June 25, 2022

Popular Vote and the Courts

Michael Smith

New argument from the left. Justices appointed to SCOTUS by presidents who won the Electoral College but not the popular vote are illegitimate.

By extension, they are saying any president who is Constitutionall y elected is not legitimate unless the win the popular vote.

I guess it is immaterial that presidents only nominate, the Senate seats them.

Proving once again, they will tear down any institution they do not own.



Tim adds:

Civics education in this country is horrible, at that by design. Few understand how our system works, but they all have opinions. The fact is we don't HAVE a popular vote for President. What we have is a vote in the given states to choose a slate of electors to send to Washington to vote for us. Those electors are free to vote as they please (except in states where there are laws forcing them to cst their vote for whom they are pledged.) Shoot; there is no mandate to even have a popular vote. South Carolina still had the state legislature choose the electors as late as 1860. While every state now has a popular vote for that there is no federal mandate.

And there is nothing to force any precinct to count votes. What this means is the popular vote is never a complete picture. Every precinct will count votes, but once the issue is settled in their state they can choose to keep counting - or not. So in the last couple of elections California has counted, counted, counted to run up the popular vote tally, and nobody will challenge what the precincts produce because it doesn't materially affect the outcome of the election. BUT it certainly affects the political debate. The Democrats are using this "popular vote" myth to demand eliminating the College of Electors and thus further move us to pure democracy, something the Founding Fathers feared and loathed.

As Plato pointed out, democracy quickly and invariably deteriorates into chaos, anarchy, and the rise of a tyrant.

So, if they are now saying a Justice must be appointed by the winner of the popular vote, then why not just elect the Justices and be done with it? I mean, if democracy is so all-fired wonderful, why shouldn't we democratize the Courts? Fro that matter, why have the Courts at all? Let the People decide every issue! Take a pleibescite.

It's interesting they are arguing the overturning of Roe is some sort of "eliminating" of a "right". But they want rights to be decided b y democratic action. Hypocrisy is ripe here.

If rights transcend the collective will (as Rousseau and every leftist since believes they do not) then they are not up for democratic meddling. Our Founders believed they came from "Nature and Nature's God" and not from men. That is the whole reason we have an independent judiciary.

The Left only accepts an independent judiciary when they are attacking those rights they were put in place to protect.

That was why judges were not elected (as they are in many states) to the Federal bench in the first place. Politics was supposed to stay out of it.

Maybe we should have a national popular vote on Senators and Congressmen? I'd like to see Pelosi or Di Fi have to win over voters in Alabama.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 12:20 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 559 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Now, that last is an interesting idea!

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at June 25, 2022 01:13 PM (pdDZ2)

2 There is, in fact, no such thing as a "national popular vote," such a thing is literally nonexistant, because there is no national election. The media has more and more stridently touted the fiction of a "national popular vote" by summarizing the individual state vote counts, but it remains a meaningless fiction which does not exist anywhere but in the feverish imaginations of hyperpartisans.

Posted by: Bill H at June 25, 2022 11:49 PM (Q7br2)

3 I thought so Dana!  Make Schumer and Pelosi and AOC run in the Deep South, say.

Somehow I don't think they'll be amenable to that idea.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at June 26, 2022 08:57 AM (U9fSZ)

4 Exactly Bill! We don't really know how the "national vote" tallies up.

All we have is vote counts in precincts to establish the official vote certified by the given state's Secretary of State.

New York regularly stuffs the ballot boxes after the national election is decided to make it appear the Democrats are stronger than the rest of the country's vote would make it appear.

The whole point of a "national vote" is to allow the Democrats to steal elections. Nothing more.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at June 26, 2022 09:01 AM (U9fSZ)

5 Kanpur Matka! Day chart Matka ! Kanpur Satta Chart ! kanpur Matka Result ! Kanpur Satta Result ! Dubai Matka Result ! Dubai Satta Matka ! Dubai Satta matka ! Dubai Matka Chart ! Kanpur Panel Chart ! Kanpur Bazar satta Matka ! Birbal matka ! Birbal satta Matka ! Taj Morning matka ! Bombay Morning Matka ! Kalyan Matka ! Kalyan Matka Result ! Kanpur satta Matka ! Kanpur Satta Result ! Gulam day Matka ! Gokul day Satta Matka ! Satta Matka ! CHARMINAR SATTA ! Kanpur matka Result Today Fixx Result !

Posted by: Kanpur Matka at September 22, 2022 04:19 AM (zm4ix)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




24kb generated in CPU 0.0229, elapsed 0.705 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.6982 seconds, 164 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 82645
  • Files: 13097
  • Bytes: 4.0G
  • CPU Time: 283:04
  • Queries: 2999593

Content

  • Posts: 28625
  • Comments: 126630

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0