February 10, 2018
New Research Suggests Minimal Impact of Greenhouse Gases on Planetary Temps
Timothy Birdnow
A new formula for determining planetary temperatures without the greenhouse effect has set the climatological world on fire.
From No Tricks Zone:
"In a new peer-reviewed scientific paper published in the journal Earth Sciences last December (2017), a Federation University (Australia) Science and Engineering student named Robert Holmes contends he may have found the key to unlocking our understanding of how planets with thick atmospheres (like Earth) remain "fixed†at 288 Kelvin (K), 740 K (Venus), 165 K (Jupiter)…without considering the need for a planetary greenhouse effect or changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations."
[...]
" The difference between the real and imagined Earth with no atmosphere is 33 K, meaning that the Earth would be much colder (and uninhabitable) without the presence of greenhouse gases bridging the hypothetical "heat gapâ€.
Of that 33 K greenhouse effect, 20.6 K is imagined to derive from water vapor droplets in the atmosphere (1,000 to 40,000 parts per million [ppm] by volume), whereas 7.2 K is thought to stem from the "natural†(or pre-industrial) 200-280 ppm atmospheric CO2 concentration (Kramm et al., 2017).
As a "thought experimentâ€, the critical heating role for water vapor droplets and CO2 concentrations lacks real-world validation. For example, the Earth’s oceans account for 93% of the planet’s heat energy (Levitus et al., 2012), and yet no real-world physical measurements exist that demonstrate how much heating or cooling is derived from varying CO2 concentrations up or down over a body of water in volume increments of parts per million (0.000001). Consequently, the CO2 greenhouse effect is a hypothetical, model-based conceptualization."
[...]
"In particular, formula 5 (and 6) as presented here, totally rules out any possibility that a 33°C greenhouse effect of the type proposed by the IPCC in their reports [23] can exist in the real atmosphere."
End excerpts.
In short, CO2 is not leading to thermogeddon. Even the alarmists must now admit the worst case scenario offered by the IPCC isn't going to happen.
The case for climate catastrophe keeps getting thinner and thinner.
A new formula for determining planetary temperatures without the greenhouse effect has set the climatological world on fire.
From No Tricks Zone:
"In a new peer-reviewed scientific paper published in the journal Earth Sciences last December (2017), a Federation University (Australia) Science and Engineering student named Robert Holmes contends he may have found the key to unlocking our understanding of how planets with thick atmospheres (like Earth) remain "fixed†at 288 Kelvin (K), 740 K (Venus), 165 K (Jupiter)…without considering the need for a planetary greenhouse effect or changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations."
[...]
" The difference between the real and imagined Earth with no atmosphere is 33 K, meaning that the Earth would be much colder (and uninhabitable) without the presence of greenhouse gases bridging the hypothetical "heat gapâ€.
Of that 33 K greenhouse effect, 20.6 K is imagined to derive from water vapor droplets in the atmosphere (1,000 to 40,000 parts per million [ppm] by volume), whereas 7.2 K is thought to stem from the "natural†(or pre-industrial) 200-280 ppm atmospheric CO2 concentration (Kramm et al., 2017).
As a "thought experimentâ€, the critical heating role for water vapor droplets and CO2 concentrations lacks real-world validation. For example, the Earth’s oceans account for 93% of the planet’s heat energy (Levitus et al., 2012), and yet no real-world physical measurements exist that demonstrate how much heating or cooling is derived from varying CO2 concentrations up or down over a body of water in volume increments of parts per million (0.000001). Consequently, the CO2 greenhouse effect is a hypothetical, model-based conceptualization."
[...]
"In particular, formula 5 (and 6) as presented here, totally rules out any possibility that a 33°C greenhouse effect of the type proposed by the IPCC in their reports [23] can exist in the real atmosphere."
End excerpts.
In short, CO2 is not leading to thermogeddon. Even the alarmists must now admit the worst case scenario offered by the IPCC isn't going to happen.
The case for climate catastrophe keeps getting thinner and thinner.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 344 words, total size 3 kb.
20kb generated in CPU 0.4709, elapsed 1.0868 seconds.
35 queries taking 1.0805 seconds, 157 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
35 queries taking 1.0805 seconds, 157 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
