January 10, 2025

Shame on Coney Barrett and Roberts!

Timothy Birdnow

John Roberts (no surprise there) and Amy Conehead Barrett joined with the radicals on the Supreme Court to deny Trump's appeal to delay sentencing for his bogus New York conviction.

Coney-Barrett was a huge mistake and increasingly votes with the Left on issues. She may not be David Souter yet but she's trying.

Trump is probably being sentenced as I write this.

According to the article:

"First, the alleged evidentiary violations at President-Elect Trump's state-court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal. Second, the burden that sentencing will impose on the President-Elect's responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial court's stated intent to impose a sentence of 'unconditional discharge' after a brief virtual hearing," read the ruling.

So they ruled based on vague statements made by judge Merchan that he MIGHT do something rather than taking it out of his hands when he has already botched this thing. What happens if Merchan changed his mind and orders Trump serve time?

The whole point of sentencing now is to humiliate Trump just before his inaugural. It serves no other purpose. Merchan knows full well that the media will be crowing about this, calling Trump a convicted felon on inauguration day.

The big picture here is that Coney-Barrett came highly recommended by the Heritage Foundation. Highly recommended. Of course it was the Heritage Foundation that devised the scheme that Barack Obama implemented in the Affordable Care Act aka Obamacare. That tells me we should stop listening to Heritage.

The problem with SCOTUS is there is great pressure on the justices at any given time and it takes a strong person to resist joining the liberals and being loved. Barrett is clearly not a strong person and I didn't like her appointment at the time. Now we know she's willing to sell us out.

Doubt that? I give you the words of the leftist Politico:

"Amy Coney Barrett: Meet the last best hope for Supreme Court liberals

And you may have noticed there was no real protest over Barrett when she was selected. That is a sure sign. we saw the same thing with John Roberts when Bush tapped him (in fact the Democrats told Bush Roberts was the only guy they would accept.)

I don't know why it's so hard to find people with integrity and who understand what is happening in our society. The Left uses the law like a weapon. (The perfect analogy was used in the t.v. show "Better call Saul" where Jimmy's brother says "Jimmy with the law is like a monkey with a machine gun".) Any so-called Conservative put on the court is there to push back against such, yet here Barrett and Roberts are going along to get along and by so doing help to Make America Late Again (as in dead). But they will get some lovin' from the media and the liberals, yes sir!

Sadly the system is corrupted to the core. To get to a point where you can be appointed to SCOTUS you have to have been approved by the Senate to inferior courts, and that means anyone with integrity and brains will be blackballed. The system is designed to promote insiders. Roberts was the ultimate insider and remains so today. So too, apparently, is Barrett. And to stay on the inside you have to give the Ruling Class what it wants.

Shame on Coney Barrett and Roberts!

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:28 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 579 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Well, when you're a president and you nominate someone to be a Supreme Court justice, you aren't always sure just what you're gonna get; I hate to sound like a misogynist, but Sandra Day O'Connor was no Rose of Sharon either.

And I think Bush made a large unforced error by bringing John Roberts in as Top Dog, when he could have brought him in as an Associate Justice and elevated Clarence Thomas to the top seat. I have to say that move was pure laziness on "Dubya's" part.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at January 11, 2025 01:06 AM (Idemf)

2 I agree Dana. Yeah; Sady D. was not the best we could get - and it showed.  Purely a DEI pick. But Reagan had other fish to fry and didn't want the fight at taht time.

Speaking of Thomas, it's kind of scary that it was Bush who chose him, isn't it?  I'm sure the Bush family is kicking itself for that "mistake".

I would like to see a non-lawyer put on the court. There is no educational or professional requirement. But it won't happen.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at January 11, 2025 09:16 AM (82Mq6)

3 nice work

Posted by: Freelance Digital Marketer in Thrissur at January 12, 2025 11:00 PM (UvyTF)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




24kb generated in CPU 0.0162, elapsed 0.5208 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.5142 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
America First News
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Blaze News
Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
The Daily Fetched
Dana and Martha Music From the Heart Music
On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Just the Facts
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let .the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
Real Climate Science
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Western Journalism
Science Daily
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 117405
  • Files: 10375
  • Bytes: 4.0G
  • CPU Time: 192:01
  • Queries: 4299956

Content

  • Posts: 30092
  • Comments: 135029

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0