September 06, 2019

Federal Reserve Election Meddling

Timothy Birdnow

For some time now I have been warning about the dangers of the Federal Reserve and how this ultra-governmental agency could and has in the past manipulate the election results. Well, I'm not alone; Ron Paul has called them out. According to Conservative HQ:

Last week, the facade of Federal Reserve "independence” was dealt a severe blow says Dr. Paul. Ironically, the person who broadcast to the world that the Fed is anything but "independent” was ex-New York Fed President Bill Dudley. Dudley wrote that, "Trump’s re-election arguably presents a threat to the United States’ and global economy, and if the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic outcome, the Fed’s officials should consider how their decisions would affect the political outcome of 2020.”

The timing of Dudley’s threats to use Fed monetary policy to affect the outcome of a US election couldn’t come at a more striking time. After all, for more than two solid years Americans have been bombarded with fabricated stories about Russians rigging our elections. And yet here is a Federal Reserve official threatening to do the same exact thing - but this time for real!

Whether it’s the mainstream media, the CIA, the FBI or now the Federal Reserve, more and more Americans are waking up to the fact that there is a Deep State in America and its interests have nothing to do with American liberty. In fact, our liberty is what the Deep State wants to abolish concluded Dr. Paul.

The Fed has damaged the economy in the past, most notably in their manipulation of the money supply leading up to (and causing) the Great Depression. But there are other things; they kept interest rates too low during the Bush era, which kept lending down and so made the Bush era recovery weaker than it should have  been. They pursued a weak dollar policy at that time, too, which sucked manufacturing jobs and "hard" industry out of the United States. This was guaranteed to trigger the real estate boom; low interest rates made real property more attractive because it was something that wouldn't depreciate. With Congressional help in promoting "affordable housing" we had a perfect storm, with everyone invested in real estate rather than industry, and with a weak dollar which  artificially drove up property values. But it was guaranteed to burst, and I do not believe the Fed board was unaware of that fact. In reality, they set the stage for the collapse, and I rather suspect it was a planned play. If not, they were grossly incompetent and should be subject to litigation over the fact. The crash gave us Obama and the subsequent era of democratic socialism.

In other words, the Fed clearly created a bubble.

It should be pointed out the Fed kept interest rates low during the Clinton era to bolster growth. Unlike the Bush era, the rates were not so low as to discourage lending, but low enough to encourage investments. Under Bush the rates were so low that it was more profitable to banks and lending institutions to sit on the money rather than lend it out at no return.

I bought my first home in 1992 at 8% interest. That was a tremendous interest rate at the time. Consider how low it would become - under four percent - and think about how much those falling interest rates helped the Clinton Administration. Clinton stayed in office solely because the economy was so good. Through most of 1998 thirty year fixed rate mortgages [linj=http://mortgage-x.com/general/national_monthly_average.asp?y=1998]those rates remained largely below seven percent.

When the Clinton lawsuit against Microsoft burst the tech bubble the Fed doubled down, reducing rates and thus encouraging the real estate bubble. By 2008 interest rates were dipping below six percent even while industry was being sucked out of the American heartland; people were no longer getting decent jobs to pay for the ridiculously inflated prices of real estate, inflated by the Fed who had greatly expanded the money supply.

In other words, they gave us both Clinton and Obama. Obama never did have a major hike in interest rates while he was in office, but that helped his program as he wanted "sustainable" economic growth aka no growth at all. But the public disagreed.

So Trump comes in during a time of a sluggish economy and the Fed immediately begins raising rates. That was probably good, but they have raised them too far too fast. This at a time when Trump's Administration has been raising tariffs to force China - our major manufacturing rival - to play by the rules. We need to keep the interest rates down until this trade war is over - but the Fed has been pushing them up anyway.

Jerome Powell was a protege' of Janet Yellen, the Keynsian Obama appointed head of the Federal Reserve. Powell has been in Washington most of his life and is the ultimate insider. He will side with the Establishment. I suspect the Fed is timing this to pull the rug out from under Trump, to get the economy to crash just before the election - the way they did to John McCain. The Fed took steps to cause a sharp downturn to the economy just before the elections. They began buying U.S. dept  - cannibalizing the economy. This is like refinancing a car loan with a credit card. Investors understood what that meant, and they responded by sheltering their assets rather than investing.

We've seen this many times, and it always ties with the Federal Reserve.

Watch for some dirty tricks by the Fed in the next six to eight months.



Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:15 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 949 words, total size 6 kb.

1 We can't say we weren't warned. I think it was Tom Jefferson who told us to stay away from this kind of thing. I'm sure I remember him telling me. "Dana," he said, "stay away from any kind of central banking scheme -- they'll screw you to the wall when they get the chance."

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 06, 2019 09:56 PM (jDPtg)

2 Yep!  Hamilton - a northeast liberal - was the guy who wanted this. Central banks have enormous power, and Jefferson understood that fact.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at September 07, 2019 06:49 AM (gEjPp)

3 Yep. That's one reason I didn't get along with Alex all that well. In fact, one time I told him if he didn't get his act together, eventually the New York artsy scene would make a musical about him, with loud ugly music that ordinary people couldn't hum. He didn't believe me about that either.
I also told him it wasn't a good idea to piss off Aaron Burr because he was a really nasty dude. And you know what happened there!

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at September 07, 2019 01:29 PM (w+lqe)

4 It is especially decent, though look into the tips during this home address. harris poll online

Posted by: Kelly Reynolds at March 09, 2020 12:46 PM (QMzry)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




26kb generated in CPU 0.0097, elapsed 0.5189 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.5137 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 48261
  • Files: 11082
  • Bytes: 5.7G
  • CPU Time: 128:47
  • Queries: 1696457

Content

  • Posts: 28462
  • Comments: 124910

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0