October 17, 2020

New Twitter Rules Even Worse

This from Anthony Watts:

Twitters New Rules - from my friend Roger L. Simon

The GOP has only itself to blame. Andrew Breitbart warned us years ago: "Politics is downstream of culture.”

Few listened—or did anything about it anyway.
Result: Twitter, Facebook, Google, Netflix, YouTube, and on and on. They rule the world.

Everyone, or almost everyone, crumbles before them, from your kindergarten teacher to major American corporations scared of being accused of racism, sexism or whatever new ism pops out of the mouth of Maisie Hirono.

You have to survive, after all.

"Better ‘woke’ than broke” has become today’s version of "Better Red than dead.” Indeed, they are much the same thing.
We live in the world according to Twitter, Facebook, and Google. A deceased Brit gave us the name for it. Welcome, as Tucker Carlson noted the other night, to the Ministry of Truth.

So when Twitter announces—via Vijaya Gadde, its "Legal, Policy and Trust & Safety Lead”—their two new principles in the wake of the Hunter/Joe Bidenemail censorship scandal, caveat emptor.
The first, about hacked content, is so much eyewash. The second is extremely dangerous and, yes, Orwellian:

"2. We will label Tweets to provide context instead of blocking links from being shared on Twitter”

I see. They will "provide context.”
This is actually more sinister than their previous approach—censor ship. At least that was obvious.

This is, in essence, thought control.

You, the great unwashed, are not capable of analyzing for yourself. You need guidance—the same guidance they provided when publishing ad infinitum obvious disinformation about non-existent Trump-Russia collusion or propaganda from Javad Zarif, foreign minister of a country whose citizens are not allowed access to the internet but just happens to have 1.5 million Twitter followers.
I wrote "publishing” above because that’s what Twitter does, despite their denials and insistence that they only link to other publishers, supposedly giving Twitter itself a firewall against lawsuits.

This appears all the more ludicrous given their new rule two, which indicates that not only are they curating, they are editorializing (i.e., publishing… Congress take note).

So, in the words of V. I. Lenin, what is to be done?

FOR SOME SUGGESTIONS, CONTINUE:

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:37 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 369 words, total size 3 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




17kb generated in CPU 0.18, elapsed 0.4668 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.4483 seconds, 115 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black
Canada Free Press
Christian Daily Reporter
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 70799
  • Files: 22243
  • Bytes: 1772.4M
  • CPU Time: 759:42
  • Queries: 2837553

Content

  • Posts: 20365
  • Comments: 65864

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0