The Overshoot Day calculation relies heavily on an array of country-level and global UN data about everything from the food produced and consumed in each country to how much waste is generated, timber is felled, and fossil fuels are burned. The calculation is limited by the quality of the global data, which in itself might have some big underestimations built in. Research has suggested that the UN Food and Agriculture Organization might be underestimating the size of the global seafood harvest by 30%. But the UN numbers are the best available, for now, so that’s what they use.

"What we do is very much accounting,” said Lin, one of four researchers who spend six months each year crunching the numbers. "Everything we consume, and all the waste we produce—we can map back over how much bioproductive area it would require.”

They calculate individual overshoot days for each country, too; the US’s overshoot day was way back on March 15. Australia’s was March 31. Qatar’s was Feb. 11.

If the world’s population consumed natural resources and produced waste at the rate that the US does, it would take five Earths to sustainably meet those needs.

Half of the Earth's land surface is still wilderness, according to recent research https:// www.crosswalk.co m/1174969/ and https:// www.researchgate .net/ publication/ 48378816_Wildern ess_Earth%27s_L ast_Wild_Places and 95% of the human population lives on just ten percent of the land. https:// www.sciencedaily .com/releases/ 2008/12/ 081217192745.htmI think this emergency proclamation is unwarranted. It's just the old Malthusianism returned, or a new version of the Club of Rome Limits to Growth report https:// www.clubofrome.o rg/report/ the-limits-to-gr owth/ and Paul Ehrlich's
Population bomb hysteria of the 1970's. None of Thomas Malthus's predictions came true, nor did the Club of Romes, nor Ehrlichs. They all said we were doomed by the turn of the century.

Even if we run out of some resources, so what? Burning wood for steam power led to deforestation which led to using coal and oil and the forests recovered. Even if we can't renew some resources, we have an entire solar system to harvest. For example, there is one middling asteroid worth Ten Quadrillion dollars were we to mine it. https:// www.forbes.com/ sites/ bridaineparnell/ 2017/05/26/ nasa-psyche-miss ion-fast-tracke d/ We have pretty much inexhaustible resources in space if we could be bothered to go get them.

This article ignores the fact that we "overshoot" yearly resource budget yet still have enough. Why is that? It's because this "budget" is an arbitrarily set target, set by the environmentalis

ts so that we are guaranteed to miss it. Cute trick.

"Sustainability " is a euphemism for no growth or progress. Do you like being able to go to the store and purchase an iphone or whatnot? Ready to give that up to fulfill a socialist dream? The notion that we are running out of everything is utterly preposterous, but absolutely vital to the One World/ International Socialism movement, which has to have a reason to manage our decline. I hope you like being poor and in bondage, because that is where this will lead.

Posted by: omegle at February 25, 2021 10:48 PM (DEPvE)

Posted by: harvey at August 15, 2023 09:39 AM (eOi8K)

Hide Comments | Add Comment