June 27, 2025
Well whattya know? Turns out the Dead Sea Scrolls are older than believed and date to the times of the authors themselves.
https://scitechdaily.com/new-ai-model-reveals-biblical-dead-sea-scrolls-are-far-older-than-we-thought/
Why is this important? Because it shows that the Bible itself is quite accurate (the scrolls comport well with the Bible as we know it). It also suggests that the authors were not just made up names but real people, making what they say far more credible.
FTA:
Their findings suggest that many scrolls are older than previously believed, and for the first time, they have confirmed that two biblical scroll fragments date back to the era of their traditionally attributed authors. The results were published on 4 June in the journal PLOS One.
Until now, most individual scrolls were dated primarily through paleography—the study of ancient handwriting. However, this method lacks a firm empirical basis. In most cases, calendar dates are unavailable, and there are no directly comparable date-bearing manuscripts from the relevant time period. A significant chronological gap exists between the few Aramaic and Hebrew manuscripts with known dates from the fifth to fourth centuries BCE and those from the late first to early second century CE, making it difficult to precisely date over a thousand Dead Sea Scrolls and fragments.
But new radiocarbon dating and modeling made it possinle to date them, and voila! Turns out they are pretty much contemporary with the alleged authors.
Score one for Biblical accuracy!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:33 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 327 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Bill H at June 27, 2025 11:23 PM (FRG6e)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at June 28, 2025 06:38 AM (zEe03)
37 queries taking 0.2296 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.