November 02, 2024
Maryland AG: Stop Threatening Voters!
Timothy Birdnow
Here I thought it was Republicans who tried to suppress and threaten voters!
Maryland AG Warns Leftist Group to Stop Threatening Voters
Here I thought it was Republicans who tried to suppress and threaten voters!
Maryland AG Warns Leftist Group to Stop Threatening Voters
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Polling Follies and Mittens for Tuesday
Timothy Birdnow
I have been arguing that people are afraid to declare their support for Trump in much the same way they didn't declare for Reagan in 1980. I appear to be correct.
Here is an article about incorrect polling since '80.
FTA:
The UCLA profs failed to address WHY Republicans were unwilling to declare for Reagan. They also believed the "undecideds" made up their minds at the last moment, something entirely unprovable. More likely they had been afraid to vote Reagan but thought about how bad things had been under Carter. In other words, it was inevitable.
The author of this piece disputes that this Wilder Effect is in play:
This is a flawed argument; online polls are utterly worthless as they have no controls and are primarily taken by Millenials and others who tend to be liberals and would skew the results. And it also presupposed polls - and pollsters - are honest brokers of information, something I deny.
The article continues:
That only buttresses my claim about online polls, and egven about traditional polling. You have to be home and have the time to waste on a rather lengthy survey. Democrats have lots of time on their hands; not so much Republicans or those who would be likely to actually vote Trump (they are too busy earning a living and taking care of their families).
This article was written before the Trump/Biden debate and here we see how myopic the thinking:
Biden would be finis after the first debate as polls showed it was impossible for him to win. The "recent polls" mentioned were undoubtedly incorrect even then; the public had absolutely no reason to support the baby biter in chief, none whatsoever. These polls were trying to lead the public, not reflect it.
I strongly suspect the polls in this election will be way off, as they were in 1980.
Anyone remember the iconic photo of Harry Truman holding up the paper that said "Dewey Wins!"? Polls showed Truman would be out. Anyone remember polls showing Nixon would beat Kennedy? How about the claims the GOP stole the election from John "I Served in Vietnam" Kerry because the election did not go the way polls suggested it would? The polls have been wrong more then they have been right.
Polls should be taken with a huge grain of salt. And given the overall trends right now I think we will be very happy next week. But of course none of this can take theft into account, and what the Democrats can't win they can manufacture.
It's going to be a nail-biter; you may want to buy some mittens for Tuesday.
I have been arguing that people are afraid to declare their support for Trump in much the same way they didn't declare for Reagan in 1980. I appear to be correct.
Here is an article about incorrect polling since '80.
FTA:
Speaking to The Bruin in that article, UCLA professors attempted to explain "Where the pollsters goofed.”
"The polls immediately preceding the election did not accurately predict the election results either because poll respondents included a large number of Reagan supporters who were unwilling to declare their support for him, or because a very large portion of ‘undecideds’ and Anderson supporters decided to support Reagan over the weekend,” the article said.
End
"The polls immediately preceding the election did not accurately predict the election results either because poll respondents included a large number of Reagan supporters who were unwilling to declare their support for him, or because a very large portion of ‘undecideds’ and Anderson supporters decided to support Reagan over the weekend,” the article said.
End
The UCLA profs failed to address WHY Republicans were unwilling to declare for Reagan. They also believed the "undecideds" made up their minds at the last moment, something entirely unprovable. More likely they had been afraid to vote Reagan but thought about how bad things had been under Carter. In other words, it was inevitable.
The author of this piece disputes that this Wilder Effect is in play:
"Some pundits similarly argue that undecided voters, as well as those that may have been embarrassed to share their preference for Trump with pollsters, disrupted the polls in 2016. This "shy Trumper” theory has been largely disproven by the fact that Trump did not perform significantly better in online polls, where voters would not have had to reveal their views to real people."
This is a flawed argument; online polls are utterly worthless as they have no controls and are primarily taken by Millenials and others who tend to be liberals and would skew the results. And it also presupposed polls - and pollsters - are honest brokers of information, something I deny.
The article continues:
In the four years since the 2016 election, Pew Research Center researchers have examined the polling methods that resulted in erroneous predictions in 2016. These researchers have determined that nonresponse bias, which occurs when certain groups within a population tend to not respond to polls, and incorrect assumptions about who would turn up to vote are largely to blame.
Many pollsters relied on data from past elections to predict who would vote in 2016. However, significant changes in voter demographics invalidated many of these assumptions, resulting in inaccurate polls. Notably, nonwhite voters did not turnout for Clinton at the same rates as they did for former President Barack Obama in 2012.
End
Many pollsters relied on data from past elections to predict who would vote in 2016. However, significant changes in voter demographics invalidated many of these assumptions, resulting in inaccurate polls. Notably, nonwhite voters did not turnout for Clinton at the same rates as they did for former President Barack Obama in 2012.
End
That only buttresses my claim about online polls, and egven about traditional polling. You have to be home and have the time to waste on a rather lengthy survey. Democrats have lots of time on their hands; not so much Republicans or those who would be likely to actually vote Trump (they are too busy earning a living and taking care of their families).
This article was written before the Trump/Biden debate and here we see how myopic the thinking:
"Some of the most recent polls show Democratic candidate Joe Biden ahead of Trump in most states, including key swing states such as Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Florida. Early ballot counts also indicate that 2020 will witness historic levels of voter turnout, unlike the 20-year low seen in 2016. "
Biden would be finis after the first debate as polls showed it was impossible for him to win. The "recent polls" mentioned were undoubtedly incorrect even then; the public had absolutely no reason to support the baby biter in chief, none whatsoever. These polls were trying to lead the public, not reflect it.
I strongly suspect the polls in this election will be way off, as they were in 1980.
Anyone remember the iconic photo of Harry Truman holding up the paper that said "Dewey Wins!"? Polls showed Truman would be out. Anyone remember polls showing Nixon would beat Kennedy? How about the claims the GOP stole the election from John "I Served in Vietnam" Kerry because the election did not go the way polls suggested it would? The polls have been wrong more then they have been right.
Polls should be taken with a huge grain of salt. And given the overall trends right now I think we will be very happy next week. But of course none of this can take theft into account, and what the Democrats can't win they can manufacture.
It's going to be a nail-biter; you may want to buy some mittens for Tuesday.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 746 words, total size 5 kb.
Polls and Passion Plays
Timothy Birdnow
Very, very interesting indeed!
Statistician Nate Silver Accuses Pollsters of Lying to Keep Race Close
Silver is far from a MAGA man, or even a Republican. In fact the Democrats USED to love him. But now he is saying pollsters are "herding" because they are all getting the same numbers and those numbers are withing a fraction of each-other.
Silver himself has Trump chances of winning being 55% to 45% for Harris.
I have always held a low opinon of polling, which is usually wrong, sometimes spectacularly so. In the election of 1980 most polls showed Reagan slightly ahead in a photo-finish contest just one week before the election, and in fact Gallup showed him down considerably, yet Reagan won in a landslide. I chalk that up to the Wilder/Bradley Effect where people are embarrassed to tell pollsters what they really think but rather tell them what they think the pollsters want to hear. When someone is demonized, be it Reagan in '80 or Trump in '16 or '24 it is hard for a person, especially a weaker person, to admit they are going to vote for "Hitler" (both men being called that at the time).
But there is just plain old intentional bias too. Polls are now tools to lead public opinion and not reflect it. My wife worked as a pollster for a short time but realized that was the intent all along. Polls showing a razor-thin race helps the losing party keep up morale, and sets up legal and political challenges to the validity of the winner. It also helps turn out the vote. Now, this is a double-edged sword and can come back to bite the Democrats but if one assumes Trump is winning the media would most definitely do this, and so would most of the (liberal) pollsters. I agree with Silver; "Republican" pollsters are just lazy and fear going outside of the conventional wisdom.
Of course the pollsters also have to actually talk to someone and Democrats are far more likely to have the time to spent half an hour or more on the phone with one.
Any way you slice it polls are b.s. The REAL polls are the ones run as internal polling by the parties, who know what is REALLY happening. The ones seen by the public are messaged and managed and intended to both keep the race close and to promote an ultimate Democrat vicotry.
Our news is all morality play these days. Ace of Spades called it the "MacGuffin" which is defined as "an object, device, or event necessary to the plot and the motivation of the characters, but typically unimportant or irrelevant in itself ." I don't know much about no MacGuffins (I thought they were McDonald's new breakfast sandwhich) but I do understand morality plays and the use of Passion Plays in Medieval times. Our political system is all theatre, a passion play designed to make a point and keep us distracted.
The Democrats are always the good guys, white hat wearing heroes who are forced to fight those dastardly cowards with the black capes and stovepipe hats and waxed mustaches. It's what is sometimes called a "melerdrama", a charicature of the roles. The question is how will the good guys win! There has to be drama, there has to be struggle, complications, missteps on the road to the happy ending. The media reports it throughy that lense, as high drama with the "good guys" winning in the end.
Of course this is taking the situation 360* out of phase. The GOP are not the good guys either; at best they are the greedy flim-flam men who have to be forced to do the right thing, like Professor Waldo Wigglesworth in the old Hoppity Hoooper cartoons. (Hoppity Hooper was a Jay Ward production, from the same guy who brought us Rocky and Bullwinkle.) Or it is like the Wizard in the Oz story. The Democrats are the guys who have sold their souls to Satan and seek the ruin of all Mankind. The true good guys are those of us in Middle America trying to save what is left of our religion, our culture, and our way of life.
But the media doesn't see it that way. They frame the Democrats as the good guys and always seek the drama to keep Americans off kilter and fighting the wrong fights while the Leftist Establishment moves steadily forward with their schemes of societal evolution. Even when we win politically we end up losing culturally. Look at the Bush era, for instance.
when George W. Bush won re-election in 2004, did any of us believe twenty years later we would be opnely calling for socialism, waging war on oil, supporting terrorist Muslims against Israel, having homosexual marriages be accepted and talking about castrating small children as "gender affirming care"? Eight years of Bush saw the Left make huge gains. We won the political battle but largely have lost the war.
Now Trump is our last hope and now half the country, despite seeing the fruits of this leftism, still hate and loath him.
None of that could have happened without the media, the universities, government, and the pollsters.
So if our politics seems to you to be a fiction, a farce, a staged production, know that it largely is and Silver is no doubt right here.
Yes, there are encouraging signs like Musk taking over Twitter. Musk is a danger to the Left because, unlike Fox News, it is not at the service of the Left. Fox serves a useful purpose to the Left, which is why they allow it to exist; it acts as a safety valve to allow pressure to be relieved on the conservative public in Middle America. (Read Huxley's Brave New World where they discuss this very thing.) As Sun Tzu said, one must offer an enemy a "golden bridge of retreat" lest he get iron in his spine and fight to the last. Fox News serves that purpose; it APPEARS right wing at times but in the end, when it really matters, Fox will turn tail and run. Look at the way they simply refused to cover vote fraud/tampering in 2020, for instance. The fired their top host and paid a huge sum of cash to Dominion over a lawsuit they probably would have won (nobody wins those types of libel suits against journalists). Why?
Because Fox likes being part of the Establishment, an insider. That's where the money is, the power is, and the pleasures money and power bring.
Nobody wanted to be Rush Limbaugh, or Christopher Ruddy at Newsmax, or anyone who actually spoke the Truth because they became anathema. Trump is anathema, a kind of taboo totem. In fact he is basically Emmanuel Goldstein from Orwell's 1984; a biword, the man everyone HAD to hate for two minutes every day. That is what Trump is now for the Left; a boogeyman.
But it's all just a big play performed by the media.
The polls are just another such tool. They have to make them close to put excitement into the race so people can walk away with the satisfaction of triumphing over evil if the Democrats win - and with the resolve to fight harder if they lose.
Passion plays were often blamed for pogroms against Jews during the Middle Ages. The modern passion plays are doing likewise, only instead of Jews it is leading to attacks on Conservatives, Christians, Jews, and working class and middle class Americans. But it is the same thing.
Very, very interesting indeed!
Statistician Nate Silver Accuses Pollsters of Lying to Keep Race Close
Silver is far from a MAGA man, or even a Republican. In fact the Democrats USED to love him. But now he is saying pollsters are "herding" because they are all getting the same numbers and those numbers are withing a fraction of each-other.
Silver himself has Trump chances of winning being 55% to 45% for Harris.
I have always held a low opinon of polling, which is usually wrong, sometimes spectacularly so. In the election of 1980 most polls showed Reagan slightly ahead in a photo-finish contest just one week before the election, and in fact Gallup showed him down considerably, yet Reagan won in a landslide. I chalk that up to the Wilder/Bradley Effect where people are embarrassed to tell pollsters what they really think but rather tell them what they think the pollsters want to hear. When someone is demonized, be it Reagan in '80 or Trump in '16 or '24 it is hard for a person, especially a weaker person, to admit they are going to vote for "Hitler" (both men being called that at the time).
But there is just plain old intentional bias too. Polls are now tools to lead public opinion and not reflect it. My wife worked as a pollster for a short time but realized that was the intent all along. Polls showing a razor-thin race helps the losing party keep up morale, and sets up legal and political challenges to the validity of the winner. It also helps turn out the vote. Now, this is a double-edged sword and can come back to bite the Democrats but if one assumes Trump is winning the media would most definitely do this, and so would most of the (liberal) pollsters. I agree with Silver; "Republican" pollsters are just lazy and fear going outside of the conventional wisdom.
Of course the pollsters also have to actually talk to someone and Democrats are far more likely to have the time to spent half an hour or more on the phone with one.
Any way you slice it polls are b.s. The REAL polls are the ones run as internal polling by the parties, who know what is REALLY happening. The ones seen by the public are messaged and managed and intended to both keep the race close and to promote an ultimate Democrat vicotry.
Our news is all morality play these days. Ace of Spades called it the "MacGuffin" which is defined as "an object, device, or event necessary to the plot and the motivation of the characters, but typically unimportant or irrelevant in itself ." I don't know much about no MacGuffins (I thought they were McDonald's new breakfast sandwhich) but I do understand morality plays and the use of Passion Plays in Medieval times. Our political system is all theatre, a passion play designed to make a point and keep us distracted.
The Democrats are always the good guys, white hat wearing heroes who are forced to fight those dastardly cowards with the black capes and stovepipe hats and waxed mustaches. It's what is sometimes called a "melerdrama", a charicature of the roles. The question is how will the good guys win! There has to be drama, there has to be struggle, complications, missteps on the road to the happy ending. The media reports it throughy that lense, as high drama with the "good guys" winning in the end.
Of course this is taking the situation 360* out of phase. The GOP are not the good guys either; at best they are the greedy flim-flam men who have to be forced to do the right thing, like Professor Waldo Wigglesworth in the old Hoppity Hoooper cartoons. (Hoppity Hooper was a Jay Ward production, from the same guy who brought us Rocky and Bullwinkle.) Or it is like the Wizard in the Oz story. The Democrats are the guys who have sold their souls to Satan and seek the ruin of all Mankind. The true good guys are those of us in Middle America trying to save what is left of our religion, our culture, and our way of life.
But the media doesn't see it that way. They frame the Democrats as the good guys and always seek the drama to keep Americans off kilter and fighting the wrong fights while the Leftist Establishment moves steadily forward with their schemes of societal evolution. Even when we win politically we end up losing culturally. Look at the Bush era, for instance.
when George W. Bush won re-election in 2004, did any of us believe twenty years later we would be opnely calling for socialism, waging war on oil, supporting terrorist Muslims against Israel, having homosexual marriages be accepted and talking about castrating small children as "gender affirming care"? Eight years of Bush saw the Left make huge gains. We won the political battle but largely have lost the war.
Now Trump is our last hope and now half the country, despite seeing the fruits of this leftism, still hate and loath him.
None of that could have happened without the media, the universities, government, and the pollsters.
So if our politics seems to you to be a fiction, a farce, a staged production, know that it largely is and Silver is no doubt right here.
Yes, there are encouraging signs like Musk taking over Twitter. Musk is a danger to the Left because, unlike Fox News, it is not at the service of the Left. Fox serves a useful purpose to the Left, which is why they allow it to exist; it acts as a safety valve to allow pressure to be relieved on the conservative public in Middle America. (Read Huxley's Brave New World where they discuss this very thing.) As Sun Tzu said, one must offer an enemy a "golden bridge of retreat" lest he get iron in his spine and fight to the last. Fox News serves that purpose; it APPEARS right wing at times but in the end, when it really matters, Fox will turn tail and run. Look at the way they simply refused to cover vote fraud/tampering in 2020, for instance. The fired their top host and paid a huge sum of cash to Dominion over a lawsuit they probably would have won (nobody wins those types of libel suits against journalists). Why?
Because Fox likes being part of the Establishment, an insider. That's where the money is, the power is, and the pleasures money and power bring.
Nobody wanted to be Rush Limbaugh, or Christopher Ruddy at Newsmax, or anyone who actually spoke the Truth because they became anathema. Trump is anathema, a kind of taboo totem. In fact he is basically Emmanuel Goldstein from Orwell's 1984; a biword, the man everyone HAD to hate for two minutes every day. That is what Trump is now for the Left; a boogeyman.
But it's all just a big play performed by the media.
The polls are just another such tool. They have to make them close to put excitement into the race so people can walk away with the satisfaction of triumphing over evil if the Democrats win - and with the resolve to fight harder if they lose.
Passion plays were often blamed for pogroms against Jews during the Middle Ages. The modern passion plays are doing likewise, only instead of Jews it is leading to attacks on Conservatives, Christians, Jews, and working class and middle class Americans. But it is the same thing.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1269 words, total size 8 kb.
Democrat Vote Tampering
Timothy Birdnow
Democrat election tampering and fraud is rampant in this election and the media is llying about it or ignoring it.
All the early voting mIade the Democrats tip their hands early, before the overall chaos of the post-election period where they could hide what they were doing to an extent. Of course the media is claiming it's a "conspiracy theory" even though in many of these instances courts of law have ruled on them.
It was bad enough for the usually phlegmatic Hugh Hewitt to storm off from an interview on a Washington Post podcast as the other two media folks mocked him for saying there was obvious vote tampering (and kept interrupting him when he provided evidence) then said he wouldn't be invited back. Hewitt subsequently walked out of the interview and resigned his job at WaPo.
This is Big Steal II, bigger and badder. And I assure you if this election is even remotely close they will win. We have to so overwhelm them that they cannot steal it - or hide the evidence if they do.
Increasingly the Ruling Class is pushing America into civil war. When the political remedies fail a people have only one option left. A civil war would be terrible and everyone loses in one but unfortunately that seems to be the course our government, the Democrats, and their media allies want to take. They are fully prepared to disenfranchise native born Americans and naturalized Americans to attain and hold power. That is a recipe' for revolution.
I hope and pray it doesn't come to that. But I fear that's where it is going.
Democrat election tampering and fraud is rampant in this election and the media is llying about it or ignoring it.
All the early voting mIade the Democrats tip their hands early, before the overall chaos of the post-election period where they could hide what they were doing to an extent. Of course the media is claiming it's a "conspiracy theory" even though in many of these instances courts of law have ruled on them.
It was bad enough for the usually phlegmatic Hugh Hewitt to storm off from an interview on a Washington Post podcast as the other two media folks mocked him for saying there was obvious vote tampering (and kept interrupting him when he provided evidence) then said he wouldn't be invited back. Hewitt subsequently walked out of the interview and resigned his job at WaPo.
This is Big Steal II, bigger and badder. And I assure you if this election is even remotely close they will win. We have to so overwhelm them that they cannot steal it - or hide the evidence if they do.
Increasingly the Ruling Class is pushing America into civil war. When the political remedies fail a people have only one option left. A civil war would be terrible and everyone loses in one but unfortunately that seems to be the course our government, the Democrats, and their media allies want to take. They are fully prepared to disenfranchise native born Americans and naturalized Americans to attain and hold power. That is a recipe' for revolution.
I hope and pray it doesn't come to that. But I fear that's where it is going.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
The Father of Lies
Timothy Birdnow
If anyone still believes the media isn't in the tank for Democrats and do not lie they are deluding themselves. Here's the proof.
In an interview with Tucker Carlson Donald Trump said that Liz Chaney is a radical war hawk and expressed his doubts about her committment if she were under fire:
"She's a radiccal war hawk and a very stupid person.
Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it You know, when the guns are trained on her face.
You know, they are all war hawks when they are sitting in Washington in a nice building"
But that's not what the media reported. They cut out the beginning and the end and posted:
"Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it You know, when the guns are trained on her face."
And this, the media screamed, showed Trump was a fascist because he was threatening Chaney, threatening to use a firing squad on her (since often firing squads have nine members).
In fact, it got so bad the Democrat Attorney General of Arizona is opening an investigation to charge Trump with threatening a public official.
But it's all a lie, a twisting of Trump's words by taking him out of context.
The media doesn't even pretend to be neutral any longer, except when it's America that is under attack - then they suddenly find their neutrality and in the end side with the enemy.
The media is full of traitors. Hopefully most Americans now understand that they are liars and the father of lies.
If anyone still believes the media isn't in the tank for Democrats and do not lie they are deluding themselves. Here's the proof.
In an interview with Tucker Carlson Donald Trump said that Liz Chaney is a radical war hawk and expressed his doubts about her committment if she were under fire:
"She's a radiccal war hawk and a very stupid person.
Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it You know, when the guns are trained on her face.
You know, they are all war hawks when they are sitting in Washington in a nice building"
But that's not what the media reported. They cut out the beginning and the end and posted:
"Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it You know, when the guns are trained on her face."
And this, the media screamed, showed Trump was a fascist because he was threatening Chaney, threatening to use a firing squad on her (since often firing squads have nine members).
In fact, it got so bad the Democrat Attorney General of Arizona is opening an investigation to charge Trump with threatening a public official.
But it's all a lie, a twisting of Trump's words by taking him out of context.
The media doesn't even pretend to be neutral any longer, except when it's America that is under attack - then they suddenly find their neutrality and in the end side with the enemy.
The media is full of traitors. Hopefully most Americans now understand that they are liars and the father of lies.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:39 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 287 words, total size 2 kb.
November 01, 2024
FBI Referral Over Mike Lindell
Timothy Birdnow
This is ridiculous; the FBI is investigating Mike "My Pillow" Lindell and an organization he founded to help secure the vote because of an e-mail they sent out to poll supervisors asking about their cyber-security and requesting basic information (like their mailing addresses).
They are doing this based on "threats to poll workers" and "white powder" that was allegedly sent out. But who did all that? Almost always it was Leftists and Democrats. There are no documented cases of Trump supporters doing any of these things.
This is just another attempt to silence dissent by the government.
There is nothing illegal in what Lindell's group did, nor is there any compulsion by the group to make anyone respond. It's like getting an "enlarge your penis" pop-up on your computer; you don't click on it unless you are either an idiot or really, really sad about your lilliputian equipment.
FTA:
more...
This is ridiculous; the FBI is investigating Mike "My Pillow" Lindell and an organization he founded to help secure the vote because of an e-mail they sent out to poll supervisors asking about their cyber-security and requesting basic information (like their mailing addresses).
They are doing this based on "threats to poll workers" and "white powder" that was allegedly sent out. But who did all that? Almost always it was Leftists and Democrats. There are no documented cases of Trump supporters doing any of these things.
This is just another attempt to silence dissent by the government.
There is nothing illegal in what Lindell's group did, nor is there any compulsion by the group to make anyone respond. It's like getting an "enlarge your penis" pop-up on your computer; you don't click on it unless you are either an idiot or really, really sad about your lilliputian equipment.
FTA:
more...
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
01:07 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1444 words, total size 12 kb.
Illegals to Start Getting Obamacare
Timothy Birdnow
Proof the Left wants to kill Obamacare so they can implement full socialized medicine.
Since none of these aliens show any income at all they will be entirely subsidized by taxpayers. This will almost certainly collapse the program.
At the time many of us said this system was designed to fail so they could get single-payer. Now the Left is employing the old Cloward Piven strategy to overwhelm the system and crash it - and will have the "solution" all ready to go.
Proof the Left wants to kill Obamacare so they can implement full socialized medicine.
Since none of these aliens show any income at all they will be entirely subsidized by taxpayers. This will almost certainly collapse the program.
At the time many of us said this system was designed to fail so they could get single-payer. Now the Left is employing the old Cloward Piven strategy to overwhelm the system and crash it - and will have the "solution" all ready to go.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
12:37 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
Astounding Hypocrisy from Bragg
Timothy Birdnow
Pot meet kettle!
Soros DA Bragg's Underlings Accuse Daniel Penny's Defense Attorneys of Racially Motivated Jury Selection in Sham Trial
Why wouldn't Penny's lawyers seek to disqualify New York City blacks from a racially-motivated prosecution? They'd be fools not to.
Pot meet kettle!
Soros DA Bragg's Underlings Accuse Daniel Penny's Defense Attorneys of Racially Motivated Jury Selection in Sham Trial
Why wouldn't Penny's lawyers seek to disqualify New York City blacks from a racially-motivated prosecution? They'd be fools not to.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
The Misogynistic AOC
Timothy Birdnow
Occasional-Cortx has such a low opinion of women she is endorsing a liberal campaign to leave post-it notes in public restrooms encouraging fearful women to vote for Harris. She apparently thinks women are too weak-willed and frightened to think and act of their own free will.
This is far, far more misogynistic than anything ever coming out of any Republican camp. It insults and degrades women and shows just what a low opinion AOC and the Democrats hold of them. Women should vote Trump over this alone.
Apparently she has little experience with men; in almost all relationships it is the woman who gets the man to do her nidding, not the other way around. I suppose a woman as sexless and unappealing as AOC has trouble using feminine wiles to so much as influence a man to flush the toilet after he's done. But most women have incredible power over men and are not submissive little servants as she seems to believe.
AOC apparently doesn't know history; Cleopatra, the Egyptian queen, destroyed TWO world leaders through her ability to manipulate them using her sexual characteristics. Rome was thrown into civil war by that little split-tail she sported. We've seen that time and time again as powerful men throw everything away for women.
So AOC thinks these big pro-wrestling fan truck driving beer drinkers are going to simply bully their women into supporting Trump? Her worldview is not just ridiculous but cartoonish.
It's insulting to both men and women.
In more Democrat misogyny, the Georgia Peach Julia Roberts tells women to lie to their men and vote for Harris. Maybe she is that weak and stupid but most women are most assuredly not.
This goes to show what Democrats REALLY think of people, even their own base.
Occasional-Cortx has such a low opinion of women she is endorsing a liberal campaign to leave post-it notes in public restrooms encouraging fearful women to vote for Harris. She apparently thinks women are too weak-willed and frightened to think and act of their own free will.
This is far, far more misogynistic than anything ever coming out of any Republican camp. It insults and degrades women and shows just what a low opinion AOC and the Democrats hold of them. Women should vote Trump over this alone.
Apparently she has little experience with men; in almost all relationships it is the woman who gets the man to do her nidding, not the other way around. I suppose a woman as sexless and unappealing as AOC has trouble using feminine wiles to so much as influence a man to flush the toilet after he's done. But most women have incredible power over men and are not submissive little servants as she seems to believe.
AOC apparently doesn't know history; Cleopatra, the Egyptian queen, destroyed TWO world leaders through her ability to manipulate them using her sexual characteristics. Rome was thrown into civil war by that little split-tail she sported. We've seen that time and time again as powerful men throw everything away for women.
So AOC thinks these big pro-wrestling fan truck driving beer drinkers are going to simply bully their women into supporting Trump? Her worldview is not just ridiculous but cartoonish.
It's insulting to both men and women.
In more Democrat misogyny, the Georgia Peach Julia Roberts tells women to lie to their men and vote for Harris. Maybe she is that weak and stupid but most women are most assuredly not.
This goes to show what Democrats REALLY think of people, even their own base.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:29 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
The Sun Also Sets
Timothy Birdnow
Tucker Carlson says he was attacked by a demon while in bed once. That led him to start reading the Bible (and no doubt to his becoming such a powerful voice for Christian Conservative values).
I doubt it not. As a child I had "night terrors" in which I saw demonic beings in my bedroom who frightened the heck out of me. Those went away as I grew older, but they came back about a year or two ago (less scary but still; who wants to awaken to the sight of a demoic figure glaring at you?)
I was also actually attacked by a ghost. I didn't believe in ghosts until one assaulted me. But this particular ghost wasn't very strong; it was flailing at me in rage but had no substance. I kicked out and went right through it and then it retreated, disappearing and being replaced by what appeared to be a Fourth of July sparkler which floated lazily around the room. It was reflected in the mirror and went into a dark hallway and lit the whole hallway up. I observed it pretty carefully. I also tried to think of alternate explanations but never came up with any that made sense. This was in my then-fiance's apartment, who admitted to me she had seen this entity herself.
The previous tenant was an old man who died there. It was a crusty-looking old man that assaulted me.
At any rate, now that I've made everyone believe I'm a kook I have this off my chest. People are free to disbelieve me, but it happened and I was quite lucid at the time and there just was no alternate explanation.
So now I do believe in ghosts; seeing is believing they say. Before that happened I always lumped ghosts in with Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's. No more.
It stands to reason if one believes in God and an afterlife. Could it be ghosts are souls in Purgatory, not in Heaven but not in Hell either? Stuck out in a twilight land between the two until they are honest with themselves about their sins and willing to let go of them? Or they could even be damned souls who have yet to take their place in Hell?
I don't know but I do not disbelieve Carlson. I've talked to people who are credible and have told similar stories.
Demons are a different story but demonic possession is real and ubiquitous, something that happens in all cultures and everywhere. In fact there has been a huge rise in demonic possessions in the Western world over the last few decades, and exorcists are doing land-office business (after being an oddity as late as the seventies.) And religious holy men from all religious traditions are empowered to perform exorcisms by God; Jewish rabbis as well as Protestant Ministers and Catholic priests and Muslim clerics and even Zoarastrians and even Hindus. God is so displeased with such demonic activity He blesses even those whom he is not in communion with in this regard.
Anyone who has had any dealings with exorcisms never speak of it - and are terrified of it. One of my teachers in high school was a Jesuit novitiate (Walter Halloran) who participated in the famous exorcism that inspired Peter Blatty's The Exorcist. He never spoke of it. (He was also an old grump and a drunk, which I now understand completely.) He had his nose broken by the little boy/demon (Blatty changed it to a girl in his novel but it was a boy back in 1948 who came to St. Louis when welts appeared on his stomach saying "St. Louis" where his aunt lived. The exorcism occurred at his aunt's home in Bel Nor and later at St. Louis University's hospital. My mother knew the lead exorcist in the case, I might add, Fr. Williiam Bowderen.
At any rate the Old Catholics decided to do an exorcism on the house in Bel Nor where the kid's aunt lived as nobody stayed there long, and the Catholic Church bitterly opposed them doing this because it could stir up issues. It was televised, btw. I had been curious about this place and when they showed a street sign that was all I needed (I was an expert navigator when I could see well) and drove by the place. Interestingly enough I developed kidney stones that very night and passed three of the buggers by the end of the weekend! Coincidence? Maybe but I assure you I will not ever go by that place again willingly.
If one believes in God one has to believe in angels,and if one believes in angels you have to believe in demons. They are real, they are vicious, and they are not to be trifled with. I sympathize with Mr. Carlson.
At present the whole world is deep in spiritual warfare and the side of righteousness is currently losing. We are reaching a point where God Himself will have to step in. We call that the Great Tribulation and the Parousia (the Second Coming). It's a horrible time to live. But it is where the Good Lord has placed us and we are required to face this battle with courage and good cheer, knowing the war is ultimately won.
At any rate, I wonder if Joe Biden isn't demonically possessed; his touching, hair sniffing, and biting of children is disturbing, as is his barking like a dog and his daughter's claim he repeatedly raped her as a child. Did Mr. Biden hand his soul to the Devil? Perhaps. But he certainly has done the work of the Devil even if he's not consciously doing it.
Darkness has fallen over the whole world.
Tucker Carlson says he was attacked by a demon while in bed once. That led him to start reading the Bible (and no doubt to his becoming such a powerful voice for Christian Conservative values).
I doubt it not. As a child I had "night terrors" in which I saw demonic beings in my bedroom who frightened the heck out of me. Those went away as I grew older, but they came back about a year or two ago (less scary but still; who wants to awaken to the sight of a demoic figure glaring at you?)
I was also actually attacked by a ghost. I didn't believe in ghosts until one assaulted me. But this particular ghost wasn't very strong; it was flailing at me in rage but had no substance. I kicked out and went right through it and then it retreated, disappearing and being replaced by what appeared to be a Fourth of July sparkler which floated lazily around the room. It was reflected in the mirror and went into a dark hallway and lit the whole hallway up. I observed it pretty carefully. I also tried to think of alternate explanations but never came up with any that made sense. This was in my then-fiance's apartment, who admitted to me she had seen this entity herself.
The previous tenant was an old man who died there. It was a crusty-looking old man that assaulted me.
At any rate, now that I've made everyone believe I'm a kook I have this off my chest. People are free to disbelieve me, but it happened and I was quite lucid at the time and there just was no alternate explanation.
So now I do believe in ghosts; seeing is believing they say. Before that happened I always lumped ghosts in with Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and UFO's. No more.
It stands to reason if one believes in God and an afterlife. Could it be ghosts are souls in Purgatory, not in Heaven but not in Hell either? Stuck out in a twilight land between the two until they are honest with themselves about their sins and willing to let go of them? Or they could even be damned souls who have yet to take their place in Hell?
I don't know but I do not disbelieve Carlson. I've talked to people who are credible and have told similar stories.
Demons are a different story but demonic possession is real and ubiquitous, something that happens in all cultures and everywhere. In fact there has been a huge rise in demonic possessions in the Western world over the last few decades, and exorcists are doing land-office business (after being an oddity as late as the seventies.) And religious holy men from all religious traditions are empowered to perform exorcisms by God; Jewish rabbis as well as Protestant Ministers and Catholic priests and Muslim clerics and even Zoarastrians and even Hindus. God is so displeased with such demonic activity He blesses even those whom he is not in communion with in this regard.
Anyone who has had any dealings with exorcisms never speak of it - and are terrified of it. One of my teachers in high school was a Jesuit novitiate (Walter Halloran) who participated in the famous exorcism that inspired Peter Blatty's The Exorcist. He never spoke of it. (He was also an old grump and a drunk, which I now understand completely.) He had his nose broken by the little boy/demon (Blatty changed it to a girl in his novel but it was a boy back in 1948 who came to St. Louis when welts appeared on his stomach saying "St. Louis" where his aunt lived. The exorcism occurred at his aunt's home in Bel Nor and later at St. Louis University's hospital. My mother knew the lead exorcist in the case, I might add, Fr. Williiam Bowderen.
At any rate the Old Catholics decided to do an exorcism on the house in Bel Nor where the kid's aunt lived as nobody stayed there long, and the Catholic Church bitterly opposed them doing this because it could stir up issues. It was televised, btw. I had been curious about this place and when they showed a street sign that was all I needed (I was an expert navigator when I could see well) and drove by the place. Interestingly enough I developed kidney stones that very night and passed three of the buggers by the end of the weekend! Coincidence? Maybe but I assure you I will not ever go by that place again willingly.
If one believes in God one has to believe in angels,and if one believes in angels you have to believe in demons. They are real, they are vicious, and they are not to be trifled with. I sympathize with Mr. Carlson.
At present the whole world is deep in spiritual warfare and the side of righteousness is currently losing. We are reaching a point where God Himself will have to step in. We call that the Great Tribulation and the Parousia (the Second Coming). It's a horrible time to live. But it is where the Good Lord has placed us and we are required to face this battle with courage and good cheer, knowing the war is ultimately won.
At any rate, I wonder if Joe Biden isn't demonically possessed; his touching, hair sniffing, and biting of children is disturbing, as is his barking like a dog and his daughter's claim he repeatedly raped her as a child. Did Mr. Biden hand his soul to the Devil? Perhaps. But he certainly has done the work of the Devil even if he's not consciously doing it.
Darkness has fallen over the whole world.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:18 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 965 words, total size 6 kb.
Trump CBS Lawsuit and the Art of War
Timothy Birdnow
Trump is suing CBS News for election tampering by editing the disastrous 60 Minutes Harris interview in her favor.
This is how you do it; go after these scumbags in their citadels of pwoer!
The Donald filed a ten billion dollar lawsuit. In a sane world he'd win. But this isn't a sane world.
This is what we must do; the media no longer even pretends to be unbiased, and when they cross the line we MUST hold them to account via the courts. Even if we lose we need to tie them up in endless litigation and force them on the defensive. Now they are always on the offensive and it is WE who are fighting a rear-guard action. That has to stop.
When was the last time the Right actually launched a strike against the Left? We may launch counter-strikes but it is THEY who drive all actions, they who take the initiative. Defense is a losing strategy if you do not ever engage in an offensive.
The great Chinese military philosopher Sun Tzu had this to say about the matter:
"Security against defeat implies defensive tactics; ability to defeat the enemy means taking the offensive."
And we have been content with a dubious security all along as they make endless inroads into our strongholds, "seizing that which the enemy (we) hold dear" as Tzu also admonishes a leader to do. I mean, they have gone after the Boy Scouts, the military, our children. How much is left of what we once held dear? And still we sit and wait for the next attack.
George Patton once said fixed fortifications are a monument to Man's stupidity. Patton was all offense. While there certainly is a place for defensive strategy - it worked for George Washington and it worked for Sam Houston - it often fails as it did for Robert E. Lee and at some point you simply have to attack. Washington did at Trenton and Princeton; his army was falling apart, starving and half naked and it was a bone-cold winter and a huge snowstorm and his men's enlistments were running out. Washingto did a crazy thing and attacked and won. It was one of his rare victories (the other being Second Bunker Hill, where he also attacked). And had Washington not played defense his army would have been destroyed, surely, but at some point you just have to attack. He ALMOST didn't do it at YORKTOWN; the French had to tell him he had won the war because he wanted to move north! Ditto Sam Houston who refused to engage Santa Ana and then attacked when cornered and wiped the Mexicans out - and captured the Napoleon of the West", forcing him to sign a surrender making Texas free.
(Of course Lee lost the war at Gettysburg by making a futile, direct assault on the Union, who were dug in up on a high ridge. His second in command Broadstreet argued they should just go around the entrenced Union forces but Lee wouldn't listen and they lost so many men and so much material in Picket's Charge they could never recover. When Lee told Picket to "look after your brigade" the devastated officer replied "General, I have no brigade".)
We have not launched any sort of offensive except for Trump in '16, and we didn't do any since the Contract with America back in the nineties. It's well past time we launched a major counter-offensive. We have a man willing to lead that charge now if we only support him and drop the loser tactics of run and hide.
This most assuredly is a step in the right direction.
Trump is suing CBS News for election tampering by editing the disastrous 60 Minutes Harris interview in her favor.
This is how you do it; go after these scumbags in their citadels of pwoer!
The Donald filed a ten billion dollar lawsuit. In a sane world he'd win. But this isn't a sane world.
This is what we must do; the media no longer even pretends to be unbiased, and when they cross the line we MUST hold them to account via the courts. Even if we lose we need to tie them up in endless litigation and force them on the defensive. Now they are always on the offensive and it is WE who are fighting a rear-guard action. That has to stop.
When was the last time the Right actually launched a strike against the Left? We may launch counter-strikes but it is THEY who drive all actions, they who take the initiative. Defense is a losing strategy if you do not ever engage in an offensive.
The great Chinese military philosopher Sun Tzu had this to say about the matter:
"Security against defeat implies defensive tactics; ability to defeat the enemy means taking the offensive."
And we have been content with a dubious security all along as they make endless inroads into our strongholds, "seizing that which the enemy (we) hold dear" as Tzu also admonishes a leader to do. I mean, they have gone after the Boy Scouts, the military, our children. How much is left of what we once held dear? And still we sit and wait for the next attack.
George Patton once said fixed fortifications are a monument to Man's stupidity. Patton was all offense. While there certainly is a place for defensive strategy - it worked for George Washington and it worked for Sam Houston - it often fails as it did for Robert E. Lee and at some point you simply have to attack. Washington did at Trenton and Princeton; his army was falling apart, starving and half naked and it was a bone-cold winter and a huge snowstorm and his men's enlistments were running out. Washingto did a crazy thing and attacked and won. It was one of his rare victories (the other being Second Bunker Hill, where he also attacked). And had Washington not played defense his army would have been destroyed, surely, but at some point you just have to attack. He ALMOST didn't do it at YORKTOWN; the French had to tell him he had won the war because he wanted to move north! Ditto Sam Houston who refused to engage Santa Ana and then attacked when cornered and wiped the Mexicans out - and captured the Napoleon of the West", forcing him to sign a surrender making Texas free.
(Of course Lee lost the war at Gettysburg by making a futile, direct assault on the Union, who were dug in up on a high ridge. His second in command Broadstreet argued they should just go around the entrenced Union forces but Lee wouldn't listen and they lost so many men and so much material in Picket's Charge they could never recover. When Lee told Picket to "look after your brigade" the devastated officer replied "General, I have no brigade".)
We have not launched any sort of offensive except for Trump in '16, and we didn't do any since the Contract with America back in the nineties. It's well past time we launched a major counter-offensive. We have a man willing to lead that charge now if we only support him and drop the loser tactics of run and hide.
This most assuredly is a step in the right direction.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 623 words, total size 4 kb.
Goetz Bill to Punish Invasion Organizers
Timothy Birdnow
Isn't it well past time somebody did this?
Matt Gaetz To Introduce Legislation to End Tax-Exempt Status For Non-Profits Abetting Border Crisis
These NGO's have been funding and organizing these massive caravans for years now and nobody, not even our champions in the GOP, has thought to take action against these groups who are openly violating our laws. If a Conservative group were recruiting, say, Afrikaaners from South Africa to come here illegally do you think they would be exempt from legal action? But the Left and our whole government simply lets these people get away with this.
Anyone who funds illegals of any stripe needs to be held accountable and punished.
I have a cousin who had abunch of PARKING TICKETS that went unpaid and he was arrested and spent time in the city jail - like a month there. Yet you can recruit, fund, and support huge numbers of illegal aliens in invading our country and not be punished. George Soros is treated better than my cousin was for parking tickets, despite the fact he's destroying the country, costing taxpayers billions and perhaps trillions of dollars, and unleashed crime and disease on the whole country as well as attempting to fundamentally alter our political and social landscape. If my cousin deserved to go to jail for a month, how much more do these groups organizing this?
Laws are only obeyed if they are enforced. Let people get away with violating them and you end up with, well, St. Louis, where the prosecutor quit enforcing the law and the city spiralled out of control.
So God bless Matt Goetz. Of course the GOP has to win the Senate (and have leadership willing to advance such a bill) and the Presidency.
November truly is for all the marbles.
Isn't it well past time somebody did this?
Matt Gaetz To Introduce Legislation to End Tax-Exempt Status For Non-Profits Abetting Border Crisis
These NGO's have been funding and organizing these massive caravans for years now and nobody, not even our champions in the GOP, has thought to take action against these groups who are openly violating our laws. If a Conservative group were recruiting, say, Afrikaaners from South Africa to come here illegally do you think they would be exempt from legal action? But the Left and our whole government simply lets these people get away with this.
Anyone who funds illegals of any stripe needs to be held accountable and punished.
I have a cousin who had abunch of PARKING TICKETS that went unpaid and he was arrested and spent time in the city jail - like a month there. Yet you can recruit, fund, and support huge numbers of illegal aliens in invading our country and not be punished. George Soros is treated better than my cousin was for parking tickets, despite the fact he's destroying the country, costing taxpayers billions and perhaps trillions of dollars, and unleashed crime and disease on the whole country as well as attempting to fundamentally alter our political and social landscape. If my cousin deserved to go to jail for a month, how much more do these groups organizing this?
Laws are only obeyed if they are enforced. Let people get away with violating them and you end up with, well, St. Louis, where the prosecutor quit enforcing the law and the city spiralled out of control.
So God bless Matt Goetz. Of course the GOP has to win the Senate (and have leadership willing to advance such a bill) and the Presidency.
November truly is for all the marbles.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 2 kb.
Count Biteula
Timothy Birdnow
Joe Biden goes full vampire on a baby at a Halloween event.
Yes, he really did put the baby's foot in his mouth and bite it!
He then went to a baby in a chicken costume and acted as if he was going to take a bite out of the poor child.
I think there is something seriously wrong with Mr. Biden, more than just dementia.
In fact I am seriously starting to consider demonic possession. He seems to show the signs of it. Did Joe sell his soul for political success? Maybe.
The Irish President's dog barked frantically at Biden, clearly terrified of him. Now why do you suppose that may be?
When we were kids we received a ouija board and my brothers would play with it (it never worked for me but worked entirely too well for my oldest brother.) The dogs absolutely hated that thing. I remember one of our dogs - a very gentle and peaceable critter - snarling at it and howling. They feared that thing.
(That thing started appearing in strange places in the house in later years and once scared my mother half-to-death by falling on the floor with a loud report late one night in the basement. I took it and cut it up and threw it away in a commercial dumpster. Oddly I still have nightmared about my parent's basement, that something evil is down there.)
So maybe Joe is a vessel for El Diablo? Increasingly I see Satanic hands all over our government.
Joe Biden goes full vampire on a baby at a Halloween event.
Yes, he really did put the baby's foot in his mouth and bite it!
He then went to a baby in a chicken costume and acted as if he was going to take a bite out of the poor child.
I think there is something seriously wrong with Mr. Biden, more than just dementia.
In fact I am seriously starting to consider demonic possession. He seems to show the signs of it. Did Joe sell his soul for political success? Maybe.
The Irish President's dog barked frantically at Biden, clearly terrified of him. Now why do you suppose that may be?
When we were kids we received a ouija board and my brothers would play with it (it never worked for me but worked entirely too well for my oldest brother.) The dogs absolutely hated that thing. I remember one of our dogs - a very gentle and peaceable critter - snarling at it and howling. They feared that thing.
(That thing started appearing in strange places in the house in later years and once scared my mother half-to-death by falling on the floor with a loud report late one night in the basement. I took it and cut it up and threw it away in a commercial dumpster. Oddly I still have nightmared about my parent's basement, that something evil is down there.)
So maybe Joe is a vessel for El Diablo? Increasingly I see Satanic hands all over our government.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
Mo. Dem. Won't Endorse Harris
Timothy Birdnow
In a wild debate between Missouri Senator Josh Hawley and his Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce the aforementioned Kunce refused to say who he was going to vote to elect for President. He has failed to endorse Kamala Harris yet again!
He did not endorse her at any time in his campaign. What does that tell us about Harris?
(I'll admit I missed the debate; yesterday was Halloween and the wife cooked us a nice dinner and we watched a scary movie - Rite, starring Anthony Hopkins - and I decided to give the election a rest. My brother filled me in on it.)
Kunce is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a former Marine who projects this tough and battle-ready image (remember John Kerry did likewise; it's a common Democratic trick) but who supports all the crazy radical ideas of the 'Democrats, like open borders and transgendering children. Hawley hasn't let him get away with it and appparently he didn't last night either.
At any rate Kunce is behind by ten points and well he should be! America needs Josh Hawley (of whom I was skeptical initially; Hawley let Eric Greitens twist in the wind when prosecutor Kim Gardner went after him, something I found abhorrent even though Greitens himself - a former Democrat - was personally pretty smarmy.)
In a wild debate between Missouri Senator Josh Hawley and his Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce the aforementioned Kunce refused to say who he was going to vote to elect for President. He has failed to endorse Kamala Harris yet again!
He did not endorse her at any time in his campaign. What does that tell us about Harris?
(I'll admit I missed the debate; yesterday was Halloween and the wife cooked us a nice dinner and we watched a scary movie - Rite, starring Anthony Hopkins - and I decided to give the election a rest. My brother filled me in on it.)
Kunce is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a former Marine who projects this tough and battle-ready image (remember John Kerry did likewise; it's a common Democratic trick) but who supports all the crazy radical ideas of the 'Democrats, like open borders and transgendering children. Hawley hasn't let him get away with it and appparently he didn't last night either.
At any rate Kunce is behind by ten points and well he should be! America needs Josh Hawley (of whom I was skeptical initially; Hawley let Eric Greitens twist in the wind when prosecutor Kim Gardner went after him, something I found abhorrent even though Greitens himself - a former Democrat - was personally pretty smarmy.)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:58 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 225 words, total size 1 kb.
October 31, 2024
Kami the Antenoran
Timothy Birdnow
Kamala Harris doubles down on her open borders and amnesty policies.
Yes, in the final days before the election she actually is touting amnesty for illegals, despite polls showing the American People are enraged at the open borders policies of her boss's administration.
Harris told Telemundo:
"We need smart, humane immigration policy in America that includes a pathway to citizenship, putting more resources at the border in terms of security, honoring America’s history as a country of immigrants, not vilifying people who are fleeing harm, but instead, creating an orderly system for them to actually be able to make their case.”
Why? We gives aliens a RIGHT to come here, and to gain citizenship? Nowhere in the constitution does it say that.
How is it humane to encourage people to walk thousands of miles through dangerous territory and then move them into the center of a country where many do not even speak the language? And who is the compassion FOR? It most certainly isn't for native born Americans who are stuck paying for these people and suffering from the crime wave caused by them.
I would ask, what value is "more security at the border" if it is not there to sTOP aliens from just walking in? I really don't care about the security of the aliens themselves (well, I do which is why they shouldn't be coming here in the first place); I care about the security of our nation and our borders being unbreechable. The "security" of which Harris speaks is not security of our sovereignty but making it safer for illegals to violate said sovereignty.
I would further add most of the people showing up these days are NOT fleeing some sort of disaster but are purely economic immigrants, wanting to come here to feed at the taxpayer trough.
And if I hear one more time "we are a nation of immigrants" I am going to vomit. EVERY nation is a nation of immigrants. That doesn't change the fact that England is and should remain for Englishmen, or Japan for Japanese (the aboriginal inhabitants of Japan were the Ainu, a caucasian people who look surprisingly like Europeans but were largely wiped out by the invading Japanese.)
Immigration is only there to serve OUR purposes, not the purposes of foreigners.
In fact after the huge explosion of immigration in the late 19th and early 20th century we banned almost all immigration - and that went on until 1965 when Ted Kennedy changed immigration lws, igniting the massive invasion of America that is still ongoing to this very day.
We are not the same nation we were then and that was by design, by Kennedy and other Democrats. America is now overrun; we have about sixty million foreign born people living here, comfortably more than the population of Canada and over twice as many as Australia. How do you transmit a culture and history when so many have no connection to it?
Rome died from illegal immigration. We used to call that the Barbraian Invasions and call them barbrarians. Now we call them "migrants" or "undocumented" and pretnd this invasion of our country is a perfectly normal historical development. It most assuredly is not.
And yet Harris is calling for more of what is killing us. Her tin ear makes her oblvious to the rage native born Americans feel towards them for destroying what had once been the greatest nation on Earth, and doing so to win elections and provide cheap labor and get rid of those pesky, independent white folks.
In Dante's Inferno Antenora was the lowest level of Hell, reserved for traitors to kin and country. Harris and Biden and obama and so many other Democrats had better pack their warm socks! Antenora was really, really cold.
Kamala Harris doubles down on her open borders and amnesty policies.
Yes, in the final days before the election she actually is touting amnesty for illegals, despite polls showing the American People are enraged at the open borders policies of her boss's administration.
Harris told Telemundo:
"We need smart, humane immigration policy in America that includes a pathway to citizenship, putting more resources at the border in terms of security, honoring America’s history as a country of immigrants, not vilifying people who are fleeing harm, but instead, creating an orderly system for them to actually be able to make their case.”
Why? We gives aliens a RIGHT to come here, and to gain citizenship? Nowhere in the constitution does it say that.
How is it humane to encourage people to walk thousands of miles through dangerous territory and then move them into the center of a country where many do not even speak the language? And who is the compassion FOR? It most certainly isn't for native born Americans who are stuck paying for these people and suffering from the crime wave caused by them.
I would ask, what value is "more security at the border" if it is not there to sTOP aliens from just walking in? I really don't care about the security of the aliens themselves (well, I do which is why they shouldn't be coming here in the first place); I care about the security of our nation and our borders being unbreechable. The "security" of which Harris speaks is not security of our sovereignty but making it safer for illegals to violate said sovereignty.
I would further add most of the people showing up these days are NOT fleeing some sort of disaster but are purely economic immigrants, wanting to come here to feed at the taxpayer trough.
And if I hear one more time "we are a nation of immigrants" I am going to vomit. EVERY nation is a nation of immigrants. That doesn't change the fact that England is and should remain for Englishmen, or Japan for Japanese (the aboriginal inhabitants of Japan were the Ainu, a caucasian people who look surprisingly like Europeans but were largely wiped out by the invading Japanese.)
Immigration is only there to serve OUR purposes, not the purposes of foreigners.
In fact after the huge explosion of immigration in the late 19th and early 20th century we banned almost all immigration - and that went on until 1965 when Ted Kennedy changed immigration lws, igniting the massive invasion of America that is still ongoing to this very day.
We are not the same nation we were then and that was by design, by Kennedy and other Democrats. America is now overrun; we have about sixty million foreign born people living here, comfortably more than the population of Canada and over twice as many as Australia. How do you transmit a culture and history when so many have no connection to it?
Rome died from illegal immigration. We used to call that the Barbraian Invasions and call them barbrarians. Now we call them "migrants" or "undocumented" and pretnd this invasion of our country is a perfectly normal historical development. It most assuredly is not.
And yet Harris is calling for more of what is killing us. Her tin ear makes her oblvious to the rage native born Americans feel towards them for destroying what had once been the greatest nation on Earth, and doing so to win elections and provide cheap labor and get rid of those pesky, independent white folks.
In Dante's Inferno Antenora was the lowest level of Hell, reserved for traitors to kin and country. Harris and Biden and obama and so many other Democrats had better pack their warm socks! Antenora was really, really cold.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:44 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 636 words, total size 4 kb.
Teri Garr - RIP
Timothy Birdnow
Teri Garr - RIP.
She had struggled with MS for a long time and has now passed away. I always enjoyed her comedic style and thought she seemed a lovely person.
Go with God Teri!
Teri Garr - RIP.
She had struggled with MS for a long time and has now passed away. I always enjoyed her comedic style and thought she seemed a lovely person.
Go with God Teri!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:13 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
Pandemic II; It's Bigger! It's Better! It's in Senseround!
Timothy Birdnow
Here they come! In the Democrat's darkest hour the World Health Organization is riding to the rescue!
WHO Activates "Global Emergency" Over Monkeypox
Meanwhile a Republican poll watcher was kicked out for not wearing a mask.
Here they come! In the Democrat's darkest hour the World Health Organization is riding to the rescue!
WHO Activates "Global Emergency" Over Monkeypox
Meanwhile a Republican poll watcher was kicked out for not wearing a mask.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:06 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Election Fraud Page on X
Timothy Birdnow
Thank God for Elon Musk!
Musk Launches Election Fraud Page
Thank God for Elon Musk!
Musk Launches Election Fraud Page
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:01 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
Nevada Falling Out of Reach for Harris
Timothy Birdnow
Nevadais becoming increasingly dificult for Harris. See this analysis.
But I have faith in the Democrats willingness and ability to cheat.
Nevadais becoming increasingly dificult for Harris. See this analysis.
But I have faith in the Democrats willingness and ability to cheat.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Non-Citizens Cannot Vote in Virginia
Timothy Birdnow
The Supreme Court has weighed in on the reinstatement by a Federal judge of non-citizens who are registered to vote in Virginia. Youngkin and the Dominion win and the Democrat fraudsters lose!
That this should have had to go to the Sups is ridiculous. That a number of the liberal Justices voted to keep these non-citizens on the rolls is a disgrace.
The Supreme Court has weighed in on the reinstatement by a Federal judge of non-citizens who are registered to vote in Virginia. Youngkin and the Dominion win and the Democrat fraudsters lose!
That this should have had to go to the Sups is ridiculous. That a number of the liberal Justices voted to keep these non-citizens on the rolls is a disgrace.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:49 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
82kb generated in CPU 0.0313, elapsed 0.523 seconds.
44 queries taking 0.4983 seconds, 221 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
44 queries taking 0.4983 seconds, 221 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
