July 30, 2024
Anchors Away!
Richard Cronin
Under the gross abuse of the 14th Amendment, Russian women come to the United States to have their babies so that the kids can have dual citizenship — Russian and American.
Was this the REAL intent of the 14th Amendment ?
It does not require a Constitutional Amendment to fix this problem. Just the proper case brought before the Supreme Court which now thankfully looks to the original intent.
Pregnant Russian women flocking to Florida to give birth to new American citizens
abc13.com
Chester McAteer adds: Original intent of the 14th Amendment
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in part:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."
Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. (Jackpot babies is another term).
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans. It was written in a manner so as to prevent state governments from ever denying citizenship to blacks born in the United States. But in 1868, the United States had no formal immigration policy, and the authors therefore saw no need to address immigration explicitly in the amendment.
Senator Jacob Howard worked closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. He also served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction,
"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:
"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."
The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.
Supreme Court decisions
The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.
Over a century ago, the Supreme Court appropriately confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called "Slaughter-Hous
Tim adds:
Prior to Ted Kennedy's immigration reform bill in 1965 the law was that you had to be born to citizens of the U.S. to have birthright citizenship. And an underage girl could not pass it alone to her child if the father was a non-citizen. That's how Barack Obama was able to go to Occidental University, a school for immigrants. Or at least that was what he no doubt argued at the time.
Under the gross abuse of the 14th Amendment, Russian women come to the United States to have their babies so that the kids can have dual citizenship — Russian and American.
Was this the REAL intent of the 14th Amendment ?
It does not require a Constitutional Amendment to fix this problem. Just the proper case brought before the Supreme Court which now thankfully looks to the original intent.
Pregnant Russian women flocking to Florida to give birth to new American citizens
abc13.com
Chester McAteer adds: Original intent of the 14th Amendment
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in part:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."
Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. (Jackpot babies is another term).
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans. It was written in a manner so as to prevent state governments from ever denying citizenship to blacks born in the United States. But in 1868, the United States had no formal immigration policy, and the authors therefore saw no need to address immigration explicitly in the amendment.
Senator Jacob Howard worked closely with Abraham Lincoln in drafting and passing the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished slavery. He also served on the Senate Joint Committee on Reconstruction,
"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:
"[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word..."
The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.
Supreme Court decisions
The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.
Over a century ago, the Supreme Court appropriately confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called "Slaughter-Hous
Tim adds:
Prior to Ted Kennedy's immigration reform bill in 1965 the law was that you had to be born to citizens of the U.S. to have birthright citizenship. And an underage girl could not pass it alone to her child if the father was a non-citizen. That's how Barack Obama was able to go to Occidental University, a school for immigrants. Or at least that was what he no doubt argued at the time.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:16 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 666 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Unquestionably a tremendous effort! Seeing such well-reasoned and articulate ideas written out is inspiring. In addition to being delightful, the writing was exquisite. Please visit Laser Hair Removal in Houston for more information and expert assistance.
Posted by: at August 06, 2024 10:09 AM (NAQWM)
2
I sincerely appreciate your article's thorough research and excellent writing. It piqued my interest so intensely that I felt compelled to keep reading. Your knowledge and ability are evident. Thank you very much for sharing your insights. By the way, look into E-commerce SEO for more information.
Posted by: at September 26, 2024 04:33 PM (S2Mmz)
3
What a delightful read! I recently introduced Remote staffing to a friend and gifted them a session. They were absolutely thrilled with the experience. After reading the comments here and seeing how many people have had wonderful experiences, I felt compelled to share.
Posted by: Dwayne at November 06, 2024 10:23 AM (4p7MR)
25kb generated in CPU 0.0579, elapsed 0.1805 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1753 seconds, 169 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
37 queries taking 0.1753 seconds, 169 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
