February 25, 2020

Sotomayor Blows Her Top

Timothy Birdnow

Filthy scorched pot points bony finger at bright copper kettle.

Sotomayor issues blistering dissent, says Republican-appointed justices have bias toward Trump administration

The "Wise Latina" as she has styled herself was Obama's wing woman during his reign of error and now she doesn't like being outnumbered by originalist jurists.

She is only on the Court because she is Hispanic. She did not receive great marks as a jurist and was known as a bully who abused plaintiffs and lawyers with whom she disagreed politically.

From the article:

"It is hard to say what is more troubling: that the Government would seek this extraordinary relief seemingly as a matter of course, or that the Court would grant it," Sotomayor wrote in her dissent.

This particular case, Wolf v. Cook County, deals with the Trump administration's expansion of situations where the government can deny visas to non-citizens looking to enter the U.S. Federal law already says that officials can take into account whether an applicant is likely to become a "public charge," which government guidance has said refers to someone "primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.” In the past, non-cash benefits such as forms of Medicaidand certain housing assistance did not count, but the Department of Homeland Security issued its new public charge rule in 2019 which did include these benefits.

 

The new rule had previously beenblocked with a nationwide injunction that the Supreme Court stayed in a separate case, so the injunction in the Cook County case only affected the state of Illinois.

That narrow scope, plus the fact that the 7th Circuit is scheduled to review the Illinois injunction in the coming week, led Sotomayor to believe that the government was not at risk of suffering significant harm that warranted the Supreme Court putting the injunction on hold.

The liberal justiceexpressed concern that a majority of her colleagues had no problem with this. Sheexplained that it is unusual for an administration to seek stays against injunctions with this sort of frequency, yet it is becoming the new normal.

"Claiming one emergency after another, the Government has recently sought stays in an unprecedented number of cases, demanding immediate attention and consuming limited Court resources in each," she wrote. "And with each successive application, of course, its cries of urgency ring increasingly hollow. Indeed, its behavior relating to the public-charge rule in particular shows how much its own definition of irreparable harm has shifted.”

That my dear is because the judiciary was politicized and weaponized by the man who appointed you to your seat. Your SCOTUS colleagues are forever having to overturn activist judicial decisions by lower courts, decisions that they have no right to make.

It is unquestionably clear the President has a right to decide the terms under which aliens - especially illegal aliens - are allowed to stay in the country. This was never a judicial matter. I think this puta knows it, too.

What's the matter, Sonya or girl?  You liberals have had your way for a long time and now you are finding you can't advance your radical agendas anymore and you don't like it. Tough!  WE in Middle America haven't liked what you have rammed down our throats over the years. You are not legislators, though you have done a good job of usurping the authority. (That is precisely what was done here; a court usurped the authority of the President and the legal code.)

This should lead to the "Wise Latina" being ostricized by the rest of the Court. It is a horrible breech of editquette; Justices don't air dirty laundry. The rest of the Court should snub her for this.

Maybe she'll get frustrated and resign! At least we know she's probably at home bawling like the rotten little child that she is.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:02 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 636 words, total size 5 kb.

1 She felt that "the government was not at risk of suffering significant harm" did she? Probably it was not, but that was not what was at point. The nattering nitwit failed to realize that the issue was whether or not states are required to follow federal laws on issues which are subject to federal jurisdiction. A majority of jurists said yes.

Posted by: Bill H at February 25, 2020 09:08 AM (vMiSr)

2 Dammit, Commentor #2, this is NOT a commercial site! Will you please stop leaving your advertisements here and take them somewhere else?

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at February 25, 2020 06:29 PM (woo48)

3

Many students opt to buy Psychology Writing Services since most writing companies are good in Online Psychology Assignment Help Services and Psychology Coursework Writing Services.


Posted by: Religion & Theology Writing Services at February 26, 2020 12:07 AM (RIt7o)

4 thank you for this! really appreciate you doing this https://eyelashextensionssyracuseny.com

Posted by: Samy Mor at February 03, 2021 08:09 AM (e407W)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.1314, elapsed 1.0641 seconds.
37 queries taking 1.0569 seconds, 161 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 50234
  • Files: 12369
  • Bytes: 6.5G
  • CPU Time: 136:01
  • Queries: 1770048

Content

  • Posts: 28318
  • Comments: 123440

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0