March 07, 2025
Waters Claims Fraud
Timothy Birdnow
Every time Donald Trump or any ally of his or even supporters such as myself said the election of 2020 was fixed we have been universally shouted down by the media "with no evidence" they add every time (despite there being all manner of evidence be it statistical analysis or eyewitness testimony or the very obvious fact that juries have sent Democrats to prison for vote fraud in that election). Yet little is said when a Democrat makes unfounded claims of fraud.
Take Stacey Abrams, who is STILL claiming she was cheated in 2018 despite absolutely no evidence to prove the assertion.The media still treats her as a respected political figure.
So now we have the very crazy Maxine Waters doing what she does best. She is screeching like a howler monkey about Elon Musk and his "high tech ass" "interfering with elections".
She said "we’re not going to give up in investigating and finding out.” In other words, if the Democrats take Congress in '26 the whole stinking pogrom comes back - investigations, interference, lawfare. And this is just Maxine being Maxine to the mainstream media.
"We don’t know everything that Elon Musk has done with his high-technology a**,” she said.
"We don’t know what he’s being accused of by some, as it may relate to the election, but we’re not going to give up in investigating and finding out.”
Rep. Maxine Waters: "Elon Musk with his high-tech ass may have hacked our last election” pic.twitter.com/JlBvb4oAbe
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 5, 202
fin
Strange how it's a major issue when MAGA people do it, "election denial" but it's just a fun diversion when a Democrat does.
I'd like someone to investigate Ms. Waters and see what kind of fraud she's benefited from over the years, since she is so gung ho on stopping fraud.
Every time Donald Trump or any ally of his or even supporters such as myself said the election of 2020 was fixed we have been universally shouted down by the media "with no evidence" they add every time (despite there being all manner of evidence be it statistical analysis or eyewitness testimony or the very obvious fact that juries have sent Democrats to prison for vote fraud in that election). Yet little is said when a Democrat makes unfounded claims of fraud.
Take Stacey Abrams, who is STILL claiming she was cheated in 2018 despite absolutely no evidence to prove the assertion.The media still treats her as a respected political figure.
So now we have the very crazy Maxine Waters doing what she does best. She is screeching like a howler monkey about Elon Musk and his "high tech ass" "interfering with elections".
She said "we’re not going to give up in investigating and finding out.” In other words, if the Democrats take Congress in '26 the whole stinking pogrom comes back - investigations, interference, lawfare. And this is just Maxine being Maxine to the mainstream media.
"We don’t know everything that Elon Musk has done with his high-technology a**,” she said.
"We don’t know what he’s being accused of by some, as it may relate to the election, but we’re not going to give up in investigating and finding out.”
Rep. Maxine Waters: "Elon Musk with his high-tech ass may have hacked our last election” pic.twitter.com/JlBvb4oAbe
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 5, 202
fin
Strange how it's a major issue when MAGA people do it, "election denial" but it's just a fun diversion when a Democrat does.
I'd like someone to investigate Ms. Waters and see what kind of fraud she's benefited from over the years, since she is so gung ho on stopping fraud.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:22 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 311 words, total size 2 kb.
March 06, 2025
Stealing America with Her Own Money
Timothy Birdnow
The Democrats are the kings of slush funds and subverting taxpayer money to get themselves elected.
$375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier
The Democrats are the kings of slush funds and subverting taxpayer money to get themselves elected.
$375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
No Way Hyundai!
Timothy Birdnow
Hyundai is refusing to cancel DEI on the theory that the Democrats will come back into power and they will have the inside track, I suppose. Good luck with that.
DEI is wildly unpopular with consumers. It's main advocates are elites in Universities and activists.
Let me spell it out for these South Korean imbeciles running Hyundai; cancel DEI or we will cancel you. It's that simple. Hyundai sales will drop off if they push forward with this.
And if they refuse to follow the guidelines put in by the Trump Administration they may well wind up being defunded by America and being hit by tariffs to boot.
Go woke go broke. Continue to be woke and you become a joke.
Hyundai is refusing to cancel DEI on the theory that the Democrats will come back into power and they will have the inside track, I suppose. Good luck with that.
DEI is wildly unpopular with consumers. It's main advocates are elites in Universities and activists.
Let me spell it out for these South Korean imbeciles running Hyundai; cancel DEI or we will cancel you. It's that simple. Hyundai sales will drop off if they push forward with this.
And if they refuse to follow the guidelines put in by the Trump Administration they may well wind up being defunded by America and being hit by tariffs to boot.
Go woke go broke. Continue to be woke and you become a joke.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:53 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.
Savings Rebate Likely
Timothy Birdnow
This may be politically popular but I don't think it's a good idea; we need to pay the debt down first.
Proposed DOGE Divident Could Become Law
Of course this could help in boosting the economy at this critical juncture, which may be more important. The politics of this are not to be dismissed; Trump needs to keep the political good will on his side and only relief from high prices will do that. He was elected to fix the economy as much as to close the border; he's done the latter but now needs to accomplish the former and that's going to be a much tougher nut to crack given the Biden spending is just starting to kick in and the strangulation of the economy has yet to come fully.
So perhaps this is the right approach. We've just got to stop blowing money and Congress needs to grow a spine.
This may be politically popular but I don't think it's a good idea; we need to pay the debt down first.
Proposed DOGE Divident Could Become Law
Of course this could help in boosting the economy at this critical juncture, which may be more important. The politics of this are not to be dismissed; Trump needs to keep the political good will on his side and only relief from high prices will do that. He was elected to fix the economy as much as to close the border; he's done the latter but now needs to accomplish the former and that's going to be a much tougher nut to crack given the Biden spending is just starting to kick in and the strangulation of the economy has yet to come fully.
So perhaps this is the right approach. We've just got to stop blowing money and Congress needs to grow a spine.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
No Matter
Timothy Birdnow
More winning!
Trump Effect: Mayor of D.C. Renaming "Black Lives Matter Plaza”
Guess those black lives don't matter so much to the Democrats in the District after all!
More winning!
Trump Effect: Mayor of D.C. Renaming "Black Lives Matter Plaza”
Guess those black lives don't matter so much to the Democrats in the District after all!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
A Few Thoughts on the Trump Address
Timothy Birdnow
Just a few quick thoughts on Trump's address to the Congress.
First, he handed them their lunches. He pointed out exactly why America is in the current dilemma it is in and placed the blame where it belonged. It's well past time someone did that.
A liberal family member complained about the speech, saying Trump was embarassing and combative. When did she expect? These were people who FRAMED him for false crimes and tried to put him in prison for no other reason than that he beat them. And they succeeded in at least one state court before a partisan judge. Why wouldn't Trump call them out? Why wouldn't he put pressure on them.
THEY understood that, which is why they went into this thing ready to disrupt the proceedings, which tthey did, most especially Rep. Al Green who stood there pointing a cane (which could be construed as a weapon and should have been taken away from him) and shouting over the President. I was thrilled to see Speaker Mike Johnson (who I usually call Tiny but won't this day) had the man tossed from the room. But they were abusive in other ways, booing and catcalling and waving pre-printed signs that said "LIES!" on them. Republicans have never done anything even remotely like that.
Anyone remember congressman Joe Wilson? He was the man who yelled "that's a lie" when Barack Obama was giving a similar address to a joint session of Congress - and t media and the Democrats exploded over the discourtesy. He was reprimanded by the House and by his own party for just one such outburst, and the media raged against this for months. Now all the Democrats were booing and hissing and trying to drown out Mr. Trump, and Al Green stood there shouting pejoratives at the man while pointing a weapon at him (and had to be rmoved by the Sargent-at-Arms) and it's suddenly TRUMP'S fault, you know, the guy who was twice targeted for assassination by crazed liberals.
The rules are a little different when you are a Democrat than those that apply to Republicans.
Fortunately there is a move in Congress to censure Green. They should censure all the Democrats, who behaved like spoiled children.
I mean, they couldn't applaud for a 13 year old boy with cancer, for crying out loud, because TRUMP honored him at the speech. How shameful is that? How petty?
They sat on their hands the entire night. I feared many of them would wind up with gangrene from cutting off the blood supply so long. Lines that should have gotten universal applause was met with stony silence from the Democrats in the gallery. Most had their heads down; they knew they were being destroyed politically at that speech but so fear the radicals in their party they dared not applaud the most basic propositions (like the U.S. is a great country).
And it showed; after the speech the public approval rating for it was waaay up.
Trump renewed calls for most of his projects and particularly concentrated on Ukraine and the need to for peace in the region.
I won't go through the laundry list but there wasn't really anything that new. How could there be? Trump immediately set out to actually enact what he planned; he didn't jaw it to death first.
At any rate Trump had complete control of the speech and the attempts to disrupt it only made the Democrats look petty and childish.
The very fact that the media is not taking a victory lap proves this point. They are trying to hide the truth now. I saw a piece in Yahoo News claiming this speech was horribly unpopular because only 44% of respondants were EXTREMELY IMPRESSED with it, while another thirty percent were just impressed! That's how far they are reaching now.
It's sad; a whole political party has turned completely anti-American and can't even applaud the most basic statements of support for the nation. And the media is basically a bunch of traitors, looking for anything they can find to tear America and her chosen President down.
Watch for another assassination attempt on Trump in the coming months.
Just a few quick thoughts on Trump's address to the Congress.
First, he handed them their lunches. He pointed out exactly why America is in the current dilemma it is in and placed the blame where it belonged. It's well past time someone did that.
A liberal family member complained about the speech, saying Trump was embarassing and combative. When did she expect? These were people who FRAMED him for false crimes and tried to put him in prison for no other reason than that he beat them. And they succeeded in at least one state court before a partisan judge. Why wouldn't Trump call them out? Why wouldn't he put pressure on them.
THEY understood that, which is why they went into this thing ready to disrupt the proceedings, which tthey did, most especially Rep. Al Green who stood there pointing a cane (which could be construed as a weapon and should have been taken away from him) and shouting over the President. I was thrilled to see Speaker Mike Johnson (who I usually call Tiny but won't this day) had the man tossed from the room. But they were abusive in other ways, booing and catcalling and waving pre-printed signs that said "LIES!" on them. Republicans have never done anything even remotely like that.
Anyone remember congressman Joe Wilson? He was the man who yelled "that's a lie" when Barack Obama was giving a similar address to a joint session of Congress - and t media and the Democrats exploded over the discourtesy. He was reprimanded by the House and by his own party for just one such outburst, and the media raged against this for months. Now all the Democrats were booing and hissing and trying to drown out Mr. Trump, and Al Green stood there shouting pejoratives at the man while pointing a weapon at him (and had to be rmoved by the Sargent-at-Arms) and it's suddenly TRUMP'S fault, you know, the guy who was twice targeted for assassination by crazed liberals.
The rules are a little different when you are a Democrat than those that apply to Republicans.
Fortunately there is a move in Congress to censure Green. They should censure all the Democrats, who behaved like spoiled children.
I mean, they couldn't applaud for a 13 year old boy with cancer, for crying out loud, because TRUMP honored him at the speech. How shameful is that? How petty?
They sat on their hands the entire night. I feared many of them would wind up with gangrene from cutting off the blood supply so long. Lines that should have gotten universal applause was met with stony silence from the Democrats in the gallery. Most had their heads down; they knew they were being destroyed politically at that speech but so fear the radicals in their party they dared not applaud the most basic propositions (like the U.S. is a great country).
And it showed; after the speech the public approval rating for it was waaay up.
Trump renewed calls for most of his projects and particularly concentrated on Ukraine and the need to for peace in the region.
I won't go through the laundry list but there wasn't really anything that new. How could there be? Trump immediately set out to actually enact what he planned; he didn't jaw it to death first.
At any rate Trump had complete control of the speech and the attempts to disrupt it only made the Democrats look petty and childish.
The very fact that the media is not taking a victory lap proves this point. They are trying to hide the truth now. I saw a piece in Yahoo News claiming this speech was horribly unpopular because only 44% of respondants were EXTREMELY IMPRESSED with it, while another thirty percent were just impressed! That's how far they are reaching now.
It's sad; a whole political party has turned completely anti-American and can't even applaud the most basic statements of support for the nation. And the media is basically a bunch of traitors, looking for anything they can find to tear America and her chosen President down.
Watch for another assassination attempt on Trump in the coming months.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 708 words, total size 4 kb.
March 04, 2025
A Short Hiatus
Timothy Birdnow
I see Dana filled everyone in about my hiatus. It's going to continue at least through the rest of the week, alas. I am going to be tied up probably every day until she gets out of the hospital into rehab.
But I promise to return. Most blogs like this eventually closed because the author/editor tired of laboring with no return, but not me. I find it therapeutic and like the fans we have here (the few who are left anyway.) So I give you my word of honor I will, like MacArthur, return! Please be patient and check back in a few days.
Thank you all for your kindness, prayers, support, and for reading.
Tim
I see Dana filled everyone in about my hiatus. It's going to continue at least through the rest of the week, alas. I am going to be tied up probably every day until she gets out of the hospital into rehab.
But I promise to return. Most blogs like this eventually closed because the author/editor tired of laboring with no return, but not me. I find it therapeutic and like the fans we have here (the few who are left anyway.) So I give you my word of honor I will, like MacArthur, return! Please be patient and check back in a few days.
Thank you all for your kindness, prayers, support, and for reading.
Tim
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
05:50 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
March 02, 2025
No blogging Tomorrow
Timothy Birdnow
Sorry gang; I'm tied up all day tomorrow. I should be back in the saddle on Tuesday or so.
Stay tuned.
Sorry gang; I'm tied up all day tomorrow. I should be back in the saddle on Tuesday or so.
Stay tuned.
---------------------------
North-central States Editor Dana Mathewson puts his tuppence in here:
Tim's wife Cathy is currently "in hospital," as they say in the U.K., having had about six hours of surgery to repair some cancer today (3/3/2025). He called me this evening, quite upbeat, and said that she is now "resting comfortably," as they say, though she'd certainly be more comfortable if she hadn't had to go through all this stuff. She'll likely be there until Friday, he says; meanwhile he's home catching up on some sleep.
He'll be keeping me posted. I'll let him call me so as not to interrupt him if he's sleeping, eating, or more important, attending her in the hospital.
I would certainly ask for prayers from those of you who are so inclined to offer them! And bless you for doing so!
More news as it become available.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
02:31 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
Ukrainian Honeypot
Timothy Birdnow
How Zelensky and the Internationalists plan to retake all former Ukrainian territory by drawing the U.S. into a war with Russia.
From Conservative Treehouse:
"The broader ‘western’ intelligence actors have been in control of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s activity in the conflict with Russia. The outline of their plan is within the statements delivered by the Ukrainian leader, we just have to accept them.
The people who control Ukraine, Intelligence Community, CIA, elements of U.S. State Dept., NATO, EU Commission and the private sector banks and World Economic Forum investment handlers, do not want to accept a Ukraine-Russia ceasefire or peace agreement.
This aforementioned network of influence agents specifically does not want President Trump and President Putin to come to terms, because they well understand the regional territory of Ukraine will not return. However, if you look closely at the demand by Ukraine for U.S. troops as the contingency for "security guarantees” the outline of a scheme is clear.
[SOURCE]
It’s a trap!
As soon as U.S. troops enter the equation on the ground in Russia, particularly as the buffer force in the point of conflict between Ukranian and Russian military, there will be some intentional event created to harm U.S. troops and thrust the USA NATO alliance in direct combat with Russia.
This is the element of Zelenskyy’s greatest need. If U.S. troops are killed or drawn into combat, an escalated war against Russia becomes the tool to get all the captured territory back. The outline is clear.
It doesn’t need to be Russia attacking U.S-led NATO troops, it only needs to be the impression of Russia attacking to create the horrific narrative. The global intelligence network is very skilled at creating the optics of conflict and assigning blame to the wrong actors. This is what they have done in the past in various regional conflicts in order to achieve the result.
One immediate way we can tell this is the objective would be for various media to finally begin broadcasting directly from the line of conflict, the militarized zone that would divide Ukraine territory from Russia-controlled territory. Currently, the Ukraine war is the only regional war-zone where there is literally no on-the-ground reporting by western media; that would change as part of the IC approach.
President Trump instinctively knows the Zelenskyy demand for U.S. troops as the security guarantee is dangerous; it pulls us deeper into the possibility of conflict. The U.S. military industrial complex would love to see our military involved in Ukraine, and the overwhelming membership of the U.S. political deep state also support it.
Without the USA, a false flag operation to frame the Russians for attacking EU troops does not carry the same weight. It is both alarming and maddening to accept this likely scenario scheming through the minds of those who have controlled the Ukraine mess for the past several years.
Thankfully, President Trump appears to be fundamentally against the proposition for U.S. military involvement.
We should be clear-eyed about what Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the bad actors are trying to create."
How Zelensky and the Internationalists plan to retake all former Ukrainian territory by drawing the U.S. into a war with Russia.
From Conservative Treehouse:
"The broader ‘western’ intelligence actors have been in control of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s activity in the conflict with Russia. The outline of their plan is within the statements delivered by the Ukrainian leader, we just have to accept them.
The people who control Ukraine, Intelligence Community, CIA, elements of U.S. State Dept., NATO, EU Commission and the private sector banks and World Economic Forum investment handlers, do not want to accept a Ukraine-Russia ceasefire or peace agreement.
This aforementioned network of influence agents specifically does not want President Trump and President Putin to come to terms, because they well understand the regional territory of Ukraine will not return. However, if you look closely at the demand by Ukraine for U.S. troops as the contingency for "security guarantees” the outline of a scheme is clear.
[SOURCE]
It’s a trap!
As soon as U.S. troops enter the equation on the ground in Russia, particularly as the buffer force in the point of conflict between Ukranian and Russian military, there will be some intentional event created to harm U.S. troops and thrust the USA NATO alliance in direct combat with Russia.
This is the element of Zelenskyy’s greatest need. If U.S. troops are killed or drawn into combat, an escalated war against Russia becomes the tool to get all the captured territory back. The outline is clear.
It doesn’t need to be Russia attacking U.S-led NATO troops, it only needs to be the impression of Russia attacking to create the horrific narrative. The global intelligence network is very skilled at creating the optics of conflict and assigning blame to the wrong actors. This is what they have done in the past in various regional conflicts in order to achieve the result.
One immediate way we can tell this is the objective would be for various media to finally begin broadcasting directly from the line of conflict, the militarized zone that would divide Ukraine territory from Russia-controlled territory. Currently, the Ukraine war is the only regional war-zone where there is literally no on-the-ground reporting by western media; that would change as part of the IC approach.
President Trump instinctively knows the Zelenskyy demand for U.S. troops as the security guarantee is dangerous; it pulls us deeper into the possibility of conflict. The U.S. military industrial complex would love to see our military involved in Ukraine, and the overwhelming membership of the U.S. political deep state also support it.
Without the USA, a false flag operation to frame the Russians for attacking EU troops does not carry the same weight. It is both alarming and maddening to accept this likely scenario scheming through the minds of those who have controlled the Ukraine mess for the past several years.
Thankfully, President Trump appears to be fundamentally against the proposition for U.S. military involvement.
We should be clear-eyed about what Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the bad actors are trying to create."
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
02:22 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 509 words, total size 4 kb.
Why the Europeans Want War
Timothy Birdnow
So,why are the Europeans so eager to keep this Ukraine war going?
Here is an essay by Steve Eichler making a very strong case.
FTA:
The author rightly points out that the European elite want their share of the booty they think can be scammed from Ukraine. But his main and best point is that the E.U. is a Frankenstein's monster cobbled together from countries that have traditionally neither liked nor tolerated each-other. The binding force is money and fear of Russian aggression. The end of the Cold War hurt the cohesion of the E.U. and the influx of aliens, particualrly Middle-Eastern immigrants, is wildly unpopular in most European nations but very popular with the European ruling class. They fear an anti-immigration backlash and so have to find another thing to make the villagers quake with fear. They are just recycling an old, old playbook.
And the internationalists in general want to bleed Russia dry, to force her into their New World Order, put her under the thumb of the international bankers and others on the Continent.If Russia goes bankrupt and Putin is forced out then they can go in to "rebuild" her and turn Russia into another province in the International state they are building.
The Ukraine is in a very strategic position in Eastern Europe, controlling access to Russian as well as Central Asian oil and gas. Ukraine has plenty of untapped oil and gas of her own, plus the best agricultural land in the region. The Europeans lust after all of that, as does Russia. The Ukrianian People are just the eggs that must be broken to make the omelet.
So,why are the Europeans so eager to keep this Ukraine war going?
Here is an essay by Steve Eichler making a very strong case.
FTA:
"GOLD! The EU holds massive portions of Russia’s gold and foreign exchange reserves, which have been frozen as part of sanctions. Ukraine currently uses these assets to fund its military and economic needs, but there are ongoing discussions about outright confiscation. To be frank, they want to keep the gold forever and then grab Ukraine in the process!
The Troll Under the Bridge is a child’s story, but it carries the truth about the boogeyman and the danger of the unknown element. That story serves as a good example of how maintaining the perception of Russia as an existential threat serves a dual purpose.
First, it justifies continued military expenditures and deeper European integration under the guise of collective security.
Second, it helps European leaders deflect domestic dissatisfaction amid economic crises, rising unemployment, and public unrest over increasing crime rates fueled by mass migration.
The European Union, often criticized as an artificial construct built on liberal economic policies, faces internal turmoil. To prevent further fragmentation, European politicians rely on the external enemy narrative to maintain unity. This strategy has historically proven effective in uniting populations behind their governments, even during periods of economic decline.
In the name of danger, the European Union welcomed the multibillion-dollar fresh and delicious American dollars into the heart of Europe but never dreamed those very dollars would be the catalyst to bring President Trump into the mix and quickly grab the right to mine rare earths, harvest vast resources, and possibly control the very breadbasket of Europe."
The Troll Under the Bridge is a child’s story, but it carries the truth about the boogeyman and the danger of the unknown element. That story serves as a good example of how maintaining the perception of Russia as an existential threat serves a dual purpose.
First, it justifies continued military expenditures and deeper European integration under the guise of collective security.
Second, it helps European leaders deflect domestic dissatisfaction amid economic crises, rising unemployment, and public unrest over increasing crime rates fueled by mass migration.
The European Union, often criticized as an artificial construct built on liberal economic policies, faces internal turmoil. To prevent further fragmentation, European politicians rely on the external enemy narrative to maintain unity. This strategy has historically proven effective in uniting populations behind their governments, even during periods of economic decline.
In the name of danger, the European Union welcomed the multibillion-dollar fresh and delicious American dollars into the heart of Europe but never dreamed those very dollars would be the catalyst to bring President Trump into the mix and quickly grab the right to mine rare earths, harvest vast resources, and possibly control the very breadbasket of Europe."
The author rightly points out that the European elite want their share of the booty they think can be scammed from Ukraine. But his main and best point is that the E.U. is a Frankenstein's monster cobbled together from countries that have traditionally neither liked nor tolerated each-other. The binding force is money and fear of Russian aggression. The end of the Cold War hurt the cohesion of the E.U. and the influx of aliens, particualrly Middle-Eastern immigrants, is wildly unpopular in most European nations but very popular with the European ruling class. They fear an anti-immigration backlash and so have to find another thing to make the villagers quake with fear. They are just recycling an old, old playbook.
And the internationalists in general want to bleed Russia dry, to force her into their New World Order, put her under the thumb of the international bankers and others on the Continent.If Russia goes bankrupt and Putin is forced out then they can go in to "rebuild" her and turn Russia into another province in the International state they are building.
The Ukraine is in a very strategic position in Eastern Europe, controlling access to Russian as well as Central Asian oil and gas. Ukraine has plenty of untapped oil and gas of her own, plus the best agricultural land in the region. The Europeans lust after all of that, as does Russia. The Ukrianian People are just the eggs that must be broken to make the omelet.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:48 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 532 words, total size 4 kb.
Trump to Pardon Pete Rose
Timothy Birdnow
Donald Trump to posthumously pardon Pete Rose.
Rose messed up, no question, but it should not obscure the rest of a long and honorable and successful career forever.
Donald Trump to posthumously pardon Pete Rose.
Rose messed up, no question, but it should not obscure the rest of a long and honorable and successful career forever.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:54 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
Ukrainians Chastise Zelensky
Timothy Birdnow
Zelensky's childish outburst in the Oval Office might cost him dearly, and he's taking heat from members of parliament in the war-ravaged country.
From Breitbart:
"Oleksiy Goncharenko, a member of the Verkhovna Rada parliament in Kyiv, lamented that Ukraine’s relationship with President Trump came to an "end” on Friday after a heated White House meeting in which President Zelensky was accused of being "disrespectful” to the U.S. leader and the American people.
Goncharenko wrote on Facebook that it was "absolute idiocy to start ARGUING with the President of the United States in front of the cameras,” adding that "it can be done and probably should be done, but not in front of cameras.”
The Ukrainian MP, who sits with the European Solidarity bloc of former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko in the parliament, went on to warn that Zelensky’s behaviour on Friday could have "very bad consequences” for Ukraine.
Goncharenko said that such consequences could include a potential shut down of Elon Musk’s Starlink internet access to the Ukrainian armed forces to even an end of Washington sharing intelligence with Kyiv, both of which have been critical for Ukraine in its war with Russia.
The Ukrainian lawmaker added, "Zelensky has put millions of people at risk, and it’s madness.”
Goncharenko also appeared to agree with President Trump’s conclusion that Zelensky was not prepared for peace, writing: "This time, it’s not only Putin’s choice. He wants a war it’s totally obvious. But on February 28, this choice – the choice of war – was also made by the Ukrainian leader. Zelensky. It’s his common choice with Putin.”
The fallout from Zelensky’s disastrous meeting with President Trump on Friday has not been contained to the political sphere, with critiques also reportedly coming from the Ukrainian military. Time magazine has cited an unnamed colonel in the Ukrainian armed forces in Kyiv who, upon seeing the news of the meeting, said: "Well done… He pushed back, you have to respect that… But now we’re f—ed.”'
fin
You don't bite the hand that feeds.
BTW as Tom Radout points out at Townhall, what Zelensky needs is not more weapons but a visit to Men's Warehouse. If the man dressed like a professional he'd feel like one and thus behave like one. His attire is insulting at the Oval Office when meeting with the President; you don't show up at the WH for an important meeting with the leader of the free world dressed like you just left a honkey-tonk. Sloppy dress makes for sloppy thinking and beahvior; it's why the military wears uniforms, or why Catholic schools make kids wear them.
Zelensky looks like he just got off of a canoe trip.
Zelensky's childish outburst in the Oval Office might cost him dearly, and he's taking heat from members of parliament in the war-ravaged country.
From Breitbart:
"Oleksiy Goncharenko, a member of the Verkhovna Rada parliament in Kyiv, lamented that Ukraine’s relationship with President Trump came to an "end” on Friday after a heated White House meeting in which President Zelensky was accused of being "disrespectful” to the U.S. leader and the American people.
Goncharenko wrote on Facebook that it was "absolute idiocy to start ARGUING with the President of the United States in front of the cameras,” adding that "it can be done and probably should be done, but not in front of cameras.”
The Ukrainian MP, who sits with the European Solidarity bloc of former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko in the parliament, went on to warn that Zelensky’s behaviour on Friday could have "very bad consequences” for Ukraine.
Goncharenko said that such consequences could include a potential shut down of Elon Musk’s Starlink internet access to the Ukrainian armed forces to even an end of Washington sharing intelligence with Kyiv, both of which have been critical for Ukraine in its war with Russia.
The Ukrainian lawmaker added, "Zelensky has put millions of people at risk, and it’s madness.”
Goncharenko also appeared to agree with President Trump’s conclusion that Zelensky was not prepared for peace, writing: "This time, it’s not only Putin’s choice. He wants a war it’s totally obvious. But on February 28, this choice – the choice of war – was also made by the Ukrainian leader. Zelensky. It’s his common choice with Putin.”
The fallout from Zelensky’s disastrous meeting with President Trump on Friday has not been contained to the political sphere, with critiques also reportedly coming from the Ukrainian military. Time magazine has cited an unnamed colonel in the Ukrainian armed forces in Kyiv who, upon seeing the news of the meeting, said: "Well done… He pushed back, you have to respect that… But now we’re f—ed.”'
fin
You don't bite the hand that feeds.
BTW as Tom Radout points out at Townhall, what Zelensky needs is not more weapons but a visit to Men's Warehouse. If the man dressed like a professional he'd feel like one and thus behave like one. His attire is insulting at the Oval Office when meeting with the President; you don't show up at the WH for an important meeting with the leader of the free world dressed like you just left a honkey-tonk. Sloppy dress makes for sloppy thinking and beahvior; it's why the military wears uniforms, or why Catholic schools make kids wear them.
Zelensky looks like he just got off of a canoe trip.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:52 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.
Widespread Cheating at Air Force Academy
Timothy Birdnow
They should all be given Dishonorable Discharges, at a minimum.
Widespread Cheating Discovered at the Air Force Academy
This is no different than the plagiarism scandals at Harvard and other Ivy League institutions, except it involves what should be the most honorable of all educational outlets. If the military does not demand honesty of it's members, if the concept of "an officer and a gentleman" is simply trashed, what do we expect will happen?
Oh wait; "honor" and "gentlemen" are such passe' ideas, not suited for us modern Americans!
They should all be given Dishonorable Discharges, at a minimum.
Widespread Cheating Discovered at the Air Force Academy
This is no different than the plagiarism scandals at Harvard and other Ivy League institutions, except it involves what should be the most honorable of all educational outlets. If the military does not demand honesty of it's members, if the concept of "an officer and a gentleman" is simply trashed, what do we expect will happen?
Oh wait; "honor" and "gentlemen" are such passe' ideas, not suited for us modern Americans!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:36 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
Media Lied About Trans Soldiers
Timothy Birdnow
I assure you it's not just in the matter of transgendered troops; they've hugely inflated the number of trans people in general to promote this abominable concept.
Media Hugely Inflated Number of Transgender Troops
According to Breitbart:
The media has done this for decades with any group they want to promote, and to disspirit the majority. You saw this with racial minorities being overrepresented on television and in commercials and whatnot. We have seen this with the homosexual community. Most people think a quareter of the population is gay and ten percent trans; the reality is at most 3.8% and that includes both gay and trans. Trans are a statistical blip, being well below 1% (0.3% to be precise). (Alfred Kinsey, who we now know was a sicko pervert, told us homosexuals account for 10% of the population, then a very dubious Gallup poll concluded it was 8%, but both of these are bogus. A later Gallup poll from 2012 concluded the number was 3% forhomosexuals.) I would add that polls show an increase in numbers among younger people who have been brainwashed to see lgbtq as a status symbol. They aren't gay; just want people to think they are because otherwise they the despised "normies" or "breeders".
We always get these high numbers from polls commissioned by activist groups and promoted by an activist media. But they are all lies and always have been.
As I stated they are designed to make the normal individual feel outnumbered, feel to be odd, in the minority, and want to jump on the bandwagon. It has largely worked with homosexuality which used to be something whispered about but is now fairly accepted in our modern society. Time was the Bible was the final word "neither homosexuals, nor the effeminate, shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven" but now it's "let it all hang out" and the promotion of the lifestyle by the media and the mandarins of culture have made it appear much larger than it is. It's a Potemkin Village. (For those who do not know, Tsarina Catherine the Great ordered her interior minister to build a bunch of new villages to house the peasants. He didn't do it. She decided to take a tour of them along the Dneiper and so Potenkin built a bunch of false front sets and had actors playing happy peasants. They moved the peasants down the river ahead of the Czarina's boat. It appeared like Potemkin did his job but in reality he faked the whole thing.)
I assure you it's not just in the matter of transgendered troops; they've hugely inflated the number of trans people in general to promote this abominable concept.
Media Hugely Inflated Number of Transgender Troops
According to Breitbart:
"For the last decade, the establishment media have touted advocates’ claims that 15,000 transgender people are serving in the U.S. military.
But this week, President Donald Trump’s Pentagon revealed the transgender population is just 4,240 service members.
That adds up to one transgender person for every 500 service members in the United States military of 2.1 million active and reserve members.
That transgender share is just 0.2 percent, or one-fifth of one percent, of the military.
In football terms, the transgender share is just 8.6 inches on a 120-yard football field.
The media’s much-claimed 15,000 number is almost four times the Pentagon’s 2025 count of 4,240 self-declared transgender service members."
But this week, President Donald Trump’s Pentagon revealed the transgender population is just 4,240 service members.
That adds up to one transgender person for every 500 service members in the United States military of 2.1 million active and reserve members.
That transgender share is just 0.2 percent, or one-fifth of one percent, of the military.
In football terms, the transgender share is just 8.6 inches on a 120-yard football field.
The media’s much-claimed 15,000 number is almost four times the Pentagon’s 2025 count of 4,240 self-declared transgender service members."
The media has done this for decades with any group they want to promote, and to disspirit the majority. You saw this with racial minorities being overrepresented on television and in commercials and whatnot. We have seen this with the homosexual community. Most people think a quareter of the population is gay and ten percent trans; the reality is at most 3.8% and that includes both gay and trans. Trans are a statistical blip, being well below 1% (0.3% to be precise). (Alfred Kinsey, who we now know was a sicko pervert, told us homosexuals account for 10% of the population, then a very dubious Gallup poll concluded it was 8%, but both of these are bogus. A later Gallup poll from 2012 concluded the number was 3% forhomosexuals.) I would add that polls show an increase in numbers among younger people who have been brainwashed to see lgbtq as a status symbol. They aren't gay; just want people to think they are because otherwise they the despised "normies" or "breeders".
We always get these high numbers from polls commissioned by activist groups and promoted by an activist media. But they are all lies and always have been.
As I stated they are designed to make the normal individual feel outnumbered, feel to be odd, in the minority, and want to jump on the bandwagon. It has largely worked with homosexuality which used to be something whispered about but is now fairly accepted in our modern society. Time was the Bible was the final word "neither homosexuals, nor the effeminate, shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven" but now it's "let it all hang out" and the promotion of the lifestyle by the media and the mandarins of culture have made it appear much larger than it is. It's a Potemkin Village. (For those who do not know, Tsarina Catherine the Great ordered her interior minister to build a bunch of new villages to house the peasants. He didn't do it. She decided to take a tour of them along the Dneiper and so Potenkin built a bunch of false front sets and had actors playing happy peasants. They moved the peasants down the river ahead of the Czarina's boat. It appeared like Potemkin did his job but in reality he faked the whole thing.)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:30 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 539 words, total size 4 kb.
Where the Rubber Hits the Road
Timothy Birdnow
Maryland Democrats want to put condom machines in preschool.
For whom? The staff maybe?
These people are mad as march hares!
Maryland Democrats want to put condom machines in preschool.
For whom? The staff maybe?
These people are mad as march hares!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:11 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Zelensky Stuck on Stupid
Timothy Birdnow
Volodymyr Zelensky,having put his foot in his mouth when trying to embarrass and shame President Trump in the Oval Office, has gone on a tweet storm, inserting not just his foot but both of his legs as well.
This guy doesn't know when to shut up.
You do not demand, insult, and insist when you are asking somebody for lots of money.
After offering a perfunctory thanks to America he goes on to rail about how Putin breaks his ceasefire promises and so apparently there should be no deal with him. He may have broken the deals in the past (or did Zelensky?) but if the U.S. brokers this it's a different matter entirely. (The Russians are great legalists and usually have a legal point when they do something even if we do now always like it. To blame them for breaking a deal is fine and dandy but often they have a reason that justifies such actions.)
Be that as it may, the fact is what Zelensky is calling for when he said "lasting peace" is a Russian surrender and the return of all territory, including Crimea, and maybe some extra territory to boot.
Zelensky and the American media forget that the Minsk Agreement was violated repeatedly by the Ukrainians. They damed the Dneiper to cut off water to Crimea. They closed pipeline access. They regularly shelled Russian forces in Crimea. They are not clean in this by any stretch.
If Putin violates the cease fire then it will trigger greater Western involvement. He knows that; he's not stupid. Zelensky knows it too. But zelensky doesn't want to pay for the war and for the peace; he's hoping to suck the U.S. in without giving any concessions to us. The mineral rights deal was wtered down to become very favorable to Ukraine but Zelensky STILL blew it up, and probably because he figures he can force the U.S. into the war anyway.
As they author of this piece points out, Zelensky basically took a cease-fire off the table, which took any negotiations off the table. Then he told Trump the U.S. was going to keep underwriting what is becoming HIS war.
Apparently Zelensky doesn't remember Versailles; after the First World War the Germans met with the Allies to discuss terms for peace. With Clemenceau and Wilson involved it morphed into a dictation of complete surrender by Germany, which only led to the rise of Naziism and the Second World War. But the point is the Germans would never havee accepted a surrender in the first place had those terms been made. Zelensky would have simply prolongued the war had he been one of the negotiators. (That wouldn't have been a bad thing; the war would have ended in a stalemate had the U.S. not stuck it's nose in and a stalemate would have left the governments that ran Germany and Austria in power, thus preventing the rise of Hitler. But this is a different situation and if Russia doesn't have something to gain to save face it will fire Putin - literally, with guns - and a far worse leader will take power there. Putin's possible replacements make him look positively Jimmy Carter-esque.)
Zelensky figures what has worked on Biden and on the leaders of Europe will work on Trump. He has another thing coming.
After spending $200 Billion to prop up his corrupt regime Trump may just pull the plug. Ukraine won't last long without aid. Zelensky is willing to lose his whole country out of personal pique and a misguided idea that he can actually win the war with Russia. He's like the dark knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail who, after Arthur cuts off all four of his limbs, says "O.K. - we'll call it a draw!" The fool doesn't know he's already lost.
BTW Zelensky was rolling his eyes and mocking Trump nonverbally throughout the discussion, and making it clear he didn't respect the current President of the United States. He didn't walk out on his own either but was "escorted" out aka tossed out on his rump.
This was the right thing to do. In a tough negotiation you have to be ready to walk away from the table, or kick the other guy out.
Oh, one more thing; Zelensky met with Congressional Democrats just before his cocky up-yours to Trump. Coincidence? I think not.
Volodymyr Zelensky,having put his foot in his mouth when trying to embarrass and shame President Trump in the Oval Office, has gone on a tweet storm, inserting not just his foot but both of his legs as well.
This guy doesn't know when to shut up.
You do not demand, insult, and insist when you are asking somebody for lots of money.
After offering a perfunctory thanks to America he goes on to rail about how Putin breaks his ceasefire promises and so apparently there should be no deal with him. He may have broken the deals in the past (or did Zelensky?) but if the U.S. brokers this it's a different matter entirely. (The Russians are great legalists and usually have a legal point when they do something even if we do now always like it. To blame them for breaking a deal is fine and dandy but often they have a reason that justifies such actions.)
Be that as it may, the fact is what Zelensky is calling for when he said "lasting peace" is a Russian surrender and the return of all territory, including Crimea, and maybe some extra territory to boot.
Zelensky and the American media forget that the Minsk Agreement was violated repeatedly by the Ukrainians. They damed the Dneiper to cut off water to Crimea. They closed pipeline access. They regularly shelled Russian forces in Crimea. They are not clean in this by any stretch.
If Putin violates the cease fire then it will trigger greater Western involvement. He knows that; he's not stupid. Zelensky knows it too. But zelensky doesn't want to pay for the war and for the peace; he's hoping to suck the U.S. in without giving any concessions to us. The mineral rights deal was wtered down to become very favorable to Ukraine but Zelensky STILL blew it up, and probably because he figures he can force the U.S. into the war anyway.
As they author of this piece points out, Zelensky basically took a cease-fire off the table, which took any negotiations off the table. Then he told Trump the U.S. was going to keep underwriting what is becoming HIS war.
Apparently Zelensky doesn't remember Versailles; after the First World War the Germans met with the Allies to discuss terms for peace. With Clemenceau and Wilson involved it morphed into a dictation of complete surrender by Germany, which only led to the rise of Naziism and the Second World War. But the point is the Germans would never havee accepted a surrender in the first place had those terms been made. Zelensky would have simply prolongued the war had he been one of the negotiators. (That wouldn't have been a bad thing; the war would have ended in a stalemate had the U.S. not stuck it's nose in and a stalemate would have left the governments that ran Germany and Austria in power, thus preventing the rise of Hitler. But this is a different situation and if Russia doesn't have something to gain to save face it will fire Putin - literally, with guns - and a far worse leader will take power there. Putin's possible replacements make him look positively Jimmy Carter-esque.)
Zelensky figures what has worked on Biden and on the leaders of Europe will work on Trump. He has another thing coming.
After spending $200 Billion to prop up his corrupt regime Trump may just pull the plug. Ukraine won't last long without aid. Zelensky is willing to lose his whole country out of personal pique and a misguided idea that he can actually win the war with Russia. He's like the dark knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail who, after Arthur cuts off all four of his limbs, says "O.K. - we'll call it a draw!" The fool doesn't know he's already lost.
BTW Zelensky was rolling his eyes and mocking Trump nonverbally throughout the discussion, and making it clear he didn't respect the current President of the United States. He didn't walk out on his own either but was "escorted" out aka tossed out on his rump.
This was the right thing to do. In a tough negotiation you have to be ready to walk away from the table, or kick the other guy out.
Oh, one more thing; Zelensky met with Congressional Democrats just before his cocky up-yours to Trump. Coincidence? I think not.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 739 words, total size 5 kb.
Early to Bed and Early to Rise
Timothy Birdnow
New research suggests "night owl" habits lead to much higer incidents of mental health issues than do their early rising cousins.
People who regularly stay up well past midnight are 40% more likely to suffer from emotional and stress-related disorders than are others, according to a New Study by Stanford Medicine published in the journal Psychiatric Research. The study tracked the sleep habits of 73,888 people and found a clear correlation between the times the late nighters went to bed and other issues (like depression).
The study focused on older adults. They were given monitors to see how much activity was involved so as control for that.
These problems could be reduced or eliminated if night owls would impose earlier bedtimes on themselves, the researchers found.
I know from personal experience that I feel much better and am happier if I maintain a cons istent bedtime before Midnight. I try to go to bed at the same time every day too,so as to avoid insomnia. I used to suffer from terrible insomnia, and when I worked the graveyard shift (for three years) I hardly ever slept. But returning to a normal schedule completely cured me of insomnia and it's rare when I get it now,provided I follow the rules about bedtime and whatnot.
Benjamin Franklin admonished "early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise" and it appears that, by and large, he was right.
Humanity's whole existence was dominated by the day/night cycle, and that even predates the human condition. We are day creatures by evolution. Our primary sense is sight, and it doesn't function well in the dark (unlike some creatures like cats). We are thus day hunters and gatherers and are evolved for operating in daylight. The invention of artificial light (starting with fires) made it possible for us to stay awake after dark,but there never was a really good light source until the nineteenth century when gas lighting was invented, followed by electric. Candles and whale oil lamps and olive oil lamps just don't put out that much light. May as well just go to bed when the sun goes down. And if you do burn the lamps you risk burning up all your precious oil for them!
Electricity changed all that. Now we get power from miles, hundreds of miles, away and it's easy; just flip a switch and you have light! That made staying up late atrractive, but in the end we weren't built to be owls or bats. We have a natural rhythm.
Which is disrupted by late nights. Corisol prroduction is interrupted, as is melatonin production. The end result is the night owl gets less REM sleep and as a result feels more tired and tends to become depressed and lethargic. Not all,of course, and there are people who do amazing things at three a.m. (look at Donald Trump) but for the lion's share of us it does not serve us.
Truckers, for example, often bing-drive, going well into the night. They are 22% more likely to suffer from depresion and anxiety and other stress-related problems than the general public. All shift workers have higher rates of mental health issues than does the daytime public (33% as a whole). Does anyone wonder why Dracula was such a jerk?
so a good nights sleep makes for a happy life, and to get one an earlier bedtime really helps.
New research suggests "night owl" habits lead to much higer incidents of mental health issues than do their early rising cousins.
People who regularly stay up well past midnight are 40% more likely to suffer from emotional and stress-related disorders than are others, according to a New Study by Stanford Medicine published in the journal Psychiatric Research. The study tracked the sleep habits of 73,888 people and found a clear correlation between the times the late nighters went to bed and other issues (like depression).
The study focused on older adults. They were given monitors to see how much activity was involved so as control for that.
These problems could be reduced or eliminated if night owls would impose earlier bedtimes on themselves, the researchers found.
I know from personal experience that I feel much better and am happier if I maintain a cons istent bedtime before Midnight. I try to go to bed at the same time every day too,so as to avoid insomnia. I used to suffer from terrible insomnia, and when I worked the graveyard shift (for three years) I hardly ever slept. But returning to a normal schedule completely cured me of insomnia and it's rare when I get it now,provided I follow the rules about bedtime and whatnot.
Benjamin Franklin admonished "early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise" and it appears that, by and large, he was right.
Humanity's whole existence was dominated by the day/night cycle, and that even predates the human condition. We are day creatures by evolution. Our primary sense is sight, and it doesn't function well in the dark (unlike some creatures like cats). We are thus day hunters and gatherers and are evolved for operating in daylight. The invention of artificial light (starting with fires) made it possible for us to stay awake after dark,but there never was a really good light source until the nineteenth century when gas lighting was invented, followed by electric. Candles and whale oil lamps and olive oil lamps just don't put out that much light. May as well just go to bed when the sun goes down. And if you do burn the lamps you risk burning up all your precious oil for them!
Electricity changed all that. Now we get power from miles, hundreds of miles, away and it's easy; just flip a switch and you have light! That made staying up late atrractive, but in the end we weren't built to be owls or bats. We have a natural rhythm.
Which is disrupted by late nights. Corisol prroduction is interrupted, as is melatonin production. The end result is the night owl gets less REM sleep and as a result feels more tired and tends to become depressed and lethargic. Not all,of course, and there are people who do amazing things at three a.m. (look at Donald Trump) but for the lion's share of us it does not serve us.
Truckers, for example, often bing-drive, going well into the night. They are 22% more likely to suffer from depresion and anxiety and other stress-related problems than the general public. All shift workers have higher rates of mental health issues than does the daytime public (33% as a whole). Does anyone wonder why Dracula was such a jerk?
so a good nights sleep makes for a happy life, and to get one an earlier bedtime really helps.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 579 words, total size 4 kb.
March 01, 2025
Altgov
Timothy Birdnow
The Empire Strikes Back - via Algov.
read about it here.
The Empire Strikes Back - via Algov.
read about it here.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
Eastern European Game of Thrones
Timothy Birdnow
Here is a terrific piece on globalists and the Ukrainian war. I highly recommend it.
The author argues WWIII is still a possibility as the Europeans are trying to "Trump proof" their Ukrainian war and force the U.S.'s hand by putting troops on the ground and thus compelling America to send in "peacekeepers" - and thus escalate, pushing Putin to counter.
The author rightly sees the goals of this war in the WEst - to illustrate the "dangers" of rogue nation states and empower international governing bodies and illustrate the futility of individual national action. While he doesn't specifically address the matter, I believe it is to bleed one of the few power blocks outside of the internationalists control until it bends it's knee to the plutocracy in the West. He does discuss the way Russia is fighting a war of attrition and how it's strangling Ukraine, but what he fails to mention is that is precisely the war the West is fighting against Putin and Russia.
I think he knows this but it's not the thrust of his essay, and in the interests of time he has to hold back on it.
Boots on the ground would change everything.
He points out, rightly, that the go-ahead to use long range ballistic missiles to strike deep into Russia by the outgoing Biden Administration was an attempt at escalation to bind Trump's hands and force the war to continue, in fact to move into a new phase.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; Putin will be killed if he is removed from office, and he will be removed from office if he loses. He can't afford to lose. He will do anything to prevent that, up to and including the use of nuclear weapons.
And I ask; what will we do if he uses tactical nukes? Will we fry them with our entire arsenal? Theirs is bigger and newer than ours and would do more damage.
This has been a dangerous game we've been playing for some time now.
As the author points out, Zelensky's arrogance does not come out of thin air; he was clearly punped up from some source. Who? The Europeans? The Neocons and Democrats? Somebody has been telling Zelensky they have his back with Trump.
Here is a terrific piece on globalists and the Ukrainian war. I highly recommend it.
The author argues WWIII is still a possibility as the Europeans are trying to "Trump proof" their Ukrainian war and force the U.S.'s hand by putting troops on the ground and thus compelling America to send in "peacekeepers" - and thus escalate, pushing Putin to counter.
The author rightly sees the goals of this war in the WEst - to illustrate the "dangers" of rogue nation states and empower international governing bodies and illustrate the futility of individual national action. While he doesn't specifically address the matter, I believe it is to bleed one of the few power blocks outside of the internationalists control until it bends it's knee to the plutocracy in the West. He does discuss the way Russia is fighting a war of attrition and how it's strangling Ukraine, but what he fails to mention is that is precisely the war the West is fighting against Putin and Russia.
I think he knows this but it's not the thrust of his essay, and in the interests of time he has to hold back on it.
Boots on the ground would change everything.
He points out, rightly, that the go-ahead to use long range ballistic missiles to strike deep into Russia by the outgoing Biden Administration was an attempt at escalation to bind Trump's hands and force the war to continue, in fact to move into a new phase.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; Putin will be killed if he is removed from office, and he will be removed from office if he loses. He can't afford to lose. He will do anything to prevent that, up to and including the use of nuclear weapons.
And I ask; what will we do if he uses tactical nukes? Will we fry them with our entire arsenal? Theirs is bigger and newer than ours and would do more damage.
This has been a dangerous game we've been playing for some time now.
As the author points out, Zelensky's arrogance does not come out of thin air; he was clearly punped up from some source. Who? The Europeans? The Neocons and Democrats? Somebody has been telling Zelensky they have his back with Trump.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 2 kb.
Her Word's not her Bondi
Timothy Birdnow
Here is the scoop about the release of the Epstein files phase I by a journalist at The Blaze. She, and a host of other conservative journalists, is not happy.
Pam Bondi seriously overpromised. She also played this in a way that embarassed the conservatives who participated.
Either Bondi has the goods as she claimed and is not releasing them or she is being stonewalled by the FBI. Either way she should tell us exactly what is going on here.
If she has the goods and can't release it yet that is fine; there are many reasons not to do so, because releasing the information can compromise ongoing investigations. But she needs to come clean on that.
Right now Bondi looks like another Deep Stater who managed to worm her way into a key position. She needs to come clean or get out.
Here is the scoop about the release of the Epstein files phase I by a journalist at The Blaze. She, and a host of other conservative journalists, is not happy.
Pam Bondi seriously overpromised. She also played this in a way that embarassed the conservatives who participated.
Either Bondi has the goods as she claimed and is not releasing them or she is being stonewalled by the FBI. Either way she should tell us exactly what is going on here.
If she has the goods and can't release it yet that is fine; there are many reasons not to do so, because releasing the information can compromise ongoing investigations. But she needs to come clean on that.
Right now Bondi looks like another Deep Stater who managed to worm her way into a key position. She needs to come clean or get out.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
106kb generated in CPU 0.1226, elapsed 0.9632 seconds.
47 queries taking 0.9456 seconds, 248 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
47 queries taking 0.9456 seconds, 248 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
