September 19, 2019
The Great Colorado Vote Fraud Game
Timothy Birdnow
The State of Colorado, under the leadership of Democratic Secretary of State Jena Griswold has banned the use of bar coded ballots for machine counts.
According to CNN:
The Left wing Brennan Center is in favor of this.
Why? There has never been any example of machine hacking in the fashion of which they speak. Nobody has ever claimed anyone changed a single vote by hacking these systems. Even though CNN keeps pushing the 'Russian interference" angle in this story, they don't even try to claim that anyone has ever been able to change a single vote by remote tampering with these machines.
But we HAVE examples of hand ballots being tampered with. Remember the election of 2000? The "hanging chads", the "pregnant chads" etc. We are going to se the same thing with these printed ovals, and the Democrats will use the same arguments to disqualify or accept as it pleases.
This is just another example of the Democrats trying to keep the electoral system open to their cheating.
They know this system will make it much more difficult to stuff the ballot box, so they are going to go back to the old system - the very system they complained about in past elections. They know they have a much better chance of faking votes without a coding in place.
A quick glance at Sec State Jena Griswold (was she the daughter of Clark Griswold on Vacation?) Griswold was a vote stealer for Barack Obama in the 2008 election. Governor Chickenlooper, er, Hickenlooper appointed her a liason with the Feds. She assumed her postion in 2019, no doubt with money from George Soros and his Secretary of State Project. She was the first Democrat in that position since 1963.
Her priorities are voter registration and campaign finance reform. Need I say more?
The State of Colorado, under the leadership of Democratic Secretary of State Jena Griswold has banned the use of bar coded ballots for machine counts.
According to CNN:
But some states have purchased voting
machines that print out a paper receipt with either a QR (short for
"quick response") or a more traditional barcode — something a computer
can read, but a human cannot — which can then be easily scanned and
tallied to represent a voter's choices.
But
those codes are still controversial and experts warn that even though
they're on paper, elections still need to be audited before results are
certified.
"A voter can verify the
ovals, the candidates they chose, but how it gets tabulated is actually
through an encrypted QR code," Colorado Secretary of State Jena
Griswold told CNN. "Is it really a voter verified paper trail if a
voter cannot verify the encrypted QR code?"
To
that end, from 2021, Colorado will no longer certify machines that
count votes by QR or barcode.
Under a pending deal with Dominion, the vendor that currently supplies Colorado's voting equipment, a newly engineered software upgrade will instead print out ballots with choices picked marked with darkened ovals, identical to how a hand-marked ballot would look. Dominion's scanners already are designed to record hand-marked ballots, "so no change is necessary," spokeswoman Kay Stinson said.
Under a pending deal with Dominion, the vendor that currently supplies Colorado's voting equipment, a newly engineered software upgrade will instead print out ballots with choices picked marked with darkened ovals, identical to how a hand-marked ballot would look. Dominion's scanners already are designed to record hand-marked ballots, "so no change is necessary," spokeswoman Kay Stinson said.
The Left wing Brennan Center is in favor of this.
Why? There has never been any example of machine hacking in the fashion of which they speak. Nobody has ever claimed anyone changed a single vote by hacking these systems. Even though CNN keeps pushing the 'Russian interference" angle in this story, they don't even try to claim that anyone has ever been able to change a single vote by remote tampering with these machines.
But we HAVE examples of hand ballots being tampered with. Remember the election of 2000? The "hanging chads", the "pregnant chads" etc. We are going to se the same thing with these printed ovals, and the Democrats will use the same arguments to disqualify or accept as it pleases.
This is just another example of the Democrats trying to keep the electoral system open to their cheating.
They know this system will make it much more difficult to stuff the ballot box, so they are going to go back to the old system - the very system they complained about in past elections. They know they have a much better chance of faking votes without a coding in place.
A quick glance at Sec State Jena Griswold (was she the daughter of Clark Griswold on Vacation?) Griswold was a vote stealer for Barack Obama in the 2008 election. Governor Chickenlooper, er, Hickenlooper appointed her a liason with the Feds. She assumed her postion in 2019, no doubt with money from George Soros and his Secretary of State Project. She was the first Democrat in that position since 1963.
Her priorities are voter registration and campaign finance reform. Need I say more?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:22 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 509 words, total size 4 kb.
1
There may be, as you say, no example of machine hacking of this sort. I would prefer to say "no detected hacking." Remember recent complaints of computerized voting where people have complained of "pre-loaded" votes for Democrats on screens which the voters were unable to clear. And in systems handing you receipts detailing your (supposed) vote tallies, if you can't read it (bar codes or QR codes), how the dickens do you know what it says, unless you have a smartphone with a reader app (like I have) in order to check it RIGHT AWAY, with the voting judge presumably trying to hustle your ass out of there?
Nope. Don't want it. No way. Nada.
Nope. Don't want it. No way. Nada.
Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 19, 2019 07:11 PM (9UHx9)
2
Dana, you know more about this sort of thing than I, but I would point out that a.the person pushing to get rid of the bar code system is an Obama Organizing for America hack and b. I don't believe these machines are networked so foreign hacking would be difficult. Yes, I remember the bad machines, but they were not so much hacked as tampered with.
I have no doubt that they want the hard copy ballot primarily to steal votes. And I'm not sure if it would not be possible to give out the paper reading but still encode it a different way.
I may be wrong on this,, though.
I have no doubt that they want the hard copy ballot primarily to steal votes. And I'm not sure if it would not be possible to give out the paper reading but still encode it a different way.
I may be wrong on this,, though.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 20, 2019 08:42 AM (FgUWJ)
3
Apply for online gambling websites, casinos, online slots, the best websites in the world of gambling. No minimum deposit, real money, real rich.
Posted by: เว็บ สล็à¸à¸• at February 17, 2022 07:27 AM (o+Ofr)
26kb generated in CPU 0.0118, elapsed 0.1692 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1631 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.1631 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
