Timothy Birdnow

If anyone needs proof that the Climate Change issue is about internationalism and imposing socialism just read this.

"In addition to charting a possible new course for society, the researchers say their "paradigm shifting” plan can support climate modeling and discussion by providing a set of actions that strongly emphasize social and economic justice as well as environmental sustainability.

Oregon State’s William Ripple, former OSU postdoctoral researcher Christopher Wolf, and collaborators argue their scenario should be included in climate models along with the five "shared socioeconomic pathways,” or SSPs, that are used by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

"We understand that our proposed scenario may be a major challenge to implement given current trends in emissions, a lack of political will, and widespread social denial, but its merits can’t even be honestly debated if it’s not included in the suite of options,” said Ripple, distinguished professor of ecology in the OSU College of Forestry. "We’re arguing for radical incrementalism: achieving massive change through small, short-term steps. And we’re offering a much-needed contrast to many other climate scenarios, which may be more aligned with the status quo, which isn’t working.”'

I wonder; who asked them to impose their vision on the rest of us? I certainly did not.

I like my civilization they way it is thank you.
This shows plainly that the goal is Communism, nothing less.

Why did Environmental Research Letters publish this?

This makes it even more plain:

"The income share variable extends back to 1820 and shows how the top 10% have consistently received at least 50% of all income, illustrating global economic inequality over the long term,” Ripple said. "The restorative pathway would represent a more equitable and resilient world with a focus on nature preservation as a natural climate solution; societal well-being and quality of life; equality and high levels of education for girls and women, resulting in low fertility rates and higher standards of living; and a rapid transition toward renewable energy.”

The top ten percent received 50% of all income (if indeed this stat is true, which I doubt) because they MADE the wealth, you dope! Without wealth inequality there is no wealth. Socialist states always become impoverished.

"Unlike some of the current shared socioeconomic pathways, the restorative pathway does not rely on the development of carbon capture technologies, nor does it assume continued economic growth as the SSPs do.

"By prioritizing large-scale societal change, our proposed pathway could limit warming much more effectively than pathways that support rising resource consumption by wealthy nations,” Ripple said. "We aim to bend the curves on a wide range of planetary vital signs with a holistic vision for addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and socioeconomic injustice. Our work presents a case for how humanity can embark on the journey of saving the world from these environmental and social crises.”

Now how is that to be done? By restricting economic activity. It means less energy usage. It means more regulations, and fewer consumer goods. In other words it means POVERTY but it will be spreaed around to everyone so there!

This is what Climate Change was always about.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 01:37 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 530 words, total size 4 kb.