David Dorell :

Low ESG score will allow the banks and investment firms to deny capital for oil and gas industry. It's banking policy of the WEF going around the government to create an oligarchy outside of our constitution and bill of rights and the Dems are allowing it.

Once they bankrupt the oil and gas industry, shift control of the financial world to E-currency through the Federal Reserve, and institute their plans to control all energy, the government will take over control of the oil and gas industry (because they will need it even more than ever) and control the entire population through control of energy and finance.

I'm wondering now what they will do with this before the midterm elections to force their will on the people.

From the Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard: "To achieve net zero emissions by 2050, we need a whole economy transition - every company, every bank, every insurer and investor will have to adjust their business models, develop credible plans for the transition and implement them.” And this

This is the WEF agenda, who partnered with the UN for this: The WEF argues that the WORLD IS BEST MANAGED BY A COALITION OF MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, not sovereign states such as the United States government.

The organization says that such governments are no longer "the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” and that "the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance." Good luck voting them out if you don't like it.



Eva Kovaks it is the climate change alarmists who put life down the list. Name one person you know for a fact died from "climate change". I dare you!

People die from poverty, from lack of services, lack of heat in winter, from lack of air conditioning in summer. We can point to actual, tangible things. You can only point to weather events that you try to claim is caused by a changing climate that you assume is caused by industrial emissions (you do know that we've put less than one molecule of carbon dioxide into every ten thousand molecules of air, if that; the Covid shutdown saw the rate of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continue  as it had been before the shutodwn and the reduction in emissions)

Yes, we should drill. Had we not stopped drilling under Mr. Biden (who defunded the oil commpanies by pressuring banks to stop lending to them, who talked down oil so as to scare off investors, who imposed a ban on drilling on Federal land, including in ANWAR, who killed multiple pipelines, who made it nigh unto impossible to get the permits needed to drill - there are many needed to open wells and Biden only approves a few so the companies can't drill, etc.) The price of gasoline was spiking well before this war. And it was the extra money Putin gained from this that has funded the Ukrainian invasion.

Drill and get the price down and you will defund Putin. It's really that simple. It is exactly what drove the Russians out of Georgia in '08; the price of oil dropped precipitously and Putin ran out of money.

And oil is very important for so many things besides gasoline. We use it for plastics, for instance.

Yes, we do need to drill here, drill now. Just the promise of drilling new wells will drop the price as investors regain confidence.

Instead, people like you want to play with tinker-toys that generate minimal, unreliable power. Pinwheels and silicon plates. Ri-ight.

Would you favor nuclear? That produces no greenhouse gas and at the same time is reliable and efficient.

I didn't think you would.

People die from energy poverty. Energy is the modern measure of wealth. A lot of poor people are going to die, and many more suffer, so rich liberals in the West can feel self-righteous.

By the way, governments are the ones funding all the climate hysteria. They stand to benefit immensely from it, both in terms of raising taxes and in implementing all sorts of regulatory schemes. What we are seeing is what Roger Revelle thought; a modest warming (if it is even a result of carbon dioxide emissions is questionable) which, thanks to the logarithmic nature of this, is just about crapped out.

The argument was never about CO2 anyway; it was about whether this would be a positive or negative feedback. The fear of the alarmists was that it would lead to the evaporation of water which would eventually lead to the melting of the permafrost and discharge of methane. The realists pointed out that more water vapor means more clouds which reflect more heat.

I would point out Antarctica had some of the coldest recorded temperatures this year. So much for that!

Tim adds:

Did you ever see the '70's movie Rollerball starring James Caan, David? It was a world ruled by multinational corporations. It is looking eerily familiar to that.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:31 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 836 words, total size 5 kb.