Gerry McGuire

On the appearance of some stories by SCIENTISTS wondering if the dramatic drop in reported cases of seasonal flu meant that C19 was somehow "protective” against influenza.
_______

The flu numbers dropped from about 35 million to around 1500.

That should tell you something fishy is going on.

And then you have articles appearing suggesting that C19 could be protective against flu?

Then you definitely know there’s bullshit going on.

No, Mr. Scientist. The drop in the number of reported flu cases by over 99.996% in the advent of C19, meant that reporting them as C19 rather than influenza was protective against the folks running Covid, Inc. being found out to be utter frauds.

How can we be sure?

1. If a relatively innocuous common cold affecting the cells of the upper respiratory tract that in half of the vast majority of cases was not noticeable and in 95% of the other half was "mild,” then THAT kind of infection would be vastly preferable to 35,000,000 cases a year of a very unpleasant and even deadly flu.

2. And if 1, then why 3?

3. "Here we are to save the day! Let’s try to wipe out what gives to 35 million people a year the relief described in 1 above by subjecting 237 million people US (3.61 billion worldwide) to a product that infects their healthy cells ANYWHERE in their body with C19 RNA in a way that provokes the most severe and damaging innate immune inflammatory response with a wide variety of outcomes depending on the tissues affected.”

See? None of that makes sense.

And moving on to something else that doesn’t make sense:

What happens in rare cases, as the result of inflammatory immune response on tissues of the pancreas, to some kids who happen to get a viral infection?

What will happen when tens of millions of preadolescent children every year are given viral RNA products that, by design, unavoidably, invariably, and indiscriminatel y infect healthy cells throughout their body with C19 RNA, provoking widespread immune inflammatory attack on those cells?

Watch for an uptick in cases of juvenile diabetes among kids receiving the viral RNA products.

How many?

Find the ratio of the total number of juvenile diabetes cases per year to the total number of kids of that age range per year suffering from a non-respiratory viral infection (since the viral action is mostly restricted to the tissues of the respiratory tract).

Then calculate the fold increase by the total number of kids subjected to the viral RNA products that indiscriminatel y infect healthy cells throughout their bodies with viral RNA, inevitably provoking innate immune inflammatory attacks against the tissues containing those cells.

That will give a number to look for.

It’s already known that this happens in the testes of preadolescent boys with the result that the damage caused by the resulting immune response will impair everything that depends on the hormonal signaling between the testes and the pituitary gland—physical growth and sexual maturation. And immune inflammatory response in the testes can cause scarring of the microtubules of the vas deferens resulting in sterility.

Since the ovaries are the gender equivalent of testes and since girls are born with all the ova they will ever need for procreation, and since viral RNA products have been found in the gonads, then product-initiat ed infection with viral RNA of healthy cells in the ovaries of infant and preadolescent girls could be expected to result in several different outcomes:

1. Innate immune inflammatory attack against them could result in later ovary-related developmental, sexual, and reproductive dysfunction, including sterility. Similar outcomes have already been documented during animal testing and adult female test recipients of the viral RNA products, but the products were given EUAs regardless. And, of course, among product recipients in the public the same outcomes have been documented, including a significant increase in miscarriage.

2. Cells, including ova, that escape innate immune inflammatory attack and are not killed outright by the over-production of viral protein, can become transformed by the presence of viral RNA being converted by cellular reverse transcriptase into DNA and then inserted randomly into the nuclear genome. It’s already been documented that this can occur in human hepatocytes. This phenomenon of viral infection can later manifest as cancer. It’s already known to occur as the result of infection by the human papilloma virus in both males and females.

But there are even worse possible consequences.

3. Since ova are privileged cells that do not undergo replication until fertilization, then one could expect to see years later, in any girls that make it into what appears to be a normal adult reproductive state and who aren’t outright sterile, the appearance of a wide variety of teratogenic monsters and birth defects as a result of viral RNA product-altered nuclear DNA of ova.

And all of this as the result of Covid, Inc. worldwide in a rush to inject virtually the entire world’s population with the functional equivalents of artificial viruses designed to indiscriminatel y infect healthy cells throughout the body with viral RNA, supposedly in an effort to offer protection against what is, in the vast majority of cases in the minority of the population that will ever get the native virus, a relatively innocuous common cold.

And they have already done it between 1 to 4 times to more than 66% of the entire world population.

Are you seeing the deep senseless of these actions of Covid, Inc. from any legitimate medical point of view?

If you’re not seeing it now, just wait for it to appear in theaters near you.

Or IN you.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:19 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 945 words, total size 6 kb.