June 30, 2023

Durham's Potemkin Village

Timothy Birdnow

Yep- Durham threw the investigation to make it appear we had accountability when in reality it was his job to close the book on this.

From the Uncover D.C. article:

UncoverDC was one of the first to point out that the Durham Investigation was nothing more than The Mirage of Accountability. This became even more evident when Special Counsel John Durham recently testified before the House Judiciary Committee. Representatives Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Matt Gaetz (F-FL) took Durham to task during the hearing—calling him out for his halfhearted investigation.

Joseph Mifsud is the mystery man who started the Russia hoax. He's mentioned 89 times in the Mueller report, but, strangely, not once in Durham's. @RepMattGaetz and I want to know if Mifsud is associated with a Western intelligence agency. pic.twitter.com/KZtl6PL6Sp

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) June 23, 2023

It was perfectly encapsulated when Durham stated, "That was not something that we were asked to look [at]” when asked about illicit acts by the Mueller Special Counsel Team. Rep. Gaetz reacted in bewilderment and shot back, "That is not true, Mr. Durham … because I am holding the document that authorizes your activity, and it specifically says ‘the Investigation of Special Counsel Robert Mueller'”.
Durham Scope Memo

The "charging document” referenced by Rep. Gaetz was the Order (commonly referred to as a "scope memo”) issued by Attorney General Bill Barr to appoint John Durham as Special Counsel and detail the matters to be investigated.

To understand the degree to which Durham failed to investigate the events of "Spygate meaningfully,” it is useful to look at the original scope laid out in the memo and compare it to the Durham Team’s interpretation of their assigned tasks as detailed at the beginning of their final report (i.e., "The Durham Report").

Do read the whole piece.

I never had any faith in Durham from the beginning, and I have not been proven wrong. The report is damning, but nowhere nearly enough. Durham clearly wanted to keep his reputation in tact but exonerate the Swamp.

Here is a bit more:

To understand the depth Durham went to avoid doing his job, one only needs to go to Footnote 7 at the bottom of Page 2of the report. Again, we will dissect the footnote to demonstrate how Durham completely eviscerates his assigned duties from the onset.

"We have not interpreted the Order as directing us to investigate the Department’s handling of matters associated with the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.”

Right off the bat, Durham states he has no intention of looking into the DOJ’s handling of the Clinton private email server investigation. Durham was explicitly tasked with investigating "law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns”. That would certainly include the Clinton classified email investigation. This was the entire reason the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax was concocted in the first place—both to distract the public’s attention from Clinton’s mishandling of classified information and assist the FBI in covering it up. It is simply inconceivable any serious effort to investigate Spygate could be done without looking into the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton email investigation.

"For a review of those matters, see Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice, ‘A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election’ (June 2018).”

In order to justify this glaring omission, Durham instead points to a previous reportprepared by Michael Horowitz and the DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in June 2018. Let’s not forget Durham was asked to begin his investigation into these matters in May 2019 while still U.S. Attorney for Connecticut. This following a review by the newly appointed Attorney General (Bill Barr) into issues with those investigations—nearly a year after IG Horowitz issued his report. So the OIG report clearly was not considered sufficient at the time of Durham’s original appointment.

We must also point out that OIG is not a criminal investigative agency. OIG is a creation of Congress that acts as a fact-finding organization to assist Congress in its constitutional oversight role. OIG does not even have subpoena power to compel former or non-government employees to submit to questioning. By punting the Clinton email investigation to OIG, Durham has now ensured there will never be any meaningful review of that investigation by any law enforcement agency.

"We also have not interpreted the Order as directing us to consider the handling of the investigation into President Trump opened by the FBI on May 16, 2017. See FBI EC from Counter-intelligence, Re: [Redacted] Foreign Agents Registration Act – Russia; Sensitive Investigative Matter (May 16, 2017). (The following day, the Deputy Attorney General appointed Special Counsel Mueller "to investigate Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election and related matters.” See I Mueller Report at 11-12 (describing the authorities given to Special Counsel Mueller).”

This is the most bewildering passage in the entire Durham Report. It’s hard to fathom how they could bring themselves to put it down on paper, and this is what most stunned Rep. Gaetz in the hearing. The Durham Team actually said they interpreted the order as notdirecting them to investigate the actions of the Mueller Special Counsel Investigation, even though it says precisely the exact opposite.

It should be obvious this was nothing but a Potemkin Village, a false front to hide the truth.


Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 12:44 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 907 words, total size 8 kb.

1 Your article is a perfect article without a hitch. Thank you. My site: where to bet boxing online

Posted by: OKBet E-sports at July 09, 2023 11:41 PM (70UAe)

2 Good step you have written of writing content relating to cooperate sense. Better yet good working skills and hope you write more of this soon. Shining Jacket

Posted by: Mike Rooney at October 13, 2023 01:29 AM (sLiqt)

3 Great insights! I appreciate the practical tips shared here. Simple yet effective, making it easy for anyone to apply in their daily lives.Writing Services

Posted by: writing at January 26, 2024 10:37 AM (ozEt5)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




27kb generated in CPU 0.0685, elapsed 0.4899 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.4844 seconds, 162 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 17949
  • Files: 3142
  • Bytes: 943.4M
  • CPU Time: 36:18
  • Queries: 670798

Content

  • Posts: 28553
  • Comments: 125860

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0