September 22, 2019
Bill H. Draws our attention to this asinine article from CNN.
From the Complete Nuts Network:
No, Venus was much warmer, and it was changes in solar irradiance that triggered the planetary warming. But let us continue:
What happened to Venus is pretty clear. Venus had a surface temperature around two hundred degrees F (real habitable, that!) but then the Sun got warmer and it boiled away the Venusian oceans (which still show in large basins on the planet.) All that water vapor in the air heated the planet before breaking up and dissipating into space due to the solar wind and no magnetic field to block it - and the extra solar irradiance heated the planet. Then too, Venus has a very thin crust (probably due to its ridiculously slow and retrograde rotation) and so massive volcanic activity ensued, eventually making the atmosphere one ninety times as dense as the Earth's. It is that density that matters - far more than the carbon dioxide levels. If it were all nitrogen the planet would still be far too hot.
The article proves my point:
This amount of co2 would not have been "reabsorbed into the surface"; there was far too much of it. This is a ridiculous statement. This stuff came from deep in the interior of the planet, not from the surface.
Venus is a very different world from Earth. It has a year that is shorter than its' day, and the planet rotates in reverse (if you could see the sun at all it would rise in the west.) Scientists think something probably smacked into it in the distant past.
Venus also has no plate tectonics, and so there is no change in her surface structure for millions of years - followed by a period of spasmodic seismic activity which leads to a complete "resurfacing". During this period massive amounts of internal gas are likely released - mainly carbon dioxide. The stuff won't blow out into space and has no water to absorb into, so it just sits there looking ugly (sort of like Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who is about as old). This means the air pressure keeps rising and more heat is trapped. It has little to do with the composition of the atmosphere and everything to do with it's density.
If carbon dioxide were the primary reason for this, Mars would be habitable, a planetary Riviera. It's not; Mars is very cold, colder than it should be. The atmosphere actually freezes out in winter, forming huge dry ice caps.
BTW this research was done at the Goddard Institute, James Hansen's weaponized stomping ground. I would check the clock if they said good morning to me there.
Seriously; there was a scientist and author named Emanuel (sometimes spelled Imanuel) Velikovsky, who postulated a number of ideas about planetary science. He was considered a crackpot by "normal" scientists but has never, to my knowledge, been disproven on any of his theories. In one of his books, "Ages in Chaos," which I used to have but most likely have lost, he establishes that Venus violently "joined" our solar system, flying in from outside, within Biblical times (which book I cannot remember) and points out biblical passages that support the idea, even saying that it passed close enough to Earth to knock us basically upside-down in our rotation. And we stayed there until Mars came in almost as violently (during the time of the Book of Isaiah) and knocked us back.
If any of this is true, especially about Venus, there's no wonder that it is considerably different in makeup from the rest of the Solar System planets.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 22, 2019 02:01 PM (jexFU)
Interesting theory, Dana. SOMETHING seriously disturbed Venus at some point. I rather doubt it was in historical times (Bodes law, for example, makes it unlikely as Venus is right where it should be - double as far from Earth as it is from Mercury) but it at least attempts to explain what happened.
Actually, Mars is way too small, too; it should be a "super Earth" from what we have seen of other solar systems. Something screwed that planet up, kept it from forming properly or (more interesting) smashed into it and broke a big chunk off. It shouldn't be the puny kid brother it turned out to be.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 23, 2019 07:48 AM (pR6Fl)
Earth and Moon have enormous tidal effects on each other, and will eventually (if the Sun doesn't burn them up first) cause both to break up into fragments.
I mention this because the biggest atmospheric problem for Venus is that it doesn't have the Moon.
Posted by: Bill H at September 23, 2019 08:19 AM (vMiSr)
Something to think about.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 23, 2019 10:24 AM (gbxHu)
It certainly does have a number of important benefits - like tidal forces churning up chemicals we need on the surface. And it moves the oceans, keeping them oxygenated.
Great points, Bill and Dana!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 23, 2019 11:21 AM (pR6Fl)
This medication is used to help relieve severe ongoing pain (such as due to cancer). Oxycodone belongs to a class of drugs known as opioid (narcotic) analgesics. It works in the brain to change how your body feels and responds to pain.
The higher strengths of this drug (more than 40 milligrams per tablet) should be used only if you have been regularly taking moderate to large amounts of opioid pain medication. These strengths may cause overdose (even death) if taken by a person who has not been regularly taking opioids.
Posted by: buy oxycodone pills at May 02, 2020 09:35 AM (8Soj8)
37 queries taking 0.2653 seconds, 120 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.