July 11, 2022
Here is an essay translated from Italian by the great physicist Carlo Rovelli.
I don't agree with it all by any means, but I agree with some of it and he makes excellent points.
one of the most famous living Italian physicists.
This is how he feels about the War in Ukraine..
Few times have I felt like this period, so far away from everything I
read in the newspapers and see on television regarding the war
happening now in Eastern Europe.
Few times I have felt so at odds with the dominant discourse.
Maybe it was since my restless adolescence that I didn't feel so hurt and offended by the public discourse around me.
I asked my self why. Deep down, I often disagree with the political and
ideological choices of the countries where I live, but this is normal
there are many of us and we have different opinions, different world
readings.
So why do I feel so upset, hurt, scared, as I read all
the newspapers, and I hear the constant rhetoric about war on the
television?
I understood that today.
I understood it when I
think back to the period of my early adolescence, when many years ago
the youth of many countries around the world began to rebel against a
state of things that seemed wrong to them.
It's been many years since then. The world seems infinitely more complex to me, difficult to decipher, difficult to judge, than it seemed to me then. I lost the illusion that everything can be clean and honest in the world long ago.
But the explosion of hypocrisy of the West in this last year is unparalleled.
Suddenly, the West, all together in a choir, began to sing like the
bearer of values, the boulevard of freedom, the protector of weak
peoples, the guarantor of legality, the guardian of the sanctity of
human life, the only hope rather for a world of peace and justice. This
chant, how good and fair the West is and how bad autocratic states are,
is a chorus repeated in unison and endlessly by every newspaper
article, every television comment, every editorial.
Putin’s fierce
evil is repeated, flaunted, repeated, declared endlessly. With every
bomb that’s dropped on Ukraine, it tells us how much Ukraine is bad and
we are good.
I would be glad to join the chorus if every time we condemn the fact that a military power has attacked a sovereign country with futile pretexts the West would add "And I, the West, therefore, strive in the future never to do anything like that again.†and as I did in Afghanistan, Iraq, in Libya, Grenada, Cuba, and so many other countries. We did, but now that the Russians are doing it we realize how painful it is and we won't do it again. "
I would be happy to join the chorus, if every time we condemn the completely condemnable fact, that Moscow bombs civilians in Kiev as a reason that Kiev bombed the Donbass if the West would add "And I am the West so I commit not to never doing anything like that again in future, like I did when I bombed Belgrade, killing thousands of people, innocent women and children, adducing that Belgrade bombed Kosovo as a reasonâ€.
I would be happy to join the chorus, if the West would add "And I am the West, therefore I pledge myself never to do anything like that again in the future, as I did when I bombed Libya, invaded Iraq, destabilized governments around the world, from the Middle East East to South America, Chile to Algeria, Egypt to Palestine every time a people voted for a government not favorable to Western interests, overthrowing democratically elected governments like in Algeria, Egypt or Palestine, instead supporting dictatorships like in Saudi Arabia I know the reason is convenient, even if the Saudis continue to slaughter Yemenisâ€.
I would be happy to join the choir that moves for the poor Ukrainians if this choir would also move for the Yemenis, Syrians, Afghans and everyone else with slightly different skin tone, instead of leaving everyone else out and to rot.
And maybe I would disagree, but
not so disgusted, if I just heard "we are the strongest, we want to
dominate the world with gun violence, to defend our wealth, and we will
dominate it. "
At least there would be no hypocrisy.
We now arrive at excesses that shout surrealism.
Our newspapers talk about the "imperial" logic of China and China.
Russia . when china has virtually no soldier outside of internationally
recognized chinese borders and Russia has soldiers only few kilometers
from its border.
Americans have one hundred thousand soldiers in
Europe, they have military bases in Central America, South America,
Africa, Saudi Arabia, the Pacific, Japan, Korea, and on the go,
basically everywhere in the world.
People are afraid to use an atomic bomb.
Is the West the only one to have used the atomic bomb to assert with
extreme violence its unconditional dominance, even in a war already
won, no one else has done it. China is reportedly aggressive. But he
didn’t fight a single war since Korea and Vietnam, while the West had
ongoing wars around the world.
Who is the empire?
I love the
West, but for the cultural wealth it has given to the whole world, not
for having become masters thanks to slavery, exterminating entire
continents, plundering everything and continuing to do so, not for this
rampant violence and hypocrisy Isia continuing the horrors of the past.
The problem of the world is not who should be in charge, what political
system do we all have to adopt uniformly. The problem with the world is
how to live together, tolerate each other, respect each other,
collaborate.
The world has billions of inhabitants. The majority
of them are from out of the West. There are some in China, India,
Russia , Brazil, the rest of South America, Africa, Asia. I am the
majority of humanity. They no longer have sympathy for the West. They
are running out of them. They do not participate in sanctions against
Russia , many refused even to vote for condemning Russia at the UN,
despite the fact that Russia was obviously condemnable.
Not because
they are bad, because they love violence, or they have poor motives,
but because they see the rampant hypocrisy of the West, which fills the
world with its armies, feels free to slaughter, and then makes a candid
soul if another one behaves to bad.
The world, in its vast majority, would like that the common problems of humanity, global warming, pandemics, poverty, to be faced jointly, with joint decisions. He wishes the United Nations cared more. The West blocks this collaboration, they feel they have the right to rule, because they have their guns, violence from them.
Now the West is restless because
China is getting rich, so it teases, provokes and accuses her of
everything impeachable even if there are any.
The West seeks
conflict with China. He would like to humiliate her militarily before
she grows too much and that becomes impossible. The western ruling
class is heading for WW3. Ukraine's problems could be solved as the
West wanted to solve Yugoslavia in the end: a civil war that has been
dragging on for a long time, with external military interventions, that
led to a separation in different parts. But the West doesn't want a
solution, it wants to hurt Russia. ... He can't do anything but repeat.
On television they show happy faces at western leaders meetings, happy
about their aircraft carriers, their atomic bombs, their countless
weapons, trillions of euros used to make weapons, with which they could
solve the worlds problems or, instead they are used to reinforce a
violent predominion on the world.
And all this colored with nice
words: democracy, freedom, respect for nations, peace, respect for
international legality, respect for the law.
Behind, like zombies,
all the journalists and journalists to repeat. Whitewashed tombs. On a
blood trail of millions of deaths tortured over the past decades by our
bombs.
From Hiroshima in Kabul.
And they will continue.
Sinceramente
non riesco a capire cosa ci sia di difficile nell'ammettere come almeno
concepibile il fatto che i russi e la Russia, non Putin, si siano
sentiti minacciati dall'avanzata verso est della NATO. Proprio sapendo
che molti dei popoli che facevano parte del blocco sovietico li odiano
(le ragioni dell'odio ci sono sempre) credo che l'idea che entrassero
in un'alleanza (formalmente difensiva ma non tale per quanto visto in
Serbia) non debba essere stata molto tranquillizzant
I honestly can't understand what's so hard about admitting as at least conceivable the fact that the Russians and Russia , not Putin, felt threatened by NATO's eastern advance. Just knowing that many of the peoples who were part of the Soviet bloc hate them (there are always reasons for hate) I think that the idea of them entering an alliance (formally defensive but not as seen in Serbia) should not be and it has been very soothing. Was this to be avoided? Yes, I think it would have been a good idea. It would have been smart to take a slow wait attraction strategy. But the powers don't think this way and the USA certainly doesn't think that way. Exporting the model is essential for the US, especially for Democrats less for the GOP. And patience if it is a model that is not sustainable for a mass of 8 billion people (that is, if it is in fact, an ideological imposition), the important thing is that the mirror works as long as it works, as long as it guarantees accumulation. The impression is that Western Europe, led by servants of the USA and their interests for decades, has suffered the strategy without contradicting it except through energy suicide, hoping that the energy bond based on gas pipelines, would and the conflict is defused. Another masterpiece by Frau Merkel and various products of the Goldmann Sachs & C school that ruled us and still rule us. The one who touched us was the worst of all. The most devoted servant.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:52 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1788 words, total size 22 kb.
Posted by: Tell The Bell at July 12, 2022 12:26 AM (lUgTq)
Dubai Ratan Matka
Posted by: Kanpur Matka at September 21, 2022 04:25 AM (zm4ix)
Posted by: Fake Watches at June 27, 2023 03:19 AM (MTdxD)
37 queries taking 0.3088 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.