March 24, 2022

Here’s Why Russian Forces Can’t Take the Ukrainian Capital of Kyiv

Dana Mathewson


This adds to a post I made a few days ago.
Matt Vespa writes on Townhall.com:

When the Conservative Political Action Committee kicked off in late February, so did Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It seemed by the time the conference ended; Russian troops would be in firm command of the country. The Ukrainian capital of Kyiv was projected to fall within days of the invasion. Retired Gen. Jack Keane, a regular on Fox News, did say that the Ukrainians will mount a solid defense, but they will eventually be overrun by Russian troops. Not the case. We underestimated the Ukrainians' ability to stand their ground. We overestimated the Russian military’s supposed prowess. What happened? It seems that things have atrophied.

Russian armored tactics used to be excellent. Russian tanks are not usually blown to bits in the numbers like we’re seeing in Ukraine. To add more humiliation to Moscow’s supposed military might, armored columns have run out of gas. Everything is stalled except in the city of Mariupol which is besieged and engulfed in classic urban house-to-house fighting right now. Despite no food, water, or electricity, the Ukrainian defenders are not surrendering. Elsewhere, Russian forces are truly stuck in the mud.

Will the capital fall? As of now, no—the Russians don’t have the men or materials to capture the capital. Vladimir Putin is reportedly pressuring Belarus’ Alexander Lukashenko, but he is reluctant to deploy forces into the country. The first phase of this war is over, and Russia failed.

There's more here: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/03/24/heres-why-russian-forces-cant-take-the-ukrainian-capital-of-kyiv-n2604965

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:52 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I'll admit I am surprised the Russians didn't secure the country by  now, but then, when you think about it, they weren't invading a much smaller country (like Georgia)but a nation of sizable population. Ukraine has a population of 43,476,153 making it a little under a third of the population of Russia (at 145,830,647). Ukraine is comfortably larger than the population of Canada at 38,311,500.

The Ukraine is also pretty big from a European perspective, being slightly larger than France.

Western Ukraine had been part of the Hapsburg Empire and so is far more Westernized than the other former Soviet Republics.

And it has many resources that most other countries do not. Food is plentiful, for instance, so starving them out is difficult.

AND they have had considerable technical and military support from the West.

So I guess Putin underestimated them. So did I.

The longer this drags out the harder it will be for Russia to continue; it's costing them huge amounts of money.

But, if Putin is facing a disastrous pullout he will have no choice but to take an act of desperation.

I will say this, no matter if Putin remains in power or not, the Russians will not make the mistake of overestimating their own forces again. They will work dilligently to improve their military, I see no way around a new cold war.

And they will no doubt try to assert their power again somewhere else. They hold grudges.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at March 25, 2022 09:00 AM (Dzyvy)

2 Tim, I think this whole thing is Putin over-estimating his "stuff." It appears that the Russian Army operates differently from others, and it has done them no favors.

Posted by: Dana Mathewson at March 25, 2022 10:29 PM (551jX)

3 I think you are spot on there Dana.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at March 26, 2022 06:55 AM (7WPTi)

4 You know Dana, thinking about it, I suspect Putin probably hollowed out the Russian Army of any decent leadership (much as the Democrats have done with our military). The Soviets could have a strong army because they were always ruthless, and "disappeared" anyone who might present a problem. But Putin came into this as a despot-in-the-making and he had to get rid of anyone who might present a challenge to his personal power. As far as I know he didn't use the old Soviet way of sending them to gulags or shooting them, but rather used attrition to retire the more politically unreliable ones. The result would be yes men telling him what he wanted to hear.

Hitler, a johnnie come lately tyrant, had much the same problem. He fired any general in the Wehrmacht who didn't approve of HIS plans and the result was eventually the Allies out-generaled the Germans.

But with Putin it's worse because he has real fears of a coup against him. The Wehrmacht never would have done that, what with the Prussian traditions.



Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at March 26, 2022 07:01 AM (7WPTi)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




24kb generated in CPU 0.0178, elapsed 0.2975 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2886 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
Always on Watch
The American Thinker
Bird`s Articles
Old Birdblog
Birdblog`s Literary Corner
Behind the Black Borngino Report
Canada Free Press
Common Sense and Wonder < br/ > Christian Daily Reporter
Citizens Free Press
Climatescepticsparty,,a>
_+
Daren Jonescu
Dana and Martha Music On my Mind Conservative Victory
Eco-Imperialism
Gelbspan Files Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Let the Truth be Told
Newsmax
>Numbers Watch
OANN
The Reform Club
Revolver
FTP Student Action
Veritas PAC
FunMurphys
The Galileo Movement
Intellectual Conservative
br /> Liberty Unboound
One Jerusalem
Powerline
Publius Forum
Ready Rants
The Gateway Pundit
The Jeffersonian Ideal
Thinking Democrat
Ultima Thule
Young Craig Music
Contact Tim at bgocciaatoutlook.com

Monthly Traffic

  • Pages: 24761
  • Files: 4412
  • Bytes: 1335.9M
  • CPU Time: 47:15
  • Queries: 920539

Content

  • Posts: 28557
  • Comments: 125942

Feeds


RSS 2.0 Atom 1.0