February 17, 2020
In a recent post on transgenderism Dana Mathewson pointed out that scientists are now coming out decrying the notion of multiple sexes - and that this concept clashes with "gay" culture because it dismisses the very idea of different sexes in general.
I pointed out in the comments section:
Wearing the opposite sex's clothing is a mental disorder. It is not some sort of alternative sex. It is no different than a guy dressing in nineteenth century garb and saying he's Napoleon.
And so it is.
The point is there have been forces at work in Hollywood and other Progressive bastions that have been promoting this for quite some time.
I quoted research last summer that disproved the "gender spectrum" theory. Let me quote from the article again:
Physiological differences between mammalian genders are quite often easy to spot—in addition to organs involved in reproduction, there are skeletal and facial hair differences, as well as height differences. Prior research and anecdotal evidence has also suggested there may be some differences in the way the brain works. But what about variations in gene expression? The researchers in this new effort report that very little research has been done in this area, which is a problem—recent studies have shown that there are many gender-based health issues. Women are more likely to suffer from autoimmune diseases, for example. And men are more likely to develop cardiovascular diseases.
To learn more about gender-based gene expression, the researchers sequenced the RNA of both genders of four non-human mammals: rats, mice, macaques and dogs. As part of their efforts, they tested different tissues in each of the animals to ensure that each germ layer was represented. They also sequenced tissue from all of the most prominent organs. They then compared what they found to similar data collected from human subjects stored in the Genotype Tissue Expression Consortium database.
So clearly "gender" (the proper word is sex; gender is a function of language, not biology) is NOT fluid but is set by genetics. See the Physorg article here.
But Liberalism is about making a god of Man, and gods aren't bound by such mundane things as biology. If you want to be a girl, you can just make yourself into one! Freedom to the Left is to do what you will. In fact, that was the very definition of freedom given by Aleister Crowley, the infamous occultist (known also as The Beast 666.) Crowley was a notorious hedonist and black magic practitioner whose followers had sex with animals and did other things to alienate themselves from God. Crowley's admonition was to "do what thou wilt". Modern Wiccans and other practitioners of witchcraft put the caveat "as long as you hurt nobody else" on the end of that, but it is rather putting lipstick on a pig. In the end witchcraft is a practice whereby belief and rites can alter reality, can make things as "thou wilt" as opposed to as Nature and Nature's God ordained. But it is the same sin.
And our headlong rush to normalize "transgenderism" is that sin. We have decided we will make this decision, not God, not nature. It is the creature usurping the Creator.
If you don't like the religious tone of that well fine; how about saying it is going against science and the laws of nature. Either way, it is a sort of madness. You don't take a guy who thinks he's a bird to the top of a cliff and let him jump off.
At any rate, when I read Dana's post this morning it clicked with me. I had just watched Little Big Man last night (hadn't seen it in decades) and it made me realize just how long they have been working at that.
I remember a "trans woman" in the eighties movie Crocodile Dundee too. While they were poking a little fun, the fact is they also set the "woman" in a sympathetic light.
This has been a campaign in the works for decades.
The subject was a family of five; Mom, Dad and three daughters, except for eight years it had been two daughters and a son. The Son came to his parents and announced, "I'm a girl," and the parents lovingly supported him, now her, in that.
There was no thought given that the boy was feeling outnumbered with two sisters, and that he was being left out of things that his two older sisters were participating in. There was no mention that maybe he had a better role model in Mom and two older sisters than he had in a father that maybe wasn't present much. There was no thought that maybe the television at home had been blaring the "#metoo" nonsense about how evil men are. There was no thought that maybe he should spend some time with a mental health professional.
No indeed. "Mom, I'm a girl," so let's call him her and buy her a lot of dresses. Isn't this a lovely little family? God help us all.
Posted by: Bill H at February 17, 2020 09:22 AM (vMiSr)
If you tell someone that he should be ashamed of what he is is it any surprise that he might try to NOT be that? I remember in the old days how there were black people who would straighten their hair or do other things to look more white - because social pressures made being black something they did not want. Now we tell little boys they are the root of all evil and are surprised at how many say they are really girls.
I read the number of male to female is way, way higher than female to male. OF COURSE it is!
This is a mental health issue and we're treating it as a cultural and medical issue.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at February 18, 2020 07:44 AM (5qXxF)
37 queries taking 0.3378 seconds, 110 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.