May 29, 2023

'ANTI-TERRORIST' SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP HIDES GOVERNMENT COVID LIES

James Doogue

Our Government demanded 4,213 Covid-19 related Social Media posts be censored under Anti-Terrorist laws. But they wanted to keep the post's details secret. Not surprisingly it turns out the censorship was protecting government and Big Pharma lies.

An FOI request by Senator Alex Antic revealed the Department of Home Affairs demanded the 4,213 instances of censorship on Covid-19 related posts.

The posts were supposed to relate to cases of disinformation and misinformation so why the need for secrecy?

Rebecca Weisser from Spectator Australia has discovered through a whistleblower that many of the banned posts simply went against the Government narrative at the time. Much of that narrative has since been debunked. https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/05/whos-behind-australias-censorship-industrial-complex/

The FOI request response by the secretary of the Department of Home Affairs Michael Pezzullo revealed that between January 2017 and December 2022, his department had referred 13,636 posts to digital platforms such as Facebook, Meta, Twitter, Instagram and Google to review against their terms of service. Of these, 4,213 were related to Covid. But the department refused to provide details of the posts which were censored.

This is the sort of behaviour we'd expect in China and Russia not in a supposed free, democratic society.

There's an awful lot of cover-ups going on post Covid-19 to protect those in authority who lied and made mistakes.

Thanks to a whistleblower, 'The Spectator Australia has seen a spreadsheet that includes the date on which posts were flagged for censorship, the title of the posts, and the reason for the referral.'

Here are some examples from Spectator Australia.

On 21 January 2021, a post titled ‘Coercion is not consent’ was referred to Facebook because, ‘Video content is assessed to breach Facebook’s Community Standards (violation of misinformation threshold) as the content contains the statement "This v@ccine will take lives.”’ The reason given for censoring the post was ‘Content appears designed to undermine public confidence in Covid-19 vaccination program.’

The trouble with censoring this post is that it was correct. Just in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration has admitted that 14 people were killed by the Covid vaccines and the deaths of another 972 people have been reported to the TGA because it is suspected that their deaths were caused by the vaccines.

Another post titled, ‘The Stand – The Truth About the Covid-19 Vaccine’ was flagged for censorship on 21 January 2021 because it was ‘assessed to have breached Facebook’s Community Standards (violation of misinformation threshold) as linked content includes misleading claims including that the "so-called vaccine experimental biological agent” actually doesn’t stop transmission’.

It is a fact that the Covid vaccines don’t stop transmission. Experts such as emeritus Professor Robert Clancy, one of Australia’s leading immunologists, pointed out that the vaccines never could have stopped transmission because they couldn’t trigger the development of antibodies in the nose and throat.

A post from 20 January 2021 was flagged because it urged people to ‘fight the "malicious mask mandate” and say no to masks and lockdown, directly contradicting official government advice on the efficacy and necessity of those public orders’.

Yet it was widely accepted before Covid that masks cannot stop the transmission of respiratory viruses and that lockdowns do great harm to society and can only protect a privileged ‘laptop class’.

In the ultimate touch of black humour, one of the reasons given for flagging a post for censorship was ‘misrepresenting a George Orwell quote’.

It is obvious that these posts are not examples of ‘online terrorist and extreme violent content’ and thus it would seem that they should never have been censored under the relevant legislation. Worse, in each of these cases, it is the government that was the purveyor of misinformation, not the post being censored.

This would be funny if it weren’t so dangerous and so tragic. In 2022 more than 25,000 Australians died unexpectedly. The government refuses to investigate what has caused the biggest increase in excess mortality in Australia since the second world war as the prime suspect is the mass Covid vaccination campaign that it conducted.

The most depressing aspect of the revelation of government collusion with Big Tech to censor social media in Australia is how little coverage it got in mainstream media. Chris Kenny wrote about it in the Australian but his article was down the side of page five. Blink and you missed it. That was better than the ABC which didn’t cover the story at all. At the Guardian, Tory Shepherd didn’t see anything wrong with the government calling for the removal of whatever it deemed to be misinformation. Rather she accused Antic and One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts of ‘crying censorship because they themselves have had posts taken down’. Removing the social media posts of senators sounds a lot like political censorship but the left has become so authoritarian these days that it no longer blushes at silencing its opponents.

That almost identical pandemic censorship should occur in the US and Australia is not an accident. Early in the pandemic, the World Health Organisation called for Big Tech to remove any posts about the pandemic that countered its official narrative. Far from lamenting the mistakes that it made, the WHO is calling for even more power and resources via a pandemic treaty which it will use to censor misinformation during the next pandemic. Frighteningly, the Australian government and the mainstream media seem only too happy to give the WHO a blank cheque.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised before he was elected, that he would order a royal commission or some other inquiry into the nation’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/albanese-promises-covid-19-inquiry-federation-reform-20220125-p59qz7

I guess we were also expected to believe him when he claimrd he went to that True Thai massage place in his electorate in March 2013 for a traditional massage.
https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2019/04/nines-aca-reviving-memories-of-therapeutic-albos-true-thai-massage-booking-happy-endings.html

The mainstream media are in bed with big tech, who are in bed with the Government. We will never get an honest inquiry into Covid-19. All we can hope for is the public never again submit to this type of power grab and coercion.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:03 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1016 words, total size 7 kb.




What colour is a green orange?




25kb generated in CPU 0.0589, elapsed 0.4461 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.44 seconds, 158 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 25212
  • Files: 4543
  • Bytes: 1364.8M
  • CPU Time: 48:10
  • Queries: 937449

Content

  • Posts: 28557
  • Comments: 125950

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0