany should conquer it.
And of course he was to be the one to carry out the Final Solution to the Jewish Question in the Middle East. He and the Muslim Brotherhood taught the Nazis how to address their message to the Muslim world, and, for their part, they imbibed the full range and richness of European Jew-hatred. There is a reason why Islamic terrorist organizations use the Nazi salute. They are, quite literally, Islamo-Nazis.
Not all Muslims are Islamo-Nazis, but polls show that the percentage of Muslims living in Islamic-majority countries who have "unfavorable views of Jews" ranges from 60% to 100%. They are assiduously and intensely taught, from infancy, to hate Jews and believe that Jews should be killed for the fact of being Jews. The result is described, quite well, by Pat Condell in "A Special Kind Of Hate." (NOTE: Youtube video)
In truth, this is nothing new, and it applies especially to Jews, but not only to Jews. Mass murder of all non-Muslims is endemic to Islamic rule. Islamic rule in India is emblematic. It is an ongoing phenomenon. Here is a more recent example.
The Islamic fundamentalist jihadis are driving the Jews out of Europe. Why are Jews in America so sure they will not do the same in America? Are they really so confident that they view it as repugnant racism to even vet "refugees" for terrorists? The Jews seem to be so deeply brainwashed that they cannot see the difference between the Muslim "refugees," who are destroying Western Europe, and their own grandmothers fleeing the Holocaust.
Jack Golbert has practiced law in New York, California, and Israel for a multinational clientele including Israeli NGOs and was also a law professor in Los Angeles. He has practiced law in Jerusalem since 1986
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/not_all_refugees_are_created_equal.html
February 28, 2017
Not all refugees are created equal
By Jack Golbert
Suppose the Communists had deposed Hitler and were hunting the Nazis down, killing them or shipping them off to gulags (meaning "concentration camps"). And suppose a great many Nazis managed to flee the country. Would the Jews have besieged the government and the media, pressuring the government to allow unlimited numbers of them to enter to the U.S. as refugees? After all, "we too have been refugees." Would that have even been rational?
That is exactly what most American Jews today are doing, but the Nazis this time are Islamo-Nazis, literally. The Muslim Brotherhood is the Islamic branch of the Nazi Movement, unrepentant and unpunished. The founder of the Brotherhood, Hassan al-Bannah, teamed up with the Nazis in the early 1930s and grew under Nazi tutelage. (Bing [or Google] the parameters bannah nazi and read what comes up.) The infamous grand mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, had connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in the early 1930s and was the undisputed creator and leader of the Palestinian national movement. He went to Berlin in 1941, was received by Hitler personally, and forged an alliance with him.
Haj Amin al Husseini raised Islamic divisions for the Waffen SS and was to rule the Middle East under Hitler when Germany should conquer it.
And of course he was to be the one to carry out the Final Solution to the Jewish Question in the Middle East. He and the Muslim Brotherhood taught the Nazis how to address their message to the Muslim world, and, for their part, they imbibed the full range and richness of European Jew-hatred. There is a reason why Islamic terrorist organizations use the Nazi salute. They are, quite literally, Islamo-Nazis.
Not all Muslims are Islamo-Nazis, but polls show that the percentage of Muslims living in Islamic-majority countries who have "unfavorable views of Jews" ranges from 60% to 100%. They are assiduously and intensely taught, from infancy, to hate Jews and believe that Jews should be killed for the fact of being Jews. The result is described, quite well, by Pat Condell in "A Special Kind Of Hate." (NOTE: Youtube video)
In truth, this is nothing new, and it applies especially to Jews, but not only to Jews. Mass murder of all non-Muslims is endemic to Islamic rule. Islamic rule in India is emblematic. It is an ongoing phenomenon. Here is a more recent example.
The Islamic fundamentalist jihadis are driving the Jews out of Europe. Why are Jews in America so sure they will not do the same in America? Are they really so confident that they view it as repugnant racism to even vet "refugees" for terrorists? The Jews seem to be so deeply brainwashed that they cannot see the difference between the Muslim "refugees," who are destroying Western Europe, and their own grandmothers fleeing the Holocaust.
Jack Golbert has practiced law in New York, California, and Israel for a multinational clientele including Israeli NGOs and was also a law professor in Los Angeles. He has practiced law in Jerusalem since 1986
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
03:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 532 words, total size 3 kb.
89kb generated in CPU 0.0333, elapsed 0.2277 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.2103 seconds, 218 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
34 queries taking 0.2103 seconds, 218 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
