The push for net zero is the new religion. The rich can afford to pay for indulgences to carry on their lifestyles under decarbonisation . But decarbonisation will cost the lower and middle class a greater part of their income and dramatically restrict their lifestyles.

Meanwhile global temperature has failed to rise as predicted by the global warmists, despite massive corruption of temperature records to 'cool' the past to make warming seem more significant.

All the other markers of climate catastrophe have been delayed from the scary predictions repeated every decade since the 1980's. We keep getting told humanity has just 10 years before everything is a disaster.

- The oceans are rising in some places, falling in others. Easily explained by subsidence and geological movements mainly.

- The Great Barrier Reef is not only still there, but as healthy as ever.

- The Maldives, which should have been underwater by now have completed a new airport and multiple new hotel resorts with plans for more.

- Sea ice extent in the Arctic and Antarctic is above average.

- The rate of ice melt in Greenland is no greater than it has been since the Little Ice Age.

- NASA satellites show the planet has greened by more than 17% in the last 30 years due to CO2 fertilisation of plants. Plants thrive with greater access to CO2, are more productive and are more drought tolerant.

- The globe has avoided mass starvation predicted in the 1960's to happen from the 1980's onwards, due to the population explosion because crops are more productive. Largely this is because we have developed more hardy and productive grains and other crops, but also because greater atmospheric CO2 has increased productivity.

- Areas where glaciers are reversing, or permafrost is thawing it is being revealed that forests and grasslands once thrived before the advent of the Little Ice Age.

Releasing these frozen lands so they provide land where plants, animals and humans can once more survive, can only be considered a bad thing by wealthy people who own much of the world's arable land.

In fact if the world does warm by the 1.5°C - 2.0°C we are told to dread, there will be more positive than negative outcomes for the world's plants, animals marine-life and humans. You don't have to be a scientist to know this. Just compare the life in the tropics, compared to temperate zones and then arctic regions. On land or in the oceans, the warmer climes do better. Desserts exist across all latitudes.

COP26 spent no time trying to prove the theory that human CO2 emissions will cause catastrophic climate change. The decades of propaganda has meant that is taken as a given. Despite the fact the long term ice core data which they once used to prove the correlation between atmospheric CO2 and global temperature actually shows that rising temperatures come before rising CO2 levels, not the other way round.

Only the unthinking morons and those who cheer the policy outcomes now accept that human CO2 emissions are causing uncontrollable global temperature increases causing catastrophic climate change.

You can't logically believe, as the Extinction Rebellion people claim, that there's only about 22 years to go before a mass extinction event, and at the same time cheer China's commitment to be net zero by 2060. That's 39 years from now, by which time they will be responsible for emitting most of the globes human CO2 emissions.

That's how dumb the climate issue has become.

RE: SAULE OMAROVA, Biden's nominee to be U.S. Comptroller -

She was born in the Soviet Socialist Republic; graduated from Moscow State University in 1989 on the 'Lenin Academic Scholarship'. Her thesis is titled "Karl Marx's Economic Analysis and the Theory of Revolution in The Capital."
She said (quote) that "We need to bankrupt the energy industry"

Source: Wikipedia. Can't believe this? Go ahead, fact check it.

WEATHER HOAXS

Native American societies all had their Weather Gods religions like we do today with The Climate Change cult religion. The Inca Mayan and Aztec societies sacrificed Thousands of their citizens to promote the settled weather science of their times outcomes The left has combined religion Pseudoscience and politics all together in Global weather hoax crisis. Is this even legal. Or Moral? I don’t think so.

THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE this weekend. Please read 30 seconds from my friend, David Gaudrault:

Project Veritas is a journalistic concern owned and operated by James O’Keefe, famous for exposing corruption and nefarious activities. Project Veritas has an ACTIVE defamation lawsuit against The NY Times and things are not going well for the newspaper.

Project Veritas came into a copy of Joe Biden’s daughter’s diary, which contains her description of her father showering with her when she was a young girl and she considered it inappropriate.

Project Veritas DID NOT PUBLISH one single word from that diary because they were unable to authenticate it. Like journalists should.
This past week, the FBI raided James O’Keefe’s home, entering with a battering ram, searching his home while he was outside in handcuffs and seized his cellphone.

O’Keefe’s phone contains highly sensitive & consequential information about sources, future stories, and employees' personal info.
Yesterday the New York Times published attorney-client privileged emails, showing Veritas obtaining legal opinions to ensure they violated no laws if they went forward with stories.

A federal judge has noted the obvious hanky-panky and collusion between the FBI & the Times. In what world does the FEDERAL government have law enforcement jurisdiction over a lost/stolen diary, even if it belonged to the daughter of the President? That is a matter for the appropriate police department.
A Special Prosecutor should be appointed immediately.
The FBI is too broken to fix. (me here: It has become the KGB of the Left)

<a href="https://opalperfumes.com/">متجر عطور سعودي </a>

<a href="https://opalperfumes.com/">اوبال للعطور </a>

<a href="https://opalperfumes.com/">متاجرعطور سعودية </a>

<a href="https://opalperfumes.com/">اسعار العطور الاصلية </a>

https://opalperfumes.com/

متجر عطور سعودي

اوبال للعطور

متاجر عطور سعودية

I really like what you've obtained right here, certainly like what you're saying and
the way in which wherein you are saying it. You make
it entertaining and you continue to care for to stay it sensible.
I can not wait to read much more from you.
This is really a wonderful web site.

كل ما تحتاجيه سيدتي من طرح وعبايات Ùˆ نقاب هنا في Ù…تجر عبايات دار تالة ,  ستنالي كل ما يرضي ذوقك الرفيع من تصميمات Ùˆ موديلات عبايات المناسبات وعبايات شتوية والعبايات الملونة Ùˆ عبايات سادة سوداء Ùˆ عبايات رسميه بإطلالة مميزة وصيحة فائقة من موديلات الطرح Ø§Ù„ثابتة وطرح برباط والطرح الملونة والطرح المطرزة والنقاب

اوبال متجر عطور سعودي يقدم تشكيلة فريدة من افخم العطورات النسائية من انواع العطورات النسائية المفضلة لدي ذوات الحس المميز اختاري من بين منتجاتنا أفضل عطور رجالية وافخم عطر نسائي  Ø¨Ù„مسات سحرية وتفردي بعطرك

By Bartholomew Chiaroscuro

Aynsley Kellow in The Spectator has an article pointing out some of the absurdities of the ‘green’ argument being forced down our throats at the moment. My friend Richard North has posted the whole thing if you want to read it.

Some highlights struck me.

How about ‘renewables’ producing 300 times more waste than nuclear plants?

How about a renewables plant, solar or wind power, requiring 17 times more steel to build then a nuclear plant, and 30 times more concrete?

How about the production of solar panels releasing complex chemicals that have 200 times the global warming impact of carbon dioxide?

How about the production of these panels and wind turbines in China itself being reliant entirely on coal supplied energy?

In medieval times people seriously believed in alchemy. Alchemists searched for the means to turn lead into gold, instantly. But their quest was also a spiritual one. They searched for the philosophers' stone, the means to turn the ‘clay’ of humanity, by the addition of a chemical discovery, into the ‘gold’ of a superior and worthier, more spiritual, more angelic, being.

Much has been made of the cult-like aspects of modern environmentalis m. It’s been pointed out that it has key aspects of religious fundamentalism to it--the belief that man is flawed and sinful, the belief that punishment for the sins is required, the belief that natural disasters are God’s or Nature’s reactions to these sins, the belief in a coming apocalypse, and the belief in a moral divide between the sacred, sanctified, holy and enlightened people, the believers, and the obscene, polluting, unholy and unenlightened people, the sceptics.

It’s the ‘coming apocalypse’ bit that really should tell everyone this stuff isn’t rational. But look at the other elements too. How is any belief system that includes all of these aspects of religious fundamentalism ‘scientific’?

It’s also difficult to point out to such people when their policies are damaging. The damage, to us, to human sinners, is the point. We must be punished for the crimes of industrialisati on and for escaping a past in which natural man only lived to 35. We sinned. Therefore we deserve higher taxes and don’t deserve heated homes.

But I think I’m the first to note the similarity with alchemy. Because the solutions being proposed are purely magical ones directly akin to the idea of transmuting lead into gold. What we are told to invest trillions of pounds in is a transmutation of our economy, our way of life, our standards of living. We are told that we turning lead into gold, and this is possible.
It isn’t.

Renewables don’t really work. They might with much more research and development work. They don’t work now.

They are inefficient. They are costly. They are unreliable. They can’t meet current energy needs, let alone future ones. They require support from other energy sources. They produce massive environmental costs themselves. They rely on highly polluting processes for their creation.

They are lead. In terms of energy supply, we are exchanging gold for lead. But there is a purely magical belief we are getting something better. And it’s a mystical, spiritual belief too. It is making us better. We are improved by doing it. We are transmuted into angelic beings. That’s even before you note how many of these loons are also transhumanists who want us to meddle in human DNA as much as possible. No respect for Nature and it’s boundaries in THAT part of their philosophy.

Our current leaders are like the medieval kings who invited people like John Dee to their courts to commune with angels and produce gold from clay. Some of the alchemists actually made real discoveries, founding the science of chemistry. Most didn’t. Many were total charlatans, who knew that they were lying, some were, like Dee, sincere believers. The whole effort was largely absurd.

In one sense the alchemists were far less dangerous. They didn’t ever suggest totally changing the whole of society and impoverishing the people in pursuit of their claims. They just wanted a laboratory, some funding, and belief in their madness.

How much worse is it when alchemists decide that WE are their laboratory, or the entire planet? How curious it is that people who consider the planet fragile enough to be affected by the accidental crimes of man, never consider that it might be damaged by their deliberate solutions which seek to tamper with global climate processes they can’t fully explain. At one and the same time they tell us that man is too stupid not to damage everything, and that man is so wise that he can change everything at once.

That is the thinking of an alchemist.

More proof if you needed it, that Covid-19 isn't a serious risk to the young and healthy.

This data is replicated around the world. This debunks the need for mass lockdowns, covid-19 restrictions and compulsory vaccinations.

By all means encourage the elderly, and those with serious co-morbidities to get vaccinated and take whatever other precautions they want, including wearing masks, or self isolation if they choose.

But it is immoral to force or coerce others to do those things.

By the way, we need to point out that inflation in the USA is NOT part of a world-wide trend.

At 6.2%, Biden has driven inflation double most of the rest of the industrialized world. For instance, in Britain, inflation is only 2.1% today. France is at 2.6%, Italy 2.9%, Australia, 3%, Canada 4.4%, Germany 4.5%. The next closest is Spain at 5.5%.

My point is, more often in the past when inflation hit the USA it was nearly the same in every western nation. Today it isn't and we can place the blame on Biden.