The Greening of the Ground Zero Mosque
Timothy Birdnow
Mark Musser has an outstanding piece at Accuracy in Media about "Park 51", the Green and sanitized name for Cordoba House, or the Ground Zero Mosque. Musser, author of Nazi Oaks, a book which chronicles the Nazi infatuation with Deep Ecology and the nascent Green movement, has this to say about the gang-greenous plans:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/an-ecofascist-crescent-moon-near-ground-zero/
"Ibrahim Abdul-Matin, a U.S. environmental policy consultant and one of Feisal Abdul Rauf’s spokesmen for the new mosque being contemplated near Ground Zero, surprisingly announced in August that it will be the first “green mosque” in the United States. Not only will this structure comply with very strict LEED green standards (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), but it will also become an interfaith cultural center that will emphasize “the intricate relationships between Islamic teachings and environmentalism.” As such, this new mosque will not only be built green, but it will also become an environmental Islamic community center. In fact, the project has been renamed “Park 51” to reflect this green emphasis.
In The Daily Beast, Ibrahim Abdul-Matin went on to say that “Islam calls upon people to be stewards of the earth and to treat all things in nature as sacred. The new name…invokes images of trees, creeks, and children playing. Parks are for the public. Parks are fun. Parks are green. And parks are not controversial.”
Contrary to such an innocuous suggestion is that injecting environmentalism into Islam is hardly uncontroversial. In reality, it only multiplies the dangers by stuffing more flammable material into a rich concoction of explosive anti-western civilization sentiments, all in the name of green moderation. Both Islam and environmentalism loathe western financial institutions, all of which was best represented by the Twin Towers—the bastion of international free trade—before they came crashing down in flames on 9/11. Thus to suggest that a green mosque is uncontroversial is naïve at best, and in reality, completely disingenuous. New York’s Ground Zero area might be better served by a typical mosque with plenty of prayer rugs on hand for its worshipers. That environmental regulations have already played a large role in stalling the rebuilding of Ground Zero is not something that should go unnoticed, especially now with a green mosque going up nearby.
Blending environmentalism with Islam can only serve to strengthen the totalitarian ideals of the green movement. With modern environmentalism’s fixation on ecological holism that strictly views people and their economic activities as expendable, unbalanced, unsustainable and cancerous—this will only be greatly bolstered and strengthened by the totalitarian will of Allah. If modern western man is way out of line with regard to the environmental movement, just think what it will mean when Allah enters into the equation."
End excerpt.
Others have made the connections between the rising radical Islam and National Socialism http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/243467/berlin-jerusalem-clifford-d-may , and now Mark Musser has taken the next logical step, one that I suspect is ahead of the curve. Nazis thinking was instrumental in the Islamo-fascism that has permeated the Islamic world, and one should expect a rising tide of environmentalism to go along with the dollup of Ubernationalism and anti-Semitism among the Followers of the Prophet. If nothing else, this is a great weakness of the West, one that can be exploited. Western liberals are already in love with Islam, and should there be GREEN Islam...
Be sure to read the entire piece; there are some terrific points advanced. This is truly food for thought.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:08 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 579 words, total size 4 kb.
1
This mosque plan appears to be falling apart. The so-called owner, Sharif al-Gamal, has had foreclosure papers served on his offices because he is months overdue in his rent. Why would he not pay his rent and risk not being able to close on the other half of the mosque property because he is a deadbeat? Because this whole move was a propaganda setup and al-Gamal and his partners don't feel the need to keep up appearances on what appears to be a phoney shell real estate corporation.
Posted by: JackKemp at September 16, 2010 07:23 AM (gpucF)
2
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2010
Iranian Hostage-Taking is Old News and that's the Problem
By Alan Caruba
Am I the only one who thinks it is absolutely bizarre that America, Great Britain, and the rest of the world views the Islamic Republic of Iran’s history of hostage-taking as just another problem to be dealt with by diplomats?
Kidnapping is one of the worst crimes committed in any society, but the Iranians do it with impunity. The latest news concerns the release of Sarah Shourd, one of three Americans along with Josh Fattal and Shane Bauer, who we’re told strayed too close to the Iranian border while hiking. The two men are still being held.
Still unaccounted for is Robert Levinson, an American who disappeared in Iran in 2007. In the September 14 edition of The Wall Street Journal, his daughter had a letter published. “My father was in Kish Island, Iran, on private business when he disappeared without a trace on March 9, 2007.” She noted that Press TV, an Iranian media outlet reported that he was “in the hands of Iranian security forces.” Sarah Lawrence is planning her wedding and her letter pled with the government of Iran “to do everything possible to find my father and send him home to me, my mother, and my six brothers and sisters.”
American relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran were determined on November 4, 1979 when 66 of our diplomats and embassy personnel were taken hostage. They were held for 444 days until the hour that Ronald Reagan took the oath of office for the first time.
Name a nation other than North Korea that routinely takes foreigners hostage. There simply could not be any comity between nations if hostage-taking was the rule instead of the exception. The taking of U.S. diplomats in 1979 broke centuries of tradition in which even ancient cultures understood that diplomats are engaged in missions determining issues too important to permit them to be imprisoned or killed.
The expression, “Do not kill the messenger” comes from this tradition.
What does this tell us about the ayatollahs running Iran? It brands them as little more than common gangsters, blackmailers, and thugs.
It was not for nothing that former President George W. Bush included Iran, along with Iraq and North Korea in his “Axis of Evil.” Such bold, clear identification of criminal nations was refreshing at the time and remains so today.
It comes as no surprise that Iran’s Intelligence Minister, Heydar Moslehi, recently told reporters that the three U.S. hostages are spies even though no charges have been brought against them since last July. Instead, Moslehi and other Iranian officials have let it be known that that there are eleven Iranians in custody in the United States and other nations that they want released.
Last September, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly suggested that the three Americans could be released for Iranians currently held in Iraq, members of the Revolutionary Guards who were captured while posing as “diplomats.”
The United Nations Security Council Resolution 579 was adopted unanimously on December 18, 1985, in a meeting called by the United States. The Council expressed its deep concern at the prevalance in incidents of hostage-taking, primarily by Iran, knowing that this thuggish behavior has grave consequences for the international community and relations between states.
Except for the formalities, Iran has been at war with the United States since the day it took our diplomats hostage in 1979.
The UN Security Council resolution asked member states that were not party to the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages to participate. The resolution identified hostage-taking as "manifestations of international terrorism."
Iran is the epicenter of international terrorism these days and has been for years. It is the sponsor of two internationally recognized terror organizations, Hezbollah and Hamas, and has had its hand covertly involved in countless acts of terror. It is widely believe that Iran is playing host to Osama bin Laden as it is known his family has been given sanctuary there.
And now Iran moves relentlessly toward acquiring nuclear weapons. There can be no good end to this scenario and it must be one that initiates the destruction of the leadership of Iran and its nuclear potential.
© Alan Caruba, 2010
Posted by: R. de Haan at September 16, 2010 08:56 AM (2F7lz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
26kb generated in 0.0323 seconds; 37 queries returned 119 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.