James Doogue

Covid-19 Response - Crime Against Humanity?

A German Investigative Committee is all set to launch a legal action against those responsible for COVID-19 crisis. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is one of the top trial lawyers in Germany having been involved in successful actions against major global corporations in the past. He is one of four members in a group of lawyers who has investigated and is prosecuting global officials for what he calls the COVID 19 scandal, a deliberate crime against humanity.

Dr. Fuellmich released his video on October 3rd, 2020. He describes how there is no legal doubt about the possibility of a class-action lawsuit against those responsible for the lockdowns.

'Those responsible for [the corona fraud scandal] must be criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity and sued for civil damages… On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas.'

You can watch the video here:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7wp1yd?fbclid=IwAR2njZoS85SOvUVGzBl2Iw7hglTXxFSeUKHv6Lg0-7C-Vn0FAYsKVuEK6EQ

If you don't want to watch the video, you can read a summary, or access the text of the video here: https://theplantstrongclub.org/2020/10/14/testimony-of-german-attorney-those-responsible-for-corona-scandal-must-be-criminally-prosecuted-for-crimes-against-humanity/

There's an excellent Australian-centric critique of the video by Sanjeev Sabhlok. https://www.sabhlokcity.com/2020/10/reiner-fuellmichs-video-about-covid-crimes-against-humanity-hes-on-the-right-track-but-has-missed-out-many-things/


You may remember Sabhlok was an economist in the Department of Treasury and Finance in Victoria. He famously resigned from his Treasury role on 10 September 2020 to protest the outrageous violations of liberty and good policy by the Daniel Andrews government. He's currently writing a book about the response to the pandemic and the hotel quarantine failure.

Back to Dr Fuellmich's video. I believe this is an important (40 minute) video whether you agree with the content or not, simply because it demonstrates there is a significant body of well qualified individuals who do not accept the global narrative about Covid-19.

Covid-19 is real, that's been scientifically proven. But there are many issues which are accepted as fact, which are not proven.

For instance, most people don't understand that the RT-PCR test does not prove whether a person has Covid-19. It tests for the presence of a partial strand of a DNA marker. The DNA sample taken from individuals is amplified (doubled) up to 40 times.

The amount of times the sample is amplified is important. A sample doubled 20 times has magnified the sample by 1.05 million, 27 times by 134.2m, 30 times by 1.07 billion, and so on exponentially.

At some point the result has to become meaningless because there's no evidence that such a minute quantity of a partial strand indicates whether the person was ever sick, will get sick, or is ever infectious.

Save for possible cases of contaminated samples, all it tells us is that at some stage the person was in contact with the virus.

I can come in contact with people with a cold every winter but that doesn't mean I'll catch a cold or am infectious.

I don't know what number of amplifications are being used in Australia. In the US testing companies admitted they had no direction from the CDC regarding the number of amplifications.

One company might use 30 amplifications, another 35, or 28, or whatever. A person could be tested by one test and be deemed to be Covid-19 free, and with another, considered Covid-19 positive and be placed in isolation. It's pretty arbitrary.

As far as the laboratories running the tests are concerned, the higher the number of amplifications the better. Every test determined as 'positive' will mean they get to do more tests. On the person who is deemed positive, until they produce a negative test, and on all their close contacts or anyone else concerned about having been exposed.

So far Australia has conducted over 8.33 million tests. At $150 each, my guess, that's worth $1.25 billion!

The testing will continue, and it will be required for all international travellers. The vaccine will probably be required if we want to travel.

There's an awful lot of money to be made.

In this video I'm not sure if the contention that excess deaths is no greater than a bad influenza season is quite accurate.

However we do know that 2017 and 2018 were very light seasonal influenza years so there are people dying with Covid-19 who may have died before Covid-19 if we'd had typical seasonal influenza levels in all recent years.

But no matter how you argue about the number of infections and deaths, one indisputable fact which isn't up for debate, is that Covid-19 is rarely serious or deadly for healthy individuals, particularly those under 65 yrs. So why should they be in lockdown or curfew?

I get that the elderly and medically vulnerable need to be protected, but that can be done without locking down everyone else!

UPDATE
When I first wrote this I was sceptical of the claim in the video that excess deaths were no different than had we been having a bad flu season. I've now had time to check and this is what I discovered.

Here's data for Sweden which shows their death rate in 2020 is pretty much inline with other years in the last 10. https://www.statista.com/statistics/525353/sweden-number-of-deaths/

With regards to the UK, if you believe the news, they should be swimming in excess deaths. You can see in the graphs at this reference there has been a significant spike in excess mortality in the UK over the Covid-19 timeline. https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps

However, in this video they claim that spike in the UK and other countries can be put down to how the elderly were managed in aged care facilities.

If that's the case we should see the excess deaths rate fall below average after those close to death were taken a bit sooner by Covid-19. There is some evidence that is the case, but we'll have to wait and see what the impact of the so-called second wave is before making that call.

The current death rate of 9.413 per 1000 is above the 10 year average, but not by a huge amount. As you can see from the table, the death rate has been on the rise since 2014 in any case. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/GBR/united-kingdom/death-rate

Global death rates have seen an uptick of 0.44% so far in 2020, which would seem to support the notion of an increase in excess deaths. But when you check the data in this table you note that the death rate also increased 0.44% globally from 2018 to 2019.

So there does seem to be support for the contention expressed in this video that there hasn't been a meaningful increase in excess deaths at least.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:06 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 1116 words, total size 7 kb.