Dana Mathewson

Color me skeptical. For months I've believed this man has been a scapegoat for the "Get Trump At All Costs" crowd. Remember when they went to pick him up, with a SWAT team large enough to attack a Mexican drug cartel -- and took CNN along for the ride?

The article says that he was "convicted by a jury in Washington, D.C." Tell me, friends, what do you think are the chances of finding a jury in D.C. that would be totally impartial in a case like this? About the same as the jury in the Emmet Till murder case, I'd say. (How many of you are old enough to remember the Till case, by the way?)

This article is chock-full of good writing. I prefer to give you the link and let you go for the gold, rather than excerpting it, OK?

And for more of my two-cents, I think any and all "cases" arising out of the Mueller "probe" should be vacated as "tainted." Stone, Flynn, Manafort, and any others if indeed they exist.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

Of course, I still want the IG to finish his report, and AG Barr and friends to do their work. They don't come from the Mueller witch hunt.

Hide Comments | Add Comment